For those of a paedo nature?!

[Not_today]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Wtf, somewhat wrong isnt it?!

[Jamboney]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Wtf, somewhat wrong isnt it?!

There's quite a demand for this sort of thing which I've always found odd. There's a review of her from earlier this year, seemingly before she advertised the whole little girl thing. She actually looks quite hot in the more conventional pics that were added to the review.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=137676.msg1531056#msg1531056

[Scotpunter]

One of my past businesses was an online sex toys website. Before Lovehoney completely cornered the market. One of my best sellers were the schoolgirl outfit followed by the cheerleader one.

It is an incredibly common and harmless thing providing both parties are adults.

[Roth]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Wtf, somewhat wrong isnt it?!

Agree. Too much IMHO.

[bigmanbigman]

Agree. Too much IMHO.

too much too far

[scutty brown]

what do you make of this one?
External Link/Members Only

she wants to make films in which she appears to be underage, and if I remember correctly that would make the films illegal

[mrdiamond77]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Wtf, somewhat wrong isnt it?!

Agree.  That is taking things too far.        

[Doombar]

Yeah disgusts me.  Hopefully no one on her AW feedback list has the same name on here! 

[finn5555]

There is a demand for DD/LG roleplay and perfectly legal so as long as it does no harm crack on I say 

[Scotpunter]

what do you make of this one?
External Link/Members Only

she wants to make films in which she appears to be underage, and if I remember correctly that would make the films illegal

I think it is legal if the actress or actor is over 18. If it was illegal to make sexual images or movies where a girl appears younger then a number of top shelf magazines would of been illegal too. There used to be loads of 'Barely Legal type mags about pre internet.

Likewise mainstream films like 'Lolita' or 'Pretty Baby' would never of been screened.

[jamescornwall]

i believe she is over 18. to be honest~ i rather all the paedo go see her instead of going out raping little girl

[bigmanbigman]

i believe she is over 18. to be honest~ i rather all the paedo go see her instead of going out raping little girl

yes but turn that around and ? Not good at all

[MaxDeane]

I can confirm that Cherry is actually 22, just finished a degree at Bristol Uni. I saw her a couple of times this year, before that major profile overhaul. A nice shy seeming girl, extremely petite frame.

When I saw the revised profile I did DM her to say it was a bit much and not my bag, I think there is a blog comment on her AW page with her justifying the change in approach.

She has certainly been busy since the change, lots of guys obviously liking what she is doing.

[notcalledchris]

Big proper womanly tits are obviously there. I wouldnt have thought real pedos were attracted to them.

[Roth]

I can confirm that Cherry is actually 22, just finished a degree at Bristol Uni. I saw her a couple of times this year, before that major profile overhaul. A nice shy seeming girl, extremely petite frame.

When I saw the revised profile I did DM her to say it was a bit much and not my bag, I think there is a blog comment on her AW page with her justifying the change in approach.

She has certainly been busy since the change, lots of guys obviously liking what she is doing.

Concerning.

[Link7]

Completely fucked up. This young lady knows exactly what she's doing with the way this profile is set up, yes its a business decision, and she has a target market, but let's be honest and call that target market what they are.

For me, this is completely different to an adult who buys a school girl outfit or cheerleader outfit, that is aimed at a fantasy of a young (but sexually mature) girl. Think britney spears in her Baby One More Time video. When you think cheerleader you think of a college or uni age girl. It's 16+

This profile is aimed at a fantasy of a pre-pubescent girl. She is sucking a dummy in her gallery pics ffs. Obviously she will have some normal clients who just like the innocent student thing, but there will be some proper wrong'uns booking this girl, I guarantee it. To the guy who says it's better a paedo books her than commits a crime, aye but that's not how paedophilia works. In the end they will do both. Its a psychiatric disorder, they fancy kids, so booking this type of escort fantasy will encourage their desires. It's like those that view child pornography - it doesn't satisfy their desire, it makes them more likely to offend.

Surprised the girl is willing to go this far. Just shows when it's money at stake everything else goes out the window. It's not right. If she doesn't know that yet she should wait and see some of the geezers she comes across.

[Link7]

One of my past businesses was an online sex toys website. Before Lovehoney completely cornered the market. One of my best sellers were the schoolgirl outfit followed by the cheerleader one.

It is an incredibly common and harmless thing providing both parties are adults.

A primary school girl's outfit? Did it come with a sippy cup too? I should think not.

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

[Roth]

Link7 - you have said it all.  Agree. 

[GoodIdea]

Its a real shame. She was recommended to me by another WG but that was before this incarnation which makes me somewhat uncomfortable tbh.

[Bangers and Gash]

10/10 for those tits. 

[Terenas]

Link7 - you have said it all.  Agree. 

I'll second that Roth.

Some argue that it keeps paedos of the streets. I think it encourages them. They will go to extraordinary lengths to justify or rationalise their behaviour. She is doing that for them.

[finn5555]

10/10 for those tits. 

I would bang her dummy out cock in what's the problem 

[j4ckw1ll5]

Agree with others ref pedo thing & this being a step to far on how she's pitching herself.
However she's clearly pretty hot & has a great rack so if I was to book her I'd just request she dresses differently - student/college girl stuff not primary school!

[TerryTibbs]

I saw her walking through Bristol city centre yesterday.

See looked completely normal and very pretty.

No dummy in sight!

 

Terry 

[Link7]

  to those who back me up on this. Quite surprised there are even a few who think it's ok, think some of you are majorly missing the point.

Not saying normal blokes can't book her. The fact she has a proper woman's chest is all the more reason she could easily market herself as a young woman/cute student type.

Instead she has gone all out to attract nonces  because apparently it pays better. What kind of greedy, immoral...she is happy to pretend to be a toddler ffs

I don't fancy her at all but would never book even if I did, I'll have nothing to do with a woman who entertains nonces. She knows full well that Uncle Pete or whoever might enjoy his booking with her so much that he goes and tries it on his niece. Don't try and convince me that can't happen, because it can (and probably will), she's already told someone she's had a big increase in business, what type of blokes do you put that down to?

I've no issue with fetishes that harm nobody, we all have preferences and some people's are weird, I know that. But escorts who offer to act out paedophile fantasies  it is NOT a harmless sexual preference, it is a psychiatric disorder which causes so much harm, they need treatment, they do not need their sickness encouraged. Even if this girl is servicing just a few of them, it is very, very unhelpful in my view.

[vw]

to those who back me up on this. Quite surprised there are even a few who think it's ok, think some of you are majorly missing the point.

Not saying normal blokes can't book her. The fact she has a proper woman's chest is all the more reason she could easily market herself as a young woman/cute student type.

Instead she has gone all out to attract nonces  because apparently it pays better. What kind of greedy, immoral...she is happy to pretend to be a toddler ffs

I don't fancy her at all but would never book even if I did, I'll have nothing to do with a woman who entertains nonces. She knows full well that Uncle Pete or whoever might enjoy his booking with her so much that he goes and tries it on his niece. Don't try and convince me that can't happen, because it can (and probably will), she's already told someone she's had a big increase in business, what type of blokes do you put that down to?

I've no issue with fetishes that harm nobody, we all have preferences and some people's are weird, I know that. But escorts who offer to act out paedophile fantasies  it is NOT a harmless sexual preference, it is a psychiatric disorder which causes so much harm, they need treatment, they do not need their sickness encouraged. Even if this girl is servicing just a few of them, it is very, very unhelpful in my view.

Supposedly her new pimp is into this stuff

External Link/Members Only

according to those with wisdom on UKE

43 pages of comments for those that are interested

External Link/Members Only

I expect that lancspunter has been there

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=119789.msg1370727#msg1370727

[Roth]

Supposedly her new pimp is into this stuff

External Link/Members Only

according to those with wisdom on UKE

43 pages of comments for those that are interested

External Link/Members Only

I expect that lancspunter has been there

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=119789.msg1370727#msg1370727

Both of them sound sad old cunts.

[MaxDeane]

I find this really disturbing, thanks for the links to the UKE stuff, I'm on UKE but had missed that thread.

Like I posted above in this thread, I've seen Cherry a couple of times, both reviewed here. Thinking about the timing of my visits, the first was well before the profile change and was a cracking meet.

The second was already booked and scheduled before the change but happened a week or so after. Like I said above, I messaged her about the profile change, voicing my concerns about the disturbing images on the revised profile and got a message back stating: -

'I understand that my profile update isn't for everyone, but it is a niche that is working really well for me, however I am still the same person and will still provide the same service to you as before.'

The meet went ahead and although good, was not a patch on the first. I felt at the time that this was just one of those times when you don't click with a WG.

However, on reflection and having seen the suggestion on UKE that she now has a Dom/Owner/Pimp who has her head in a fucked up place I do feel that her attitude was altered, hard to put a finger on what it was but she seemed less engaged.

Proper shame that things have gone this way, first impression on the first meet were of a sweet, shy girl, who was just horny as fuck and had a pretty wide Kinky streak. I can imagine that a ProDom could have found her an easy target to manipulate.

[vw]

I find this really disturbing, thanks for the links to the UKE stuff, I'm on UKE but had missed that thread.

Like I posted above in this thread, I've seen Cherry a couple of times, both reviewed here. Thinking about the timing of my visits, the first was well before the profile change and was a cracking meet.

The second was already booked and scheduled before the change but happened a week or so after. Like I said above, I messaged her about the profile change, voicing my concerns about the disturbing images on the revised profile and got a message back stating: -

'I understand that my profile update isn't for everyone, but it is a niche that is working really well for me, however I am still the same person and will still provide the same service to you as before.'

The meet went ahead and although good, was not a patch on the first. I felt at the time that this was just one of those times when you don't click with a WG.

However, on reflection and having seen the suggestion on UKE that she now has a Dom/Owner/Pimp who has her head in a fucked up place I do feel that her attitude was altered, hard to put a finger on what it was but she seemed less engaged.

Proper shame that things have gone this way, first impression on the first meet were of a sweet, shy girl, who was just horny as fuck and had a pretty wide Kinky streak. I can imagine that a ProDom could have found her an easy target to manipulate.

She was sound when i had comms with her bit could never match diaries, before profile change.

sure she used to work for hampshire parties before her AW profile happened, but has always been on a back burner for me.

[Doombar]

to those who back me up on this. Quite surprised there are even a few who think it's ok, think some of you are majorly missing the point.

Not saying normal blokes can't book her. The fact she has a proper woman's chest is all the more reason she could easily market herself as a young woman/cute student type.

Instead she has gone all out to attract nonces  because apparently it pays better. What kind of greedy, immoral...she is happy to pretend to be a toddler ffs

I don't fancy her at all but would never book even if I did, I'll have nothing to do with a woman who entertains nonces. She knows full well that Uncle Pete or whoever might enjoy his booking with her so much that he goes and tries it on his niece. Don't try and convince me that can't happen, because it can (and probably will), she's already told someone she's had a big increase in business, what type of blokes do you put that down to?

I've no issue with fetishes that harm nobody, we all have preferences and some people's are weird, I know that. But escorts who offer to act out paedophile fantasies  it is NOT a harmless sexual preference, it is a psychiatric disorder which causes so much harm, they need treatment, they do not need their sickness encouraged. Even if this girl is servicing just a few of them, it is very, very unhelpful in my view.

+1 well said Link.  There are lot of real paedos out there who will see her, and "would be paedos" who will use her as a practice ground before abusing a vulnerable child.  It's just sick. 

There is a reason why AW do not allow "ageplay" as a Like, or even to be mentioned on profiles.  They should also vet photos which clearly imply it.

[vw]

+1 well said Link.  There are lot of real paedos out there who will see her, and "would be paedos" who will use her as a practice ground before abusing a vulnerable child.  It's just sick. 

There is a reason why AW do not allow "ageplay" as a Like, or even to be mentioned on profiles.  They should also vet photos which clearly imply it.

Roleplay is used as a training or teaching tool

Maybe report photos to aw if you think they breach rules.  Searched their help for ageplay and no mention of banning.

[bigmanbigman]

Think she was called cherry tarts ??

[Doombar]

Searched their help for ageplay and no mention of banning.

AW Terms state:
Any content (wording, graphical or audible) that suggests under age activity, activities involving animals or activities that are normally conducted against the will of an involved party, whether published in the context of role-play or otherwise, are not permitted in any area of the Site. This includes but is not limited to, your profile summary and details, picture titles, movie descriptions, blogs, sale items and erotica articles.


If you go to Twitter and search for "Adultwork Age Play" you will see a list of WGs who have fallen foul and had their profiles deleted.

[vw]

AW Terms state:
Any content (wording, graphical or audible) that suggests under age activity, activities involving animals or activities that are normally conducted against the will of an involved party, whether published in the context of role-play or otherwise, are not permitted in any area of the Site. This includes but is not limited to, your profile summary and details, picture titles, movie descriptions, blogs, sale items and erotica articles.

Thanks for that seems she should not be resenting her adverts like that on adultwork

If you go to Twitter and search for "Adultwork Age Play" you will see a list of WGs who have fallen foul and had their profiles deleted.

Posted by 1 girl, not sure i trust the source though as not from official channels and its on twitter.

[Link7]

Supposedly her new pimp is into this stuff

External Link/Members Only

according to those with wisdom on UKE

43 pages of comments for those that are interested

External Link/Members Only

I expect that lancspunter has been there

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=119789.msg1370727#msg1370727

Crikey. Didn't read the whole of the UKE thread, but from what I can see, there was a general consensus being fought against by a very limited number of people, including two or three well-established punters on here, who just kept posting and liking each other's comments about not judging others and being able to separate fantasy from reality.

Luckily, at least on UKP, most of us don't see punting as a cloak which legitimises any type of sexual behaviour whatsoever, and are ready to judge paedos all day long. If you are fantasising about sex with kids you need help.

I'd steer well clear. There's a dodgy sounding pimp involved, a bunch of nonces and undesirables very likely involved, an SP who may or may not be being controlled. Whole thing has got trouble written all over it. I will not be at all surprised if at some point, for whatever reason, police get involved.

[vw]

Crikey. Didn't read the whole of the UKE thread, but from what I can see, there was a general consensus being fought against by a very limited number of people, including two or three well-established punters on here, who just kept posting and liking each other's comments about not judging others and being able to separate fantasy from reality.

Luckily, at least on UKP, most of us don't see punting as a cloak which legitimises any type of sexual behaviour whatsoever, and are ready to judge paedos all day long. If you are fantasising about sex with kids you need help.

I'd steer well clear. There's a dodgy sounding pimp involved, a bunch of nonces and undesirables very likely involved, an SP who may or may not be being controlled. Whole thing has got trouble written all over it. I will not be at all surprised if at some point, for whatever reason, police get involved.

Yes, its uber faux liberal on UKE and a competition sometimes to be the most liberal, personally my blacklist grew from that thread.

That granny carmel57 asked if a relative of yours paid for this sort of role play would you let them look after your kids.  the question was skated over and she posted 3 times and was ignored, very unusual as many do usually reply swiftly to her.  External Link/Members Only

i would not let a relative that i knew had these fantasies look after my child or any of the nephews/nieces, only hypothetical though how would i ever know.

[Roth]

Crikey. Didn't read the whole of the UKE thread, but from what I can see, there was a general consensus being fought against by a very limited number of people, including two or three well-established punters on here, who just kept posting and liking each other's comments about not judging others and being able to separate fantasy from reality.

Luckily, at least on UKP, most of us don't see punting as a cloak which legitimises any type of sexual behaviour whatsoever, and are ready to judge paedos all day long. If you are fantasising about sex with kids you need help.

I'd steer well clear. There's a dodgy sounding pimp involved, a bunch of nonces and undesirables very likely involved, an SP who may or may not be being controlled. Whole thing has got trouble written all over it. I will not be at all surprised if at some point, for whatever reason, police get involved.

Dodgy cunts then?

[Link7]

Yes, its uber faux liberal on UKE and a competition sometimes to be the most liberal, personally my blacklist grew from that thread.

That granny carmel57 asked if a relative of yours paid for this sort of role play would you let them look after your kids.  the question was skated over and she posted 3 times and was ignored, very unusual as many do usually reply swiftly to her.  External Link/Members Only

i would not let a relative that i knew had these fantasies look after my child or any of the nephews/nieces, only hypothetical though how would i ever know.

Spot on. Nobody in their right mind would trust such a person around kids.

[Link7]

Dodgy cunts then?

Well, put it this way - I know who's on my watchlist.

[bigmanbigman]

One word to sum up
CASH.

[KenniLingus]

I saw her a few years back but this change of her page made me uncomfortable. I'd see her again but tell her to leave the kids clothes at home. She is a right dirty bitch!

[TerryTibbs]

Rates have increased to £180 ph 

Must be more perverts around than we thought 

Terry 

[Roth]

Rates have increased to £180 ph 

Must be more perverts around than we thought 

Terry 

 

[vw]

Rates have increased to £180 ph 

Must be more perverts around than we thought 

Terry 

there are ore punters than non punters would ever imagine.   

[Shaketherooom]

to those who back me up on this. Quite surprised there are even a few who think it's ok, think some of you are majorly missing the point.

Not saying normal blokes can't book her. The fact she has a proper woman's chest is all the more reason she could easily market herself as a young woman/cute student type.

Instead she has gone all out to attract nonces  because apparently it pays better. What kind of greedy, immoral...she is happy to pretend to be a toddler ffs

I don't fancy her at all but would never book even if I did, I'll have nothing to do with a woman who entertains nonces. She knows full well that Uncle Pete or whoever might enjoy his booking with her so much that he goes and tries it on his niece. Don't try and convince me that can't happen, because it can (and probably will), she's already told someone she's had a big increase in business, what type of blokes do you put that down to?

I've no issue with fetishes that harm nobody, we all have preferences and some people's are weird, I know that. But escorts who offer to act out paedophile fantasies  it is NOT a harmless sexual preference, it is a psychiatric disorder which causes so much harm, they need treatment, they do not need their sickness encouraged. Even if this girl is servicing just a few of them, it is very, very unhelpful in my view.

I completely agree - this is completely wrong in my view and encourages / reinforces possible paedophile behaviour. I wouldn't want to be associated with her in any way!

[BM]

Just spotted on a porn tracker.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[PeachyAssFan]

Bumping and old thread  - So fucking what?   

[vw]

Bumping and old thread  - So fucking what?   

probably her pimp/owner.

[PeachyAssFan]

probably her pimp/owner.

+1

[JV547845]

I've had the pleasure of seeing her before her 'makeover'.  Damn good punt. She used to have loads of porn clips on her profile from the parties down in portsmouth.  She was way hotter before she baby dolled it up too, especially with the pink and black hair, but if other people have a kink for that look then it's fine to indulge in it with a fellow consenting adult.