Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Is £150 p/h the new norm - and should it be?  (Read 6218 times)

Offline Bonker

I confessed to my friend that I had a threesome with his wife Hazel and her sister coco. He said I was fucking nuts.

Offline MT balls

There maybe a kernel of truth in the last 4 posts . :D


Offline Bonker


Offline Nirvanian

+1 - there is no "group", we're all different, with different motives for punting and differing budgets. I personally won't pay even £30 for dfk, owo and a shag, because I never want that nowadays.

Foxy Lady there Hendrix!

Offline scutty brown

If you see a girl who's a nut is it OK to ask to see her bolt-ons? And is it safe to ask about screws?

Offline LLPunting

If you see a girl who's a nut is it OK to ask to see her bolt-ons? And is it safe to ask about screws?

I'm not interested in their ironware, I just want to get at their lubricant.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28

Offline scutty brown

I shagged a girl named Hazel a few weeks back

Offline winkywanky

Was it a marathon session?

(You might have to think about that one, but if you're of 'a certain age' you should have no problem  :D).

Offline scutty brown

Was it a marathon session?

(You might have to think about that one, but if you're of 'a certain age' you should have no problem  :D).

Stop snickering at the back..........

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28
I shagged a girl named Hazel a few weeks back
Did you give her the whole nut?


Online jesse4585

Cash rules everywhere around me.

Offline scutty brown

Anyone for a Walnut Whip?    (Do Cadburys still make them? Not seen them for years)

Offline Beamer

Tesco own label is nearly as good

Offline Bonker


Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28
Anyone for a Walnut Whip?    (Do Cadburys still make them? Not seen them for years)
B&M sells them.

Offline poacher no2

When did the 45 mins price come popular Used to be 30 mins then an hour price Now there is a 45mins in-between.

Online threechilliman

When did the 45 mins price come popular Used to be 30 mins then an hour price Now there is a 45mins in-between.

Good for those of us who only cum once, 30 is too rushed, an hour sees me chatting the last 10 away.

Offline Daffodil

I look at professions like doctors, dentists, and lawyers* as being one end of the spectrum and judge accordingly. I’ll be honest and say I don’t really know what their average hourly rate is but I’d be surprised if it was much greater than £150ph and certainly nowhere near some of the ludicrous prices some Sex Workers quote. I do accept that some members of these professions will be on silly money of course.

As such, no, I do not think Sex Workers should be “earning” that kind of money as the norm. Morally at least. But I also don’t think pop singers, football players, influencers should be either.

But it is market forces and I don’t begrudge them asking for what they can get. I would do the same.

I personally would not pay so much just to have sex and would use other means, but that’s easier for me to say than for somebody who doesn’t have other means. Also I’m coming at it from my own financial means. I’m sure if I was a millionaire I wouldn’t think twice about paying some Sex Worker £150ph.

*i.e. professions that you have to have demonstrated significant achievement just to get on the course and then a huge amount of expensive training and regulation thereafter.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28
I look at professions like doctors, dentists, and lawyers* as being one end of the spectrum and judge accordingly. I’ll be honest and say I don’t really know what their average hourly rate is but I’d be surprised if it was much greater than £150ph and certainly nowhere near some of the ludicrous prices some Sex Workers quote. I do accept that some members of these professions will be on silly money of course.

As such, no, I do not think Sex Workers should be “earning” that kind of money as the norm. Morally at least. But I also don’t think pop singers, football players, influencers should be either.

But it is market forces and I don’t begrudge them asking for what they can get. I would do the same.

I personally would not pay so much just to have sex and would use other means, but that’s easier for me to say than for somebody who doesn’t have other means. Also I’m coming at it from my own financial means. I’m sure if I was a millionaire I wouldn’t think twice about paying some Sex Worker £150ph.

*i.e. professions that you have to have demonstrated significant achievement just to get on the course and then a huge amount of expensive training and regulation thereafter.
GP working an NHS hospital I forget the name but it's the equivalent of freelance is nowhere near on £150 an hour. I think with specialist nurses it's about £28?

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28

Offline Payyourwaymate

Tontober next month.

What's that? I am genuinely asking, I have no idea Tontober is.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28
What's that? I am genuinely asking, I have no idea Tontober is.
Some girls offer deals at £100 an hour, usually there is a thread per region, also girls that are £100 all year round.

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,300
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
What's that? I am genuinely asking, I have no idea Tontober is.

It started out as punters trying to find SPs who charged £100 or less and only punt with them throughout October. Other SPs then started putting offers on of £100 ph, could be all month or just on certain days / times.  As Ali Katt said there's normally threads in the different regions.

Offline Payyourwaymate

Oh, alright. Thank you for the answers  :hi:.

Offline winkywanky

Perhaps we should start a new campaign, and call it Tonyear.

Offline Nirvanian

Perhaps we should start a new campaign, and call it Tonyear.

What a cracking idea...

Offline mexicola

Sadly 150ph is now the norm.

A girl I saw about a month ago, new to the game, has just increased her rate from 120 to 150.

Other girls  near me,  look nothing special, new to AW and going 140/150/160 an hour. After a few months there profiles are still up with zero FB. Don't seem to learn drop the price and you may get some business.

Personally I wouldn't go above 120hr at the moment, and thats for a good range of services from a good looking WG.

There are still a few crackers out there at 110/110 hour.  Perhaps they are better at balancing rates vs booking numbers.




Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28
Sadly 150ph is now the norm.

A girl I saw about a month ago, new to the game, has just increased her rate from 120 to 150.

Other girls  near me,  look nothing special, new to AW and going 140/150/160 an hour. After a few months there profiles are still up with zero FB. Don't seem to learn drop the price and you may get some business.

Personally I wouldn't go above 120hr at the moment, and thats for a good range of services from a good looking WG.

There are still a few crackers out there at 110/110 hour.  Perhaps they are better at balancing rates vs booking numbers.
Maybe in scouseland and London, not that many girls at £150 in Yorkshire or East Midlands.

Offline LLPunting

Sadly 150ph is now the norm.

A girl I saw about a month ago, new to the game, has just increased her rate from 120 to 150.

Other girls  near me,  look nothing special, new to AW and going 140/150/160 an hour. After a few months there profiles are still up with zero FB. Don't seem to learn drop the price and you may get some business.

Personally I wouldn't go above 120hr at the moment, and thats for a good range of services from a good looking WG.

There are still a few crackers out there at 110/110 hour.  Perhaps they are better at balancing rates vs booking numbers.

Where in London are you talking about when you say "near me"?

Just because ONE girl increases her price to 150 does not make it the new norm.  Did you capture how many SPs appeared at or raised their rate to 150?  Did you capture the number of SPs above and below this price point?

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28
Where in London are you talking about when you say "near me"?

Just because ONE girl increases her price to 150 does not make it the new norm.  Did you capture how many SPs appeared at or raised their rate to 150?  Did you capture the number of SPs above and below this price point?
Most of his reviews are Liverpool and Cheshire.

Offline LLPunting

AW only (includes agencies who also register)
11629 <=149 UK-wide  2198 in London
4685 =150  UK vs 956 in London;  which is more than at any 80, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140
6754 >=151  UK vs 1983 in London
Oddly 10039 >=150;  2570 in London so something hinkey with AW, 2817 <150, 2568>150.

So modal value appears to be 150 (most common price point)  BUT still more girls available for less than more across UK, not so in London which is unsurprising and hasn't been for years.

Add in Massage parlours and the numbers will further favour sub 150.  In London this may well swing things back in favour of sub-150 overall but unlikely.

Add in Agencies, well the regions will have to do those surveys.  London-wise the price-point probably moves even further North of 150, again where it's been for years.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2019, 04:02:46 pm by LLPunting »

Offline Cellular40

Where in London are you talking about when you say "near me"?

Just because ONE girl increases her price to 150 does not make it the new norm.  Did you capture how many SPs appeared at or raised their rate to 150?  Did you capture the number of SPs above and below this price point?

I agree.

If people want to pay it, they will. If they don’t, they won’t.

There are plenty of escorts charging under £150 an hour, so there really isn’t a shortage for those who don’t want to pay more.

I have paid £150 an hour and I would again if the escorts ticked all my boxes. I’ve also paid less, and I would again. We all have our own budget at the end of the day.
Banned reason: Shit stirring troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline LLPunting

Most of his reviews are Liverpool and Cheshire.

Don't the girls pay the guy for a good service up that way?

Offline WelshClipper

Coincidentally I did a survey of all the wgs available today in west mids and northwest.

Using my hotlist criteria, I came up with 20 I could fuck for 100,  12 I could fuck for 120. 55 I could fuck for 150. 10 I could fuck for 200.

So very subjective but I was surprised myself how weighted it was towards 150.

There may be some truth in op's suggestion  :unknown:

Offline LLPunting

Coincidentally I did a survey of all the wgs available today in west mids and northwest.

Using my hotlist criteria, I came up with 20 I could fuck for 100,  12 I could fuck for 120. 55 I could fuck for 150. 10 I could fuck for 200.

So very subjective but I was surprised myself how weighted it was towards 150.

There may be some truth in op's suggestion  :unknown:

What are your hotlist criteria?
The stats should be based on raw count of female escorts in the area above or below 150

Offline WelshClipper

What are your hotlist criteria?
The stats should be based on raw count of female escorts in the area above or below 150

A very subjective survey I agree, I was trying to see what appealed to me at each threshold. I wasnt interested in any real accuracy but was surprised at the imbalance.

Although I agree with you a proper study would require raw data.

Offline LLPunting

A very subjective survey I agree, I was trying to see what appealed to me at each threshold. I wasnt interested in any real accuracy but was surprised at the imbalance.

Although I agree with you a proper study would require raw data.

So what criteria did you use to generate the search results you got?

What further selection criteria did you then apply by visual inspection?

Offline Home Alone

Sadly 150ph is now the norm.

A girl I saw about a month ago, new to the game, has just increased her rate from 120 to 150.

Other girls  near me,  look nothing special, new to AW and going 140/150/160 an hour. After a few months there profiles are still up with zero FB. Don't seem to learn drop the price and you may get some business.

Personally I wouldn't go above 120hr at the moment, and thats for a good range of services from a good looking WG.

There are still a few crackers out there at 110/110 hour.  Perhaps they are better at balancing rates vs booking numbers.

Which brings us to supply & demand. Plenty of perfectly satisfactory SPs m at the eastern end of the East Lancashire Road from mexicola for £100 - £120.

Offline Vice Admiral

A dozen years ago £60 for half-an-hour was pretty standard on Adult Work.  Now it's mainly standard only for Romanians.

The helpful web-site inflation.iamkate.com tells us that £60 in 2008 equates to £79-20 in 2018.  So £80 is a fair enough index-linked price – although there are still some very decent (and indeed indecent) girls charging £70.

In my experience there's little or no correlation between the price a girl charges and her attractiveness and commitment.

I find it astonishing that so many girls in my region (the Solent) – usually either new-ish to Adult Work and / or with not much feedback – are asking £100, £120 or even £150 for half-an-hour.  This is a relatively recent development.

I may be Ebenezer Scrooge's favourite nephew, but I wouldn't pay a three-figure sum for half-an-hour even if Candice King started selling herself in Butlocks Heath.




« Last Edit: September 14, 2019, 09:34:16 am by Vice Admiral »

Offline LLPunting

A dozen years ago £60 for half-an-hour was pretty standard on Adult Work.  Now it's mainly standard only for Romanians.

The helpful web-site inflation.iamkate.com tells us that £60 in 2008 equates to £79-20 in 2018.  So £80 is a fair enough index-linked price – although there are still some very decent (and indeed indecent) girls charging £70.

In my experience there's little or no correlation between the price a girl charges and her attractiveness and commitment.

I find it astonishing that so many girls in my region (the Solent) – usually either new-ish to Adult Work and / or with not much feedback – are asking £100, £120 or even £150 for half-an-hour.  This is a relatively recent development.

I may be Ebenezer Scrooge's favourite nephew, but I wouldn't pay a three-figure sum for half-an-hour even if Candice King started selling herself in Butlocks Heath.

Are these new entrants from the post-millenial generation of over-entitled yoof?

Oh to meet Candice Butlocks...