Read page 2 of this thread and tell me what you don't understand.
I read page 2. There are about 6 posts that are not simply "this AW profile has BB or US ticked". About 4 of the posts are useful in that they describe a WG that doesn't have BB/US ticked but has offered it during the meet.
Regarding the AW profiles that have either BB/US ticked and having a reference of them in case they remove those Likes in future: this is a perfect project for someone with web programming skills. Perhaps UKP could have a new page that simply lists all AW profilesthat have either BB or US ticked, what date they were first "ticked" and what date both Likes were unticked. Any profile that gets onto the list stays there. The UKP web devs could have have the page update every day/week, and UKP members could simply refer to that list. It would eliminate the need for 30 pages of "AW profile has BB/US ticked", and it would be far more accurate than relying on members to submit a post.
Any AW profile on here could have a flag to indicate "Has or has had BB/US Likes ticked", which would be displayed when viewing a linked SP, along with the current stats of Positive/Negative review count, etc. For example:
Hidden Image/Members OnlyThis would leave this thread available (and less polluted) for posts about the more risky WGs that don't advertise but offer during the meet.