Maybe she got the hump with this review?https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=353122Many SPs don't like UKP for a number of reasons that are regularly discussed on here. I can understand a reaction against a review that says her pics aren't representative and that the customer wasn't fulfilled. If it were a positive review that described the experience in the way she likes to think of it, then I doubt UKP would have been mentioned on her ad. She would just be quietly happy with the business it drove her way.If you hunt around, her old website talks up the whole tantric experience blah blah blah (you need to look at it through Google cache) so I guess she positions herself as some premium provider. The reality might be somewhat different. That what she doesn't like.External Link/Members Only
Oops.. never a good idea to Google yourself Can someone confirm that the public can read the massage reviews? I can’t seem to access them unless I’m logged in
Only members should be able to read reviews now so I believe Search Engine crawlers shouldn't be finding them either (Wahey! Even less reason for punters to worry about privacy). Head1 finally and thankfully got that loophole filled a little while back.
This suggests that someone probably told her about the review, either a punter or another SP.
It does. Also, the review ends up recommending her for a good massage without sexual titillation, which is exactly what she wants to promote anyway. It should be saving her a lot of requests, which clearly irritate her. As she was trading expensively on her alluring photographs, the unspoken formula for a busy massage practice, she ought to wind her neck in a bit.
“ Don't ask me for a lower price for a massage” - AKA this massage will cost you an arm and a leg and it’s very average
