It comes across as whiteknighting, even if you don't intend it. You've admittedly written a review of her after she got a bit of a bashing and it's the 3rd separate review of the escort in 18 months that doesn't really add any new information.
As BM says, a brief note added to your most recent review would have sufficed if it's not that much different.
You haven't even given us any information about her new flat etc, which was the defence you gave for writing this 3rd review!
The flat - it's just like all the other flats. occasionally, there is an en-suite, which is nice, as i am into the shared shower, but usually it's a crappy shower over a bath. Like here. The room was warm, and quite small, the mattress was comfy. er...that's it.
The photos - that's her. She's probably put on a few KGs since. But not many.
I'm so not into fluffy white knighting. I just reviewed her 'cos there was a bit of a debate about her service, and i thought me providing an up to date review might be useful. But i can see that the review could be viewed in a different light, and future reviews will reflect this. Thanks for the comments.
Reading these message boards as I do - there seem to be a few things which seem to set people off - white knighting, EAS, fake profiles, prostitutes generally being c***s, etc etc. I get all that. You won't catch me getting involved in all that, though. I'm a simple chap. I choose my girls based on all the usual factors - quite often on the basis of UKP reviews, thanks UKP - I book them, I fuck them, and sometimes I review them. I've been doing this for years. It's great.