Do you write a review for every positive?

[beanfarmer05]

Just wondering, if you guys go and see a well recommended escort, and have a good time, do you still post a review every time?

I'm talking about those with dozens of positive reviews, and when you see her you enjoy it, her services and looks still match previous descriptions..

Obviously if it was a negative I'd review, or if her looks or services or prices had changed dramatically.

Just curious where others stand on this

[MrMatrix]

I will do a positive review if I do a punt, irrespective of how many positives she has. Thats the whole purpose of this site --- Reviews.

[HarryZZ]

Reviews need to be kept up to date, a review from 2 years ago is no good, so just because there are plenty of other reviews isn’t a reason not to review her.
Although I broadly agree that there’s little point post the third review of the week, especially if they all say the same thing.

[daviemac]

Admin changed the rules on reviews recently.   

Only one positive review thread can be posted for a service provider by one member per 12 month period, the exception is if the new positive review is for a threesome or more booking. This 12-month restriction only applies to positive reviews, not neutral or negative (they can be posted anytime after a positive review). During the 12-month period a member can add their new positive reviews to their existing review thread in the form of a reply.

[Stud01]

Agree with the rule changes. I am not sure what is the point of having multiple positive reviews by the same punter for the same WG.

If it is different punters having positive reviews for the WG, then fair enough.

[revoltra]

Agree with the rule changes. I am not sure what is the point of having multiple positive reviews by the same punter for the same WG.

If it is different punters having positive reviews for the WG, then fair enough.

I agreed.  It would get very boring to keep reviewing the same regular WG that I visit on a regular basic. Just once and let the world know should be sufficient.

[bushman]

I do reviews mostly for my negative experiences, unless I have a different opinion from a prevouis positive about a WG.
Multiple positives lead to some WG increasing rates and sometimes reducing quality of service.
Say I go to punt a girl with 20 positives and since no superstar can maintain a super performance day in and day out. Somebody must get her on a bad at day somepoint. Reading 20 positives may then cloud my opinion in such a way that the bad review comes sugar coated.

[daviemac]

Agree with the rule changes. I am not sure what is the point of having multiple positive reviews by the same punter for the same WG.

If it is different punters having positive reviews for the WG, then fair enough.

I agree no point in repeatedly reviewing the same one, that said a different punter should review no matter how many she has, it shows consistency in the standard of service.   

[vw]

Just wondering, if you guys go and see a well recommended escort, and have a good time, do you still post a review every time?

I'm talking about those with dozens of positive reviews, and when you see her you enjoy it, her services and looks still match previous descriptions..

Obviously if it was a negative I'd review, or if her looks or services or prices had changed dramatically.

Just curious where others stand on this

If you want to and have time o the review, there however is a new rule about positives to stop the fluffies spamming with similar reviews.

- Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking (e.g. verbally or by textual messaging). A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only requirement is that the she had accepted the initial booking. Only one review thread is permissible per punt. Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread, neither should a single punt be split into multiple review threads. Do not post the same review in multiple regions. Only sex workers can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency / establishment / brothel. Past or current sex workers or anyone related to a sex worker (e.g. boyfriend) may not review any other sex worker. Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicised by the service provider). Massage-only reviews without any sexual services are permitted, but ideally should make it clear in the topic title. Only one positive review thread can be posted for a service provider by one member per 12 month period, the exception is if the new positive review is for a threesome or more booking. This 12-month restriction only applies to positive reviews, not neutral or negative (they can be posted anytime after a positive review). During the 12-month period a member can add their new positive reviews to their existing review thread in the form of a reply.

[Jock D]

Agree 100% with Admin's new rules re: Reviews. There were a few guilty of reviewing the same bird on the Scottish board...thankfully the main culprits have gone.

[FLYING BLUE]

Yes - (because it helps others as I've been helped on this forum) But, only in accordance with site rules below;

Only one positive review thread can be posted for a service provider by one member per 12 month period, the exception is if the new positive review is for a threesome or more booking. This 12-month restriction only applies to positive reviews, not neutral or negative (they can be posted anytime after

[Littlefoot]

Just wondering, if you guys go and see a well recommended escort, and have a good time, do you still post a review every time?

I'm talking about those with dozens of positive reviews, and when you see her you enjoy it, her services and looks still match previous descriptions..

Obviously if it was a negative I'd review, or if her looks or services or prices had changed dramatically.

Just curious where others stand on this

Yes I do, on the basis of, let’s say the girl has 25 positives. In my review I might add something that may seem very insignificant to most, which no one might of mentioned before , but some punter might think yeah I like the sound of that, or they may think the opposite, and it may help to put them off!

For example I may mention she was breathing down my ear, (which drives me crazy) but may have not been mentioned in any other review as the previous reviewers may thought it not important enough to mention, or I may say she gobbed all over my cock, (which I like) that may put some off! Basically I think all reviews help, sticking to the rules of course.

[Billy no mates]

I saw a girl last October time, I had a great time, we sort of became erstwhile friends.

We text, iregularly, about life stuff mostly (she has a boyfriend who doesnt know she escorts). She noticed some of my hobbies (was an outcall to my house) and we share a passion for video games (I have full standing machines in my home, which she was curious about). She is also quite young/new/niaive and I believe not fully the right 'character' to be an escort, currently she has stopped escorting/quit.

She is already reviewed on this site (positive). I do not now always review so quickly (I did at first), because sometimes I am still caught up in the euphoria. By the time came to write my review of her (mid november). I felt I would no longer be objective, as I actually come to like her as a person. So I decided not to wirte a review of her, it would have been a positive if I had.

I have never seen her again as an escort, and could not bring myself to now.

[mrhappypants]

Just wondering, if you guys go and see a well recommended escort, and have a good time, do you still post a review every time?

I'm talking about those with dozens of positive reviews, and when you see her you enjoy it, her services and looks still match previous descriptions..

Obviously if it was a negative I'd review, or if her looks or services or prices had changed dramatically.

Just curious where others stand on this

The short answer to your question is yes.  Publish one positive review of a working girl even if she has many others.  As others have pointed out, publish only one positive review within the timespan specified in the rules, not a positive review for every meeting.

My belief?  The guiding principle for review ratings should be the effect they have on the overal aggregate. 

For the uninitiated the aggregate rating was introduced to UKP about 2 years ago.  It records a summary of the rating recorded with each and every review of a particular profile any time the link is quoted.   

The aggregate is a very powerful high level evaluation of the track record of a WG (or more specifically, a profile).  Record a positive to indicate an unreserved recommendation.  Record a neutral to indicate a recommendation with reservations or cautions.  Record a negative as a warning to other punters.  Rating within this discipline allows the reader to interpret Ellie Rose 96 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative aggregate to mean that 96 different punters each recommend without reservation based on their experience.  None have reservations.  None want to warn about her.

For this reason the guidance on the review writing guide has recently been revised.   Some (notably VW) doubt the aggregates usefulness.  Be that as it may it provides a guiding principle for how we complete individual ratings.

[myothernameis]

Agree 100% with Admin's new rules re: Reviews. There were a few guilty of reviewing the same bird on the Scottish board...thankfully the main culprits have gone.

I know I have reviewed the same escort a few times, and another member had picked up on this, but each of my reviews had something positive to say about my bookings

Could have added another 2 more reviews of the same escort, but each review would have its own merits, but do like admins new rule, and the fact it doesn't stop you adding to your review

[king tarzan]

I write honest reviews for every punt.
Whether proceeded or aborted..

I am sure judging by the mood I am writing in the chaps get am instant sense of how the show went..

[MrMatrix]

I actually write a review of every punt I do. Whether they get posted depends how I feel. I have regulars so they dont get posted - I will probably post the first punt with them.
If I get a negative, neutral , or B&S they always get posted. If its my first time with a well reviewed SP and its a positive I will still post at some stage.
So any review  I do will be done within 12 hours but may not get posted immeadiately.
I agree with Admins new ruling of not posting positives on the same SP within 12 months. Two of my regulars do access this site, they dont know who I am and I intend to keep it that way. If I'm disappointed in a regular it goes into my personnal review, which I may or may not post. If I feel their service falls short of my expectation I have no qualms about dropping to a lesser marking. For instance I'm with a regular this week and she clock watched- pissed off or what. I've done my review and I have mentioned this and she will still get a positive as rest was good. Its then up to the reader to make their own opinion as to what their expectations are if they see this SP as a result of reading any review. Just reinforces that they only care about money and not always the customer. Thats why we should all contribute by way of reviews.

[yodeling]

they can go badass in a few months so things can change rapidly .. a russian gal in soho was really very nice when she arrived and became a badass a few months later ..ended up in a big row with her and never went back..complete personality change

[Spacecowb0y]

Good,bad or neutral -they all get a review, otherwise what's the point of being here. You put info in, you get info out.
Can't stand leeches in any walk of life.

[MrMatrix]

Good,bad or neutral -they all get a review, otherwise what's the point of being here. You put info in, you get info out.
Can't stand leeches in any walk of life.

+1. Me neither.

[S_holmes]

The short answer to your question is yes.  Publish one positive review of a working girl even if she has many others.  As others have pointed out, publish only one positive review within the timespan specified in the rules, not a positive review for every meeting.

My belief?  The guiding principle for review ratings should be the effect they have on the overal aggregate. 

For the uninitiated the aggregate rating was introduced to UKP about 2 years ago.  It records a summary of the rating recorded with each and every review of a particular profile any time the link is quoted.   

 But don’t forget the first rule of UKPunting: always check that Mrhappypants agrees with your own personal rating before posting a review...such a sanctimonious sh*t -  clue is in the description and has  F all to do with you

The aggregate is a very powerful high level evaluation of the track record of a WG (or more specifically, a profile).  Record a positive to indicate an unreserved recommendation.  Record a neutral to indicate a recommendation with reservations or cautions.  Record a negative as a warning to other punters.  Rating within this discipline allows the reader to interpret Ellie Rose 96 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative aggregate to mean that 96 different punters each recommend without reservation based on their experience.  None have reservations.  None want to warn about her.

For this reason the guidance on the review writing guide has recently been revised.   Some (notably VW) doubt the aggregates usefulness.  Be that as it may it provides a guiding principle for how we complete individual ratings.

[Alvin]

I don't review every punt as I tend to see a couple of SP'sregularly and I do however review all my negatives.

[shagmore]

I try to, apart from ones that I have seen many a time. Also ones that would easily give my AW identity away - especially ones with only a few reviews.
The way I see it, I use the reviews of others as a guide so its only fair to repay the service

[munterhunter]

Personally NO. I see a couple of women on a reasonably regular basis and what we do follows an established pattern so reviewing the same woman doing the same thing just for the sake of it seems pretty pointless. In fact this site has recently introduced a rule whereby you can only review a WG once a year unless you are raising a negative or you see her as part of a duo.
Previously on here I've done repeat reviews on here for the same lady but always several months apart so I think the new rule is sensible. As for feedback I've left and received that more frequently just saying "Another great meeting with xxxx" but not after every meeting.
Reviews and Field Reports are there to inform others so I see little point in repeating the same information every time you see someone.

[Denholm]

I try to review whenever I punt a new girl, but have to admit there's a few I haven't bothered reviewing because they already have >10 positives on here and I had nothing to add that hadn't already been said

[Malvolio]

No reason not to - good to have as much info as possible on WGs on here.