Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: polite request: please mention dress size and age in reviews  (Read 2298 times)

Offline Marmalade

Not all punters have the same tastes and reviews are there to give us enough information to help us decide if a prossie fits our individual criteria. I mentioned this in a regional post but feel it is maybe worth broader discussion.

I notice that many reviewers increasingly omit when a prossie is over 30 or over dress size 12. To many, not all, but to a great many punters such specs are a deal breaker.

Whether omitting the information is an oversight, or in preference for gentlemanly language, or in deference to the prossie, or in praise of the reviewer’s own taste’s, it seems to be less than helpful.

If we’re going to have reviews, surely they should be for the benefit of all other punters who are contributing members in good stead on here, not courteously softened like AW feedbacks and reviews. The ethos of UKP is to help other punters get vfm in choosing their punts. Saying “if you don’t like a review style, just ignore it” doesn’t seem to me to be an excuse when info crucial and so basic to many punters  is omitted. Nor is it really an excuse in my opinion to say “it’s on the profile”; if a punter is scanning a large number of reviews when deciding on a prossie, it takes a lot longer if he has to read the small print of the profile just to discover he could have saved five minutes reading a  long UKP ‘review’ that didn’t mention crucial info.

The site serves as a platform to help punters exchange info and make more informed decisions about the purchase of sexual services.

Quote from: UKP Wiki Review Guidelines link: External Link/Members Only
Include in your review...
Looks; WG body and face, approximate age, height and dress size, hygiene, outfit, accuracy of photos, nationality and language.


I’m sure this request will offend some newbies, fans of ‘larger ladies’ and white knights, but a range of opinion on this, especially showing how your opinion supports UKP’s ethos, would be welcome.

Offline mrfishyfoo

The lasses description is of paramount importance IMHO as the number of them that lie on their profiles is well fucking annoying.

The more accurate the description better.  :hi: :hi:

Anyone that needs some pointers won't go far wrong, if they can be bothered, by reading a few of my reviews.  :D :D :D

Offline smiths

Good post Marm, this is surely on-topic though and ideal for the main board. I have posted a similar thread up some time ago asking punters to give the exact area the punt happened in, just saying London is not much use to me and some WGs A/W profiles have inaccurate locations on them. And to add the first part of the WGs postcode which I find very useful. Sadly so many reviewers don't do this, either out of not caring or not thinking of doing it for whatever reason.

Yes giving what the reviewer thought was the WGs age and dress size is important information in my book, I usually give this info in reviews along with the nationality she gave me and advertised as.

Offline NigelF

I totally agree with the OP (and subsequent comments).

Even if people don't feel confident with ages and particularly dress sizes then I'd still recommend they have a go at estimating and just add a caveat that they're not very good with those sort of things. It's still much better than saying nothing and having to rely on what the WG says (which of course is rarely true - especially age and dress size).

As smiths has suggested, I think this is ideal for the main board and more people would see it. I've moved it myself but please move it back if you want it in off topic.

Offline smiths

I totally agree with the OP (and subsequent comments).

Even if people don't feel confident with ages and particularly dress sizes then I'd still recommend they have a go at estimating and just add a caveat that they're not very good with those sort of things. It's still much better than saying nothing and having to rely on what the WG says (which of course is rarely true - especially age and dress size).

As smiths has suggested, I think this is ideal for the main board and more people would see it. I've moved it myself but please move it back if you want it in off topic.

Indeed, I see no problem giving an age range so early 20s or mid 30s as examples, as you say its better than saying nothing and punters can then also see how it compares to the WGs profile age. Same with dress size, I give a range like 8-10, again it gives punters an idea and can be compared to her profile. The proviso here is some profiles aren't of the same WG or get swapped of course but having this info is always handy to have in my opinion.

Offline OakTree

Age is far more easier to describe and imagine. Dress size is another thing. It really does need an accurate description with it. Size ten on a girl who’s 5’10 is a world away from size 10 on a girl who is 5’0.

Offline mrfishyfoo

Age is far more easier to describe and imagine. Dress size is another thing. It really does need an accurate description with it. Size ten on a girl who’s 5’10 is a world away from size 10 on a girl who is 5’0.

Isn't it just.  :hi: :hi:

This is why I give a lasses stats as well albeit the bigger a lass gets the more difficult that is.


Offline Punterperson1971

Good shout think I will now include it in my reviews of newbies.

Flunt

  • Guest
I don't understand why punters are fluffy on these subjects? We all have different preferences and the best outcome is to match a punter's preference with a review. Those who like an older, younger, larger or smaller can make a choice based on the review. What is the point of saying a pro$$ie is slim when she's not? It pisses off the punter looking for someone slim and makes the punter looking for someone more wholesome avoid. Likewise those who prefer the 40 somethings will appreciate a 40 something and those seeking younger company can avoid the 32 year old teenager.

Offline Malvolio

An estimate of age is useful (although I suspect we'd see a lot of variance between punters who've seen the same WG), but dress size is trickier to estimate.  Having no experience in buying dresses, I prefer to use descriptive terms like 'a big unit'.

Online Dipper

I always think a simple “age and pics accurate” covers most things relating to this.


Offline mrfishyfoo

I always think a simple “age and pics accurate” covers most things relating to this.

Until they get fat or thin, change hair colour etc etc etc or.....

FFS how dare they get OLDer !!

Offline yandex

I always think a simple “age and pics accurate” covers most things relating to this.

+1

I'm slightly puzzled by the bullshit around this - if you're really into drumming up support for a WG then lying about either will only get you found out in the end and a likely negative review when someone finds out the truth. Having said that, I'm really shit at guessing age but could probably get in the right decade. As for dress size, it's a minefield and in truth some women can carry off a larger size and some can't. It's probably easier to say whether they've got a bit of a belly or not.

Will make sure I include in my (infrequent) reviews

Offline magnetico

I always think a simple “age and pics accurate” covers most things relating to this.
Only if you post the pictures and the age as they're changing all the time on AW/agencies.
Also many pictures are using the "MySpace angle" or "fat woman angle" which is deceiving.

Offline dazzer

I think it's a bloody good idea - I'm sick of getting fatties when expecting something a lot slimmer. HOWEVER - haven't got a clue about dress sizes.
Is there not some other yardstick we can use?
Or is there not a picture of various naked women with captions of what their dress sizes are etc that we can refer to.

Offline mrfishyfoo

I think it's a bloody good idea - I'm sick of getting fatties when expecting something a lot slimmer. HOWEVER - haven't got a clue about dress sizes.
Is there not some other yardstick we can use?
Or is there not a picture of various naked women with captions of what their dress sizes are etc that we can refer to.

Indeed there is.

I like to play the fat arse small tits card.

Tell a size 8 that she's a 36-28-38 which is more like a 12 and see how fast she shows you the labels on her civvies.  :lol: :lol: :lol:





« Last Edit: May 10, 2018, 11:56:21 pm by mrfishyfoo »

vw

  • Guest
As for dress size, it's a minefield

I have checked before for a laugh and mentioned on a few reviews

This thread reminds me of this review where i upset yorkshire

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=135961.msg1515104#msg1515104

So many use the forgot or not good at sizes/ages to avoid being honest.

If people insist on using the line photos are accurate, post  a copy of the accurate photo on the review the linked ones are controlled by the prossie.

Offline Heph

My first thought on reading the title and opening line, was that this must be a piss-take, or else a well-intentioned waste of time.

But, as Marmalade has laid out his case, and with some additional insight from others, it began to seem reasonable,  desirable and, at least in parts, pragmatically achieveable.

I've taken some flak recently over two reviews. In truth, I can't now answer why I left out some of the observation points identified here - perhaps it was a combination of highlighting the more intangible things I look for; or not wanting to feel obliged to stick to a pattern; or just thoughtlessness from me; in any event, it hardly matters now.

Some of the criticism was useful, some wasn't; but Marmalade's reminder and constructive approach is good, and I'll try and steer more towards incorporating much of the guidance that it suggests.

My only caveat is that dress size is such a difficult thing to guesstimate, for all the reasons mentioned above and a few others besides. We'll all have to see how that works out.

Offline Spiceoflife

I don't know about others but the first thing I do is click on the link before reading the entire review. A photo says a lot.
Rather than guessing dress size perhaps as photos / bigger than photos / twice the size of photos etc. might be an alternative.
As already stated, a tall and toned size 14 would be much more attractive than a flabby, shapeless size 8/10 with a prominent belly. Well to me at least.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2018, 02:43:09 am by Spiceoflife »

Offline Marmalade

I always think a simple “age and pics accurate” covers most things relating to this.

Could I just answer this?

I think it’s fine to say that if it’s what you believe, though I do think it should go with a statement. Such as “age as stated as on profile as 35 seems accurate” — otherwise the punter still has to go to the profile and scroll down to see what it says — when another couple of words on the review would have made it clear.

Same with pictures as long as you describe them. But unless the reviewer has difficulty estimating dress sizes at least quoting what it says on the profile would be helpful don’t you think? You can always add a physical description. Mostly I find profile ages are not accurate, but some closer than others.

The point is when a punter is reading a review he probably wants to know whether she is (say) in the 18-25 range or over 40 range. Just saying “her age is accurate” doesn’t tell him anything. As I said, he could spend the time reading the whole review (which might one of many) only then to click on the profile and find he’s wasted his time.

Online Keema

Ok noble aim, but are we really going down the peeking in the panty drawer / wardrobe while she heads out the room with your dosh route? 

Clothes sizing isn't standard across stores never mind within stores so it will be down to eyeballing the girl. Descriptions of her body and personality are more helpful to me tbh.

Offline Sparta Prada

I’m fairly ok with guessing dress sizes, but for those who are not it may be safer to give a short range you think the girl’s size is? Such as 6-8, 8-10, 10-12, etc?

Offline GreyDave

 :hi: I make a comment on a post about the fact that many Bra sizes now are completely diffrent to what they were. Then some one put a good pic of the mixed dress size girls up :thumbsup: I mentioned DD`s used to be big un`s and E-F huge with the rare G cup absolutely f`n Massive ...now the massive ones  are called JJ`s and what would of been an A-B cup passes for a C-D` and padding :(  I reckon to size girl is really difficult pear, apple, stick, solid/Bubble butt , BBW used to mean BIG BUSTY Woman now its short hand for those in the 18-20 size aka porkers . Funny thing how they measure and how they call it I find when I have read the review if its by a guy a bit like me I think I will be ok with this one. I the past when I thought I would have a PSE time with a hottie I have been disappointed as the girl wanted a young stud who was fitter telling her she was fab  :rolleyes: and all she got was an old guy sweating and pumping :D :lol: :D
« Last Edit: May 11, 2018, 08:25:10 am by GreyDave »

Offline Marmalade

I think one of the things that annoys people is when a prossie who is clearly overweight is described as 'curvy'. 'Curvy' is misused, not to indicate a Jennifer Lopez figure, but someone who is basically overweight, fat. I don't think anyone's suggesting a hard-and-fast rule, but just to warn people who may have very different tastes and who would view a prossie as old or fat (even if you like 'milfs' and 'bbws' - both euphemisms ).

Offline Jonestown

I dont know what the problem is here, age and dress size are vital pieces of information in selecting a girl, why are folks so reticent, we are professional reviewers of female anatomy, it should not be a problem. Girls photoshop and lie all the time, its the way they are, no need for us to be complicit.

Is there anything worse than to find a fattie standing behind the door when it opens ?

Offline Marmalade

Ok noble aim, but are we really going down the peeking in the panty drawer / wardrobe while she heads out the room with your dosh route? 

Clothes sizing isn't standard across stores never mind within stores so it will be down to eyeballing the girl. Descriptions of her body and personality are more helpful to me tbh.

In your case, just a sensible, polite request to follow the UKP guidelines. Your reviews, for instance, generally, give little or no indication.

Offline latecomer

I dont know what the problem is here, age and dress size are vital pieces of information in selecting a girl, why are folks so reticent, we are professional reviewers of female anatomy, it should not be a problem. Girls photoshop and lie all the time, its the way they are, no need for us to be complicit.

Is there anything worse than to find a fattie standing behind the door when it opens ?

+1
I can't stand fatties and it's very useful to have an idea of their real (not prossie) age before booking, so this seems a reasonable request and takes very little effort to include in a review.

Offline smiths

Ok noble aim, but are we really going down the peeking in the panty drawer / wardrobe while she heads out the room with your dosh route? 

Clothes sizing isn't standard across stores never mind within stores so it will be down to eyeballing the girl. Descriptions of her body and personality are more helpful to me tbh.

So just post what you thought she was age and size wise as that's better than not saying anything in my view.

Online RedKettle

I agree with the aim of the request - but I am amazed that men feel confident using dress sizes!  Good for you and all that but I would not have a clue, I have no interest in dress sizes and they mean very little to me.  In the past if buying clothes for the OH I would look at labels of her clothes before going out, but ask me a couple of days later what size she is and it has gone.

For me a general comment about size is helpful and of course comparison with profile photos - for example a girl I saw in London a few weeks ago I made the comment:

Quote
She is the girl in the photos but they are either edited heavily or she has eaten a fuck of a lot of pies since then.  I was so much in the mood for a thin fit young blond but instead got a reasonably sizeable woman.

I hope this is helpful to punters and get's the basic information over - I could not being to guess the dress size of the photos or what she is now.

Age - easier!  I tend to comment on whether profile age is accurate but thinking about it now I realise I should state what that age is, so "profile says 25 which is about right" rather than "profile age is about right."

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Marmalade, thank you for bringing this issue to broader attention.

I think your point is obvious.  The most valuable parts of the review to a punter considering a WG for a visit is to point out where the profile is inaccurate or deceptive.

1) How closely does the physical description and photos in the profile match what the girl I will meet in the room (and what are the key differences)?

2) How closely does the experience of service match the description of "enjoys" on the profile and is the price list accurate?

3) What is the best way to get in touch with the SP, confirm services and fees and make a booking?

Reports of dress size and age do not have to be precisely accurate.   What I object to is a girl who describes herself as a 10 and is actually a size 16.  External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

There are a number of fuckers on here who fail to report this kind of gross deception in their reviews or ignore it when arriving at an overall rating. These reviews do a disservice to the board and I treat them accordingly.



Offline Squire Haggard

I've done no reviews because I've not had a punt in ages. I wont bore you with the reason for this. When I manage to get back to punting my reviews will show the essential elements at first glance. Like others above, fatties and oldies are not what I'm looking for.

IMO, this is what a review should look like, as it shows the essential elements at first glance. Goldfinch has laid down the template with all his reviews IMO  :)


External Link/Members Only

Date:      16/3/18
Time:      10.15am
Duration: 20 mins
Cost:       £30
Comms:   phoned up to see they still do 20 mins for £30 and then walked in.
Location:  just off cheetham hill rd on park street.
Lady:       Jennifer,Colombian,22,34D bust,size 10

Salon 24 was my plan B as I initially went to Tropical Palms,but none of the girls had turned up for the day shift at 10.00am,waited in reception for 10 mins,chatting to a punter who had been there longer than me,then told the receptionist I may be back later and left.

I wasn't after a full service,but fancied a change from the usual Thai or Chinese places.

I've been aware of Salon 24 for some time,just off Cheetham Hill rd on park street,and a short walk brings you there,front door was locked with a sign saying go to side door,pressed the buzzer and it was quickly answered by the receptionist and was shown to reception,was told Mille was busy,but Jennifer was available,I said that was fine and paid my money and was offered a shower,which I declined as I had one earlier in the morning and was shown to my room and was told Jennifer will be in shortly.

It was a decent room,with porn playing on a small tv on the wall and a massive bed with a mirror on the ceiling.

Got undressed and a few minutes later Jennifer enters the room in a dressing gown,which she immediately removes to show her wearing a black basque,she had massive tits and a huge arse,but that was as good as it got,facially I wasn't impressed,she had that resting bitch face type of look :(

She spoke decent English and I explained I just wanted a massage with HE,and she quizzacly looked at me and said you don't want sex? Not today thanks I said!

She went straight for the old fella and poured some oil over it and started with a handjob,it took a while to spring some life into it,which was unusual for me,but after a few minutes I asked to turn over and asked for a massage of my arse and legs,this was done competently for a short time.

I flipped over again and she continued with the hand relief,I had a good play in between her legs,moving the lower part of the basque to one side and had a good rub of her clit. ;)
Shot my load a few minutes later and was handed wet wipes for the clean up.

She didn't really do it for me,I found her rather moody and cold.

At the end of the day it was only £30 and I got my balls emptied,but I didn't take to her which made the experience less enjoyable than I'd hoped for and wouldn't see her again.

Maybe will return again to see Millie as it was a clean,tidy place and relatively cheap.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showreviews;u=130066



Offline Spiceoflife

Having looked through my reviews I'll endeavour to quote age (stated and appearance) rather than "as on profile".

Offline Spiceoflife

I've done no reviews because I've not had a punt in ages. I wont bore you with the reason for this. When I manage to get back to punting my reviews will show the essential elements at first glance. Like others above, fatties and oldies are not what I'm looking for.

IMO, this is what a review should look like, as it shows the essential elements at first glance. Goldfinch has laid down the template with all his reviews IMO  :)


External Link/Members Only

Date:      16/3/18
Time:      10.15am
Duration: 20 mins
Cost:       £30

I personally, would never put exact time and date, particularly if leaving a negative or neutral review. Even the dimmers sp could work out exactly who you are.
Plus, what difference does it make? Morning, afternoon, evening - perhaps.

Offline Spiceoflife


Is there anything worse than to find a fattie standing behind the door when it opens ?

There have been one or two that would never manage to hide behind a standard door. Barn door, perhaps.

vw

  • Guest
Date:      16/3/18
Time:      10.15am

WTF, the above is last thing i would advise posting on a review.

also no age or size

A bad example of a good template IMO. 
« Last Edit: May 11, 2018, 01:37:04 pm by vw »

Offline DastardlyDick

It's a very good idea, but I can't tell dress sizes apart and I don't think I'll be looking through a SPs wardrobe to find out!

Offline Squire Haggard

WTF, the above is last thing i would advise posting on a review.

also no age or size

A bad example of a good template IMO.

I agree about the date and time being a bad idea, as it could reveal your identity to the WG.

For those that dont know dress and bust sizes, perhaps very fat, fat, medium, slim and very slim could be used instead of dress sizes.

IMO this format would give a better at a glance summary.


Lady:       Jennifer,Colombian,22,34D bust,size 10  [Height should be added though]
Duration: 20 mins
Cost:       £30
Location:  just off cheetham hill rd on park street
Comms:   phoned up to see they still do 20 mins for £30 and then walked in.

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Squire Haggard,

Your contribution may be well meaning but it is just confusing things.  There is a clear guide here which includes and extends Marmalades point.

External Link/Members Only

Quote
Looks
Describing the WG's looks in your review serves at least three functions. It highlights positive or negative factors that may lead to/ deter a booking. It helps the reader assess the accuracy of the description in the profile. It also makes it easier to confirm the identity of the WG at the start of a meeting.

Try to give a reasonably detailed and objective description of her looks toward the beginning of the review. While a certain degree of subjectivity is inevitable, it can be helpful to mention both particularly attractive or unattractive physical features. If you can, indicate the WG's approximate height, dress size and any distinctive identifying characteristics (which make it much easier for other punters to determine whether they are actually meeting the same girl). The use of rating scales for physical and facial attractiveness is contentious - one method developed by Jason is detailed below. Highlight any concerns about hygiene.

Comment on the accuracy of the photographs and the physical description included in the profile. Give your view of her actual age. Mention her nationality. Describe how well she speaks and understands English. Also mention what she wore and if she met a dress request.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2018, 02:11:39 pm by mrhappypants »

Offline Charliehutton

To age and size I'd also add any other potential surprises, such as tattoos, which a lot of guys can find off-putting. No-one wants to compromise a girl's anonymity, so it needn't be too specific, but something like "she has some serious artwork not apparent on her photo's" would tell us all we need to know.

Offline bearcat69

A guess at dress size and age is something I do always try to include. Will be honest though and admit that I have sometimes forgotten one or the other or even both on a few occasions. Maybe I was just writing the review in a rush and didn't have time to proof read it, or maybe it's a weird hint of fluffiness sneaking in sometimes... Apologies for when that might have happened. I always try to be as thorough and objective as possible, but I am only human afterall. I have to admit that age in particular is something that I can often get completely wrong. I've been quite surprised more than a few times in the difference in guestimates I've seen, but that's all part of the fun, experience and usefulness of reviews and doesn't put me off continuing to have a guess. What I would definitely always do though, is point out if I thought there was a significant difference between stated age on her profile and what she looked IRL, same goes for dress size too, or any other aspect of her appearance that I think is significant to how she sells herself.

It is always amusing to me to see the difference in opinions on age, height and dress size across a range of reviews though. I've seen reviewers guess a girl is 23 in one review and then 43 in a different review of the same girl the next day, or size 8 in one review and then size 14 in the next review. :D I do think a lot of it does come down to psychology of the punt, it was a bad punt so suddenly she's a fat old skank, it was the best punt ever, so suddenly she's the most slim and young and beautiful prossie ever. :sarcastic: I do think though that this emphasizes the importance of having a range of guesses at these statistics across a range of reviews. If most are saying she's a size 10-12 for instance and suddenly somebody is saying she's size 6, either she's gone on one hell of a crash diet, or that guy is being very flattering to her.

One thing I'm not going to do though, is use a special template that makes sure I have a section for these statistics. I did do that on a couple of my earlier reviews. I found it made my reviews a bit stale and restrictive. I ended up not saying certain things I wanted to say. I personally feel a good description of a prossie's appearance has both the stats and the more personal opinion of what the reviewer thought of her looks, in an as objective a way as possible of course. But things like "she looked naughty" or "she looked skanky" or "she looked like a dirty bitch" or "she looked petite and feminine", as subjective statements as they may be, are often vital decision influencing pieces of information to me if they come from the right reviewer.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2018, 02:59:33 pm by bearcat69 »

Offline Charliehutton



One thing I'm not going to do though, is use a special template that makes sure I have a section for these statistics.
Quite right, BC. If reviews become too formulaic they'll become not only boring to read but boring to write, and people will stop bothering.

Offline smiths

I've done no reviews because I've not had a punt in ages. I wont bore you with the reason for this. When I manage to get back to punting my reviews will show the essential elements at first glance. Like others above, fatties and oldies are not what I'm looking for.

IMO, this is what a review should look like, as it shows the essential elements at first glance. Goldfinch has laid down the template with all his reviews IMO  :)


External Link/Members Only

Date:      16/3/18
Time:      10.15am
Duration: 20 mins
Cost:       £30
Comms:   phoned up to see they still do 20 mins for £30 and then walked in.
Location:  just off cheetham hill rd on park street.
Lady:       Jennifer,Colombian,22,34D bust,size 10

Salon 24 was my plan B as I initially went to Tropical Palms,but none of the girls had turned up for the day shift at 10.00am,waited in reception for 10 mins,chatting to a punter who had been there longer than me,then told the receptionist I may be back later and left.

I wasn't after a full service,but fancied a change from the usual Thai or Chinese places.

I've been aware of Salon 24 for some time,just off Cheetham Hill rd on park street,and a short walk brings you there,front door was locked with a sign saying go to side door,pressed the buzzer and it was quickly answered by the receptionist and was shown to reception,was told Mille was busy,but Jennifer was available,I said that was fine and paid my money and was offered a shower,which I declined as I had one earlier in the morning and was shown to my room and was told Jennifer will be in shortly.

It was a decent room,with porn playing on a small tv on the wall and a massive bed with a mirror on the ceiling.

Got undressed and a few minutes later Jennifer enters the room in a dressing gown,which she immediately removes to show her wearing a black basque,she had massive tits and a huge arse,but that was as good as it got,facially I wasn't impressed,she had that resting bitch face type of look :(

She spoke decent English and I explained I just wanted a massage with HE,and she quizzacly looked at me and said you don't want sex? Not today thanks I said!

She went straight for the old fella and poured some oil over it and started with a handjob,it took a while to spring some life into it,which was unusual for me,but after a few minutes I asked to turn over and asked for a massage of my arse and legs,this was done competently for a short time.

I flipped over again and she continued with the hand relief,I had a good play in between her legs,moving the lower part of the basque to one side and had a good rub of her clit. ;)
Shot my load a few minutes later and was handed wet wipes for the clean up.

She didn't really do it for me,I found her rather moody and cold.

At the end of the day it was only £30 and I got my balls emptied,but I didn't take to her which made the experience less enjoyable than I'd hoped for and wouldn't see her again.

Maybe will return again to see Millie as it was a clean,tidy place and relatively cheap.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showreviews;u=130066

Terrible advice, my advice unless a punter isn't bothered is never put exact time and date in a review on here. Also I have my own way of doing a review, I don't require other reviewers templates thanks. You haven't even mentioned the WGs age in this rubbish either. :rolleyes:


Offline Marmalade

I have to agree with Smiths on that, Squire. But good luck if you start posting reviews.

I’m not keen on templates personally — though I can see the attraction to a newbie. I just try to keep a mental note of what needs to be included without getting obsessive about it. If I forget something, as I do occasionally, I deserve a short sharp reminder, as does anyone else. I think Smiths also suggested giving an idea of the area. I find that very helpful. In Scotland we’ve finally got reviewers to add the city to the review title — a bit like adding first-part code to a London one maybe.  It saves even clicking on ones that the punter considers are too far to go to. For some cities the name of the suburb is more useful than postcode though.

If I can have a quick moan — I can’t stand long war-and-peace length reviews. I used to write these years ago on ISG, trying to polish my ‘writing style’ and give some ‘atmosphere’. Eventually someone pointed out they have better things to do than wade through that shite. It’s onanistic. I don’t mean a very unusual incident, but not much excuse to write a long page for a regular punt IMO.

To people who do insist on doing long reviews: maybe have a mental checklist to include the stuff we’ve mentioned on this thread and put it at the beginning? Then it’s up to the individual punter how much they really want to read.

Offline Drekszter

Agree with the OP.

It never hurts to confirm the stats on the WG's profile because the only person who will really find out if let's say, she's put on weight/lost weight or lied about anything else is the punter. I try to mention how accurate the WG has sold her appearance as and if something feels off, won't hesitate to call it out.

Offline Plan R

 :thumbsup: Will make sure I include in my (roughly bi-monthly) reviews.
Quite liking 'larger' ladies, (size 14 - 18) I think I'm not too bad at estimating within that range,
For me though, innacurracy is more likely to occur at the lower end of the dress size scale

Offline Squire Haggard

Terrible advice, my advice unless a punter isn't bothered is never put exact time and date in a review on here. Also I have my own way of doing a review, I don't require other reviewers templates thanks. You haven't even mentioned the WGs age in this rubbish either. :rolleyes:

Her age is mentioned. Agreed that time and date are not a good idea.

Offline magnetico

I’m not keen on templates personally — though I can see the attraction to a newbie.
I already planned to start a thread on that subject, probably next week  :thumbsup:

Offline snaitram99

Re dress sizes, eventually found this, which I posted in 2015 and some people may find useful:

British sizes (IMHO):

8 = slim (6 = poss. bordering on anorexic)

10 = slim-ish

12 = neither slim nor big

14 = big - ish or curvy

16 = big (but may be a tall girl with a good shape - not often though)

18 or more = definitely big

 :hi:

Offline captainarcher

Re dress sizes, eventually found this, which I posted in 2015 and some people may find useful:

British sizes (IMHO):

8 = slim (6 = poss. bordering on anorexic)

10 = slim-ish

12 = neither slim nor big

14 = big - ish or curvy

16 = big (but may be a tall girl with a good shape - not often though)

18 or more = definitely big

 :hi:

This is great! But one man's curve could always be another man's flab

Offline Plan R

This is great! But one man's curve could always be another man's flab

Horses for courses but I think most blokes prefer curves and would crawl over ten Keira Knightleys to get to one Sammi Marsh.
Thats why it seems easier guessing the upper end of the scale than the lower

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only