WG asked not to be reviewed on UKP...

[Inspector Gadget]

No, they didn't all mention feedback, as I've already said. A percentage did. An they always broached the topic. The reasons admin gave are valid and genuine.  The main one I've been given is to fudge their earnings. If they have less feedback and the tax man approaches them, they have less earnings to declare. Apparently the tax man approaches then randomly these days and uses aw feedback as a guide to their earnings.  I've long suspected that's why you see popular lassies with a few hundred glowing feedback, and then all of a sudden, they retire, only to come back a week later under the same name, but with zero feedback.  But then, they probably all talk shite, and will give you the ' non-genuine' reason. But as has been stated by several already, regardless if they make a request, a bad service would always trump that and that info should be passed on to others

[Lilywhite]

To be honest, some of those positive reviews that are seriously 'over-egged' are just as irritating as negative reviews. If one guy comes in and bigs you up, then writes a review which is purely about saying what a top shagger he is you're bound to have people disappointed when they don't have as good a time. This site has become a double edged sword for people, yes - we should be pulled up if the service is shite or we're lying... but fuck sake, the fluffy shit only leads to other people getting annoyed with us when we aren't perfect. I've asked someone not to review before because I knew he would say overly positive stuff because he was that type of client- and believe me- some of the other guys who demand more would not have had the same opinion, mostly of me being "The most beautiful thing he'd ever seen" 

[RandyF]

but fuck sake, the fluffy shit only leads to other people getting annoyed with us when we aren't perfect. I've asked someone not to review before because I knew he would say overly positive stuff because he was that type of client- and believe me- some of the other guys who demand more would not have had the same opinion, mostly of me being "The most beautiful thing he'd ever seen" 

  Not feeling a whole lot of fluffy cunt love coming from 10/10 Edinburgh superstar lovely Lily.

Think you might've broken a few fluffy cunt hearts tonight, girlfriend   

[RandyF]

I've asked someone not to review before because I knew he would say overly positive stuff because he was that type of client-

I'd say that's a perfectly valid reason for not wanting reviewed on here Lily, yes.   He's gonna hype the hoor into the fluffy stratosphere, compare  you to Kelly Brook style TV glamour models, say he's rediscovered his sexuality all down to you, you've taken him to places he never knew existed  a 10/10 superstar - great. 

Then the hoors left to open the door the next bloke standing there slevering at the mouth...his face dropping as soon as you open the door because she in reality look more like Kelly Osborne's fat cousin with a 'tache then Kelly Brook 

Fluffy cunts are bad news all round baby 

[bensonhedges20]

Fluffy cunts are bad news all round baby 

The issue is they take negative or neutral comments as if its the end of the world.

Unless the discussion is positive on their fav they will just stir up shit to change the topic and spin it.

Also the taxman reason ia bull. They wouldnt trust aw feedback as its easily to manipulate. It would never be valid regardless.

The reasons escorts kill their high feedback profiles is because less people want to see an escort who has banged 500+ guys etc

A new profile would easily build up feedback over a period of time. Easy to kill your profile and build up demand while its down if an escort has the same contact number

[Jock D]

To be honest, some of those positive reviews that are seriously 'over-egged' are just as irritating as negative reviews.... but fuck sake, the fluffy shit only leads to other people getting annoyed with us when we aren't perfect.

  Dear oh dear...you couldn't make this up...a bona fide hoor coming on to a punters site to tell the fluffies to get real. 

Of course the deluded narcissists will totally re-interpret what Lily is saying, and turn it into a compliment to themselves and carry on regardless 

[bensonhedges20]

Dear oh dear...you couldn't make this up...a bona fide hoor coming on to a punters site to tell the fluffies to get real. 

Of course the deluded narcissists will totally re-interpret what Lily is saying, and turn it into a compliment to themselves and carry on regardless 

Have you never read a field report on aw.

They are all taz styled amazzzzzzzzing

[Inspector Gadget]

Dear oh dear...you couldn't make this up...a bona fide hoor coming on to a punters site to tell the fluffies to get real. 

Of course the deluded narcissists will totally re-interpret what Lily is saying, and turn it into a compliment to themselves and carry on regardless 

Overly fluffed reviews can definitely harm the hoor. No doubt about it.

[Jock D]

Have you never read a field report on aw.

They are all taz styled amazzzzzzzzing

No genuine punter would ever take an AW review seriously. 

[Courtney]

Have you never read a field report on aw.

.....I try not to these days, some can be so embarrassingly cringeworthy.

[auldie63]

I've asked someone not to review before because I knew he would say overly positive stuff because he was that type of client- and believe me- some of the other guys who demand more would not have had the same opinion, mostly of me being "The most beautiful thing he'd ever seen" 

Can't believe anyone on here would possibly put up such a review. Never read anything remotely like that.
Oh, wait a minute!

[ickydicky]

back to the op and my bet would be either kendra or celine/magalie/sexyfrenchgirl and it would
 not surpirse me if they also know each other. hard to find sympathy for kendra but she doesnt stand a chance with celine/magalie/sexyfrenchgirl. the french nutter who wants to drop her turds in mens mouths will run rings round kendra.

[Burnside]

This is getting boring now, as no doubt Mr Fox won't say who it is, and Admin have cleared up the issues that i felt covered the start of this thread.

[ickydicky]

This is getting boring now, as no doubt Mr Fox won't say who it is, and Admin have cleared up the issues that i felt covered the start of this thread.

sorry guv but i aint bored and want to know who it is.

[Sonny Crockett]

To be honest, some of those positive reviews that are seriously 'over-egged' are just as irritating as negative reviews. If one guy comes in and bigs you up, then writes a review which is purely about saying what a top shagger he is you're bound to have people disappointed when they don't have as good a time. This site has become a double edged sword for people, yes - we should be pulled up if the service is shite or we're lying... but fuck sake, the fluffy shit only leads to other people getting annoyed with us when we aren't perfect. I've asked someone not to review before because I knew he would say overly positive stuff because he was that type of client- and believe me- some of the other guys who demand more would not have had the same opinion, mostly of me being "The most beautiful thing he'd ever seen" 

Surely it's up to him to decide whether he wants to write a review, not you!!!