Haha. For the record, I took no "offence". I simply stated my own opinion about a privacy issue (which I might add, I later accepted might be flawed). Why I chose to do it, was crystal clear. I'm not a "white knight" - simply someone who is part of this forum and might have a different opinion now and again. For example, I have occasionally spoken out about some of the misogyny and casual racism that gets banded around by a minority on here. That doesn't make me deluded or lacking objectivity about sex workers (which I'm assuming are the character traits associated with white knighthood).
Additionally, can I say again that the "much needed objectivity" was pointless and patronising imo.
Finally, why the second someone disagrees with you, are they labelled as having "profound issues"? Very odd.
Not only are you a sanctimonious white knight, but you also struggle with facts.
You didn’t simply state your own opinion about a privacy issue, you made 5 separate posts on that other thread to try and suppress exchange of punting info between members, just like you tried to prevent objective comments about the prossie in question on this thread.
And where is the disagreement you allude to, when it is clear the comment you quote was made before any exchange between the three of us.
The fact is, the only disagreement is between the two of you and the ethos of the forum. Pointing out a prostitute is not really into you, and is only giving the impression she is for money, is the reality of the situation and consistent with the culture of the forum. Jumping on a member for posting such (and in doing so defending the prossies honour/reputation), and describing his post as cynical, patronising and unnecessary is clearly at odds with the ethos of Admins forum.
You are deluded, you do lack objectivity, and you are a white knight. None of these things require your agreement, they are determined by your posts, which are a matter of record.