Rachel-Green1986 - Congleton

[Charlie Chalk]

External Link/Members Only

This one is calling my name, but there is a bit of difference in opinion on her appearance in her reviews on here over the years. We go from:

R has a pretty large, flabby, stretch-marked, belly that isn't apparent in her AW photos. I didn't find it completely off-putting, but it wasn't very attractive either.

to

She does have some minor stretch marks on her stomach (possibly due to weight loss). 

to other reviews (both before and after both of these) which mention nothing!

I could cope with minor stretch marks, but not flabby stretch-marked tummy. I've had a look at her PG and she does seem to keep her midriff covered which makes me slightly suspicious. Has anyone seen her fairly recently who could give a definitive answer - big ugly belly or not? 

Thanks in advance for any replies

[tesla]

I cant help with Rachel as I have never seen her , but some girls do wear wide suspender belts or waspies to cover up stretch marks, which could be why they have not been mentioned in every review, or it could be some are not that bothered

[mexicola]

I have never met her but seen her profile a number of times over the last few years.

She is defo a  bigger girl, maybe a 14, but i think she has lost some weight over the years, that's evident looking though some of the pics she has posted.   

Personally i think she looks good.

[Thecunninglinguist]

I had yet another AW flirt from her yesterday. She is not in any HL but does tick all my boxes but l keep putting off seeing her for some reason. I thinking maybe because she advertised so many options, she makes herself sound just a money making industry. I do know that's the idea but just sounds like going through the numbers for the money? I have seen her shagging mate Saffie a couple of times in the past and l got the same feeling.

[Charlie Chalk]

I had yet another AW flirt from her yesterday. She is not in any HL but does tick all my boxes but l keep putting off seeing her for some reason. I thinking maybe because she advertised so many options, she makes herself sound just a money making industry. I do know that's the idea but just sounds like going through the numbers for the money? I have seen her shagging mate Saffie a couple of times in the past and l got the same feeling.

Yes, I’ve had a few flirts from her as well which is what got me interested in the first place. Her extensive list of “packages” could either be viewed as a good thing (putting a lot of time and effort into what she does) or a bad thing (punting by numbers) depending on how she actually goes about providing those services during meets. Interesting comment about Saffie as well - birds of a feather??

[Thecunninglinguist]

Yes, I’ve had a few flirts from her as well which is what got me interested in the first place. Her extensive list of “packages” could either be viewed as a good thing (putting a lot of time and effort into what she does) or a bad thing (punting by numbers) depending on how she actually goes about providing those services during meets. Interesting comment about Saffie as well - birds of a feather??

I thought l had reviewed Saffie but must have been just before my time here. She provides a good friendly VFM service, she may be a bit big now for some but yes very much out of the same mould. I wouldn't rule out going back sometime.

[BaldEagle]

I had yet another AW flirt from her yesterday. She is not in any HL but does tick all my boxes but l keep putting off seeing her for some reason. I thinking maybe because she advertised so many options, she makes herself sound just a money making industry. I do know that's the idea but just sounds like going through the numbers for the money? I have seen her shagging mate Saffie a couple of times in the past and l got the same feeling.

It's a few years since I saw her (just the once) and since then I have received many flirts. She was running some sort of catering business then as well as escorting. I think she is just a canny businesswoman. She was (is?) a bit on the chunky side but in all fairness the sex was extremely good 

[NigelF]

External Link/Members Only

This one is calling my name, but there is a bit of difference in opinion on her appearance in her reviews on here over the years. We go from:

to

to other reviews (both before and after both of these) which mention nothing!

I could cope with minor stretch marks, but not flabby stretch-marked tummy. I've had a look at her PG and she does seem to keep her midriff covered which makes me slightly suspicious. Has anyone seen her fairly recently who could give a definitive answer - big ugly belly or not? 

Thanks in advance for any replies

I've seen her subsequent to my review (sometime the following year) and either I was wrong in my review or she put on some weight since. My guess is it was a combination of both but regardless, my opinion is now very similar to Name Not Found. I should've updated my review or posted a new one so sorry about that.

Obviously though things might have improved since I last saw her but I'd say it's unlikely. Nonetheless the service was still good from what I recall although I think a little worse but I think that was mainly because she figured out who I was on here and like most WGs wasn't too happy with my review despite it being positive and if anything slightly flattering
regarding her belly!

[Charlie Chalk]

I've seen her subsequent to my review (sometime the following year) and either I was wrong in my review or she put on some weight since. My guess is it was a combination of both but regardless, my opinion is now very similar to Name Not Found. I should've updated my review or posted a new one so sorry about that.

Obviously though things might have improved since I last saw her but I'd say it's unlikely. Nonetheless the service was still good from what I recall although I think a little worse but I think that was mainly because she figured out who I was on here and like most WGs wasn't too happy with my review despite it being positive and if anything slightly flattering
regarding her belly!

Thanks for that Nigel, although it's not the answer I was hoping for! Think I might give her a miss since a flabby belly is an instant turn off for me.

[mexicola]

Nonetheless the service was still good from what I recall although I think a little worse but I think that was mainly because she figured out who I was on here and like most WGs wasn't too happy with my review despite it being positive and if anything slightly flattering
regarding her belly!

She must taking hundreds of cocks a year, many from returning punters.

How are you getting yourself in a position that you are discussing reviews and forums with WGs to allow the to work out who you are ?

[NigelF]

She must taking hundreds of cocks a year, many from returning punters.

How are you getting yourself in a position that you are discussing reviews and forums with WGs to allow the to work out who you are ?

I'm pretty sure it was because she was only touring Manchester for one day and she'd only seen two clients that day. That's what she said to me and she still wasn't even sure I was NigelF so I just denied it 

She only asked if I was NigelF at the end of the punt but the slight decline in service (or probably more accurately her attitude) during the punt was noticeable so once she questioned me, I knew that the slightly worse punt was likely due to her suspicions of who I was.

If I recall correctly Rachel was banned from here but she was shown the review by another client. I'm confident I am recalling correctly because I've just a had a look and there's strong evidence in this thread that she was a member and was banned well before I posted my review:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=88497

The client who showed her my review was apparently a member on here (according to Rachel) and he told her about the review without any prompting from her. I remember reporting it to admin at the time. We both did an mini investigation and identified a prime suspect but there was no firm evidence. At any rate, I'm pretty sure the "suspect" is no longer a member on here (either due to later banning or removal due to inactivity).

Nonethess there are a number of other girls who've been busier and still worked out who I am. I used to think they'd forget me almost immediately given the sea of cock they take (as you suggest) but really some can work it out quite easily just from memory. There are also other ways one could work it out especially if booked via AW (despite me having numerous accounts, some still used, some not) but they do require effort however fluffies can do the leg work for them (often without even being asked). I also have/had a punter-stalker who tries to out me (as NigelF) to WGs I've seen. I think I've thrown him off the scent now though or he's just moved on.

I'm better at preventing girls from working out who I am now than I was in the past but aside from just waiting quite a long time, it takes a little "misdirection" from me s(not anything misleading for punters) since I basically don't omit much from my reviews (although I'm pretty damn vanilla/not unusual so it still surprises me that I'm so seemingly identifiable).

I once did a review for a parlour girl just over a week after I'd saw her (I do wait much longer now) and she worked multiple days between my punt and the review yet she still identified me easily, in part due to not being a daft fluffy (although the review was extremely positive but she was still annoyed  ) but mainly because I just stuck to OW - which is apparently quite rare as I was the only punter (or one of two) to do so that entire week. Funnily enough that was the little push I needed to stop being a tight-arse and almost always going for OWO in parlours   

[samneil15]

Yep, been clocked myself a few times Nigel. Awkward as hell when it used to happen but I rarely care anymore.

The annoying thing is when you give a positive review and they still moan. All SP's want the fluffy type of BS review which just doesn't work on this forum.

I have never been offered a bribe or a discount etc to write a positive review though and I never will.

[Rack Admirer]

I once did a review for a parlour girl just over a week after I'd saw her (I do wait much longer now) and she worked multiple days between my punt and the review yet she still identified me easily, in part due to not being a daft fluffy (although the review was extremely positive but she was still annoyed  )

Lol. If you remember, I reviewed Asheligh Wild twice - two different parlours in Crewe - and gave her a positive both times. Yet she still saw a problem in my second review and asked me not to "take the time to come and see me again". I wonder what she'd have said if I'd given her two negs?