Ex-barebacker - advice please

[Abs]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

So, I saw this profile and was intrigued. Checked on UKP and not much info but she is on the Yorkshire barebackers list, but no mention of bareback on her profile at the moment.

Giving her the benefit of the doubt in case she just didn’t untick the bareback option, I emailed her asking if bareback was on offer (I explained if she did do bareback, it wouldn’t stop me from booking her, I would just go for OW rather than OWO. (Obviously if she did it I wouldn’t have gone through with any booking, I was just trying to get an honest answer from her). Anyway, she replied back that she did do bareback a few times when she first started but had now stopped and it was no longer on offer.

So, my question is, assuming she has been fully tested (I have asked but not yet got an answer), what’s the general consensus on whether or not I should go through with a booking. Technically, if she no longer offers bareback and has been tested, the risk is no different to any other SP who has never offered bareback. But can I trust her that it is no longer on offer?

Any help/advice would be appreciated.

[puntlover1]

She probably still barebacks her regulars. They probably bareback multiple other partners. It's a minefield. Do you really want the paranoia afterwards? Why not book someone else and save yourself the worry.

[Punterperson1971]

But still questions I would be asking 1: how will you know she’s not still doing/offering B.B.
2:would you really want to go and fuck a wg who admitted she used to or still does it.
I know I wouldn’t I’ve made mistakes before by not looking then realising after and got myself tested but i would be wary.

[shagmore]

If she's done it before, then no doubt she will do it again, either with regulars who don't advertise the fact. Or with some new guy who wants it.
Even ones who don't do BB, as we have seen in other threads, do offer.
Punting is a game not for the faint hearted, you have to reduce the risks, personally I would give it a wide steer, as she did, then a good chance she still does but not advertising

[Abs]

Thanks for the replies. They pretty much mirror my own thinking as well. Just wanted some other opinions as confirmation as her profile is right up my street so was still tempted.

I’ll be giving her a miss then.

[One Eyed Snake]

I wouldn't worry too much about it.  I think they all will do bbq with regulars, even the best of them.

[hendrix]

There isn't a prossie out there that isn't barebacking someone, so there's no point worrying about it too much beyond the obvious ones/crackheads.

[Bangers and Gash]

She probably still barebacks her regulars.

A pro$$ie that doesn't BB her regulars is as rare as one that pays tax.

[Rochelle]

There isn't a prossie out there that isn't barebacking someone, so there's no point worrying about it too much beyond the obvious ones/crackheads.

Sorry dude, but that's bollocks. There are obviously going to be some who aren't doing that.

[mrfishyfoo]

Sorry dude, but that's bollocks. There are obviously going to be some who aren't doing that.

Did you reply to the right post ?? 

[hendrix]

Sorry dude, but that's bollocks. There are obviously going to be some who aren't doing that.

Perhaps, (though I'm as certain as I can be that bb is way more prevalent than people might like to think) but in the context of worrying about bareback in the punting world, the only safe thing to do is to assume that everybody else is barebacking and sharing needles with tramps

You can only look after yourself.

[mrfishyfoo]

A pro$$ie that doesn't BB her regulars is as rare as one that pays tax.

Does that mean that the ones that do pay tax are alright ?? 

[Rochelle]

Did you reply to the right post ?? 

Yes, what about my post wasn't clear? He said every single escort out there does bareback and I said bollocks.

[Benjboy87]

I would genuinely consider that most girls do or have done bb with a client at some point in their careers. As long as you cover up prior to sex, then even if the girl is a known bber you will be fine.

And 1 thing, there are many guys here (who won't admit it) who have done bb with someone at some point in punting careers.

It's seen as a taboo topic, but we are all adults and can make our own minds up.

Twice, with 2 escorts I have seen more then once, I got caught up in the moment and done bb with (just went with the flow).

So I know full well that it happens and I guarantee I'm not the only one here that's happened to.

[mrfishyfoo]

Yes, what about my post wasn't clear? He said every single escort out there does bareback and I said bollocks.

You would "say" that BUT and this is the big but we only have your word for it that you have never barebacked a punter. 

For that matter you only have my word for it that I have never barebacked a whore. 

IMHO the whole thread is bollocks as no-one can watch anyone 24 hours a day everyday for their whole punting career. 

Only thing any of us can do is COVER UP and produce clean pox tests and even the tests are only good for as long as it takes till the next punt. 

[Punterperson1971]

You would "say" that BUT and this is the big but we only have your word for it that you have never barebacked a punter. 

For that matter you only have my word for it that I have never barebacked a whore. 

IMHO the whole thread is bollocks as no-one can watch anyone 24 hours a day everyday for their whole punting career. 

Only thing any of us can do is produce clean pox tests and even they are only good for as long as it takes till the next punt. 

Me too never B.B. a prossie ever!!!
And agree with the rest of everything that’s said in the above post

[mrfishyfoo]

Me too never B.B. a prossie ever!!!
And agree with the rest of everything that’s said in the above post

That include my edit as my OP needed covering up IMHO. 

[hendrix]

You would "say" that BUT and this is the big but we only have your word for it that you have never barebacked a punter.

For that matter you only have my word for it that I have never barebacked a whore. 

IMHO the whole thread is bollocks as no-one can watch anyone 24 hours a day everyday for their whole punting career. 

Only thing any of us can do is COVER UP and produce clean pox tests and even the tests are only good for as long as it takes till the next punt. 

Exactly! And given that both prossies and punters are usually superb liars (for obvious reasons!) anybody would be wise to take the cautious approach.

[Sureshot]

Yes, what about my post wasn't clear? He said every single escort out there does bareback and I said bollocks.

He said every prossie barebacks someone be that husband, boyfriend, pimp or one night stands.

To the OP - every hooker lies and as said, every hooker fucks someone somewhere without protection.  Take whatever risks you are prepared to take and minimise those risks as you see fit.

[hungrypunt]

Yes, what about my post wasn't clear? He said every single escort out there does bareback and I said bollocks.

What wasnt clear about your post is that it seemed completely wrong to those of us that bothered to read HIS POST properly.

SO to make clear to you he said does bareback, he didnt say with punters. You have a habit of jumping on threads here with 2 feet.The last one I noticed of you where you had assumed someone had been racist and you were a mile out with that one. Look before you leap Rochelle.
And to post s shit post that say "THATS BOLLOCKS" is obvious, course not EVERY prossie is gonna BB a punter. But its like saying everyone in the worled has an arsehole, Im sure we could post "THATS BOLLOCKS" to that, but I sure some poor soul in this world would have been born without one. Your posting shit for shits sake.

edit...crossed post sureshot

[Rochelle]

What wasnt clear about your post is that it seemed completely wrong to those of us that bothered to read HIS POST properly.

SO to make clear to you he said does bareback, he didnt say with punters. You have a habit of jumping on threads here with 2 feet.The last one I noticed of you where you had assumed someone had been racist and you were a mile out with that one. Look before you leap Rochelle.
And to post s shit post that say "THATS BOLLOCKS" is obvious, course not EVERY prossie is gonna BB a punter. But its like saying everyone in the worled has an arsehole, Im sure we could post "THATS BOLLOCKS" to that, but I sure some poor soul in this world would have been born without one. Your posting shit for shits sake.

edit...crossed post sureshot

You're the one posting shit. Where did I mention punters? I think you're the one that needs to learn to read properly. For some reason you think I'm talking about punters only when neither hendrix nor I mentioned just punters.

[Rochelle]

He said every prossie barebacks someone be that husband, boyfriend, pimp or one night stands.

To the OP - every hooker lies and as said, every hooker fucks someone somewhere without protection.  Take whatever risks you are prepared to take and minimise those risks as you see fit.

I know that's what he said, and I said bollocks.

[mrfishyfoo]

You're the one posting shit. Where did I mention punters? I think you're the one that needs to learn to read properly. For some reason you think I'm talking about punters only when neither hendrix nor I mentioned just punters.

You didn't and neither did MrH albeit you still posted that what he posted was BOLLOCKS !!! 

There isn't a prossie out there that isn't barebacking someone, so there's no point worrying about it too much beyond the obvious ones/crackheads.

Here you are. 

Sorry dude, but that's bollocks. There are obviously going to be some who aren't doing that.

[Rochelle]

You didn't and neither did MrH albeit you still posted that what he posted was BOLLOCKS !!! 

And so what if I said that?? I know I said that and I still say that. Why are a few of you so offended when the person I originally quoted took no offence whatsoever?

[john241]

if you look at most girls feedback even the ones that give bareback a big no no have seen guys that have bareback girls on there feedback trouble is were all swimming in the same sewer 

[Gordon Bennett]

She looks really drab to me.... Dunno what the intrigue or temptation is - there's nothing about her that trumps the fact she has the taint. Move on would be my suggestion.

[Sureshot]

And so what if I said that?? I know I said that and I still say that. Why are a few of you so offended when the person I originally quoted took no offence whatsoever?

No ones offended you soppy tart, just calling you out for posting bollox.  As usual, a whore has no worthy contribution to ukp.

Read the forum if you wish but try to only open your mouth for what its good for.

[Rochelle]

No ones offended you soppy tart, just calling you out for posting bollox.  As usual, a whore has no worthy contribution to ukp.

Read the forum if you wish but try to only open your mouth for what its good for.

Oh here come the insults. They don't work on me. Sorry but I'll post as and when I want within the rules. Deal with it.

And by the way, hendrix made a sweeping statement and I said bollocks because it is.
Why don't I make a sweeping statement then...all punters are old, ugly, bald, fat, sweaty guys who can't get it anywhere else. Is that true too?
 

[Sureshot]

Oh here come the insults. They don't work on me. Sorry but I'll post as and when I want within the rules. Deal with it.

And by the way, hendrix made a sweeping statement and I said bollocks because it is.
Why don't I make a sweeping statement then...all punters are old, ugly, bald, fat sweaty guys who can't get it anywhere else. Is that true too?
 

Hendix's statement was true and relative to the topic so not "sweeping".

...and im not fat, so that discredits your view on all punters

[SlamBoy]

I know that's what he said, and I said bollocks.

I find this "Rochelle" quite tiresome. I've noticed she often just jumps on a thread to say something disparaging and in a disrespectful way. There is never anything constructive from her.

Other WGs actually engage politely and constructively on UKP - "Rochelle" does neither. It's only a matter of time 

[Rochelle]

Hendix's statement was true and relative to the topic so not "sweeping".

...and im not fat, so that discredits your view on all punters

It certainly isn't my view...just giving you an example.
 

[Rochelle]

I find this "Rochelle" quite tiresome. I've noticed she often just jumps on a thread to say something disparaging and in a disrespectful way. There is never anything constructive from her.

Other WGs actually engage politely and constructively on UKP - "Rochelle" does neither. It's only a matter of time 

You wish it was only a matter of time.
Oh and there's never anything constructive? Maybe look through all of my posts.

[vw]

I find this "Rochelle" quite tiresome. I've noticed she often just jumps on a thread to say something disparaging and in a disrespectful way. There is never anything constructive from her.

Other WGs actually engage politely and constructively on UKP - "Rochelle" does neither. It's only a matter of time 

Product placement and anti touting.   

[James999]

I find this "Rochelle" quite tiresome.

She's touting, if she was better at her job she wouldn't need to as she'd have a regular stream of regulars / return clients, the fact she needs to tout for clients speaks volumes, she should fuck off to UKE 

[Rochelle]

Product placement and anti touting.   

I've no problem with anti-touting. I'm not bothered if I put people off.
Surely that means I'm not touting though...

[Rochelle]

All of this because I responded to hendrix.
 

[king tarzan]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

So, I saw this profile and was intrigued. Checked on UKP and not much info but she is on the Yorkshire barebackers list, but no mention of bareback on her profile at the moment.

Giving her the benefit of the doubt in case she just didn’t untick the bareback option, I emailed her asking if bareback was on offer (I explained if she did do bareback, it wouldn’t stop me from booking her, I would just go for OW rather than OWO. (Obviously if she did it I wouldn’t have gone through with any booking, I was just trying to get an honest answer from her). Anyway, she replied back that she did do bareback a few times when she first started but had now stopped and it was no longer on offer.

So, my question is, assuming she has been fully tested (I have asked but not yet got an answer), what’s the general consensus on whether or not I should go through with a booking. Technically, if she no longer offers bareback and has been tested, the risk is no different to any other SP who has never offered bareback. But can I trust her that it is no longer on offer?

Any help/advice would be appreciated.

don't whinge and cry like a bitch if you catch something...

[James999]

All of this because I responded to hendrix.

I didn't read your reply to Hendrix, my reply was based in your constant touting, are you not a member on UKE 

[king tarzan]

I didn't read your reply to Hendrix, my reply was based in your constant touting, are you not a member on UKE 

Rochelle can you become a member of James 13,764 (at time of writing) posts and no reviews club?

[stampjones]

I knew a (civvy) woman who swore blind she had only ever had sex with condoms despite having two sprogs - female logic!

[hendrix]

I knew a (civvy) woman who swore blind she had only ever had sex with condoms despite having two sprogs - female logic!

 

In all seriousness, some prossies seem to think that bb with the bf/pimp doesn't "count" as he's special 

While he's bb'ing all over the place 

Whatever Rochelle thinks, bottom line is that nobody knows. So, assume the worst

[mrfishyfoo]

In all seriousness, some prossies seem to think that bb with the bf/pimp doesn't "count" as he's special 

While he's bb'ing all over the place 

Whatever Rochelle thinks, bottom line is that nobody knows. So, assume the worst

HAMMER !! NAIL !! HEAD !! 

[smiths]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

So, I saw this profile and was intrigued. Checked on UKP and not much info but she is on the Yorkshire barebackers list, but no mention of bareback on her profile at the moment.

Giving her the benefit of the doubt in case she just didn’t untick the bareback option, I emailed her asking if bareback was on offer (I explained if she did do bareback, it wouldn’t stop me from booking her, I would just go for OW rather than OWO. (Obviously if she did it I wouldn’t have gone through with any booking, I was just trying to get an honest answer from her). Anyway, she replied back that she did do bareback a few times when she first started but had now stopped and it was no longer on offer.

So, my question is, assuming she has been fully tested (I have asked but not yet got an answer), what’s the general consensus on whether or not I should go through with a booking. Technically, if she no longer offers bareback and has been tested, the risk is no different to any other SP who has never offered bareback. But can I trust her that it is no longer on offer?

Any help/advice would be appreciated.

Some skank who had offered BB to any punter and says so I would avoid like the plague, she is a thick cunt at the least.

And as to bare backing in general well its likely most adults BB even if its only their partners and who knows what their partners COULD be doing and with whom. Bare backing in punting is total madness in my book and not smart with civvies you don't know and even in relationships is a risk, after all being a cheat is hardly unusual. And yes there will be SOME people who don't do BB at all but who knows who they are. NEVER trust anyones word in punting is my advice, take the risks you are prepared to take for the rewards on offer as you see them backed up by going to the GUM on a regular basis.

[stampjones]

In all seriousness, some prossies seem to think that bb with the bf/pimp doesn't "count" as he's special 

While he's bb'ing all over the place 

Whatever Rochelle thinks, bottom line is that nobody knows. So, assume the worst

Exactly

[AnthG]

"Ex-barebacker"

There is no such thing. Don't believe her. You need to consider this possibility as well. The reason why she is now an "ex-Barebacker" and using condoms all of a sudden is that she may have something nasty and wants to keep doing this job for the money but not spread it around infecting guys.

[Hurley]

I occasionally like to read saafe and there was a B.B. thread on there where at least 2 maybe 3 admitted to bareback with regulars

[wristjob]

The general concensus seems to be that they all BB anyway, so what's the difference?

Bit facetious that maybe, but I think it's all about risk/reward and what you feel comfortable with. I grew up when AIDS was starting so many of my generation spent our formative years being petrified. The reality really isn't nearly as bad as it manifested in our heads.

Anyway as some say "punting is not for the squeamish". I black anybody who openly does BB, and one of the consequences of that is sometimes girls appear out of nowhere on my searches and I wonder if they used to advertise BB. I don't think I'd outright refuse to see somebody who did BB in the past, but it would certainly see them lower down my list. End of the day it's only really a decision you can make based on how you see the risk.

Oh just to add I used to avoid OWO (and many do) and there's probably more risk catching something through OWO than covered penetration.

[bbwandy72]

all punters are old, ugly, bald, fat, sweaty guys who can't get it anywhere else. Is that true too?

Probably not all. But some of us are ;-)

[blackburnian]

Probably not all. But some of us are ;-)

The majority of us if you read SAAFE   

Bb

[TailSeeker]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

So, I saw this profile and was intrigued. Checked on UKP and not much info but she is on the Yorkshire barebackers list, but no mention of bareback on her profile at the moment.

Giving her the benefit of the doubt in case she just didn’t untick the bareback option, I emailed her asking if bareback was on offer (I explained if she did do bareback, it wouldn’t stop me from booking her, I would just go for OW rather than OWO. (Obviously if she did it I wouldn’t have gone through with any booking, I was just trying to get an honest answer from her). Anyway, she replied back that she did do bareback a few times when she first started but had now stopped and it was no longer on offer.

So, my question is, assuming she has been fully tested (I have asked but not yet got an answer), what’s the general consensus on whether or not I should go through with a booking. Technically, if she no longer offers bareback and has been tested, the risk is no different to any other SP who has never offered bareback. But can I trust her that it is no longer on offer?

Any help/advice would be appreciated.

If you want to go for it. Use a condom.

Quite honestly, bb or no bb, using a condom negates that risk when you stick your dick in a hole. Herpes and syphilis are the two things that can get around a condom, so doesn't matter whether they're a bber or not.

Serious as fuck, just Google STD/STI  transmission with NHS, will tell you most of what you need to know.

Just assume anyone you fuck will have done it bb at least once, glove up, don't try and rub/slap your dick against a bare pussy, then enjoy.