Bethany Diamond of Newcastle

[Noirtier]

External Link/Members Only

Bethany had very good reviews on here so I am sorry but I must post a negative view. My incall experience with her was most disappointing. I will not go into extensive detail and whilst the pre meeting communications were good, and whilst the location was entirely satisfactory the meeting itself was a big disappointment. The whole encounter was impersonal, unexciting, and had not a trace of eroticism. Most certainly I was brought orally to orgasm but the event was mechanical and devoid of sexual charisma. Over the last few years I have met my share of escorts, not a large number but enough to form a view. I can say that they were at best outstanding and at worst satisfactory but this is the first time I have felt the need to post a negative review. Perhaps the lack of enthusiasm from Bethany was due to a feeling of repugnance towards me but that is the risk an escort must take and yet be prepared to provide an enthusiastic service. All I can say is that if Bethany appeals to you be prepared to establish up front precisely what you seek. I did not and suffered the disappointing consequences.

[The Outsider]

Over the last few years I have met my share of escorts, not a large number but enough to form a view. I can say that they were at best outstanding and at worst satisfactory but this is the first time I have felt the need to post a negative review.

Maybe you'd be kind enough to post some reviews of these other ladies so we can read your comments on Bethany in the context of what you normally expect?  You've been signed up since 2015, so this quite a way to finally introduce yourself. 

[daviemac]

Not sure I would even class this as a review, no duration of meet, price paid, services expected and very little detail. Seems more like a moan to be.   

[Knight Templar]

If he isn't going to go into extensive detail , what's the bleeding point , we could all write a review saying " oh it was crap and she found me ugly ". I thought the whole point was to give future punters the heads up on service and what is on offer; sorry but this isn't a review as another poster  had pointed out  its more like a moan
 

[Kev3773]

Not a review 

[Moresomes]

 Had her on my hot list for quite some time.
Now I'm on the horns of a dilemma. Do I go on the 23 positive reviews, or an eight line whinge from someone who has posted once in eighteen months just to say that the S/P (probably) viewed him as an ugly twat.

[Captain bowler]

Time will tell if this is a genuine account of a meeting that took place or a malicious review.
My money is on the latter.

[Shearer1955]

If putting up a review on here you would think the op would have done the same on her AW account but no negative rating there

Jess says she won't see anybody without 5 recent feedbacks; perhaps he has them but again only 1 post here so the authenticity of the review is quesionable 

[toon972]

Looking forward to your reviews if they are better than Bethany or this op is irrelevant.

[Shearer1955]

My earlier post should have read Bethany not Jess - apologies

[Looking4fun]

Another non review,no details,prices etc

[Tiger63]

External Link/Members Only

Bethany had very good reviews on here so I am sorry but I must post a negative view. My incall experience with her was most disappointing. I will not go into extensive detail and whilst the pre meeting communications were good, and whilst the location was entirely satisfactory the meeting itself was a big disappointment. The whole encounter was impersonal, unexciting, and had not a trace of eroticism. Most certainly I was brought orally to orgasm but the event was mechanical and devoid of sexual charisma. Over the last few years I have met my share of escorts, not a large number but enough to form a view. I can say that they were at best outstanding and at worst satisfactory but this is the first time I have felt the need to post a negative review. Perhaps the lack of enthusiasm from Bethany was due to a feeling of repugnance towards me but that is the risk an escort must take and yet be prepared to provide an enthusiastic service. All I can say is that if Bethany appeals to you be prepared to establish up front precisely what you seek. I did not and suffered the disappointing consequences.

Maybe we should have a pointless rambling section.

[itsonlyonce]

On the contrary to everyone else's comment i think its a bit harsh on the reviewer. Most of the replies are too critical and not everyone has the ability to write a review that is supported by the reviewing community, nor might they have the ability to write a concise, literal masterpiece. Yes, i know like all you guys, certain information needs to be included to be deemed as an informative review.....price, location any tips etc, but to flog the poor guy for his shit review (and i agree it was for many reasons) is unfair.

I think we all have to remember that no everyone can write a Mills and Boon representation of the meeting and new posters, regardless of the time they actually joined the forum, still have the right if they feel the need to tell us on their experience, no matter how good or bad. I think at this time, Noirtier felt the time had come to write his first review even though he'd had many punts. Sure anyone who adds up the positive's against the negative's will make up their own mind about the suitability of Bethany. We all know the review is shit but what we want is to encourage the first time reviewers, who havent just turned up asking for help on other punts to contribute so it helps us all in the future.

I think flogging the poor guys for his inability to write a great literal review only lessons the chance that he may come back, for the fear of receiving another dressing down. Maybe he just needs guidance in the future so we can gleam more effective info from any future reviews. After all we still have to respect that this was HIS opinion of how he felt and not matter if we agree or not he still felt compelled to let us know, albeit not in the most informative way.

I will await your critique dear friends....

[Kev3773]

On the contrary to everyone else's comment i think its a bit harsh on the reviewer. Most of the replies are too critical and not everyone has the ability to write a review that is supported by the reviewing community, nor might they have the ability to write a concise, literal masterpiece. Yes, i know like all you guys, certain information needs to be included to be deemed as an informative review.....price, location any tips etc, but to flog the poor guy for his shit review (and i agree it was for many reasons) is unfair.

I think we all have to remember that no everyone can write a Mills and Boon representation of the meeting and new posters, regardless of the time they actually joined the forum, still have the right if they feel the need to tell us on their experience, no matter how good or bad. I think at this time, Noirtier felt the time had come to write his first review even though he'd had many punts. Sure anyone who adds up the positive's against the negative's will make up their own mind about the suitability of Bethany. We all know the review is shit but what we want is to encourage the first time reviewers, who havent just turned up asking for help on other punts to contribute so it helps us all in the future.

I think flogging the poor guys for his inability to write a great literal review only lessons the chance that he may come back, for the fear of receiving another dressing down. Maybe he just needs guidance in the future so we can gleam more effective info from any future reviews. After all we still have to respect that this was HIS opinion of how he felt and not matter if we agree or not he still felt compelled to let us know, albeit not in the most informative way.

I will await your critique dear friends....

I myself only stated that it wasn't a review which it isn't. You make a fair point, however I disagree on the point of the op being able to write a literal masterpiece. From his wording he is obviously well versed in writing so should have used his knowledge to not make the mistakes he has ie:- lack of details as per site rules. He has been logged on recently so has had the opportunity to explain his position should he wish to continue to be a useful member of this site. 

[The Outsider]

On the contrary to everyone else's comment i think its a bit harsh on the reviewer.

I welcome any reviews, and I'll also support people who have less than positive experiences with popular girls. It does happen, and I've experienced it myself.  It just seems odd to launch into this random criticism as first post. We actually have no idea what went on. 

How long was the meeting, what did he pay, where was it, what services were expected and delivered.  If we have that information, we can balance his review against the others. 

Also, if he know girls who are better than Bethany, I'd like him to share that information!

[Shearer1955]

My argument is not so much about the content (although it is very limited ) but the legitimacy of it; this is only my impression but i think it could have been written by a woman - the lack of real sexual references, the preciseness of the language, absence of specifics about the punt, the general tone & attempting to undermine the escort with understated criticism - perhaps i'm wrong  & has been written by a true gent but it reads to me as though the language is soft for want of a better word 

Mebbe I'm just a silly old twat but it would be interesting if the op offers a reply

[MagpieJohn]

On the contrary to everyone else's comment i think its a bit harsh on the reviewer. Most of the replies are too critical and not everyone has the ability to write a review that is supported by the reviewing community, nor might they have the ability to write a concise, literal masterpiece. Yes, i know like all you guys, certain information needs to be included to be deemed as an informative review.....price, location any tips etc, but to flog the poor guy for his shit review (and i agree it was for many reasons) is unfair.

I think we all have to remember that no everyone can write a Mills and Boon representation of the meeting and new posters, regardless of the time they actually joined the forum, still have the right if they feel the need to tell us on their experience, no matter how good or bad. I think at this time, Noirtier felt the time had come to write his first review even though he'd had many punts. Sure anyone who adds up the positive's against the negative's will make up their own mind about the suitability of Bethany. We all know the review is shit but what we want is to encourage the first time reviewers, who havent just turned up asking for help on other punts to contribute so it helps us all in the future.

I think flogging the poor guys for his inability to write a great literal review only lessons the chance that he may come back, for the fear of receiving another dressing down. Maybe he just needs guidance in the future so we can gleam more effective info from any future reviews. After all we still have to respect that this was HIS opinion of how he felt and not matter if we agree or not he still felt compelled to let us know, albeit not in the most informative way.

I will await your critique dear friends....

I think many people are suspicious of the review not just because of the way it's written and the lack of detail or the fact that it's the members first review but also because this "review" is their first ever post.

[stanleyjohn]

My argument is not so much about the content (although it is very limited ) but the legitimacy of it; this is only my impression but i think it could have been written by a woman - the lack of real sexual references, the preciseness of the language, absence of specifics about the punt, the general tone & attempting to undermine the escort with understated criticism - perhaps i'm wrong  & has been written by a true gent but it reads to me as though the language is soft for want of a better word 

Mebbe I'm just a silly old twat but it would be interesting if the op offers a reply

+1

I am always dubious of a first time poster who after 2 yrs on here writes a review like that.

[Third Man]

it seems that so many new posters go right in at the deep end with a glowing positive or a controversial negative rather than take some part in the forum in some way to start with. no wonder long time posters query stuff like this

[Noirtier]

I have read with considerable amusement the various comments on my review.

Let me be clear. It is my review and I will decide how long it is and how detailed it is. If it is not to your liking then pass it by. If it is not to the liking of the Administration of this site then they can choose to delete it. Personally I cannot be bothered with long reviews that dot every "i" and cross every "t." I do not read such reviews but unlike some on here I do not immediately throw criticisms at the authors. Each to their own choice.

Some have cast suspicion because it is my first review here since joining this site in 2015. I do not have to explain but I will choose to do so. In the past I have always posted my reviews on the the Adultwork profile page of the lady in question. On this occasion, merely on a whim, I thought I would post on here. Sadly I was unaware that there are some who seem only too ready to criticise. May I suggest that those who are so ready to criticise are hardly encouraging people to start to post reviews here.

Finally to the gentleman who suggested I might be female all I can say is that last time I looked I had a penis and no sign of a vagina!

[Kev3773]

I have read with considerable amusement the various comments on my review.

Let me be clear. It is my review and I will decide how long it is and how detailed it is. If it is not to your liking then pass it by. If it is not to the liking of the Administration of this site then they can choose to delete it. Personally I cannot be bothered with long reviews that dot every "i" and cross every "t." I do not read such reviews but unlike some on here I do not immediately throw criticisms at the authors. Each to their own choice.

Some have cast suspicion because it is my first review here since joining this site in 2015. I do not have to explain but I will choose to do so. In the past I have always posted my reviews on the the Adultwork profile page of the lady in question. On this occasion, merely on a whim, I thought I would post on here. Sadly I was unaware that there are some who seem only too ready to criticise. May I suggest that those who are so ready to criticise are hardly encouraging people to start to post reviews here.

Finally to the gentleman who suggested I might be female all I can say is that last time I looked I had a penis and no sign of a vagina!

Perhaps you should read the site rules. I still await your first review 

[Looking4fun]

Maybe you should read the guide on how to write reviews before your next review,it has some helpful tips & it also states what should be included in a review,
I.e. Services,location,price etc.
I said your review wasn't a review because it doesn't include any of that info?
I'll also point out I would have made the same remarks wether you are a first time reviewer or 101st time reviewer,the reviews on ukp are to help fellow punters make a decision on which girls to book,
Your attempt at a review doesn't help anyone make decision in my opinion.

[toon972]

I stick by what I posted and would like to know who these better girls are. There might be a hidden gem there or at worst a previously reviewed girl, which is still welcome. It also gives us an idea on your type of booking, which Bethany obviously is not.

[Noirtier]

Well gentlemen correspondents I have learned much from you and am grateful. I have to tell Mr alfie2013 that I am not remotely interested in the site rules and I have to tell Mr Looking4fun that I have no interest in a guide to writing a review.

What you have absolutely taught me is that whilst this site may be useful for picking up information, and I will continue to use it for that, it is not a site where I would wish to make postings of any kind. For the purposes of submitting escort reviews I will return to Adultwork where I have never been subject to being harangued.

I take the opportunity to thank all those who took the time to read my review and comment upon it and I wish you all the best of luck.

[Kev3773]

Well gentlemen correspondents I have learned much from you and am grateful. I have to tell Mr alfie2013 that I am not remotely interested in the site rules and I have to tell Mr Looking4fun that I have no interest in a guide to writing a review.

What you have absolutely taught me is that whilst this site may be useful for picking up information, and I will continue to use it for that, it is not a site where I would wish to make postings of any kind. For the purposes of submitting escort reviews I will return to Adultwork where I have never been subject to being harangued.

I take the opportunity to thank all those who took the time to read my review and comment upon it and I wish you all the best of luck.

Pleased I won't have to read any more of your totally useless posts seen as this was your last one. 

[The Outsider]

Well gentlemen correspondents I have learned much from you and am grateful. I have to tell Mr alfie2013 that I am not remotely interested in the site rules and I have to tell Mr Looking4fun that I have no interest in a guide to writing a review......  it is not a site where I would wish to make postings of any kind.

I dare say we'll survive.  Close the door on your way out. 

[Noirtier]

Sorry I forgot one thing. Good manners cost nothing

[toon972]

Yeh continue lurking, I am sure you will continue to meet good reviewed girls.

[Shearer1955]

Good manners work both ways....there are rules which operate and people adhere to for the benefit of all on here so to say "I am not remotely interested in the site rules" smacks of ignorance & boorish behaviour of itself

[Kev3773]

Sorry I forgot one thing. Good manners cost nothing

Common sense costs the same  Is that definitely your last post ?

[walking dead]

Sorry I forgot one thing. Good manners cost nothing

You definitely sound like a girl?  Mother? !

[Name Not Found]

I have to tell Mr alfie2013 that I am not remotely interested in the site rules and I have to tell Mr Looking4fun that I have no interest in a guide to writing a review.

What the hell are you doing on a review site if you have no interest in its rules and no interest in writing a useful review?

[Looking4fun]

So the op normally leaves feedback on aw but this time he chooses to leave a review on here,I wonder why?bet theirs no aw feedback left after his/her booking.

[Kev3773]

Having reread the ops posts I too think there's a strong possibility they're written by a female. Possibly a rival, jealous of Bethany's popularity ( I've not seen her just going by reviews ) 

[Looking4fun]

Having reread the ops posts I too think there's a strong possibility they're written by a female. Possibly a rival, jealous of Bethany's popularity ( I've not seen her just going by reviews ) 

I'd say some wg that doesn't realise that January is normally a quite month for punting.

[MagpieJohn]

So the op normally leaves feedback on aw but this time he chooses to leave a review on here,I wonder why?bet theirs no aw feedback left after his/her booking.

Agreed. Perhaps it's because AW has RULES about leaving feedback that he's not interested in.