Telling an escort up front that you will review them

[LauraHoD]

Whatever you happen to do [as a job / run a business] i'm presuming that you get a feel for whatever situation it is ?
To a certain extent can second guess what the other party is thinking of / are likely to do
There are various pointers
Why should an SP be any different ?
Especially an experienced one & judging by stuff on here an insightful one @ that

Indeed. I think most genuine reviewers don't want to identify themselves. Although some do unintentionally.

[Stevelondon]

After seeing miss wolf, she mentioned that she would be posting a review of me on here. Simply because the world needed to know how exceptional my sexual capabilities are.
I think her terminology was something like,
“I’ve never had so many orgasms with anyone …. Ever”

Oh wait a minute.
My bad, sorry. That’s a dream I had this morning.

It was just so real…… where’s the coffee.

[Iloveoral]

I’d be interested in a private message Laura if you wanted to let me know who is discussing a UKP review at the start of a meet. 

[scutty brown]

Most guys who mention reviewing before the service have no intention of actually writing one. They just think it's a tactic to get a better service. I just tell them I don't care if they write a review or not. It won't have any bearing on the service they receive. Same when guys say "If you do a good job I will come back and see you again"...so I'm thinking I should do a shit job so I don't have to see you again!!

Also I never request reviews from clients. If they ask me if they can review me(after the booking) I just tell them it's entirely up to them. I have loads of reviews already so it won't make a big difference. Cos I post on here guys do ofter mention the site but I never tell them to write anything about me unless they want to. It think it comes across a bit desperate.

I have to say there's a certain degree of irony in what you say Laura, though you may not be aware of it. How long have you been with HoD?
What you may not know is that for years Karl ran a sustained campaign of fake reviews on this site through various proxies and sockpuppets. It got so bad that there were actual suggestions of banning HoD/MKE reviews from the site. There were also suggestions that he was planting negative reviews about competing agencies and girls.
In view of what you say there's a degree of amusement in thinking punters are threatening to subvert HoD's reputation through planting false negatives. Not that doing so is right, any more than Carl planting fake positives was acting correctly. Both are totally incorrect to do.
This old thread will give some background
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=249576

(FWIW the thread starter, Slamboy later got the boot for some other kind of misdemeanor)

[LauraHoD]

That was before my time. I won't comment on it. Also I believe "Slamboy" was a disgruntled former employee of HoD or was acting on her instructions. I have no evidence of this. But some of things they posted  suggested that.

Also when people imply they are going to review. They don't say who they are. They probably are not even members...when pressed some even admit they are not members. And there are other review sites other than this one. Obviously if someone said "I'm on UKP ,my name is xxxxx and I will write you a bad review if you don't do xxxx" then I would report them. Buts it's more like a subtle hint.

[scutty brown]

That was before my time. I won't comment on it. ...............

No that's fair enough, I didn't think you would be aware.
My point really was to just show that the problems of fake reviews and manipulation can take many forms, though obviously trying to blackmail/induce you girls into something you don't want to do is about as low as it gets

[webpunter]

Also when people imply they are going to review. They don't say who they are. They probably are not even members...when pressed some even admit they are not members. And there are other review sites other than this one. Obviously if someone said "I'm on UKP ,my name is xxxxx and I will write you a bad review if you don't do xxxx" then I would report them. Buts it's more like a subtle hint.

Punters implying that they are gonna do a review 
Clueless & cuntish
& i'd wager that sad forgettable indvividuals
A reasonable possibility that physically & intellectually challenged
I feel for you thinking do i kick the tosspot out & pass up on the ££ ?, it must be tempting   
Fuck that, get the tosspot to shoot in record time & mention in passing a one cum policy, didnt you know .... oh dear

& mention to a Mod your observations
The tactical route to take will be to wait & see if a review follows along