WGs with static or slow moving feedback

[Taggart]

Do you draw any particular conclusion about girls whose feedback remains static for several weeks or months, or moves extremely slowly?

Does it suggest she may not be working and taking a break, has a full diary of regulars who no longer lbook through AW or leave feedback or does it act as a sign to stay away and find someone else?  I've around a dozen on my HL who fall into this category.

[smiths]

Do you draw any particular conclusion about girls whose feedback remains static for several weeks or months, or moves extremely slowly?

Does it suggest she may not be working and taking a break, has a full diary of regulars who no longer lbook through AW or leave feedback or does it act as a sign to stay away and find someone else?  I've around a dozen on my HL who fall into this category.

I know some WGs mainly work off their phones so them not having much or any feedback doesnt necessarily mean anything. I have had many good regulars over the years located off A/W who had no FB when I first punted with them and still had very little months later.

As ever check WGs out on here and see who might have punted with them, or take a chance in search of a gem but bearing in mind they could be low lifes.

[laidbackasiandude]

On occasions you can come across AW profiles where log-ins are infrequent, because the "independent" AW WG
is actually an agency WG.

[jcdmj12]

Do you draw any particular conclusion about girls whose feedback remains static for several weeks or months, or moves extremely slowly?

Does it suggest she may not be working and taking a break, has a full diary of regulars who no longer lbook through AW or leave feedback or does it act as a sign to stay away and find someone else?  I've around a dozen on my HL who fall into this category.

Only if it it's a pattern which has changed, i.e. used to get loads of feedback, but now doesn't.

A lot of girls' feedback doesn't represent their working patterns, for example Ashley Gold:

External Link/Members Only 

Only has 8 FB in 10 months, but I know for a fact she is a very busy WG who works in a consistent typical EE fashion (2 weeks here, 1-2 weeks back home)

[oring123]

If a girl has 20 plus feed back from punters that you can trust its no problem
If all punters suspect it is

[vw]

Means fantastic to me usually, I like the part time pussy and many times can be a sign of this, prefer to be an early investor these days rather than being a pokemon collector.

If it concerns you then its a problem, I always say go with your gut and by posting this your gut is telling you something !

[theGOAT]

Do you draw any particular conclusion about girls whose feedback remains static for several weeks or months, or moves extremely slowly?

Does it suggest she may not be working and taking a break, has a full diary of regulars who no longer lbook through AW or leave feedback or does it act as a sign to stay away and find someone else?  I've around a dozen on my HL who fall into this category.

If they have little recent AW feedback and little feedback on here it is generally a bad sign in my experience.

But for sure some girls are super hot about getting AW feedback and some really don't give a toss.  Number of AW feedbacks doesnt sway my opinion, whereas feedback on here means a great deal.

[NelsonH]

A lot of them hunt feedback at first and then don't bother.

They think that a high feedback might suggest they are shagged out.

50 or so looks OK, 500 a bit less so.

[Ben4454]

Generally if the working girl hasnt recieved any new feedback within a couple months but logs in everyday she'll ignore your booking. if she has a number displayed it changes the odds a tiny bit.  That is 7 years of aw experience talking. could be from ego boosting, pg, webcamming only but lists herself as escort for increased traffic or just a total bollox business sense.

[EnglishRebecca121]

A lot of them hunt feedback at first and then don't bother.

They think that a high feedback might suggest they are shagged out.

50 or so looks OK, 500 a bit less so.

are men generally put off by higher feedback ? doesnt mean the girl is fucked any more than someone with say 50, just prehaps recieve more bookings through aw than phonecalls...

[vw]

are men generally put off by higher feedback ? doesnt mean the girl is fucked any more than someone with say 50, just prehaps recieve more bookings through aw than phonecalls...

As always depends on the man.   

Some are pokemon collectors, others are in denial and others are pioneers who try something new !

The ones it bothers area more likely the unsavoury ones that want exclusivity and seem to think if they pay more they get it !

Being reviewed by certain banned fluffy members puts me off ever visiting people.

[ProtocolDroid]

are men generally put off by higher feedback ? doesnt mean the girl is fucked any more than someone with say 50, just prehaps recieve more bookings through aw than phonecalls...

It's impossible for individual forum members to answer your question, which asks what men generally feel. I'm with NelsonH on this one, though, so that's two votes for some but not too much AW fb so far.

I must say some new profiles with no fb really appeal to me as well, as long as they don't have any obvious alarm bells, but unfortunately due to work commitments it's usually very difficult for me to get in there first, so to speak.

[pking_paul]

Part timers feedback of girls I know can be all over the place. I have to say that the likes of Carly G who I met years ago and now has nearly 1,400 puts me off seeing her again, well that and some of her other antics of course 

[nigel4498]

are men generally put off by higher feedback ? doesnt mean the girl is fucked any more than someone with say 50, just prehaps recieve more bookings through aw than phonecalls...

Personally it doesn't deter me as high feed back is an indication that she is a good SP and that the majority of her feed back is from repeat clients.

[willbred]

I do wonder why a girl might have been on AW for 12 months and only got, say 2 ratings. I'm less likely to be put off by one who's been getting a rating per week but either hasn't had any for a bit or the number is increasing slowly. I know girls who have reached 50-100 ratings and have so many regulars who have already posted feedback / reviews that the feedback has reached a sort of "saturation point". And then you have the whole " what is the integrity of AW's feedback system" issue......

[The_Don]

Do you draw any particular conclusion about girls whose feedback remains static for several weeks or months, or moves extremely slowly?

Does it suggest she may not be working and taking a break, has a full diary of regulars who no longer lbook through AW or leave feedback or does it act as a sign to stay away and find someone else?  I've around a dozen on my HL who fall into this category.

I take feed back on A/W with a pinch of salt.

I've punted a few W/G that had 0 feed back (some of my better punts as well). Or very little, feed back but they still have a follow of punters!


Some don't log in for days or week but still pick up the phone and take bookings!

[Anallover6969]

I take feed back on A/W with a pinch of salt.

I've punted a few W/G that had 0 feed back (some of my better punts as well). Or very little, feed back but they still have a follow of punters!


Some don't log in for days or week but still pick up the phone and take bookings!

+1

Wazzername? English Blonde Jenna with all those positives on AW?

AW feedback Shmeedback

[The_Don]

+1

Wazzername? English Blonde Jenna with all those positives on AW?

AW feedback Shmeedback

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

UKP, feed back on her show how back A/W feedback can be

[hullad]

What you have to watch for as well with low counts is ladies who do not formally except the AW bookings. I have had couple of these and have a few more on my radar , they give poor service and it prevents punters rating them.

A lot of EE ladies never bother with it either and that could be for similar reasons or they do not know or are not allowed to use it.

You have to take everything in and try to make a balanced judgement, but scores coming in that are good over time has too count for something.

[theGOAT]

are men generally put off by higher feedback ? doesnt mean the girl is fucked any more than someone with say 50, just prehaps recieve more bookings through aw than phonecalls...

No.  If a girl has a very high number of AW feedbacks it generally just means she insists punters make an AW booking before each and every meet (like Angelina or Michelle Ind). They must think it helps them get more business.

Most girls - like you - don't do that.  Feedback is something that is organised after a meet if the punter asks for it.  If a girl is new and has little feedback she may ask me for it.

[willbred]

No.  If a girl has a very high number of AW feedbacks it generally just means she insists punters make an AW booking before each and every meet (like Angelina or Michelle Ind). They must think it helps them get more business.

Most girls - like you - don't do that.  Feedback is something that is organised after a meet if the punter asks for it.  If a girl is new and has little feedback she may ask me for it.

Yeh, it's like, the girl's got 1500 ratings...good for her. What am I going to do - read 'em all? I want a shag, not revise for an exam!!!