Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Lady Dita - Bridgend  (Read 4094 times)

STAR-LORD

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only


Meet Date:   Friday 19 May
Meet Location:   Bridgend
Type:   In-call

Time Spent:   1 hour
Fee:   £150

Physical:
Dita is not a small lady, however its a pleasant change, she is sexy and hot!. Dita has a lot of sexuality going for her. And bloody hell she has got a pretty face! Lovely big smile, pretty eyes. I was instantly turned on as soon as she opened the door to me in her black attire (can't remember actual outfit), but she definately looked radiant. Pictures and profile are pretty darn accurate.

Personality:
She has got one of the best escort etiquette's I have ever encountered. Very warm personality, very charming, intellectual, spontaneous and can hold her own. Marvelous GFE experience, if I don't mind saying so. She's so polite, she even hung my suit, waistcoat, shirt on coat hangers - neat and tidily!

Services:
Reverse cowgirl, receiving oral, oral, 69er, doggie/on all fours, vaginal and clitoris play, COB, 'Rock and roller', regular missionary, Cowgirl, Missionary on spoon...to be honest I lost track of our sexual positions! Haven't performed all the services yet, but not ruling anything out yet!


About the Meeting:-

Probably one of the hottest, most sensual encounters I've ever come across in escort experiences. Waited approximately 2 weeks for this booking, as Lady Dita was one of the escorts who placed a bid for me on Reverse bookings. No dissapointment with this encounter whatsoever. Not a clock watcher either (no BS - she focuses purlely on you and your satisfaction, not how much time is left). Ran way over time, but that's what seperates her from a lot of vanilla escorts. Wanted me to leave completley and utterly satisfied. Now if that's not great service, I don't know what is!

I feel that Lady Dita and myself had a fantastic experience/first booking. I think we both thoroughly enjoyed every moment of our awaited encounter. She's got a heart of gold, and thrilling physically.

Took a shower at the end - too much activity and a long journey home - bloody good idea! Lol. I had no reason to watch the clock at all!


Would visit again:   Yes
Would recommend:   Yes
Value for money:   Excellent

An incredible meeting. Doesn't clockwatch. Very kind, very friendly, great etiquette & a hot lady. Happy to meet again. Dita is worthy of her positive feedback.

Offline iverthickone

Nice one NW.  Sounds like you have a new regular there then!

On the hl she goes!

Online Steelworker

Fucking hell, NW. I feel like an amateur. You fitted a lot in that hour compared to what I did. Top stuff and good review  :)

Offline mrdiamond77

Nice review Nightwolf.   :drinks:

STAR-LORD

  • Guest
Fucking hell, NW. I feel like an amateur. You fitted a lot in that hour compared to what I did. Top stuff and good review  :)

I was lucky, it was a belated birthday bang! Lol. :bomb:

So now I'm trying to calm down on bookings and being not so rampant. Im grateful to you for your review.  :thumbsup:

STAR-LORD

  • Guest
Nice one NW.  Sounds like you have a new regular there then!

On the hl she goes!

Unfortunately the lady I considered my regular retired recently. So I'm on rotary calculations on bookings. I

STAR-LORD

  • Guest
Nice review Nightwolf.   :drinks:

Thank you, I have about 3 more reviews  to write up. Take note my reviews aren't in chronological order.

Offline HughJardon

Great review Wolfie,  she's getting some decent feedback of late. Also good work on utilizing the AW reverse booking system.. If you can get a punt for less than advertised I say good work and Top man

Anyway I don't know whether I'll be hitting her up anytime soon but just wanted to show a spot of newbie support to you

 :drinks:


STAR-LORD

  • Guest
Great review Wolfie,  she's getting some decent feedback of late. Also good work on utilizing the AW reverse booking system.. If you can get a punt for less than advertised I say good work and Top man

Anyway I don't know whether I'll be hitting her up anytime soon but just wanted to show a spot of newbie support to you

 :drinks:

Thanks for the support HJ. RB is an interesting feature. If I'm stuck for choice with an indie (ridiculously high AW holistic number now), I'll use RB. Either that or contact Portfolio Escorts.  :music:

STAR-LORD

  • Guest
Hotlist not Holistic!  Dammit proof reading! :sarcastic:

Offline Gastroboy

Nice review. Dita has been in my radar for a couple of weeks. Seems her prices are creeping up.
Did you receive DFK and OWO in your £150? They're down as extras on the profile.

STAR-LORD

  • Guest
Nice review. Dita has been in my radar for a couple of weeks. Seems her prices are creeping up.
Did you receive DFK and OWO in your £150? They're down as extras on the profile.

I don't really bother with DFK, but OWO was included.

Offline Ferguson86

Just been checking this girls profile after the great reviews: she sounds like exactly what I look for in an escort. Problem is she is now listing "bareback" as a like. I could imagine this being a mistake but she refers to extras on her likes list.
I've seen a couple of brilliant reviews from top posters about this girl so I thought I'd bring it to your intention, as this would worry me if I'd seen her. Hopefully it's a misunderstanding about owo but I'd hate to have noticed this without giving the heads up to you all-hopefully I'm wrong as she looks awesome


Hidden Image/Members Only
Banned reason: Abuse towards moderator.
Banned by: daviemac

Online Steelworker

When I saw her close to when she started, she had a strongly written bit saying no bareback. There was never a hint of it during the booking. Seemed par for the course to stick mac on. For her sake, I hope she's not being stupid although I do notice some fucking wierd stuff appearing on the profile which is written in poorer English than I'd expect. Also the new extra for deep FK and not for BB looks like she ticked the wrong box. I'm not worried as I got my annual check done 2 weeks ago but will not be returning now anyway just because of the uncertainty. Good spot.

Online Steelworker

Although I'm not worried for me, I did some research and noticed a potential change. Since 30th May, she has seen 2 punters who have seen SP's with BB on their profile. The most recent had 2 recent girls showing this. This should signal to all out there that there is a bit more evidence than just maybe a mistake and could show changed and future intent. Bloody crazy  :scare:

Tazza79

  • Guest
Looks like a mistake to me. I tried to book her for BB to check and she told me no in no uncertain terms!

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: June 09, 2017, 08:32:02 pm by Tazza79 »

Online Steelworker

That's good to hear. I was surprised as hell when I saw that earlier. She needs to be careful with the boxes she ticks if she's changing her likes list

Tazza79

  • Guest
Yeah I know. Shame if a top girl like her messes up like this after all her positive reviews. I'm going to book her and do a review. Keep us posted on her guys.

Offline Ferguson86

As much as the reviews make her sound awesome, I'm out because the fact she advertises that means she'll have had punters who look for that kind of thing as Steelworker says. A huge Shame as her pictures made me very interested!
Banned reason: Abuse towards moderator.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Ferguson86

Sorry if I learned anybody I just thought having seen that listed I should share...
Banned reason: Abuse towards moderator.
Banned by: daviemac

Tazza79

  • Guest
We don't know she has had punters who go BB. Just because they have used SPs who go BB doesn't mean they did, or that she went BB. I prefer to go by all the positive reviews as they are fact. Everything else is just assumption and that's not fair on her. Like I said, she told me no chance when I asked for BB as a test.

Tazza79

  • Guest
We also don't know if the BB advertising was a mistake or not yet. Steelworker and Nightwolf said she didn't offer them BB. It's a bit unfair to damn her without actual evidence that she's done it.

Offline charlie-mott

We also don't know if the BB advertising was a mistake or not yet. Steelworker and Nightwolf said she didn't offer them BB. It's a bit unfair to damn her without actual evidence that she's done it.

5 posts in, 1 recommending Dita and 2 defending barebacking. Is this Lady Dita, a white knight or maybe a genuine punter?

Tazza79

  • Guest
Ha ha I'm not a white knight nor defending Bareback. I just reckon the good reviews are worth listening to especially as by two established members

Gatchaman

  • Guest
Yeah I know. Shame if a top girl like her messes up like this after all her positive reviews. I'm going to book her and do a review. Keep us posted on her guys.

I have seen girls comment a few times on UKE or SAAFE (can't remember which) that when editing their profiles things seem to get ticked at random.  It's possible there are bugs in the AW software.  Seems to be gone now.

Thanks for the heads up though, Fergie.  As ever, we all need to consider the available information and make our own assessment of what is an acceptable risk.

Online Steelworker

Indeed Gatchaman. The balance of my experience (and that of NW) with this lady and the speed of correction suggests clearly to me it was an error. However, as you say, each of us need make our own call. Agree that Tazza's comments should be greeted with caution.

STAR-LORD

  • Guest
Its a pity this is a 2nd positive review that I've published that has turned into an investigation case. I'm relatively new to UKP, but when I do post a review (which does take ages), I always publish accurately and honestly. If there is a negative or an issue of the booking, i will raise it, to the fairness of clients/punters. I am an amateur, and am still following to a T, "the Punter's Creed".

 I forgot to mention that ALL sexual positions were protected with condom. I apologise for not mentioning services as penetration (protected), before the list of positions. Take note, Lady-Dita, did NOT offer BB before or during booking, I DON'T enquire about BB before or during a booking (there is no point), and quite frankly I wouldn't go for BB'ing due to the nature of the game.

The way I see it, IMO i believe there was an error, either by Dita, or bugs as Gatchaman said, in the system on AW. Either way mistakes can be made. All I did was provide an accurate, positive review. I can't do more than that. At the end of the day this is a very good site. Without it, we take a big gamble on AW feedback.

Steelworker and I provide, the only Wales reviews on Dita I believe, both being positive and accurate to our individual experiences, but gentlemen its your decision whether to accept them or not. Afterall, you can always walk away if you have your doubts with a booking, its a fundamental right.

Offline iverthickone

Hi NW

You and Steel have in a very short space of time become highly valued members of UKP.  Your reviews are excellent, and I do wish more members would review their exploits like you two.

Keep it going, and don't worry about the politics!

Online Steelworker

Thanks Iver. Keep going? Oh, ok then, if you insist  :cool:

Offline Ferguson86

Its a pity this is a 2nd positive review that I've published that has turned into an investigation case. I'm relatively new to UKP, but when I do post a review (which does take ages), I always publish accurately and honestly. If there is a negative or an issue of the booking, i will raise it, to the fairness of clients/punters. I am an amateur, and am still following to a T, "the Punter's Creed".

 I forgot to mention that ALL sexual positions were protected with condom. I apologise for not mentioning services as penetration (protected), before the list of positions. Take note, Lady-Dita, did NOT offer BB before or during booking, I DON'T enquire about BB before or during a booking (there is no point), and quite frankly I wouldn't go for BB'ing due to the nature of the game.

The way I see it, IMO i believe there was an error, either by Dita, or bugs as Gatchaman said, in the system on AW. Either way mistakes can be made. All I did was provide an accurate, positive review. I can't do more than that. At the end of the day this is a very good site. Without it, we take a big gamble on AW feedback.

Steelworker and I provide, the only Wales reviews on Dita I believe, both being positive and accurate to our individual experiences, but gentlemen its your decision whether to accept them or not. Afterall, you can always walk away if you have your doubts with a booking, its a fundamental right.

I feel like you are having a dig at me for noticing something on a profile. I think I speak for most of the members in saying I'd rather be aware of someone who is advertising unprotected sex than just pretending I haven't seen it so as no feelings of previous viewers are hurt. The only reason I saw her profile was due to your review, and I fancied following it up as you are a seemingly respected honest poster. Next time I see something like this I will now think twice about drawing attention to it as it seems it wasn't appreciated.
Banned reason: Abuse towards moderator.
Banned by: daviemac

STAR-LORD

  • Guest
Ferguson86, trust me I'm not having a dig at you. As a matter of fact, you have a right to your opinion as does everyone else on here, and you did what you thought was right and necessary. I'm not discrediting you. I'm not on this site to have a dig at anyone. You picked up on something which others may have overlooked on her profile. I'm just saying there was a general mistake on her AW profile. So don't feel hard done by. Whether you or are any other client still want to  go there its up to you or themselves. So don't fret dude. The choice is yours.  ;)

Offline BoobyNewbie


STAR-LORD

  • Guest
Yes, that's true. A good lady recruited by a good agency.    :cool:
« Last Edit: June 25, 2017, 12:54:49 am by STAR-LORD »

STAR-LORD

  • Guest
« Last Edit: July 11, 2017, 09:51:37 pm by STAR-LORD »