Clearly fake field reports on AdultWork

[Badboyrich]

Do the moderators on AW do anything about field reports that are clearly dodgy?
For example, looking at field reports created by date, the majority for London yesterday are very clearly fake, just from the pattern alone.
If it is so obvious, surely it should be stopped.

[OldAdmin]

No they are too busy waiting for fake profiles to accumulate enough credits from private galleries sales so they can terminate the profiles and keep all the money to themselves and not automatically refund punters.

[Stealthmode]

No they are too busy waiting for fake profiles to accumulate enough credits from private galleries sales so they can terminate the profiles and keep all the money to themselves and not automatically refund punters.

+1

[User176]

Do you guys have any tips on how to spot a fake field report?

I suppose I can occasionally "tell" whether a post is written by a man or a woman, but sometimes I can't tell if a report is fake or if the punter hasn't bothered to use a spellchecker.

[daviemac]

Do you guys have any tips on how to spot a fake field report?

I suppose I can occasionally "tell" whether a post is written by a man or a woman, but sometimes I can't tell if a report is fake or if the punter hasn't bothered to use a spellchecker.

Presume any feedback / field report on AW is fake. Even some members on here have admitted to posting false positives on there to avoid a retaliatory negative from the prossie. 

[Malvolio]

Do you guys have any tips on how to spot a fake field report?

I suppose I can occasionally "tell" whether a post is written by a man or a woman, but sometimes I can't tell if a report is fake or if the punter hasn't bothered to use a spellchecker.

Don't bother reading field reports on Adultwork - they're not worth your time.  Looking at the review section in your local area on here is the way to go.

[PeachyAssFan]

Am I right in thinking that field reports need to be approved by the WG for them to be published - hence never seeing a “bad” field report

[Boinky]

No, but it's like ebay, you leave a WG a negative review she'll leave you one. You get a few negatives yourself and then some other WG's won't see you.

Imagine you say she was a crap punt, charged extra for everything etc. She replies you stole off her, never showed up, smelled of booze etc. Other WG's are just going to avoid you if you've got a few reports like that.

[OldAdmin]

Am I right in thinking that field reports need to be approved by the WG for them to be published - hence never seeing a “bad” field report

Yes a field report (not the regular one-liner feedback) will not show up on a profile unless approved by the WG, which obviously they are not going to do.
It can still be found if a punter uses the hard to find External Link/Members Only and search by profile name, which barely anyone does.

[Taggart]

Am I right in thinking that field reports need to be approved by the WG for them to be published - hence never seeing a “bad” field report

Some punters are too scared to give a negative report. Every now and then you will see a positive or fluffy report and then filed a negative one for the same girl, which raises Qs.

There is a trait of false reports appearing on AW for two specific WGs. The give away is the ‘pairing’, one for one girl comes with one for the other from the same punter, plus punters have unrealistic nicknames.
You need to be blind not to spot it.

Only genuine source is this site.

[McSwell]

I think it's a fair assumption that the first couple of feedback posted for any girl are likely to be from her pimp, boyfriend or a tame punter.

Once you get past that into maybe a dozen or over all it proves that it is genuine profile of a girl offering services and not some sort of con, bait & switch of other.

[satyromaniac]

AW is only useful (IMO) for finding girls in my area. Or the area I’m working in.
Once you find a girl you like cross examine her profile on ukp. If no feedback on here then you will have to TOFTT.
Never trust any feedback or reviews on AW. The system is ridiculous, it amazes me that punters even bother with it and pay for PG’s.   

[PeachyAssFan]

Yes a field report (not the regular one-liner feedback) will not show up on a profile unless approved by the WG, which obviously they are not going to do.
It can still be found if a punter uses the hard to find External Link/Members Only and search by profile name, which barely anyone does.

Clarification appreciated

[Gordon Bennett]

Do you guys have any tips on how to spot a fake field report?

I suppose I can occasionally "tell" whether a post is written by a man or a woman, but sometimes I can't tell if a report is fake or if the punter hasn't bothered to use a spellchecker.

Once a field report is submitted, the lady can choose whether or not it is displayed in her feedback. If she chooses not to display it you can only find the field report by specifically searching her name on the Search Field Reports tab. My broad assumption is that the ones she's not publicising are more likely to be more genuine, truthful and accurate.

[Hobbit]

I wouldn't bother looking at field reports on AW. Most of them sound like as if they were from a Mills and Boons' Novel. Written extremely fluffy and clearly by white-night cunts who think the girls will have their babies if they write them a field report. 

[django0700]

Don't bother reading field reports on Adultwork - they're not worth your time.  Looking at the review section in your local area on here is the way to go.

Agreed, I have had good punts ONLY after I started reading UKP and ignoring AW reviews.. certain profiles on AW have multiple good reviews posted within minutes by the same user name...

[freeze44]

Can we worth keeping an eye out on field reports although think as been suggested unless spot the negs then need to search as no wg going to put them up.

Have a look at this one though and the feedback!!

External Link/Members Only

[Home Alone]

And that's the third similar sort of allegation in her feedback list.

[Londonpunter30]

Can we worth keeping an eye out on field reports although think as been suggested unless spot the negs then need to search as no wg going to put them up.

Have a look at this one though and the feedback!!

External Link/Members Only

She has feed back stating that already.. the twat should have done his research first

[G.Raff]

No they are too busy waiting for fake profiles to accumulate enough credits from private galleries sales so they can terminate the profiles and keep all the money to themselves and not automatically refund punters.

Exactly! AW has been known to do that, I don't understand how they can get away with it, surely it's illegal - even if the user broke T&C?
They should refund the money to either punter or WG, not themselves.

Also Cheers Admin for enlightening us about Field Reports, I never knew that!