Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Alaska of Mansfield  (Read 5800 times)


1 review(s) for xxxalaskaxxx (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]

Roland D Hay

  • Guest
First of all let's get the good stuff out of the way. Alaska is very pretty, she has a fantastic figure and despite some mentioning stretch marks on her tummy, they were hardly noticeable. Also, very nice clean flat and Alaska herself was very clean and well turned out.

Now onto the meet... Comms were good and I was given the address to a newish block of flats in Mansfield. On arriving, the alarm bells sounded because I'd been subject to a bait and switch scam here a few months previous. Apparently the bait and switch scam is still running from flat 14. PM me if you want specific details. Nothing to worry about though, Alaska works from a different flat and this operation has nothing to do with her.

This could so easily have been a neutral review but it wasn't going to get better than that because quite simply it was just a boring vanilla service with Alaska asking me a number of times what I liked. Always a bad sign in my view, highlights a lack of spontaneity and imagination; I was thinking, please just get on with it.

The reason it is a negative review is this... I'd booked a half hour appointment, I generally do with new girls as part of my punting risk management process. However when I got there Alaska sat down on the couch and started chatting for quite some time, she told me all about her pending marriage arrangements, her kids, her fiancé etc etc and since I arrived at 12 and we were still chatting at 12.30 I'm thinking that she clearly has chosen to do this in her own time. She mentioned that she liked to chat with punters before as it eases the flow in the bedroom. Now don't get me wrong I enjoyed the chat and I thought she was a nice girl, so much so that I said that I was happy to stay for the hour if she had time? It was actually 12.30 when I asked to move things to the bedroom at which point she started texting her fiancé, to let him know what time she'd be back she said.

I've heard punters mention many times on here how WG's like to chat their way through punting time and maybe I've been lucky because it's never happened to me before. Was I right to assume that I'd get an hour of sex after she sat chatting for half an hour? I think so.
So a few minutes later she followed me into the bedroom, slipped off her dressing gown and got on the bed. She made it clear by pulling away that there was no kissing, I'm kind of ok with that actually, I don't go in for DFK with working girls as that is something that to me only feels right with wives or girlfriends. Anyway what followed was as run of the mill as it gets, handjob, owo, cowgirl and doggy. About 15 minutes into the sex I started to become aware that Alaska just wanted me to come so she could go. And 25 minutes in she asked me how I'd like to finish. Finished with a handjob, came over her tits. All perfectly times to finish at 1pm, got dressed and was out of the flat and in my car by 1.05pm thinking why the fuck did I pay her for the hour. If I hadn't asked for the hour then what was I getting, a five minute hand job?
If girls want to chat with punters then fine, but they should be clear whose time they're eating into, to be frank I left feeling cheated. Not a terrible experience but I couldn't possibly recommend for anything other than 30 minutes of vanilla sex with a further recommendation that you confirm that any chatting is in her own time.


Roland D Hay

  • Guest
Profile now gone and I'm not entirely surprised. She didn't strike me as someone who enjoys what she does.

Offline Northerndave666

Thanks for the post Roland, it has saved some of us some of our hard earned not visiting her

Roland D Hay

  • Guest
She'll pop back up again. She's started running a group of girls from the same flat. Suspect she'll be having a break for her marriage before she's back.


Offline Northerndave666

She's back....

External Link/Members Only

Ignore that, it's not her, same gallery for the pics, etc, but might be just a coincedence

Roland D Hay

  • Guest
She's back....

External Link/Members Only

No she isn't, its not her. I have a hunch that this is one of the girls she has working from her flat though. Alaska could well be one of the 'friends' mentioned.

External Link/Members Only

Roland D Hay

  • Guest
I was right about the hunch. Alaska is back and on the profile.

External Link/Members Only

Bit weird though, she still calls herself Alaska but it's hidden behind the hyphenated names. Only one of the duo profile pics is her. She's obviously doing her best not to be recognised but she looks more and more like a scammer.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2014, 10:02:07 pm by Roland D Hay »

Offline latecomer

Sorry to hear about your experience and I think you're absolutely right to give her a negative.  Sadly, the more I read on here the more it convinces me I'm right to go for just 30 minute punts.  OK I'm just a tightwad but the cost is far more modest and the WG just doesn't have the time to chat away and do nothing - after all she's got to provide some sort of service in that time whether she likes it or not.

Roland D Hay

  • Guest
I think it speaks volume that a girl gets one negative review on here and she immediately removes her profile and tries to reinvent herself without anyone noticing. I checked out her PG for totally non-sexual reasons and she is now being a little more coy about her identity. No facial shots whatsoever but lots of her and the fiancé barebacking... I'm presuming it's the fiancé.

Definitely one to avoid!

Offline monkeybucket

i'm so glad i read this i was going to give her a call tomorrow. phew thanks guys.  is this the same girl?
External Link/Members Only

Roland D Hay

  • Guest
Yes, that's definitely her. Book if you fancy a cup of tea and a nice chat otherwise forget it!  :hi:

Offline monkeybucket

Thats sad...she looks very nice.. :(
I'm following your recent advice on other posts though going to see if i can get to see Miss Chelsea Hart instead.


Roland D Hay

  • Guest
Thats sad...she looks very nice.. :(
I'm following your recent advice on other posts though going to see if i can get to see Miss Chelsea Hart instead.

You won't go wrong with Chelsea, she's a star!  :drinks:

Offline monkeybucket

I tried to get to see her today but she was ahem "busy". Maybe monday.. but i'll ring her earlier its a bit weird calling a girl younger than me i've usually kept to women 30+ but my fav is on her hols.
She really that good btw?

Roland D Hay

  • Guest
She's great, really enjoys what she does, loves to please and is good fun. A really nice girl.

Offline monkeybucket

Your making me feel sad that i didn't call her earlier today..i had to go without :(

MidlandsPunter

  • Guest
Seeing this post is the reason I signed up to this site. I cannot agree more, Alaska is awful, would go as far as saying she is the worst escort I have ever seen. I would love to write a detailed field report about the encounter but as it was a duo I don't want to discredit her duo partner as she was very good and the reason I didn't just walk out!

Alaska old adultwork photos were heavily airbrushed and she had ALOT of make up on, when you see her in real life you wonder how she even manages to get customers to stay as she isn't attractive and her stretch marks are really bad.

She has an indie site here where you can see clear photos of her that don't appear to be airbrushed much, you will hopefully see what I mean. Here's the link: External Link/Members Only

Roland D Hay

  • Guest
Seeing this post is the reason I signed up to this site. I cannot agree more, Alaska is awful, would go as far as saying she is the worst escort I have ever seen. I would love to write a detailed field report about the encounter but as it was a duo I don't want to discredit her duo partner as she was very good and the reason I didn't just walk out!

Alaska old adultwork photos were heavily airbrushed and she had ALOT of make up on, when you see her in real life you wonder how she even manages to get customers to stay as she isn't attractive and her stretch marks are really bad.

She has an indie site here where you can see clear photos of her that don't appear to be airbrushed much, you will hopefully see what I mean. Here's the link: External Link/Members Only

I'm not quite sure why you can't write a review that details Alaska's performance in your duo without discrediting her partner?

Also, despite the fact that I wish I'd never wasted my money and also felt ripped off I don't understand, especially given the 'clear photo's' you posted how you can say she is unattractive. Attractiveness is a matter of personal preference and I whilst I think she's a shit escort I don't really understand your comments about her personal appearance. I didn't think her stretch marks were bad at all.

We obviously both agree that she's a terrible escort but your post reads like you have another hidden agenda?

MidlandsPunter

  • Guest
Perhaps I could of worded it better, I personally thought she was unattractive, mainly due to the tattoos as they are not my thing, but as a positive she has got a good body slim body. Apologies if I offended, I was just happy to find someone else who had had a dreadful experience with this lady, felt quite ripped off as I don't punt very often.

Roland D Hay

  • Guest
Perhaps I could of worded it better, I personally thought she was unattractive, mainly due to the tattoos as they are not my thing, but as a positive she has got a good body slim body. Apologies if I offended, I was just happy to find someone else who had had a dreadful experience with this lady, felt quite ripped off as I don't punt very often.

No need to apologise MP and you offended no one. It just seemed as though there was something you weren't saying. If you really felt ripped off by Alaska then I would urge you to write a review and link it to her new personal profile.

I have to say that I agree completely on the tattoo's. I don't like them generally and she has overdone it with some  awful tats. However I chose to overlook them when I booked her, did you not know she had tats when you booked?

I think Alaska is one of those really shit prossies who has gotten away with providing a shit service and ripping off punters for quite some time now and I suspect there are far more than you and I. Hopefully reviews on this site will limit her ability to do that in future.

MidlandsPunter

  • Guest
The reason I'd be worried to discredit her duo partner is she was obviously there so she would need to be mentioned so for me to write a review I'd need to make sure I praised the other lady accordingly.

I knew she had tattoos but not as many as she actually has. I completely agree though she was shockingly awful and I hope other people come forward with field reports on her so no one else gets ripped off.

Roland D Hay

  • Guest
The reason I'd be worried to discredit her duo partner is she was obviously there so she would need to be mentioned so for me to write a review I'd need to make sure I praised the other lady accordingly.

I knew she had tattoos but not as many as she actually has. I completely agree though she was shockingly awful and I hope other people come forward with field reports on her so no one else gets ripped off.

Well praise the other lady accordingly. Nothing unusual about having a duo where one or the other was poor. No different to guys on here who attend parties, they don't all rate every girl at the party and review accordingly. Alaska is clearly trying to market herself in other areas after burning her bridges here and on AW. You won't be able to leave negative feedback on her own website and that will suit her just fine. She actually emailed me after I wrote the review here but I wasn't interested in what she had to say and immediately binned it without reading it. I had already formed a view that she treated punters as mugs and thought she could talk herself out of most things, including the vast majority of the time punters pay for.  On reflection I was probably being overly generous saying that she was a nice girl. I now see her as a cynical and devious prossie whose modus operandi is to talk punters out of expensive time they have paid for. The other great illusion she manages to create is one of being a sexually adventurous slut in the bedroom. I found her to be pretty clueless and possibly one of the most boring punts I've ever had.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 17
  • Reviews: 28
I did have one prossie talk away about half of my paid and it was about their kids and husband. Actually it's happened more than once, but it doesn't anymore. If they are talking bollocks I just pounce them. Since I'm mainly a parlour man these days it doesn't seem to happen anymore. I can't believe these dumb broads think we would be interested in anything but their body. Chat about their kids or husband is totally offensive and a total turn off.   :angry:

Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,030
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
Seeing this post is the reason I signed up to this site. I cannot agree more, Alaska is awful, would go as far as saying she is the worst escort I have ever seen. I would love to write a detailed field report about the encounter but as it was a duo I don't want to discredit her duo partner as she was very good and the reason I didn't just walk out!

The reason I'd be worried to discredit her duo partner is she was obviously there so she would need to be mentioned so for me to write a review I'd need to make sure I praised the other lady accordingly.


MP, it is your choice as to whether you would want to file a review for the duo session you had, but it would certainly not reflect negative in any way on the other girl.

For those who have followed Alaska's profiles regularly, it will be obvious as to which girl you are referring to in the duo. If this is the girl (and I am 99% certain that it is), then I can confirm that I have recently seen her TWICE (since Christmas) and had an excellent time on both occasion. I had seen her previously approx 18 months through an agency and then she disappeared. I recently found out that she had taken time off to have a baby and was now back, so ended up seeing her again.

When I get a chance, will post a positive review on her. I posted positive comments about her on PNet at the time, re the old meeting from 18 months ago.

Hope this helps.

Offline monkeybucket

Who is the other girl Tiger..? I'm around Mansfield and have to travel a distance to see hot ladies.

Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,030
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
As MidlandsPunter did not want to mention her, IMHO I would be stepping on his toes by then naming her. I am lazy with long essays, so bear with me til I get the review up.

For what it's worth, she's based in Leicester.

MidlandsPunter

  • Guest
The other girl is called Mandy and as CoolTiger just said she is excellent but Alaska really let her down. I have decided I will write a review but I will ensure it doesn't discredit Mandy although it seems like she already has a good reputation on here so I'm not as worried to mention her name now.

MidlandsPunter

  • Guest
Just came across this and thought you'd like to no this is Alaska with airbrushed out tattoos. I think she also runs this agency so would definitely avoid.

 External Link/Members Only

Offline monkeybucket

Just came across this and thought you'd like to no this is Alaska with airbrushed out tattoos. I think she also runs this agency so would definitely avoid.

 External Link/Members Only

The number is the same as her AW profile...its really a shame though as she looks terrific in her pics. and some of the other girls look good too... :(

Offline Ali Katt

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 17
  • Reviews: 28
Just came across this and thought you'd like to no this is Alaska with airbrushed out tattoos. I think she also runs this agency so would definitely avoid.

 External Link/Members Only
Same fireplace:
External Link/Members Only

MidlandsPunter

  • Guest
It gets even more dodgy! This girl and agency pops up everywhere  exact same girls listed here with a different number again External Link/Members Only

The name of this agency says it all   :lol:

Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,030
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
It gets even more dodgy! This girl and agency pops up everywhere  exact same girls listed here with a different number again External Link/Members Only

The name of this agency says it all   :lol:

The above agency has been operating in the East Mids region for quite a few years now, and has been discussed on numerous forums.

In addition, There is also East Midlands Escorts, who also operate in the same area.

You may find the same girls on both agencies, e.g. Alaska, Imogene, Sophie, Stacey, etc.

External Link/Members Only


I would think it is Aimee/Alaska that needs to be avoided (given the comments in this thread), rather than all the girls on the Agency list.

MidlandsPunter

  • Guest
Just checked the site, Sophie and Stacey on that site are different girls to the one on the East Midlands one I'm sure?

Don't think Imogen is on both sites either?

Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,030
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
Well praise the other lady accordingly. Nothing unusual about having a duo where one or the other was poor. No different to guys on here who attend parties, they don't all rate every girl at the party and review accordingly. Alaska is clearly trying to market herself in other areas after burning her bridges here and on AW. You won't be able to leave negative feedback on her own website and that will suit her just fine. She actually emailed me after I wrote the review here but I wasn't interested in what she had to say and immediately binned it without reading it. I had already formed a view that she treated punters as mugs and thought she could talk herself out of most things, including the vast majority of the time punters pay for.  On reflection I was probably being overly generous saying that she was a nice girl. I now see her as a cynical and devious prossie whose modus operandi is to talk punters out of expensive time they have paid for. The other great illusion she manages to create is one of being a sexually adventurous slut in the bedroom. I found her to be pretty clueless and possibly one of the most boring punts I've ever had.

Given the fact that she is on most sites for the East Midlands area, me thinks that she has realised the significance of this thread and is now on a PR cruise, trying to get some retractions/positive spin on her FB, cos she must have really felt the pinch in her bookings!!


Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,030
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
Just checked the site, Sophie and Stacey on that site are different girls to the one on the East Midlands one I'm sure?

Don't think Imogen is on both sites either?

Websites are linked, I am certain of that.

As for the girls, yes you may have a point, that pictures are different, but more than a coincident that same names appear.

As for Imogene, AFAIK I think she is trying to go Indie, so she may have removed herself from Easy Girls Agency.

Apologies if I gave incorrect info, I hardly use Agencies in the East Midlands, so am not up to date with any of the girls who appear in their portfolios.
« Last Edit: March 18, 2014, 01:32:59 pm by CoolTiger »

MidlandsPunter

  • Guest
Either way the moral of the story is to avoid Alaska / jasmine / Aimee / whatever next!

Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,030
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
Just checked the site, Sophie and Stacey on that site are different girls to the one on the East Midlands one I'm sure?

Don't think Imogen is on both sites either?

Websites are linked, I am certain of that.

As for the girls, yes you may have a point, that pictures are different, but more than a coincident that same names appear.

As for Imogene, AFAIK I think she is trying to go Indie, so she may have removed herself from Easy Girls Agency.

Apologies if I gave incorrect info, I hardly use Agencies in the East Midlands, so am not up to date with any of the girls who appear in their portfolios.

My apologies. I have confused different agencies, as I hardly track them or the girls in their portfolios.
Easy Girls is an altogether different Agency to East Midlands Girls, and have different girls on their sites. Also, Imogene has not previously worked for Easy Girls.

Either way the moral of the story is to avoid Alaska / jasmine / Aimee / whatever next!

Agreed. That is the main advice coming out from this thread.