I do write a line of feedback for the girl on AW and yes, sometimes I do a field report too, actually. I get the girl to write me a line if it was a good punt as I do want a potential new punt to read my feedback. That certainly helps as my focus is giving oral to the best of my ability and lots seem to like that haha
I do tell the lady in question that I'm happy to write a little feedback [/bon AW AND that I shall be writing a review on UKPunting. I tell them this once I'm there and the fun is about to start, if it fits into conversation. Usually during the final chat about what is and isn't allowed, as per previous emails/calls/texts. Something like: 'obviously I'll write a review on UKP once I've time'. That has to get them on their game, surely. Seems to! A couple of girls have said things like: oh, please don't be too rude about me. There was no need to, in those cases!
Incidentally, I do NOT do this for outcalls. And I would only leave review for an outcall if positive. A negative outcall review I would leave a few days then perhaps invent or at the very least preach be extremely vague about the day and the venue, for fear of reprisal
Not had an issue in over ten years' punting.
Hope this helps
I'm afraid it doesn't help, no. May I perhaps strongly urge you to reconsider your approach.... ? It
might help you get better service, but it is a bit dishonest and means your independence is sacrificed (a bit like a restaurant critic who phones ahead to say he's the food critic from the Times). Much better to say you'll leave some feedback on AW. You could even deny all knowledge of UKP if you have to, or say, "What's that?" It is, after all, none of their business.
Of course you will not 'get a problem' by being pleasant to everyone. (Well in most cases. Occasionally a prossie goes awol since she feels she's too high class for a review on a punter site!)
AW is for leaving feedback to prossies. You do a nice-to-be-nice if you are inclined, and expect her to do the same. (I've personally modified my approach on this so as not to be too disingenuous even on AW. I say upfront that I don't normally leave reviews, especially glowing ones as 'nobody believes them', but that I will try and remember to leave a nice fairly bland word or two such as 'had a great time' or 'nice lass'. If she was shit, I forget. Otherwise I do it.)
When people join UKP they often carry the AW-induced attitude over at first at least. It has 'served them well'. Unfortunately it doesn't serve other punters. With AW we can all see if the prossie has some 'nice compliments'. But with dozens, hundreds (depending on your area) that doesn't narrow it down for hard earned cash. Hence one should (see the UKP reviewing tips) write the good and bad points of a punt.
'Good and bad points' are for two reasons. The first is style: if a reviewer only sees the good or only sees the bad the review lacks credibility. It suggests it is only a very personal judgement of no relevance to a punter who might have seen things differently. The second is information about the reviewers standards. Punters vary in what they find acceptable, so by seeing the scale of what a reviewer finds good and bad and in-between I can try to judge if that reviewer
for me is on the same planet.
There's a very broad range of punters on here. Some are just thrilled that they can pay for sex with a reasonably good-looking woman. Others make a clear distinction between their personal feelings and unemotional assessment. Experienced punters also tend to be quite good at smelling bullshit (sometimes even unintentional bullshit). Mostly none of us have met each other. It means little online to say one has been punting for x number of years with xxxx number of hookers until one establishes that with convincing evidence (which admittedly takes some time usually); all people really have to go on is discernible fact: it may be by comparing ones reviewed to their own experience with those prossies or simply an analysis of the consistency and believability of a punter.
UKP does not try to be 'easy' compared to AW or even UKE: it was set up because there was no site that offered unbiased, uncensored, discriminating reviews. There's only one ethos: to benefit punters. Best of luck.
