Barebackers targeting no bb girls

[Tom5334]

I googled to see if she's any new reviews as was planning another visit, I reviewed her on the London boards a few months ago.

Her name came up on a barebacker/bug chaser forum, one of the posters on there had arranged a bb session with her after offering extra money. I continued reading the thread, the bb'ers were actively targeting 'non bb' girls and seeing how much extra cash it takes to get them to bareback.

Quite a few popular London girls cropped up as targets for them, extra 100 or 200 quid for the girls to allow bareback.

These fuckers sicken me, it makes you wonder if punting is worth the risk. I can accept a small risk from OWO and would never bb myself, but if you've got bug chasers and bb'ers looking to pay over the odds, I'm not sure it's a game I want to keep playing.

[Jimmybob]

Certainly worry even if you don't bb yourself. What if you are with one of these girls and the condom breaks? If often happens. 

[hendrix]

The reality, I believe, is that all escorts provide bareback to somebody, whether that's pimps, boyfriends or punters who pay for it. Ultimately, it's a risk/reward game. You can only look after yourself, you have no control about what might have just happened with the previous punter

[CBPaul]

An eye opener isn't it.

Seems it's viewed as a challenge by some, getting a no barebacker to go bareback and then they think triumphantly that they are the first to take her bareback  These people also seem think it's an achievement to cum inside when they've been told not to and the prossie gets pissed off.

I've had prossies tell me that it is quite common to be asked about bareback and to be offered extra cash for it, sometimes a stupid amount of cash which seems to increase the younger and fitter the prossie is.

No doubt plenty take the extra cash so the obvious thing to do is assume they've done it at some point and assess your own risks from there.

Of course plenty of the stories are going to be fantasy land punters and many seeking bareback will just stick with the rotating Romanians that actively offer it. Good luck to them if that's what they want, no need to pollute my punting stream though.

[Sir Lance-a-lot]

Well, most of those "rotating Romanians" probably don't offer it, as they don't seem to know what it means, and it almost invariably gets added to most EE profiles by the pimp without the WG's knowledge.

But this is what has always puzzled me about the BB scene.  I will never understand bugchasers, but surely there are guys out there who just prefer sex without a condom and are prepared to accept the extra risk.  But surely it's in their interests to reduce that risk by picking just one regular to BB with - so why do BB girls move around so much?  It's also in THEIR interests to reduce their own exposure to STI's by sticking with regulars - so why tour the country, picking up STI's all over the place, and forcing any non-bugchaser BB punter to see a different WG every few weeks?

Perhaps there are actually only a very small handful of WG's who really offer bareback, and they're the ones who stay put.

[cunnyhunt]

I have posted this before.

A friend and I picked 10 local profiles at random and questioned who would bareback, the results were 6/7 gave a yes answer and it was confirmed by a phone call with no misunderstanding.
3 or 4 asked for more money (£10-£30)

Never believe what a pro$$ie says if they say they do not BB.

[Jimmybob]

The reality, I believe, is that all escorts provide bareback to somebody, whether that's pimps, boyfriends or punters who pay for it. Ultimately, it's a risk/reward game. You can only look after yourself, you have no control about what might have just happened with the previous punter

Agreed Hendrix. But its a different thing if the girl has been barebacking with known bug chasers. God knows what they have picked up and passed on. The girl may not even know, IF she goes to gum clinic, which most I think do not, std's dont show up for a length of time.

[CBPaul]

Well, most of those "rotating Romanians" probably don't offer it, as they don't seem to know what it means, and it almost invariably gets added to most EE profiles by the pimp without the WG's knowledge.

But this is what has always puzzled me about the BB scene.  I will never understand bugchasers, but surely there are guys out there who just prefer sex without a condom and are prepared to accept the extra risk.  But surely it's in their interests to reduce that risk by picking just one regular to BB with - so why do BB girls move around so much?  It's also in THEIR interests to reduce their own exposure to STI's by sticking with regulars - so why tour the country, picking up STI's all over the place, and forcing any non-bugchaser BB punter to see a different WG every few weeks?

Perhaps there are actually only a very small handful of WG's who really offer bareback, and they're the ones who stay put.

I don't doubt that many don't know what is on the profile, it's the same issue with kissing, OWO, in fact anything that requires some effort.

I can't see how seeing a regular barebacker is going to reduce risk that much, she'll be taking loads from plenty of punters between visits, whether she moves around or not. As for the moving around I doubt they have a great deal of choice in some cases, for those that do it's probably far more lucrative - new area = more punters.

[smiths]

I googled to see if she's any new reviews as was planning another visit, I reviewed her on the London boards a few months ago.

Her name came up on a barebacker/bug chaser forum, one of the posters on there had arranged a bb session with her after offering extra money. I continued reading the thread, the bb'ers were actively targeting 'non bb' girls and seeing how much extra cash it takes to get them to bareback.

Quite a few popular London girls cropped up as targets for them, extra 100 or 200 quid for the girls to allow bareback.

These fuckers sicken me, it makes you wonder if punting is worth the risk. I can accept a small risk from OWO and would never bb myself, but if you've got bug chasers and bb'ers looking to pay over the odds, I'm not sure it's a game I want to keep playing.

Welcome to the real world of punting, its not a pastime for the squeamish in my view. I punt on a risk to reward basis, taking the risks i see as worth the rewards, so i require OWO but wouldnt do BB.

Of course someone saying a WG has offered them BB who i dont know and/or hasnt any credibility in my eyes doesnt make what they say true. It could be a rival WG or pimp trying to damage a WGs reputation for example.

ANY WG who is prepared to offer BB to a punter for an additional cost is one very stupid woman in my opinion. WGs can earn good money without needing to offer BB. And ANY punter who does BB with a WG is also one very stupid guy, neither obviously know what the other has been doing and with whom. It must be the case there is a call for BB in punting otherwise WGs wouldnt advertise they offered it over not advertising they dont offer it.

[pianodave]

All you can do is look after yourself as well as possible, no point worrying about what others do.

Those bug chasers have made their own risk/reward decision. They obviously think the extra pleasure is worth the risk. I guess I'm lucky in that I really don't feel sex is that much different with a decent condom, feels perfectly fine to me and have never even thought about having BB with a WG. I've even been with civvies who felt better with a johnny on, due to some weird shaped fanny inside that hurt my cock end.

But i guess if a condom totally ruins sex for you, it might be worth the risk - as it seems to be for these guys.

No point getting irate, you can't control other's actions. Best not to worry, wrap yourself up and let others decide their own risk.

[SamLP]

This is one thing I miss as I'm out of a relationship. All the married men can BB their wives and have safe fun with a WG.

However it's verging on criminal or mental for a punter to BB a girl not knowing who she's done and what they have, and for a WG to offer it not knowing what the punter has. An extra £100 won't protect them for an STD.

[Boundless]

Fuck me!
You think you've got punting sorted then this pops up.
I'd never heard of bug chasers and now I've googled it and looked at some BC sites I feel quite queasy. 

I totally agree with the other posters on here re risk/reward and I am quite happy with the decisions I've made as to what I do with whom, but this is certainly food for thought.

[Boundless]

This is one thing I miss as I'm out of a relationship. All the married men can BB their wives and have safe fun with a WG.

However it's verging on criminal or mental for a punter to BB a girl not knowing who she's done and what they have, and for a WG to offer it not knowing what the punter has. An extra £100 won't protect them for an STD.

I agree.
In the days when sex was on the menu at home it was always BB of course, there's nothing quite like the feeling of cumming in a nice warm wet pussy.
There's no way I'd BB a WG in a million years, unless of course there was a doctor present to certify that she was disease free and preferably a virgin!