Fake AW Feedback

[Midland]

Hi guys,

I see similar topics have been posted before but last was long enough ago that I would necro an old post so figured something new was better!

So I found this profile which looked great: External Link/Members Only

Then checked and found this review: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=377570.msg3859634#msg3859634 which while positive didn't sound that great to me. So I had a look at the AW feedback and this is where I noticed a weird pattern, aside from the 2 initial feedbacks that it was a B&S (which already is a no-go for me), the reviewers names and review all looked quite similar (often repeating details like a random word + 2-4 numbers, pearlers like "fuckgood89", "Jose_89", "chufi84", "british89", "david-julian86", "evans90", "tevam80" etc then while going into profile after profile I noticed another pattern of two words with a space in between and similar styles of writing there too like "Paul Mit", "Billy Big", "Big Spence", "Johny Bad", "Eli But", "Bob Noky" etc), so I went into their feedback from the providers and noticed that magically they have all reviewed each other, so I have clearly found a network of fake punter profiles + Brazillian providers and anyone on this list is an automatic "stay away" for me personally even if they have great real reviews (which a few of them do on here), some of them are TS which is not my thing but added for reference:

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

This is just the tip of the iceberg, this network is huge and spans the whole country.

And this, gentlemen, is the reason why I don't trust AW reviews / feedback!













Hidden Image/Members Only

[RandomGuy99]

I think most people take everything said on AW with a pinch of salt. When I look at an SP's feedback on AW I also check who has left it and who else they've seen and what they've said. Sometimes you can spot fake reviews or that the SP sees people who have seen barebackers. I also look for how many times a particular SS has left feedback for an SP. Sometimes there's 20 or 30 feedbacks from the same SS, which also leads me to believe it's fake. This information allows me to eliminate those SPs as people I don't want to see.

Fake reviews do seem to be pretty commonplace on AW.

[David1970]

Hi guys,

I see similar topics have been posted before but last was long enough ago that I would necro an old post so figured something new was better!

So I found this profile which looked great: External Link/Members Only

Then checked and found this review: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=377570.msg3859634#msg3859634 which while positive didn't sound that great to me. So I had a look at the AW feedback and this is where I noticed a weird pattern, aside from the 2 initial feedbacks that it was a B&S (which already is a no-go for me), the reviewers names and review all looked quite similar (often repeating details like a random word + 2-4 numbers, pearlers like "fuckgood89", "Jose_89", "chufi84", "british89", "david-julian86", "evans90", "tevam80" etc then while going into profile after profile I noticed another pattern of two words with a space in between and similar styles of writing there too like "Paul Mit", "Billy Big", "Big Spence", "Johny Bad", "Eli But", "Bob Noky" etc), so I went into their feedback from the providers and noticed that magically they have all reviewed each other, so I have clearly found a network of fake punter profiles + Brazillian providers and anyone on this list is an automatic "stay away" for me personally even if they have great real reviews (which a few of them do on here), some of them are TS which is not my thing but added for reference:

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

This is just the tip of the iceberg, this network is huge and spans the whole country.

And this, gentlemen, is the reason why I don't trust AW reviews / feedback!













Hidden Image/Members Only

I don’t think any has ever trusted AW reviews, your post will not be earth shattering news to anyone.

[Stevelondon]

Good investigation work that man.

But as has been said. Take the feedback left on AW with a pinch of salt and trust your own thoughts on the subject.
Unless it’s been left by me of course 😂

[southcoastpunter]

Aw feedback can be useful - if you know what to look for. Maybe not in a large city but in many towns you can see punter who have seen the same girl(s) you have and therefore you can assume he likes what you like and that he is a genuine punter and not a made up name/profile.

if you click on the guys who have left feedback, often you can see that the same guys have left the same feedback on several same girls and can assume they are rotated as part of a "controlled" or worse group and if you wish you can avoid on the basis that its less likely to be a positive experience!

So it can tell you certain things - but just don't believe everything that is written in feedback.
 
lots of guys even on here don't like leaving negative feedback on AW for fear of a negative in return. I have left 4 negatives feedbacks on AW and 3 said/did nothing, only one replied/disputed it and that was with an excuse/explanation. no negative to me in response!

[daviemac]

Good investigation work that man.

But as has been said. Take the feedback left on AW with a pinch of salt and trust your own thoughts on the subject.
Unless it’s been left by me of course 😂

Not sure it makes a difference what the feedback on AW says, these 2 have multiple positives on here which most punters accept as more reliable. 

32 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (28 positive, 3 neutral, 1 negative)
22 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (18 positive, 1 neutral, 3 negative)

[Midland]

Not sure it makes a difference what the feedback on AW says, these 2 have multiple positives on here which most punters accept as more reliable. 

32 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (28 positive, 3 neutral, 1 negative)
22 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (18 positive, 1 neutral, 3 negative)

I was surprised by the positive feedback on those two but they are certainly part of the network and certainly have plenty of fake AW reviews, I guess the fake reviews are just to drum up business and start them off and how they then proceed is up to them. If the girls in the network are busy regardless of the level of service they give, due to not needing legitimate reviews as the fake ones fooling enough people,  then perhaps that's why many of them don't care enough to try harder since the end result is the same and they can get away with less work for the same pay? While others, like these two, perhaps genuinely enjoy it.

[daviemac]

I was surprised by the positive feedback on those two but they are certainly part of the network and certainly have plenty of fake AW reviews, I guess the fake reviews are just to drum up business and start them off and how they then proceed is up to them. If the girls in the network are busy regardless of the level of service they give, due to not needing legitimate reviews as the fake ones fooling enough people,  then perhaps that's why many of them don't care enough to try harder since the end result is the same and they can get away with less work for the same pay? While others, like these two, perhaps genuinely enjoy it.

Are you saying we should ignore the 28 positive reviews on here and not book her because you think the AW feedback is fake?

Most members here treat AW feedback just as an indication the escort exists and if they see one they fancy check on here for reviews, if none then they can move on or TOFFT, if reviewed then make a judgement call based on them.

Regarding the names with numbers in, to give you an example of how common it is there's over 2,000 members on here with the numbers 8 & 9 in their name and over 1,000 with the numbers 8 & 4 and that's just two sets.

[Midland]

Are you saying we should ignore the 28 positive reviews on here and not book her because you think the AW feedback is fake?

Most members here treat AW feedback just as an indication the escort exists and if they see one they fancy check on here for reviews, if none then they can move on or TOFFT, if reviewed then make a judgement call based on them.

Regarding the names with numbers in, to give you an example of how common it is there's over 2,000 members on here with the numbers 8 & 9 in their name and over 1,000 with the numbers 8 & 4 and that's just two sets.

No, not at all. I am saying those 2 are anomalies, they are clearly better than the others that are part of that network and people should certainly always trust the feedback here more than any feedback on AW (fake or otherwise). The usernames were not the only evidence I used to determine the links I posted though, the reviews are all similar with similar language and punctuation, and they are clumped together in times and dates and they have multiple reviews going both ways - but only for/from women in the network, the more you dive into the data the more red flags pop up, I was simply pointing out an observation I found when trawling through said data when I had too much time on my hands! 

[bops909]

No, not at all. I am saying those 2 are anomalies, they are clearly better than the others that are part of that network and people should certainly always trust the feedback here more than any feedback on AW (fake or otherwise). The usernames were not the only evidence I used to determine the links I posted though, the reviews are all similar with similar language and punctuation, and they are clumped together in times and dates and they have multiple reviews going both ways - but only for/from women in the network, the more you dive into the data the more red flags pop up, I was simply pointing out an observation I found when trawling through said data when I had too much time on my hands! 

With the software available now to handle big data and draw out similar language and other patterns, I think some really useful data analysis could be done, given access to the right data sets. Maybe the Adultwork API gives the  right access? I don't know.

Thank you for showing us what's possible. 

[GorillaWarfare]

Adultwork reviews aren't really worth it. As mentioned on this site countless times, I'd take one UKP review over 50 AW reviews. A lot of people would give a positive to the worst girls out of not wanting to deal with a retaliation negative. A lot of girls will not book you if there's even one negative on your profile.

People play the system on that site and everyone knows it. You've just gotta try and figure out who is legit and who isn't - usually if a user has seen a girl you've seen it's a good sign, even if that isn't 100% proof.