Can a WG have too many UKP Reviews?

[lostandfound]

They are not bothered it helps them make up their mind not to punt people, that was the point.  Why would you pay to fuck someone that does shit that repulses you !

He was replying to a post which basically said "too much information"

By their nature punts are full of yucky details. Repeating myself again - I find it odd that punters are bothered by it. Just in case it's not clear by now - that is my opinion.

[Jason]

I have met quite a few girls who now have high feedback on AW and numerous reviews on UKP when they still had 0-10 AW ratings and 0-1 reviews on UKP. Some of these girls were good enough to end up becoming regulars. For the well-reviewed London girls that I haven't met so far, there should probably be a good reason why I still haven't met them - usually it has to do with their looks.

For girls that I did meet when they were new and later became very popular on UKP but not regulars of mine the reason I am not bothering booking them again is usually the booking difficulty. Most of these girls don’t display a phone number anymore and even if they do it is usually pointless - they will still ask you to book through the AW system and you also need to book well in advance, a month or longer beforehand proving also that their "Available Today" sign is nothing but a lie.

Lining up in the queue, getting screened on AW, jumping through hoops, and waiting for months for a time slot that I might also have to go out of my way to take is definitely not my way of punting. 

[Gordon Bennett]

Reviews are obviously good, but I feel there are 'bandwagon jumper' punters that have to see a recently well reviewed girl so that they too can post a positive and be in the club so to speak. I've seen some very well reviewed and talked about girls that I wonder what the fuss is about. Its like some guys support the 'best' football team because its the best.

I think this is a fair point. I also reckon that there's a possibility someone could post a completely fictitious review, ie not even see the girl - just lash up a review that apes the plethora of other positive reviews that a well liked/reviewed girl has genuinely accrued. Might sound a bit outlandish but it would be a tactic a "bandwagon jumper" could use in order to demonstrate their punting chops and become a forum top boy or whatever.
Ultimately, you just have to assess all the reviews, feedbacks, galleries you can and make a balanced judgement.

[RedKettle]

I don't think a WG can have too many reviews if they are all genuine and from a variety of people.

However a great number of positive reviews does not mean you will automatically have a great time, she might have an off day or frankly she is not what you really want.  God knows you learn from this site that we all have very different tastes and want different things from our punting.

There is a danger of raised expectations - like going to see a hyped film at the cinema which is not as good as you expect but never could have been, however when you see it again a year later you realise it is actually pretty good.

Lots of reviews is just one factor in making a decision, the more of them the more pieces of information you can extract from them if you want to read them - I must say I tend to give up after a glance down them!

[Iloveoral]

There seems to be a lot of good comments here, I agree with the majority that you can't have too many reviews, as mentioned 40 positive is equal to 10 not better but it does show consistency with a good service, the honest fact is most girls will have an off day or don't click with a certain punter, a few punters are easily offended by a girl with loads of reviews and leave a fake report to distrust the review system, the bad apple don't rot the cart, the more reviews of a girl imo does give a clearer picture of what her service is like, you can match that to the reviewer to see if he has the same interest/ looking for the same "extras" etc. As for X3's comment on staying away from a girl that licks ass (that was my review of Tammy wasn't it? Hehe) that's his choice and the review gave him the information he required to know she wasn't the girl for him and his hard earnt money.
Personally I think we have an amazing review section here, yes some reviews are fluffier than others and some are filled with hate, again more reviews makes those reviews stand out more as bollox, again imo

[myothernameis]

We've had the thread about AW FB which counts for nothing, but what about girls with loads of reviews, racked up very quickly?
my mind starts to think they're asking for reviews to be done.

I think Sexy frenchgirl, would be in this category, with 1500+ feedback, and 100+ reviews, you have to think this is what she does, there now way an escort can rack up this many feedback and reviews, on her own 

[Iloveoral]

I think Sexy frenchgirl, would be in this category, with 1500+ feedback, and 100+ reviews, you have to think this is what she does, there now way an escort can rack up this many feedback and reviews, on her own

I'd consider that to be a safe bet if she has 100+ positive from regular trusted reviewers here

[Timmy2]

I'd consider that to be a safe bet if she has 100+ positive from regular trusted reviewers here

Do you love Oral  (re new Avatar)  .... ILO

[Iloveoral]

Do you love Oral  (re new Avatar)  .... ILO

Admin deleted my old as sexually explicit/ hardcore I think

[threechilliman]

Personally I think we have an amazing review section here, yes some reviews are fluffier than others and some are filled with hate, again more reviews makes those reviews stand out more as bollox, again imo

Not if there from credible reviewers - again IMO.

tcm

[Iloveoral]

Not if there from credible reviewers - again IMO.

tcm

100% agree with you, there are credible reviewers saying things that don't add up, Some fluffing up the report and some just vindictive, purely as an example (and no way debating a review) I scratched my head on a review you recently wrote after seeing a photo of an email, if your review had been the only one about said girl it would have put me off seeing her, but because there is a vast selection of reviews it gives me a little more to go on when making my choice, so I'd definitely say more reviews or better than less.

Another example I'll give, I've reviewed a girl twice, the first time I saw her it was fantastic but the second was a b&s and I wrote a negative as I believed everyone should know the truth, so I've I fact created more reviews as this thread is discussing but IMO it was the right thing to do.

I think the more recent the reviews are also helps as someone that was amazing last year may not be delivering the same service level this year.

[cueball]

I scratched my head on a review you recently wrote after seeing a photo of an email,

Ha ha, yeah, I remember that, she made herself look a right cunt didn't she, posting total lies and then the dicks who've not even seen her came in to save her honour, yeah, it were comedy gold weren't it 

[OldAdmin]

Admin deleted my old as sexually explicit/ hardcore I think

You changed it yourself, I see it in the server logs. You are just trying to troll me or pretend to be persecuted.
You're lucky I didn't ban you after your pisstake reply a few days ago - wanting to be made moderator after I gave you last warning and accusing UKP membership of being bullies.
It's pretty obvious what you are doing in this thread regarding your favourite prossie, cueball saw it above, I warned you about it.
Last chance exhausted.

[vw]

You changed it yourself, I see it in the server logs.
You're lucky I didn't ban you after your pisstake reply of wanting to be made moderator after I gave you last warning and acussing UKP members of being bullies.
Times up for good now.

Great call 

Quite why he thought he should be a moderator.     

Constantly trying to undermine negative reviews. 

[cueball]

 

 

[vw]

 

Agree was funny  him wanting to book disabled prossies to watch struggle on the steps to his house wasn't so funny !

I'm booking her for an outcall just to see how see gets up the 12 steps to the front door, worth a giggle and you been framed pay £250 so it's like free sex 

Yet he persisted in defending crap service !

[threechilliman]

Well I was about to PM ILO regarding that email and what went on but I've been saved the bother. Never mind eh?

tcm