Should we trust AdultWork or UKPunting reviews?

[Sheer Tights]

External Link/Members Only

Reviews of WGs seem to differ, for example Lovely Ivy has universally negative comments & reviews on UKP, while on AW she has 100 positive reviews. With the two sites being poles apart which one can we trust?

[OldAdmin]

You must be a pimp or prossie asking this question 

No review system is perfect, but AW is least trustable. Pimps and prossies prefer it because they find it easier to manipulate.

[Brazilian Martian]

Are you trolling 

Most punters know that aw reviews are worthless, you have been a member since 2014 and you ask such a stupid question that I would expect from a newbie 

[Sheer Tights]

I did not know AW reviews were worthless so question answered within 5 mins

[hungrypunt]

"High Class"
"Independent"
"Friendly"
"100% Genuine"


ROMMY 

[Charlie Chalk]

Are you for real?

[dboy74]

UKP everytime!

[Brazilian Martian]

I did not know AW reviews were worthless so question answered within 5 mins

So I take it you don't read what others posts about adultwork or  romanians you really must have your head in the sand. But what really irks me is you questioning ukp reviews 

[poseidon]

There's been plenty of threads here about this. AW reviews are unreliable because if a punter gives a WG negative feedback, the WG tends to give him nasty negative feedback in return. A punter has to give positive feedback before a WG can respond with a positive for him so it's a quid pro quo system. Some WGs won't see punters with zero or negative feedback.

On UKP, as long as you use a different nick from your AW profile, you can review a WG honesty without it getting in the way of booking other WGs on AW.

[Chorley]

Are you for real OP?  

[rockharders]

OP, stick to AW reviews they will do you fine.

If you've been a member here for a couple of years, read up the knowledge and still ask dumb questions like this, you are beyond help.

[Bangers and Gash]

Someone has been smoking crack 

[smiths]

I did not know AW reviews were worthless so question answered within 5 mins

So you haven't read any of the hundreds of posts and loads of threads about this since you joined then, its like the dumb leading the dumb sometimes, even when a punter finds UKP they don't bother reading the advice given to at least take or leave it.

[smiths]

Someone has been smoking crack 

Only been a member on here for two and half years but wasn't aware of A/Ws rep on here.

[gary03]

Aw can still be useful if you do your homework & only believe reviews from guys who have seen girls you know are genuine

[stampjones]

External Link/Members Only

Reviews of WGs seem to differ, for example Lovely Ivy has universally negative comments & reviews on UKP, while on AW she has 100 positive reviews. With the two sites being poles apart which one can we trust?

You should believe AW mate. Go see her. If she's shit its obviously your fault cos AW is never wrong. Also you should absolutely 100% belive all the prossie adverts. This place is just a bunch of guys who dont know what they're talking about as you obviously worked out over your long membership. In fact you probably shouldnt believe this post either if anyone on a prossie ad contradicts it

[king tarzan]

Aw can still be useful if you do your homework & only believe reviews from guys who have seen girls you know are genuine

100% agreed

Even if mixed reviews on adultworks and ukp I do give the honey benefit of the doubt..

Englishjenny who I saw years ago had review on this site that said kissing was basically shit and she was rush rush.
( profile non existent )
When I corresponded with her I told her about my research and she sounded adamant that it was not like it was described. . After all I was paying £140 for the hour!
Not peanuts by any means!!
Anyway I saw her the kissing was dfk intense
Great sex and great owo delicious mango and no clock watching..
I evaluate both sides. ..
Unless there are several reviews with same similarities on ukp then I don't even bother going to the lady..

[peter purves]

External Link/Members Only

Reviews of WGs seem to differ, for example Lovely Ivy has universally negative comments & reviews on UKP, while on AW she has 100 positive reviews. With the two sites being poles apart which one can we trust?

Strictly answering the confines of your question with the example, then it is clear who the punter should be favouring. 

Moving the discussion slightly along - hopefully not too far. With reviews the discrepancy I find is not about the service per se but 'looks', even on here there has been a wide array of opinions regarding a WGs looks. This is probably due to the issue of 'subjectivism'.

[Jerjer]

UKPunting reviews seem much more objective and detailed. I've noticed a couple of AW accounts that have recently been suspended for suspicious behaviour even when the lady had 30+ positive feedbacks. Some women even go as far as hiding their AW feedback, which immediately raises a red flag. Ideally, a lady could have favourable reviews on both UKPunting and AW, together with an established website of her own. The problem is that there are some women who never get reviewed or discussed on UKP. I guess no news can be good news but relying upon AW feedback alone is something of a step across a minefield, especially for a beginner.   

[Delfrommem]

100% agreed

Even if mixed reviews on adultworks and ukp I do give the honey benefit of the doubt..

Englishjenny who I saw years ago had review on this site that said kissing was basically shit and she was rush rush.
( profile non existent )
When I corresponded with her I told her about my research and she sounded adamant that it was not like it was described. . After all I was paying £140 for the hour!
Not peanuts by any means!!
Anyway I saw her the kissing was dfk intense
Great sex and great owo delicious mango and no clock watching..
I evaluate both sides. ..
Unless there are several reviews with same similarities on ukp then I don't even bother going to the lady..

Mango as slang for fanny?? Never heard that one before???!! 

[Malvolio]

You clearly don't read the London review boards then...

[whiskyfan]

Mango as slang for fanny?? Never heard that one before???!! 

Just wait till he starts on about his "massive banana".

[Jimmyredcab]

Most punters know that aw reviews are worthless.

Not really true.
The majority of AW reviews are probably genuine -------------- any punting site can have false reviews.   

[smiths]

Not really true.
The majority of AW reviews are probably genuine -------------- any punting site can have false reviews.   

I very much doubt that's the case, unprovable anyway either way but in my view most are probably made up by the WG or pimp.

[bearcat69]

Well, if you know a trusted punters username on AW then I suppose you can look at that, and take something from that. But even then I wouldn't really trust that, and would take it with a heavy pinch of salt.

Realistically, how often is somebody going to leave negative or neutral feedback, under fear of possible discretion breaking retaliation from those WGs that have bad attitudes? Not very often, I wouldn't fucking risk it, not worth the potential hassle IMO.

UKP is the best source of reviews that I have found. There is nothing that compares to it. Yeah you could question a reviewers opinion and fake reviews get posted, but it's the rare exception rather than the norm, and such things tend to get quickly revealed and dealt with anyway.

Honestly, only an idiot puts any value into AW feedback, it's pretty much meaningless to me in making a decision on which SP I want to book.

[Jimmyredcab]

Well, if you know a trusted punters username on AW then I suppose you can look at that, and take something from that. But even then I wouldn't really trust that, and would take it with a heavy pinch of salt.

Michelle Independant has over 1000 positive reviews on Adultwork --------------- my guess is that they are all genuine. 

[smiths]

Michelle Independant has over 1000 positive reviews on Adultwork --------------- my guess is that they are all genuine. 

No she hasn't got 1000 positive reviews on A/W, she has 1007 feedbacks as her head line amount and a number of reviews, feedback is often just a line or two, it often doesn't give much info and detail on the punt the punter had, except him saying she was great or suchlike.

She does though have many positive reviews on here and a very small number percentage wise that aren't positives, and they are worth infinity more to me than anything on A/W.

[Jimmyredcab]

Michelle Independant has over 1000 positive reviews on Adultwork --------------- my guess is that they are all genuine. 

Some people hate Adultwork because they make a profit, last time I checked it is not illegal in this country to run a successful business.   

[Jimmyredcab]

Michelle Independant has over 1000 positive reviews on Adultwork --------------- my guess is that they are all genuine. 

She also has 114 positive reviews on here ----------------- 3 negative (one of those negatives was not an actual meet)

[bearcat69]

Some people hate Adultwork because they make a profit, last time I checked it is not illegal in this country to run a successful business.   

I don't think you would ever see me hate on AdultWork for being a business and making a profit.

I understand that they want to encourage bookings to be made and positive feedback to be left, as that is what means they will make money. In essence it keeps the site profitable and alive, and it being the primary source of escorts in the country, last thing I would want is for that to not be the case.

I just wouldn't base my decision on which girl I want to book based on the feedback there. If a girl has over 1000 feedback on AW, there more than likely is good reason for it.. But the reviews on here allow me to confirm that to a greater degree, and understand what exactly is good about that particular girl.

Honestly, when I first started punting, and before I started reading reviews on here, Adultwork was almost a bit of an indecipherable mess to me. I would probably never even of heard of Michelle Independent had it not been for UKP reviews.

[Jimmyredcab]

I don't think you would ever see me hate on AdultWork for being a business and making a profit.

Don't get me wrong, Adultwork has faults ------------- lots of them, for example when they allow girls to hide their feedback.

They are unique in so much that they get revenue from the girls AND the punters who pay for private galleries, they must make thousands week after week.   

[Brazilian Martian]

Not really true.
The majority of AW reviews are probably genuine -------------- any punting site can have false reviews.   

Jim the site makes it possible for prossies to leave feedback on clients so I can imagine some punters will post positive feedback just for a easy life.

[hw189]

I once went to see an English girl off AW who had well over 100 positive AW feedback at the time. Thought to myself, can't go wrong with this one. This was well before the days of discovering this site and when I was still a bit naive. Turns out this girl was a scammer, and I was robbed blind by her boyfriend / pimp on arrival. Can't remember the exact details, but every time I left a negative feedback on this scammer's AW profile (and I did this several times to warn others) the feedback just either got deleted, or her feedback got hidden.

Lesson learnt the hard way. Never again did I ever trust AW feedback and reviews from that day on.

[cueball]

Obviously you need to take care in believing what is written on the internet by anonymous people on any site.

On here, I've got my trusted buddies and then the other members reviews that I trust also.... here the trust comes in time and input, the bullshitters tend to get weedled out eventually.

The only use aw fb is for me is the question whether she's real or scam. The words written in aw fb are completely irrelevant to me, it's only any use for cross checking if she's real (fb from punters who have seen the same lass as me etc).

I've seen lasses that have glowing aw fb but the reality has been a disappointment.

The old ymmv is never more apt than when applied to punting though.

[jr8777]

Jim the site makes it possible for prossies to leave feedback on clients so I can imagine some punters will post positive feedback just for a easy life.

I'm a VERY infrequent client who has predominantly used one girl in recent years who's not adultwork registered. 

I've seen a few profiles of girls on AW that I'm interested in seeing, but who as things stand aren't available to me due to lack of feedback, so am looking at seeing a couple of others over the next few months - more to collect the feedback I need rather than out of any huge desire to see the girls concerned.

I think in the circumstances I'd be very reluctant to leave a bad review - I've read several bad reviews on AW which have degenerated into ugly tit for tat slanging matches, which leave the punter looking as bad as the girl he's trying to criticize.  I think my approach would be to chalk a bad punt down to experience and either keep schtum or even give a favourable review in the hope of receiving one in turn. 

Sorry if that's cowardly and unhelpful to other users but there it is!

[cueball]

I think in the circumstances I'd be very reluctant to leave a bad review - I've read several bad reviews on AW which have degenerated into ugly tit for tat slanging matches, which leave the punter looking as bad as the girl he's trying to criticize.  I think my approach would be to chalk a bad punt down to experience and either keep schtum or even give a favourable review in the hope of receiving one in turn. 

Sorry if that's cowardly and unhelpful to other users but there it is!

I think most don't care what you put on aw

You could do yourself a power of good by sharing in review form on here though

[smiths]

I think most don't care what you put on aw

You could do yourself a power of good by sharing in review form on here though

Spot on.

[Jimmyredcab]

Jim the site makes it possible for prossies to leave feedback on clients so I can imagine some punters will post positive feedback just for a easy life.

I am not Jimmyredcab on Adultwork -------------- I only leave true feedback. 

[Jeff_withpetersen]

I did not know AW reviews were worthless so question answered within 5 mins

I wouldn't say they are 'worthless' but your question was, should we trust AW or UKP reviews. The answer to which is, trust UKP 100 times out of 100. As far as I'm concerned, nobody sane is going to see someone with 100 positives on AW but 0 positive/2 negative on here. And frankly it's embarrassing when WGs get a bad review on here and get all indignant, oooo but what about all my AW feedback.

AW feedback is tainted (potentially) by the fact that AW is massively in favour of the ladies and also guys can fear getting tit for tat negative feedback if they leave a negative.

[king tarzan]

I am on both adultworks as Jagajee and king tarzan on here..

On both adultworks  and uk punting positive virtually guarantees yummy dfk and a great friendly gfe...
I don't bullshit, I tell the truth on both...
And would go far as to say I am MR CREDIBLE on both adultworks and uk punting. ..

[Brazilian Martian]

I am on both adultworks as Jagajee and king tarzan on here..

On both adultworks  and uk punting positive virtually guarantees yummy dfk and a great friendly gfe...
I don't bullshit, I tell the truth on both...
And would go far as to say I am MR CREDIBLE on both adultworks and uk punting. ..

Mr credibe 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[king tarzan]

Mr credibe 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Better than your mingher jackhammer reviews!!

[The_Don]

External Link/Members Only

Reviews of WGs seem to differ, for example Lovely Ivy has universally negative comments & reviews on UKP, while on AW she has 100 positive reviews. With the two sites being poles apart which one can we trust?

I've made my current view clear, on A/W and the way I book W/G.