Keeping a record of your meets

[Bonker]

Doesn't meet all the criteria but there is a note facility on AW in the hot list against each SP.

[MLawro93]

Would be a good way to understand how much is spent each year, every year too.. then again that maybe depressing 

This is the real reason why I don't keep real notes.  The truth is, I don't wanna know!

[Darren101]

I do keep their profile pics saved somewhere (non-shared area for my eyes only) . Just for me to reminiscence who I've shagged.  I don't keep a record of cost as I'd probably rather forget how much I've spent.

[MissWolf]

Well, I'm afraid that's bollocks, MissWolf.  You will find hundreds, if not thousands, of photos of retired SPs on this site even though their profiles have gone and they've quit the game.

And also, even if you close your AW profile, if that profile had an image attached to it, you can still find that image under the External Link/Members Only section if you know its .jpg reference.

I  would have thought this was of much more concern to you ladies when you retire compared with the odd punter who keeps their picture on his computer!!....

It was a genuine question as to what is kept not an opinion of what they should do or of whether stuff remained after they had gone, no need to be rude 

[daviemac]

Well, I'm afraid that's bollocks, MissWolf.  You will find hundreds, if not thousands, of photos of retired SPs on this site even though their profiles have gone and they've quit the game.

But most of them can't be reposted or linked to.

[PilotMan]

But most of them can't be reposted or linked to.

If you know the SP's name or AW I'd then you can see their pictures on here if there was a review and it was indexed. The thumbnails always show the AW gallery pictures. AW don't remove them.

[Murray Mint]

But most of them can't be reposted or linked to.

That's not really so, because most of the images accompanying reviews are from AW at the time of the review or thereabouts, so if you click on the image, you get the AW address even if the profile is long dead. This one, for instance
(Photo from unknown source removed)
and this lovely lady retired the better part of a decade ago.

[daviemac]

If you know the SP's name or AW I'd then you can see their pictures on here if there was a review and it was indexed. The thumbnails always show the AW gallery pictures. AW don't remove them.

If they are on a review as thumbnails at the top then you aren't reposting them and I'm not talking about AW, I'm talking about this site.

[daviemac]

That's not really so, because most of the images accompanying reviews are from AW at the time of the review or thereabouts, so if you click on the image, you get the AW address even if the profile is long dead. This one, for instance
External Link/Members Only
and this lovely lady retired the better part of a decade ago.

Just because they were posted on the review at the same time it was posted does not mean they can be linked to, some can some can't. For example if the thread contains a verification pic the thread can't be reposted, quoted or linked to.

The rule is if in doubt then don't post it or report the post and ask if it's OK. Gone are the days when anything can be posted.

Can you link to where that photo came from so it can be checked.

[sensualencounter]

It was a genuine question as to what is kept not an opinion of what they should do or of whether stuff remained after they had gone, no need to be rude 

I’ll offer my opinion though - I think it’s wrong to keep photos of escorts that someone has harvested without her explicit consent, whether she is still working or retired. I think it’s creepy and an invasion of her privacy, whether it’s legal or otherwise.

[PilotMan]

I’ll offer my opinion though - I think it’s wrong to keep photos of escorts that someone has harvested without her explicit consent, whether she is still working or retired. I think it’s creepy and an invasion of her privacy, whether it’s legal or otherwise.

Have you read Adultworks Terms and conditions for membership for a Service Provider?

[Murray Mint]

Just because they were posted on the review at the same time it was posted does not mean they can be linked to, some can some can't. For example if the thread contains a verification pic the thread can't be reposted, quoted or linked to.

The rule is if in doubt then don't post it or report the post and ask if it's OK. Gone are the days when anything can be posted.

Can you link to where that photo came from so it can be checked.

I chose a picture of an SP of whom I had some knowledge but if, say, you pick reviews from London and go back to page 899 you will find 50 reviews from 2014. 40 of those reviews include a photos which can be opened full-screen and has a link that can be reposted. I would suggest that an equally significant proportion of every other review on this site is similar.

[daviemac]

I chose a picture of an SP of whom I had some knowledge but if, say, you pick reviews from London and go back to page 899 you will find 50 reviews from 2014. 40 of those reviews include a photos which can be opened full-screen and has a link that can be reposted. I would suggest that an equally significant proportion of every other review on this site is similar.

Once again not all photos on old reviews can be reposted or linked to, they are judged on an individual basis and very much depend on what other content is in the review.

These are the rules, it's up to you if you chose to ignore them but as you have been made aware, on more than one occasion, the rule exists, posting, reposting, linking to threads that contain images not allowed or any attempts to circumvent the rules could result in a ban of a minimum of 14 days.

Just to make it very clear so there is no misunderstanding, just because a picture is still on the site in an old post does NOT mean it can be reposted, quoted or linked to in a current post.

I would suggest you reread the rules in the link at the bottom of every page as there is also a new one about ignoring a mods warning and I can't be any clearer on this point.

[sensualencounter]

Have you read Adultworks Terms and conditions for membership for a Service Provider?

No, I’m not a SP so wouldn’t have need to. But out of interest, why do you ask?

[PilotMan]

Regarding the rules on posting / reposting / relinking (pictures) - I can only see that it refers to Verification and PG photos. I couldn't find anything else in the rules about reposting pictures or relinking.

How do we know what not to post / relink if they are judged on an individual basis?

[PilotMan]

No, I’m not a SP so wouldn’t have need to. But out of interest, why do you ask?

How would you know what the SP has consented to?

[daviemac]

Regarding the rules on posting / reposting / relinking (pictures) - I can only see that it refers to Verification and PG photos. I couldn't find anything else in the rules about reposting pictures or relinking.

How do we know what not to post / relink if they are judged on an individual basis?

As I said before as one example if a thread has an AW verification picture in it can't be linked to or reposted, it isn't as simple as seeing a picture on a thread and linking to it, something else on the thread might be against the rules. Another thing to consider is can it be shown that a picture from an old thread did come from a public gallery and not a PG when they were allowed.

Like I have already said the rules have changed gone are the days when anything could be posted. If in doubt don't post it or ask.  If a picture is already on the site then anyone can find it.

BTW if you click on an AW picture it tells you they are copyrighted and can't be copied without the owners consent.

[sensualencounter]

How would you know what the SP has consented to?

I don’t. So what’s your point? Are you saying that every escort who signs up to aw consents for all their pics to be copied and reproduced?

As I’ve said before, just because something might be out there and legal to pass on, it doesn’t mean that morally you should.

And as Davie has just said “BTW if you click on an AW picture it tells you they are copyrighted and can't be copied without the owners consent.” So, unless aw is lying and bluffing, then there’s a starting point for not copying the photos.

[PilotMan]

I don’t. So what’s your point? Are you saying that every escort who signs up to aw consents for all their pics to be copied and reproduced?

As I’ve said before, just because something might be out there and legal to pass on, it doesn’t mean that morally you should.

And as Davie has just said “BTW if you click on an AW picture it tells you they are copyrighted and can't be copied without the owners consent.” So, unless aw is lying and bluffing, then there’s a starting point for not copying the photos.

The thumbnails in reviews are linked to the original source, when you open them it's AW displaying them. So no copyright infringement.

[Malvolio]

I don’t. So what’s your point? Are you saying that every escort who signs up to aw consents for all their pics to be copied and reproduced?

As I’ve said before, just because something might be out there and legal to pass on, it doesn’t mean that morally you should.

And as Davie has just said “BTW if you click on an AW picture it tells you they are copyrighted and can't be copied without the owners consent.” So, unless aw is lying and bluffing, then there’s a starting point for not copying the photos.

If you're looking to police morals on this site, you've got plenty of work to do and some sticky definitions of what is and isn't moral.  A lot of people in this country would say my habit of paying women half my age to have sex with me is immoral, but I don't care about that.

[sensualencounter]

If you're looking to police morals on this site, you've got plenty of work to do and some sticky definitions of what is and isn't moral.  A lot of people in this country would say my habit of paying women half my age to have sex with me is immoral, but I don't care about that.

I’m not looking to police anything, merely offering my opinion. But you’re right about differing views of morals.

Without wishing to stray into politics, I personally believe that there has been a huge invasion of privacy going on for donkeys years in the press and with the internet it’s exploded. There are laws but they are often abused and they also sometimes can’t keep up with the pace of technology. And the general public, when seeing big and famous people / corporations behaving in this manner tend to think it’s fine for them to do the same.

But (again imo) it appears that so many people don’t use common sense or don’t care about their actions and simply hide behind the catch all of “Well it’s out there in the public domain, so they’ve waived their right to privacy” without giving any regard to the person. This shit has literally led to loss of life, break ups of relationships, job losses, stigma, health issues, harassment and so on.

And I’m not just talking about big celebrities but also teenagers trying to go about their lives. And yes that might all sound a bit dramatic as we’re talking about sex workers here - consenting adults making their own decisions (mostly - but that’s another story). But they are human beings too and can be affected in these ways. Surely they have a right to privacy and getting on with their lives, like the vast majority of escorts respect punters’ privacy?

[Watts.E.Dunn]

This ID nonsense at elections will be the start of ID cards you'll see!

They'd like us all to have chips up our arses like cats and dogs if they get their way!, and inbilit trackers too!!!!

[pantywetter]

I had a spreadsheet of my first 100 or so in the early 2000s.  I wish I still had it and kept it going with pictures as it would be remarkable to look back on!

[Bonker]

This ID nonsense at elections will be the start of ID cards you'll see!

They'd like us all to have chips up our arses like cats and dogs if they get their way!, and inbilit trackers too!!!!

You should complain to your local fish & chip shop as well as the RSPCA. Sarsons may be innocent but should also be investigated.

[Munter84]

This ID nonsense at elections will be the start of ID cards you'll see!

They'd like us all to have chips up our arses like cats and dogs if they get their way!, and inbilit trackers too!!!!

Given that ID is already required to drive a car, buy alcohol, open a bank account etc, and ersatz forms of ID already exist and we're expected to own them (passport, driving licence), how would a government issued ID card make any meaningful difference?

I'm as anti-surveillance as the next bloke but I fail to see how a national ID card would be any more intrusive than what we already have.

[sim0256]

davey , 57 girls yet two reviews !  Thanks a lot . Mate ...

[Doc Holliday]

davey , 57 girls yet two reviews !  Thanks a lot . Mate ...

He said 57 in two years. He only joined UKP just over two months ago and he has posted 8 reviews? Not sure what your point is but you should leave this to the Mods to monitor anyway.

[daviemac]

davey , 57 girls yet two reviews !  Thanks a lot . Mate ...

Davey80 joined on February 28, 2023, 10:00:33 am, first review posted February 28, 2023, 01:05:13 pm 3 hours later. Current review count 8.

You joined August 29, 2021, 10:54:21 pm first review posted  March 20, 2022, 09:42:01 pm 7 months later. Current review count 8.

If you must criticise others over their contributions then I would advise you make sure your contributions are better than their's, in this case they fall well short.

[Fancy]

If only there was some way of compiling the details of meets. Somewhere you could include images and descriptions. You could even compile them centrally in some kind of password-protected place. Maybe they could even be of use for others looking for the same thing...

Does such a thing exist? Is anyone building this? 

[cachalote459]

Does anyone else keep a record of each meeting with a photo of the girl and then classifying the various things that happened e.g, BJ, mish, doggy, cob, cim etc.

Just a bit of fun but I sometimes enjoy the look back and handy if I’m having a second meet.

Apparently in the last 2 years I have fucked 57 different girls, 36 in mish, 20 in doggy and I’ve cum on 23 pairs of different sized tits!

Yo bro, I would put these numbers in the lotto...

[Sperminator22]

Yes, I do keep a very tidy record. Especially in the last two years, since I've started being a more serious punter.
I have three major folders on my computer, each one of those divided in further folders, one for each SP:
1) for the girls I've encountered, photos, videos, and a backup of the review.
2) for my wishlist (huge folder, limited finances).
3) filming the se(x)ssion, or photos/videos I've personally taken with the SP with her consent.

[Rockhead]

The best thing to do, as has been stated before, is simply to file a detailed review of each girl on this site. That’s what I do - and it is genuinely helpful and interesting to look back, because my long term memory for the details is terrible.
The only other thing I do is keep a simple list of names - SPs and civvies - that I have shagged, in a bid to keep my memories alive. I don’t see any need to keep photos or other, intimate details. For me, these are just reminders - stuff to make me smile (or occasionally shudder!).

[Hobbit]

I stopped counting after 110. I think that is enough of a body count to make even the great cricketers envious.

[Spamhead75]

I keep a record and looking over it again today I can see that in 16 years of punting:

* I have paid for sex 81 times
* with 26 ladies
* from 6 countries
* 2012 was my year of most variety - 5 different ladies
* 2012 and 2019 were my most prolific punting years - 7

Lots to improve on there, I think 2023 is on target to be most prolific,  then my next target is to reach 100 punts

[the_exile]

I stopped counting after 110. I think that is enough of a body count to make even the great cricketers envious.

  There are some pretty big numbers for most runs scored in an innings, mind!

With 110 (and some) I would expect you are way past the average number of sexual partners for a man in your age group.

[Jonestown]

I think once you are into a three figure + number it gets embarrassing and certainly I don't want to know, what is even more embarrassing is the ratio of civilians to Sps, oh dear me.

[Atrueyorkie]

I keep a record of my meets. Basic stuff, positions, was she hot, duration. To the point someone reads the review/summary of my meet and they know exactly what they’re getting into.

Mainly keep a brief record  because I have a memory of a goldfish sometimes and then because I’ll use it to review on here more extensively.

Not repeat visits unless something extensive

[akauya]

Aside from the moral issues of keeping records of the women (SPs) we have had sex and into the civvy world. Am I being sexist or isn't the collecting, cataloguing, analysing things (our collections) mainly a male thing? Stamp, coin, beer mat collection, etc. It's a male thing isn't it?  Mainly... so it's not too far to assume that some of us will "collect" record and analyse our punts.

[sensualencounter]

Aside from the moral issues of keeping records of the women (SPs) we have had sex and into the civvy world. Am I being sexist or isn't the collecting, cataloguing, analysing things (our collections) mainly a male thing? Stamp, coin, beer mat collection, etc. It's a male thing isn't it?  Mainly... so it's not too far to assume that some of us will "collect" record and analyse our punts.

Plenty of women collect things too. This is a potentially sexist list but it includes handbags, shoes, perfumes, crockery / household decorations like crystal, porcelain, jewellery etc

But it does seem that men tend to do the geekier collecting and categorising like train spotting, stamps, coins, games workshop etc

[PilotMan]

Plenty of women collect things too. This is a potentially sexist list but it includes handbags, shoes, perfumes, crockery / household decorations like crystal, porcelain, jewellery etc

But it does seem that men tend to do the geekier collecting and categorising like train spotting, stamps, coins, games workshop etc

I think that women's collecting of the types that you refer to above are more about social status and outward presentation.

Men are usually type cast as having a hobby/  collection that might not be the sort of thing you show off to your neighbours or family, only to your brethren in the same club. 

We do seem to have more of a propensity than women to categorise, analyse and organise things about our hobbies.

[Thephoenix]

Plenty of women collect things too. This is a potentially sexist list but it includes handbags, shoes, perfumes, crockery / household decorations like crystal, porcelain, jewellery

.....and bloody cushions!!!!!!!

Cushions, cushions, cushions everywhere, 🎶🎶🎶
She's off to John Lewis for another pair,
They're covering the bed, there's no room for my head,
I don't complain as no-one seems to care.

Despite my pleas my begging seems to fail,🎶🎶🎶🎶
She's off to Dunhelm there's a half price sale.
I've always got this frown cos there's nowhere to lie down,
No wonder I'm so tired and looking pale.

Chorus.....🎶🎶🎶🎶
The settee's got twenty three, no room for poor old me,
The bed's got twenty four, they're falling on the floor,
What's a bloke supposed to do? I'll go and sit down on the loo,
But she's put one on there too!
How am I supposed to have a poo?.......have a poo oo oo, oo oo?

.......🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶Sung in Spanish flamenco rhythm 


Hidden Image/Members Only

[Charliehutton]

Aside from the moral issues of keeping records of the women (SPs) we have had sex and into the civvy world. Am I being sexist or isn't the collecting, cataloguing, analysing things (our collections) mainly a male thing? Stamp, coin, beer mat collection, etc. It's a male thing isn't it?  Mainly... so it's not too far to assume that some of us will "collect" record and analyse our punts.

I'm sure you're right, Mr A. I wonder if to some extent it may be an age thing, too; it's a cracking hobby to have in retirement, in any case.

[Dylanbob]

I don't keep a record but I did about a year ago write down all the girls I can remember in word or excel.. must have been 98%+ accruate then roughly what I thought I paid. Then deleted the contents without saving.

Did some sums and the true cost of this hobby set in. Some were in retrospect bargains for the experience or the memory. Most filled a temporary desire and a couple I can't
believe I put my Dick (protected always) in. 

[mj]

I keep a list in a password protected Excel file.  But I only record the town, the lady's name - or enough of it to jog my memory, and whether or not we had sex.  The last bit is because most of my meets are fetish or domination related, and often don't involve sex.

There is just enough information to jog my memory when I want to reminisce, and to keep count, but little enough that it would be pretty meaningless to anyone else.