Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: JessicaLustX - Birmingham. Super weak neutral  (Read 1056 times)


3 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5510603) (1 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline theaccountant

I had wanted to see Jessica for a while, but could never bring myself to pay her rates. One day, it thought, Fuck It. Let's scratch that itch.

Links: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Location: Birmingham City Centre

When: Sep 2022

Time: 30 mins for £130

Looks: Not what I was expecting. Her profile depicts her as a toned girl. But I found her to be curvier, more of a size 10. Safe to say I was disappointed as the pictures on her profile aren't a true reflection.

Other than that, a petite blonde girl at 5'2" is correct.

For a second after the booking, I thought I was baited, but the tattoos on her lined up with what I saw in the pictures. So she has put on a fair bit of weight from some of her pictures.

Service: Paid her the money in the room and had a quick shower.

Back in the room, I got on the bed with her whilst she removed her lingerie. We started to make out with light FKs.

She went down to give me some OWO, which wasn't bad, a bit slurpy, but no teeth.

Returned with some RO, found her to be clean and didn't taste any lube.

On with the Condom and I started to fucking her in mish and then doggy.

I didn't finish as I was conscious of time and, to be fair. I was massively disappointed with what she looked like.

Tried to finish myself off in her mouth, but I wasn't interested.

Summary: This is easily a negative for me solely based on how she looked in real life against the photos on her profile. But, since I fucked her and her services were decent. I've bumped this up to a SUPER WEAK NEUTRAL.

Would I recommend: No. Too expensive in comparison to other providers.
« Last Edit: November 25, 2022, 05:49:57 pm by theaccountant »

Offline Joball87

Unlucky. Seriously some of these rates are becoming daft, I know I'd be a bit more tolerant of weight gain/slightly limited Services etc if they charged less - may as well just go for a good Lush option or similar, or several, rather than  a poor single one.

Offline theaccountant

I agree. I find myself punting less and less now. On top of some of the stupid prices girls are putting up now. I’m just bored of punting and it doesn’t excite me.

With a sheer lack of good providers at the moment. None of the girls look interesting enough for me to dip into my wallet. I’ve gone through the girls I wanted to see and have seen one of my regulars (probably for the last time, as the sex is just stale).

She was just one of the few disappointing ones. From my TOFTT experiences, it makes no sense for me to book news girls anymore. With the ones who have been around for a while, it’s just the boring same stuff over and over again.

Ultimately, I’m bored and disinterested. Not interested in the risk of getting scammed, B&S’d or be told “cum, cum, cum for me baby” 5 minutes into a 1 hour booking. It’s like these girls have read a book on “Things to say to get your guy to cum so you can fuck off and get your nails done”.

Sorry for going on a bit of a tangent. But, I’m kinda done now.

I’ll just post up a number of my negatives now so you guys know who to swerve away from.

Offline shed

SP will keep charging silly prices as long as punters pay it. Simple fact.  :unknown:

Offline chadpitt


Time: 30 mins for £130

Looks: Not what I was expecting. Her profile depicts her as a toned girl. But I found her to be curvier, more of a size 10. Safe to say I was disappointed as the pictures on her profile aren't a true reflection.

I didn't finish as I was conscious of time and, to be fair. I was massively disappointed with what she looked like.

Tried to finish myself off in her mouth, but I wasn't interested.

Summary: This is easily a negative for me solely based on how she looked in real life against the photos on her profile. But, since I fucked her and her services were decent. I've bumped this up to a SUPER WEAK NEUTRAL.

Would I recommend: No. Too expensive in comparison to other providers.

Just why would you even consider such a ridiculous price. You're only gonna get egotistical wastes of space.

Offline theaccountant

Just why would you even consider such a ridiculous price. You're only gonna get egotistical wastes of space.

She had been on my list for quite some time. Even when her price were lower. Like I said, I wanted to scratch that itch. And now that it’s been scratched, I’m not impressed. I wouldn’t return, even if she were to lower her prices.

Offline poundstock

SP will keep charging silly prices as long as punters pay it. Simple fact.  :unknown:
Unfortunately a silly price for one punter might be loose change in the back pocket for another. I suspect there are enough wealthy punters out there to keep escorts happy at whatever prices are being charged.

Offline chadpitt

Unfortunately a silly price for one punter might be loose change in the back pocket for another. I suspect there are enough wealthy punters out there to keep escorts happy at whatever prices are being charged.

Not really. I would think the pareto principle applies. The top 20% of hookers are getting the cash rich clients.

As a generous estimate their are probably 1.5m rich punters out there. 6m higher rate tax payers, 60% are male, 80% are not on pensions and take off 50% for time commitments, marriage/relationships, health issues and sexual orientation. External Link/Members Only

Obviously a lot of criminals who don't declare income will be using hookers. But they can't be any more than a few 100,000.

So that's maybe 1.8m of potential rich clients out there. That's not taking into account their expenditure as they might have far less discretionary income after paying rent, mortgage, health care, memberships, subscriptions etc. All of which have increased massively due to inflation and a fall in wages in real terms for over a decade now.

Apparently there are 105,000 sex workers in the UK. That number is probably lower than the real figure, because of street walkers, pimped girls and massage parlours. So whilst that means there's about 17 cash rich punters for every escort. Apparently according to parliament, escorts see 25 clients a week. So there isn't enough to go around.

Offline poundstock

Can’t disagree with your analysis but the situation is what it is. I stick rigidly to a maximum of £150 per hour……. until I don’t. I have sufficient funds that if I see something ‘special’ that grabs my attention, common sense is abandoned and the escort gets her price. Punters vote with their cocks not their brains.

Offline chadpitt

Can’t disagree with your analysis but the situation is what it is. I stick rigidly to a maximum of £150 per hour……. until I don’t. I have sufficient funds that if I see something ‘special’ that grabs my attention, common sense is abandoned and the escort gets her price. Punters vote with their cocks not their brains.

I get that. But then you see someone with your little brain, get buyers remorse and then cool off for a while. That's why regs are so important, they help keep the impulse under control.