Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Beeyour, Wiltshire - what's your take?  (Read 6963 times)

Offline hicf777

I often travel this way with work, spotted her on AW today as escort of the day..

 External Link/Members Only

 External Link/Members Only+

Gorgeous looking girl, proper girl next door vibes... £200 extra for anal, fair enough maybe she doesn't like it.

But then I see she offers BB for an extra £100.. what is a girl like her gaining from offering this?

Am I missing something?
Banned reason: Boundary pushing abusive cunt.
Banned by: daviemac

Online southcoastpunter

I'm not sure i would put her in the "gorgeous" category but its personal choice/likes etc. I know Wiltshire is short of WG's, but......very expensive and everything is extra. It soon adds up to a lot.

The BB thing makes her a "no" for many/most guys on here! Shame but i assume she must get her the one or two clients per day that she seeks and at those rates, she is doing ok financially.  That is why she does it! (And she is married and he knows!!!!!)

Offline bdyno

Also needs to see a face pic before accepting a booking.

And a £12 PG....
Could it be she's set her prices deliberately high, then added loads of extras to her already ridiculous hourly rate to deter anyone from booking (which requires you to contact via the text on the number that isn't displayed), to try and hide the fact that she's mainly there as a PG seller?  (although at least one of her feedbacks is probably genuine)

Did a quick check on Fabs to see if she's there, a couple of potential profiles but nothing conclusive.

Offline manofsimplepleasures

There's now a phone number on her profile. Just in case it disappears again and you're tempted... 07593 992717.

Online Coriniumstud


Offline manofsimplepleasures

Rate for 1 hour now down to £190.

Offline hamchang

  (And she is married and he knows!!!!!)

There are quite a few blokes out there who kick their kicks cleaning up other mens cum from their wife's growler. When I saw the profile first and realised that I assumed she was cuckolding him. She not for me though for all of the reasons above. She reminds me of an angry HR manager

Offline hicf777

So I subbed to her private gallery using a freeview and more convinced now that she is legit.

Some pics of her with a client that I can believe may be the case and lots of nude pics (she has a great pussy).

Tempted..
Banned reason: Boundary pushing abusive cunt.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline funfungoodguy

All looks very inviting (except the extras costsd and the BB), otherwise a great loooking girl. Has anybody from here been there yet?


Offline SmokeEater

Piss taking extras  :dash:
Bareback  :scare:

Tempted...
Not a fucking chance!!! :thumbsdown:

Online Coriniumstud

She will let you finish inside her for only £30 :dash:

Offline funfungoodguy

the most recently added photo is starkly different in appearance and looks less 'well'... ?

Offline JontyR

So I subbed to her private gallery using a freeview and more convinced now that she is legit.

Some pics of her with a client that I can believe may be the case and lots of nude pics (she has a great pussy).

Tempted..

I used a freeview to watch one of her vids after seeing her ad on the front page today. I think looking at the thumb nails that a lot of her content is with the same chap.

The scenario on this one was, ahem, interesting. Punter turns up, he knew who she was. She didn't know who he was. Namely her sisters husband. She says, "I can't fuck you, you are my sisters husband... blow job or hand job only." Then she relents but says, "I can't look at you, you disgust me, you'll have to do me from behind."

There then follows an extended period of negotiation, which ends up her quoting an outrageous price for bareback (the opposite of a mates rate!) which is then reduced when he hasn't got it all. An arrangement for regular visits follows, but being such a noble and loyal sister she says he can't come inside. He does though, seemingly with consent.

If this is role play between two actualy partners then one wonders whether the whole thing is a PG / Movie scam - interesting as the brazen bareback thing is potentially going to stop reports of it on here. If that was a genuine video then Sunday's trip to Mum's for lunch will be interesting.

Decent actress, good looking and filthy too. If she wasn't a barebacker I may have added her to the list. She did however show signs of rapid weight loss on the tits and in the belly region.

Offline pythondan

Well her marketing strategy certainly has got people on here paying attention.

Being a barebacker I would think that most people who see her would take that option - many others who might consider seeing her would be put off by it - so seeing two guys she could be making £500 per day if they go for 30 minutes with BB and CIP.

Big money for an hours work. It would take her more than three hours to earn the equivalent from none-BB meets at say £150 per hour which is what should could realistically charge given her looks etc.

Offline bdyno

Well her marketing strategy certainly has got people on here paying attention.

Being a barebacker I would think that most people who see her would take that option - many others who might consider seeing her would be put off by it - so seeing two guys she could be making £500 per day if they go for 30 minutes with BB and CIP.

Big money for an hours work. It would take her more than three hours to earn the equivalent from none-BB meets at say £150 per hour which is what should could realistically charge given her looks etc.
Good way of looking at it.  Don't forget the £200 extra for anal, so that 500 could become 900.  Then £20 for kissing so those two 30 minute bookings get her £940.  Or scrap the CIP (reducing our running total to £880), but add the £50 for CIM and £50 for swallowing in both bookings and you're at £1080.

If she thinks it's worth it for the money, then  :unknown:

If she was sensibly priced at £150ph for a non-bb meet with anal & kissing included I'd definitely be tempted.


Offline hicf777

Have just exchanged a few messages with B (full name anonymised). Very quick to reply, takes only 2 bookings a day and weekdays only so she isn't available at short notice.

Unprotected is something that she does only with her partner and 1 or 2 very regular clients. She also gets tested regularly.
Banned reason: Boundary pushing abusive cunt.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline SmokeEater

Have just exchanged a few messages with B (full name anonymised). Very quick to reply, takes only 2 bookings a day and weekdays only so she isn't available at short notice.

Unprotected is something that she does only with her partner and 1 or 2 very regular clients. She also gets tested regularly.
[So potentially her regulars could be some of those that left feedback on aw but if you check then you will see they have seen other barebackers.

A test is only good from the test till the first person she fucks and if she only sees 1 or 2 people a day then that test is pretty pointless.

REMEMBER GENTS OUR BRAIN IS IN OUR HEAD]

Offline stonebow1

Have just exchanged a few messages with B (full name anonymised). Very quick to reply, takes only 2 bookings a day and weekdays only so she isn't available at short notice.

Unprotected is something that she does only with her partner and 1 or 2 very regular clients. She also gets tested regularly.

It's been a couple of months now but she's now openly offering BB and her private videos are full of her openly suggesting she is barebacking clients. Pretty certain the above was complete bs...

This is one to firmly avoid.

Offline lewis666

Have just exchanged a few messages with B (full name anonymised). Very quick to reply, takes only 2 bookings a day and weekdays only so she isn't available at short notice.

Unprotected is something that she does only with her partner and 1 or 2 very regular clients. She also gets tested regularly.

or 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,99,140,678,987.......   :scare:  As good as they look why bother unless your willing to take the risk in which case you wouldn't need to ask


Offline Cheltclient

or 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,99,140,678,987.......   :scare:  As good as they look why bother unless your willing to take the risk in which case you wouldn't need to ask

Agreed. Something very wrong about this profile. Mind you, I almost think fair play to her for being honest about it. Would be very much worse if she was doing it all secretly as she’s the kind of girl I’d book.

But the ‘1 or 2’ client having bareback suggestion, why on Earth would you believe that (not that I’d suspect most of us would). Nativity to the extreme if you did

Offline bdyno

Agreed. Something very wrong about this profile. Mind you, I almost think fair play to her for being honest about it. Would be very much worse if she was doing it all secretly as she’s the kind of girl I’d book.

But the ‘1 or 2’ client having bareback suggestion, why on Earth would you believe that (not that I’d suspect most of us would). Nativity to the extreme if you did
What's it got to do with Christmas?  :unknown:
 :lol:

Offline Cheltclient

What's it got to do with Christmas?  :unknown:
 :lol:

Come on dude - can’t you see the festive correlation?

Nope, I’m awful with predictive text changes and rarely notice them  :yahoo:  they are usually a lot more embarrassing than that! I blame the fat fingers !!!

Offline Cheltclient

Oh and I’m sure you guessed! Twas naivety I was trying to write :)

Offline bdyno

If she was sensibly priced & not such a blatant BBer I'd unwrap her for xmas!!!

Offline Cheltclient

If she was sensibly priced & not such a blatant BBer I'd unwrap her for xmas!!!

Me too. There’s something about her pics I find really hot. Hence why it’s lucky I guess as had she been more secretive about those services, I’d prob had seen her and had a nice STD for Christmas :)

Offline sensualencounter

It's been a couple of months now but she's now openly offering BB and her private videos are full of her openly suggesting she is barebacking clients. Pretty certain the above was complete bs...

This is one to firmly avoid.

You do realise the Cunt was banned for being a complete wrong un? I wouldn’t trust a single word he said.