On the contrary to everyone else's comment i think its a bit harsh on the reviewer. Most of the replies are too critical and not everyone has the ability to write a review that is supported by the reviewing community, nor might they have the ability to write a concise, literal masterpiece. Yes, i know like all you guys, certain information needs to be included to be deemed as an informative review.....price, location any tips etc, but to flog the poor guy for his shit review (and i agree it was for many reasons) is unfair.
I think we all have to remember that no everyone can write a Mills and Boon representation of the meeting and new posters, regardless of the time they actually joined the forum, still have the right if they feel the need to tell us on their experience, no matter how good or bad. I think at this time, Noirtier felt the time had come to write his first review even though he'd had many punts. Sure anyone who adds up the positive's against the negative's will make up their own mind about the suitability of Bethany. We all know the review is shit but what we want is to encourage the first time reviewers, who havent just turned up asking for help on other punts to contribute so it helps us all in the future.
I think flogging the poor guys for his inability to write a great literal review only lessons the chance that he may come back, for the fear of receiving another dressing down. Maybe he just needs guidance in the future so we can gleam more effective info from any future reviews. After all we still have to respect that this was HIS opinion of how he felt and not matter if we agree or not he still felt compelled to let us know, albeit not in the most informative way.
I will await your critique dear friends....