B&S when the S is smoking hot

[Neal69]

I like to share my experiences with other punters so I do Reviews.

I am in a bit of a quandary about a recent punt.

So booked a WG but got switched.

The WG I booked claims to be 20, slim and a brunette.

The Switch was early 20's slim and a brunette.

Now the dilemma I am facing is that the switch was as cute as fuck and performed very well.

The Bait has her face obscured in her profile pics but I knew it was a switch as another poster on the east Anglia board mentioned a distinctive tattoo as He had the same experience.

I am inclined to go for a Neutral as a negative would be unfair IMHO.

The other poster did not review as He was told that she would be leaving the area yesterday.

I want to review as She told me that she would be here for another 2 weeks and while not an outstanding punt was a very good one.

Comments and advice from you experienced reviewers please.

N

[AnthG]

My opinion. Leave a positive but say like you have here. She is not the girl in the photo's.

One thing I have been told by girls who use fake photos is they do it so as to ensure their boyfriend won't know who they are as even if they hide their faces, from their bodies alone their boyfriend will twig on instantly it's them (which is true, I have seen body shots of girls I have simply booked and knew immediately it was them just from their skin tones and breast shapes etc).

It annoys me like hell when WGs do it, especially attractive ones who do not need to do it as it is massive deception on their part. But the above is the reason I have been told a couple of times why they do it.

The punt itself was good from what you say, its just this one problem. Its not like its a minger tricking you by putting attractive photos - which is way worse in my eyes.

[vw]

How about bad for the switcher and good for the prize.

That is unless they don't have their own profiles, then leave it up to you probably neutral would be fair !

[Neal69]

The Switch does not have an AW profile.

[webpunter]

I've had several occasions where the photos posted are a vague resemblance at best - same kind of height / body etc.  All but one pre my UKP days.  The WG in question has picked these to remain anonymous - as mentioned above.  But they've picked photos so that when the punter arrives they are pleased as punch rather than pissed off with a B&S.  There used to be a website called something like Sexy Blond Escorts - this practice was common place i understand.  One of my early reviews on here on a Kingston AW WG had exactly this.  But worked out well in terms of looks & service so who gives a ****.  More likely to kill off chances of a repeat visit tho.  My thinking is quit on this particular WG while you're ahead - as next time things could be a whole load different.  Plenty more fish in the AW pond

[Marmalade]

You had a confirmed booking with one prossie so that counts as reviewable under UKP guidelines. You didn't get to see her, so your report is merely that she did a bait and switch and that the substitute was more than acceptable (or smoking hot).

Since you don't know who the substitute was, a review of the substitute doesn't really help anyone. If it was me I'd just do a short statement along those lines and post it as neutral.

[smiths]

I like to share my experiences with other punters so I do Reviews.

I am in a bit of a quandary about a recent punt.

So booked a WG but got switched.

The WG I booked claims to be 20, slim and a brunette.

The Switch was early 20's slim and a brunette.

Now the dilemma I am facing is that the switch was as cute as fuck and performed very well.

The Bait has her face obscured in her profile pics but I knew it was a switch as another poster on the east Anglia board mentioned a distinctive tattoo as He had the same experience.

I am inclined to go for a Neutral as a negative would be unfair IMHO.

The other poster did not review as He was told that she would be leaving the area yesterday.

I want to review as She told me that she would be here for another 2 weeks and while not an outstanding punt was a very good one.

Comments and advice from you experienced reviewers please.

N

I don't do business with low lifes so if I knew it was a B&S I would of walked and done a negative review, its totally irrelevant to me if the switch was attractive.

If you do a review inform punters you were bait and switched as they can then make their own minds up whether to chance it is my advice, though I completely disagree with you that a negative review would be unfair, it WAS unfair to B&S you but it happened, on this occasion the switch was ok so you got lucky.

[azrael]

I like to share my experiences with other punters so I do Reviews.

I am in a bit of a quandary about a recent punt.

So booked a WG but got switched.

The WG I booked claims to be 20, slim and a brunette.

The Switch was early 20's slim and a brunette.

Now the dilemma I am facing is that the switch was as cute as fuck and performed very well.

The Bait has her face obscured in her profile pics but I knew it was a switch as another poster on the east Anglia board mentioned a distinctive tattoo as He had the same experience.

I am inclined to go for a Neutral as a negative would be unfair IMHO.

The other poster did not review as He was told that she would be leaving the area yesterday.

I want to review as She told me that she would be here for another 2 weeks and while not an outstanding punt was a very good one.

Comments and advice from you experienced reviewers please.

N

I agree with what anthg says and some of what smiths says, do a review in the header put some thing like " bait and switch 1 hour incall turned out well" then put a "positive" as you say it turned out as a good punt, say what you said above letting relevant punters know its not the girl in the pictures so it would be down to them if they where willing to risk it. Cant do more than that, the final decision is yours obviously you will get punters sending you messages asking questions anout tge girl you saw compared to the one in the pictures.

[Sonny Crockett]

If I ever got a B&S, I'd walk. Regardless of whether the lady was hot or not.

[Marmalade]

If I ever got a B&S, I'd walk. Regardless of whether the lady was hot or not.

In practice yes, cos most B&S's are not that amazing. But I'm not sure I believe it in principle. You go to see a reasonably ok prossie and instead god's fucking gift opens the door, gazes at you sincerely with sparkling blue eyes beneath her heavenly golden locks, apologises profusely for her 'sister' who has been taken to hospital for appendicitis and asked her to offer you a glass of wine 'and a bit more...'

Ok, sounds more like a Hollywood movie, but c'mon, if the guy had a smoking hot punt at a good price what's the fucking problem.

[Sonny Crockett]

In practice yes, cos most B&S's are not that amazing. But I'm not sure I believe it in principle. You go to see a reasonably ok prossie and instead god's fucking gift opens the door, gazes at you sincerely with sparkling blue eyes beneath her heavenly golden locks, apologises profusely for her 'sister' who has been taken to hospital for appendicitis and asked her to offer you a glass of wine 'and a bit more...'

Ok, sounds more like a Hollywood movie, but c'mon, if the guy had a smoking hot punt at a good price what's the fucking problem.

If the guy had a great punt following a B&S then that's good for him. I myself would walk as I didn't commit myself to seeing the switch lady.

[Hertsgent]

I had this scenario on a punt and reviewed as negative on that basis - but only my view....

[Neal69]

Thanks for all the comments so far 

I must repeat though that I would not have known it was a B&S had not another punter posted on the regional board about a distinctive tattoo that would not be seen unless she was undressed.

I then said something along the lines of " you are not XXXXX are you? "

N