Yes, there does seem to be an established 'style' of review-writing. Not a criticism as that precedes my membership here.
But I personally don't feel the need to describe the sexual encounter in gynaecological detail. As I'm a vanilla kind of guy, any attempt to do so would probably be fruitless anyway.
I think you have misunderstood the criticisms of the review. The objectives of the reviews is to share information, this is needed due to inherent aspects of this pursuit.
To be mature about this, the difficulties are thus:
overly affectionate reviews with little practical information are of limited utility from the practical information standpoint.
anyone can join and review. This has led to sergeis and wgs writing their own reviews disingenuously. Our primary clues when this occurs include effeminate writing styles, and overly romantic or romanticised styles.
reviews written as if the reviewer is writing about their life partner tend to get one's radar going, as it raises the question as to whether the review and its nature are borne of affection for the wg or if it is an accurate review (of the wg or the punt). When a punter gets eas it can flavour their perspective greatly, and affects truthfulness and objectivity obviously. The reality is that the hourly spend on a punt is a lot of money to piss away for most, on a punt that one went on based on incorrect information. Our pursuit also has issues involving discretion, safety and the like, and so having this forum be a place of practical and peer generated information is vital.
someone emotionally involved is also of questionable objectivity, and this renders information less useful. There is also the observable trend whereby a wg with glowing feedback starts to increase rates, and also service drops off.
There is also the fact that as punters we must know that these are transactions. As we are the paying end, it is worth keeping in mind. For the wg to see the punter from a more emotive or affectionate point of view is less problematic.
There is also the key point that this forum is for punters to be of assistance to one another. A punter getting EAS can get themselves into difficulties, as a search of the forum will show. To bring them back to earth may seem a cruel exercise, it actually serves them very well. balance and seeing things for what they are, remaining grounded are vital here. We may seem a bunch of strangers here, but for many this place is the only place they can discuss the pursuit, as well as us being the only people they can ask or share with. To keep things balanced and in touch with reality, rather than eas and fluffy, is of importance and as useful and important as any other aspect. Lets remember that many come here knowing nothing, and we do have younger members here too ( 18 and older, but that is young). To be honest and direct, and keep them grounded so they dont get messed about or taken advantage of etc is key. It would be a great disservice to them to not keep things grounded.
criticisms and a scepticism of fluffiness can be called trolling if you wish, but it is rarely the ill spirited and malicious exercise many seem to characterise it as.
These are the primary reasons for the objections, in my view.
