Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Hidden Gems (Unreviewed Girls)  (Read 3839 times)

Offline slippyin

So i've come across a gem of a SP recently who was a stunning punt, who i will look to review after bit of time has passed, but who was unreviewed on here. She has been on the scene a while, well written profile, plenty of positive AW FB, plenty of non airbrushed photo's etc and it got me to thinking why hadn't she been reviewed.

Is this because:
  • Guys want to keep them to themselves
  • Dont want them to get popular and therefore have to face a price rise
  • As the only really have regulars
  • They have some how managed to not see any guys on here

Going through my HL there are few in my region who sort of fill the same criteria. Established SP's, average price for region and decent likes list, by frequency of FB are busy and working etc  but no reviews. Now like most, i assume, i don't review every punt especially for well known girls unless they haven't had a review in a while. I have tended to keep to my regs and have reviewed them before they were and understand why we dont review regs receiving perks, preference etc. But if i TOFT will review positive or negative even if i feel the girl has the potential to be reg.

Just find it peculiar.

Any thoughts guys?




 

Offline ulstersubbie

Why don't you write the review now, so other members can decide for themselves. If the SP is that stunning, then surely a recent review will be of benefit to other members. Are there really that many hidden gems out there?

Offline xyfek

Given the size of UKP, and provided she's not based in the middle of nowhere, I think it would be unlikely that she hasn't seen guys from here. In fact, we already know that she has seen at least one... you! Whether those guys are active members, reviewing often or not, is another story. Because, let's face it, most of the members here don't bother with posting let alone reviewing.

We also do tend to be selfish bastards when we find someone we really like. Because revealing a hidden gem may not be in our best interest, as prices may go above what we're prepared to pay, she may become harder to book, or maybe she just doesn't like us that much and we might get the boot in favour of better prospects.

I hardly ever TOFTT, so most girls I see have been reviewed here, although not necessarily by me. But I'd say if you've taken some useful pointers from UKP it's only fair to give back. By all means, have your fun with this gem, but do share with the rest of us!

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,315
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
She may have changed her name and someone might recognise her.  Without knowing who it is there's no way of knowing that though.

Offline Foxtail17

Maybe she has told him not to review her on UKP?
One or two I have seen have tried to make that a condition of a booking. I never agreed nor disagreed and both were reviewed.

Offline slippyin

Wasn't talking about the new to me SP in particular just that there seem to be a few established SP's with no reviews.

Regarding the review on the gem, i will post when enough time has passed for a certain amount of discretion for me.

Offline tesla


Regarding the review on the gem, i will post when enough time has passed for a certain amount of discretion for me.

and maybe that is part of the problem, identification, I have not reviewed some meets, as what we got up to would identify me

Online Kev40ish

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,944
  • Likes: 22
  • Reviews: 24
and maybe that is part of the problem, identification, I have not reviewed some meets, as what we got up to would identify me

You don’t have to explain all the details, that will give you away  :unknown:

Is she a good fuck, what’s her BJ like etc. Is more than enough

Offline slippyin

and maybe that is part of the problem, identification, I have not reviewed some meets, as what we got up to would identify me

+1

Online LLPunting

Wasn't talking about the new to me SP in particular just that there seem to be a few established SP's with no reviews.

Regarding the review on the gem, i will post when enough time has passed for a certain amount of discretion for me.

Unless you're lying about her profile in your opening paragraph you've already mentioned enough that the lady could identify you regardless of time waited unless you were wholly forgettable to her (or she has amnesia).  One hope for anonymity would be for someone else to review her first and you subsequently post a substantially similar review in terms of details and services indulged regardless of it being a full accounting of your encounter, which of course means you won't have TOFTT or be posting first review for the SP.
Of course, now that you've mentioned you've enjoyed an unreviewed SP, your own reputation here is in the balance and if you don't review you have "condemned" your own subsequent behaviour.

The only way you can maintain your "discretion" i.e. avoid any blowback from the SP in subsequent punts is of course to not review until you have seen her as many times as it takes for you to be done with her.  Some UKPers have admitted to doing that.

Unless you have a reputation amongst SPs for posting malicious (possibly fallacious) reviews then an SP can't have much objection to a review, particularly a positive one, unless you're outing her private identity in some way or revealing services and behaviours she does not want widely known.

The only other reason for withholding a review is if you have (foolishly) compromised your privacy with the SP either by using your "real" phone number or contact details or disclosed your places of residence, work or frequent custom such that she could target you.

Offline Private Parts

Unless you're lying about her profile in your opening paragraph you've already mentioned enough that the lady could identify you regardless of time waited unless you were wholly forgettable to her (or she has amnesia).  One hope for anonymity would be for someone else to review her first and you subsequently post a substantially similar review in terms of details and services indulged regardless of it being a full accounting of your encounter, which of course means you won't have TOFTT or be posting first review for the SP.
Of course, now that you've mentioned you've enjoyed an unreviewed SP, your own reputation here is in the balance and if you don't review you have "condemned" your own subsequent behaviour.

The only way you can maintain your "discretion" i.e. avoid any blowback from the SP in subsequent punts is of course to not review until you have seen her as many times as it takes for you to be done with her.  Some UKPers have admitted to doing that.

Unless you have a reputation amongst SPs for posting malicious (possibly fallacious) reviews then an SP can't have much objection to a review, particularly a positive one, unless you're outing her private identity in some way or revealing services and behaviours she does not want widely known.

The only other reason for withholding a review is if you have (foolishly) compromised your privacy with the SP either by using your "real" phone number or contact details or disclosed your places of residence, work or frequent custom such that she could target you.

+1m

Or, quite honestly, you, are a dick
 :hi:
« Last Edit: July 28, 2020, 05:10:42 pm by Private Parts »

Offline slippyin

A review will be posted, though the main aim of the original post was to gain consensus of whether there were good established SP’s going unreviewed for any particular reason. I don’t particularly post, but do review and always in line with the service I have received.

Online LLPunting

A review will be posted, though the main aim of the original post was to gain consensus of whether there were good established SP’s going unreviewed for any particular reason. I don’t particularly post, but do review and always in line with the service I have received.

Look forward to the imminent review.

Forgot to mention another reason to withhold which is that the SP works for a group or agency who might remove privileges or blackball you for negging their girl(s).  Waiting to review doesn't protect you from many of these operations, some agencies maintain a Db with all your previous bookings and text comms.

Offline Rick2468

and maybe that is part of the problem, identification, I have not reviewed some meets, as what we got up to would identify me

I normally wait a few days before leaving a review and will leave out any bits that I think could identify me but sometimes I feel brave and just post everything that happened. Unfortunately leaving bits out means you lose information that others might find helpful but I try and keep the overall tone of the post first. I saw a working girl a few years ago and the SP actually responded to my post saying the meet never happened. It did happen and the post was positive so it was a bit strange but I get the impression she was a bit bonkers. Still it was a bit scary having someone call you out like that.

Offline tesla

You don’t have to explain all the details, that will give you away  :unknown:

Is she a good fuck, what’s her BJ like etc. Is more than enough

and therein lies the problem, I don't do blow jobs as they do nothing for me, and penetration is not always possible

Offline Steely Dan

Loads of fuckers are not on here because they are not interested. Also, nobody new has been able to join here for some time.  It is quite possible that almost no one from here has fucked her.

It terms of keeping to yourself, never forget the balance: If she is trying to make a living as an escort in your area, and she does not earn enough, she will move on.  A review can put up prices or reduce availability, but it can also keep a favourite near by and working.

Online LLPunting

Loads of fuckers are not on here because they are not interested. Also, nobody new has been able to join here for some time.  It is quite possible that almost no one from here has fucked her.

It terms of keeping to yourself, never forget the balance: If she is trying to make a living as an escort in your area, and she does not earn enough, she will move on.  A review can put up prices or reduce availability, but it can also keep a favourite near by and working.

 :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Offline HarryZZ

The premise is that everybody who ever punted is on UKP?

Offline wolfiesmith69

Some girls don't want a review-others court 1-some give us special treatment some don't-If you are on UKP it is your duty to review-Good ,bad or ugly !!!
Banned reason: Blatant tout, posting multiple reviews and starting a thread to advertise his reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Blackpool Rock

I have on occasions punted a girl and had a great service but held off on the review for a few months until i've seen her a few times.

My reason for not reviewing straight away was to stop the leaches booking her solid however i did PM a number of respected reviewing members so those who actively contribute also got 1st dibs  :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Offline Will2k


  • Ban Countdown
    Loading...
  • Posts: 87
  • Likes: 3
  • Reviews: 2
I have oft wondered why some profiles are older with little feedback. After all if there is no trade they would not be there but if there was there would be feedback. Once possible wills be because of a phone booking with no possibility of leaving  feedback. But that leaves the option of unaffiliated sites like this. So I have no idea

Offline Steve2

I don't do blow jobs as they do nothing for me, and penetration is not always possible

I certainly won't be booking you then  :lol: :lol: :lol:

Offline luv2kiss54

In my opinion reviews of new girls or those with no feedback is more important than reviewing established girls. That is what this forum is for ie  to help fellow punters make a decision to see a girl or not.

You look at a new profile and are tempted but you are put off because there is no mention of her on here or no ratings on her AW profile so effectively you have to take one for the team. Ive been let down so many times by new profiles so i rarely take a chance these days its just not worth the wasted time and hassle. Those punters which have a good experience with a newbe and keep it to themselves are just plain selfish and have no place being a member.

Offline Charliehutton

A review will be posted, though the main aim of the original post was to gain consensus of whether there were good established SP’s going unreviewed for any particular reason. I don’t particularly post, but do review and always in line with the service I have received.

Why not at least post a link? As it is, we've no idea who you're talking about.

Offline bhudda



It terms of keeping to yourself, never forget the balance: If she is trying to make a living as an escort in your area, and she does not earn enough, she will move on.  A review can put up prices or reduce availability, but it can also keep a favourite near by and working.

Indeed ... one of the nicest lasses i ever met (pre ukp) gave up because it seemed me and some other bloke in brighton were the only people who ever booked her. I met her about 4 times over a couple of months, not sure how often the other bloke met her but was more than once. But for some reason her profile on aw just didnt seem to attract anyone else.

She did say that although she was giving up on aw she would still continue to meet me ... but she didnt  :(

Offline Liverpool

These threads where someone has come across a gem/been robbed/found out the SP is a post op etc and dangle the fact that they will review in good time and then don't for ages are very pointless. Post the review and the discussion will go from there. This just seems an attempt to bolster post numbers.

Offline Jerk Chicken

I think this is an excellent post OP so thank you.

Since I joined UKP I have not done many TOFTT but done a few.

Miss Seduisante springs to mind. I could not believe this WG could offer that level of service and had so many positive reviews on AW but not one review on UKP. I had to conclude that there were multiple sneaky fuckers on UKP keeping her to themselves for fear they won't be able to get a booking in future.

Not much we can do about it but nice to get it out there!
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Malvolio

The pricier the WG is, the less likely someone's going to punt her - this may explain some WGs going unreviewed.

There's also a tendency for someone to be called out as a tout if he gives a positive first review to an expensive WG.

Me, I have a £150 price limit for a punt and I stick to it, so I wouldn't be seeing Miss Seduisante, although she does look good.

Offline Jerk Chicken

The pricier the WG is, the less likely someone's going to punt her - this may explain some WGs going unreviewed.

There's also a tendency for someone to be called out as a tout if he gives a positive first review to an expensive WG.

Me, I have a £150 price limit for a punt and I stick to it, so I wouldn't be seeing Miss Seduisante, although she does look good.

I too typically have a benchmark of £150 although I occasionally go over that. Despite Miss Seduisante's rate of £190 I simply do not believe, although I have no evidence to back it up, that she could have been whoring this long, bundles of AW positives without a UKP member sampling the goods. I am dam sure there are plenty of others like her as OP's post has eluded to. At the other end of the scale XX Petite Anna XX @ £100/ph is another TOFTT example of mine. Great slim VFM punt who I have punted loads of times. I believe some punks were keeping her secret too!
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline shyboy1

I’ve never understood the concept of leaving a long time between meetings and reviewing, especially in cases like this where it’s obviously going to be a strong positive.
Seems to me it’s far better to get the info out there to help others which is the whole point of this site.
The anonymity argument doesn’t really cut it as even if the SP does remember the meeting from the review she still can’t identify you unless you’ve used your real name on here! Chances are she’ll remember your face anyway even if you wait a couple of months.
Far better I think to do the review whithin a couple of days of meet while it’s still fresh in your mind.
I used to think SP’s would forget you after a day or two but over the years I’ve realised that’s not the case in a lot of cases especially the lower volume girls.
SB

Offline Home Alone

I've been toying with seeing a series of SPs in the NW who are what I'd have called, 'SPs who've slipped under the Radar". By which I mean SPs who've been on AW for a number of years and, you'd think, are providing a satisfactory service, otherwise they wouldn't still be on AW week after week. But they've got very few Reviews on here - none in some cases.

However, I've been seduced by a thread of Malvolio's some weeks ago and am now planning a European punting holiday for when the pandemic's cleared. So, if any of you guys want to try seeing those SPs who've slipped under your Regional Radar, be my guest! :D

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,315
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
I’ve never understood the concept of leaving a long time between meetings and reviewing, especially in cases like this where it’s obviously going to be a strong positive.
Seems to me it’s far better to get the info out there to help others which is the whole point of this site.
The anonymity argument doesn’t really cut it as even if the SP does remember the meeting from the review she still can’t identify you unless you’ve used your real name on here! Chances are she’ll remember your face anyway even if you wait a couple of months.
Far better I think to do the review whithin a couple of days of meet while it’s still fresh in your mind.
I used to think SP’s would forget you after a day or two but over the years I’ve realised that’s not the case in a lot of cases especially the lower volume girls.
SB
There are punters who do not want their AW accounts linked to their names on here, far better an escort recognising you by your AW name than the name used on here. It's all down to the individual how discrete they want to be and what needs to be done to maintain that level of discretion.

Personally I write the review up and save it on a word document just after the punt, that also gives me the chance to edit it before posting.   

Offline shyboy1

There are punters who do not want their AW accounts linked to their names on here, far better an escort recognising you by your AW name than the name used on here. It's all down to the individual how discrete they want to be and what needs to be done to maintain that level of discretion.

Personally I write the review up and save it on a word document just after the punt, that also gives me the chance to edit it before posting.
Yes I see your point about linking accounts but as both sites are hopefully anonymous I wouldn’t worry too much. Unless you’ve done something daft like leave a bareback review  :scare:
I personally would be more worried about saving my reviews on a word document, I’m not particularly good with tech so I’d be frightened of sitting in front of tv with the Daughter and a review scrolling across the screen with my iCloud pics!
« Last Edit: August 02, 2020, 09:33:33 pm by shyboy1 »

Online RogerBoner

I stopped reviewing massage parlours that claim to be 100% legit but actually aren't because it can wind up UKP members that don't get extras. I had to apologise and send a small gift to one such madam who was angry that I'd betrayed her trust. I have shared some reviews using PM. But I couldn't bring myself to review a couple that I was completely fluffy about, silly I know.

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,315
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
Yes I see your point about linking accounts but as both sites are hopefully anonymous I wouldn’t worry too much. Unless you’ve done something daft like leave a bareback review  :scare:
I personally would be more worried about saving my reviews on a word document, I’m not particularly good with tech so I’d be frightened of sitting in front of tv with the Daughter and a review scrolling across the screen with my iCloud pics!
That's the thing we are all different, we all have different reasons for doing things the way we do, the linking AW names was just one example, posting a review straight away suits you but not everyone. I don't have a problem saving one on word, you do. We all need to do things in the way that suits us. That's why, despite repeated suggestions there should be one, there isn't a template for reviews and we allow up to six months after the event to post one.