Should be easier to avoid barebackers and associated people

[OneOfaKind]

It should be a lot easier for punters and prossies to avoid people who participate in BB or have seen others that are known to.

Solutions now to avoid this are time consuming and easy to miss something, plus most don't even bother or know how to check.

Appreciate this game will never be 100% safe but something has to be done to make it easier and send these idiots into the shadows.

Talking about AW in particular, it can be used to check feedback and see the links manually but that's fairly time consuming and easy to make mistakes.

What I would like to propose is a system where a list of AW members that are confirmed barebackers (male or female) is readily available to all, searchable by AW user ID.
It would identify AW members who have left feedback for the confirmed barebackers so each person can make their own judgment call.

It could check:
* If they are a confirmed BB - from AW likes list or a known BB.
* If they have left feedback or received feedback from a confirmed BB.

In a nut shell, a website where you can search for AW users to check if they have ever openly or secretly offered BB, or whether they have met with someone who has done so.

Seems like a good idea to me and should be do-able, want some opinions on whether this is a good or bad idea please, pros and cons whatever they might be.

[Jas1975]

I would certainly use it.

[Moresomes]

This has been done to death. nearly all prossies are being, or have been barebacked by someone at some time, so apart from the initial check that it is not offered on their profile, I suggest that we all wear blobs for performing the dirty deed, or pack in punting.   

[Brazilian Martian]

It should be a lot easier for punters and prossies to avoid people who participate in BB or have seen others that are known to.

Solutions now to avoid this are time consuming and easy to miss something, plus most don't even bother or know how to check.

Appreciate this game will never be 100% safe but something has to be done to make it easier and send these idiots into the shadows.

Talking about AW in particular, it can be used to check feedback and see the links manually but that's fairly time consuming and easy to make mistakes.

What I would like to propose is a system where a list of AW members that are confirmed barebackers (male or female) is readily available to all, searchable by AW user ID.
It would identify AW members who have left feedback for the confirmed barebackers so each person can make their own judgment call.

It could check:
* If they are a confirmed BB - from AW likes list or a known BB.
* If they have left feedback or received feedback from a confirmed BB.

In a nut shell, a website where you can search for AW users to check if they have ever openly or secretly offered BB, or whether they have met with someone who has done so.

Seems like a good idea to me and should be do-able, want some opinions on whether this is a good or bad idea please, pros and cons whatever they might be.

Why not create a barebacker database in the Yorkshire section  upload their aw number and pics as prossies swap profiles. Problem solved 

[kamu]

Sounds like too much hard work. If your that bothered then you probably shouldnt be punting. Your only ever 1 step away from a barebacker.

[OneOfaKind]

Why not create a barebacker database in the Yorkshire section  upload their aw number and pics as prossies swap profiles. Problem solved 

Deleting and changing profiles is a problem but a lot of them I've seen have dozens of AW feedback and zero on here so must stay on AW a long time? - therefore would be very annoying to them as they soon get outed?

Perhaps it needs treating like child porn where by a database of known photos are kept, could then check it against AW members who try to re-create the profiles? - make it difficult to stay active for long

[OneOfaKind]

Sounds like too much hard work. If your that bothered then you probably shouldnt be punting. Your only ever 1 step away from a barebacker.

Likely only a couple of days work but probably sounds complicated if your not a techie.

Your 1 step away from a barebacker punting or not but it's about the odds and it can be improved with punting hopefully.

[Brazilian Martian]

Deleting and changing profiles is a problem but a lot of them I've seen have dozens of AW feedback and zero on here so must stay on AW a long time? - therefore would be very annoying to them as they soon get outed?

Perhaps it needs treating like child porn where by a database of known photos are kept, could then check it against AW members who try to re-create the profiles? - make it difficult to stay active for long

Why do you care if they get outed ? If you feel strongly about it do something that's what I done in the london section.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=128980.0

[hantshagger]

Sounds like too much hard work. If your that bothered then you probably shouldnt be punting. Your only ever 1 step away from a barebacker.

I'd tend to agree. also 
 I have yet to meet a girl who hasnt barebacked at some point in their life with a partner/ boyfriend/ etc.  This applies to working girls too.  I suspect that virtually 99.9% of all prossies and punters have barebacked at some point in their life.  What might be more reasonable to enquire is to be aware of any who have barebacked in the last 6 months, for example, but even then it is pretty useless, if the girl is also in a  relationship  (on the side)!!

To the OP -  just get yourself tested, and use condom for god's sake!

[kamu]

Likely only a couple of days work but probably sounds complicated if your not a techie.

Your 1 step away from a barebacker punting or not but it's about the odds and it can be improved with punting hopefully.

If its that easy then do it and see how many use it. I seem to remember somebody made a browser add on or something that flagged it at the top of their profile. Havent heard much about it since and expect the use of this would be just as short lived. If your going to avoid every pro$$ie who has been with a punter who has been with a BB pro$$ie you will probably find you wont be left with many other than those with little or no feedback. You also have the issue of the punter first seeing a BB pro$$ie after seeing many who dont. Do you then write all of them off as well? What about the fact the majority of meets dont involve exchanging feedback? Too complicated. Its easy enough to whack a johnny on and not bother with those who openly advertise it.

[OneOfaKind]

Why do you care if they get outed ?

No idea how you even came to that conclusion. Read what I wrote properly ffs.

[OneOfaKind]

If its that easy then do it and see how many use it. I seem to remember somebody made a browser add on or something that flagged it at the top of their profile. Havent heard much about it since and expect the use of this would be just as short lived. If your going to avoid every pro$$ie who has been with a punter who has been with a BB pro$$ie you will probably find you wont be left with many other than those with little or no feedback. You also have the issue of the punter first seeing a BB pro$$ie after seeing many who dont. Do you then write all of them off as well? What about the fact the majority of meets dont involve exchanging feedback? Too complicated. Its easy enough to whack a johnny on and not bother with those who openly advertise it.

Cheers for the informed reply fella.

[McSwell]

Sounds like too much hard work. If your that bothered then you probably shouldnt be punting. Your only ever 1 step away from a barebacker.

Correct,  most prossies  will be barebacking with their partner,  and he could be shagging around.

McSwell

[mcgee121]

Sounds like too much hard work. If your that bothered then you probably shouldnt be punting. Your only ever 1 step away from a barebacker.

+1 Besides pussy eating, rimming and OWO all carry risks.

[mediumjoe]

Why not create a barebacker database in the Yorkshire section  upload their aw number and pics as prossies swap profiles. Problem solved 

Already started by Mr FishyFoo couple of weeks ago in the yorks and Humber section

[munterhunter]

It's not that easy to avoid even if you do carefuk research.  Some women openly advertise bb you can go through their private galleries looking for bb pics and their feedback to check of any punter has been with a bb wg but all it takes is for one risky punt that's not been reviewed. Best advice?
Take responsibility for YOUR OWN sexual health. Do your best to avoid barebackers but always use a quality condom for penetrative sex and get checked every few months at tge GUM clinic.

[mrwhite]

What about the unintentional accidents?  Condoms can and do split (or slip off if the wrong size is used) if that happens you are barebacking albeit not intentionally.

I'm pretty sure no one would put that in a report or review, so how would you know if that girl had had that happen in a meeting?

How would you deal with the malicious BB reports left by disgruntled clients or pimps or other girls just to ruin a reputation? (it has happened)

What about all those girls that also do porn, (I've seen some of them, and from the pornstar punting threads so have a lot of us)  They all BB on set but not with punters (or so they say)  would you put them on your list?

Just be sensible, find a profile you like the look of, bag up, fuck up, and shut up!