Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Right to know  (Read 2885 times)

Offline Blackpanther

So without much detective work ive discovered a few members on here who portray safety only to be closet BB's. My dilemma is that this site reports on any escorts that openly or discreetly offer such services - so having made my discovery i believe that other members have the right to know ???

Offline Watts.E.Dunn

Don't loose any sleep over it! just assume that ALL girls BB someone and take appropriate precautions and enjoy..  or just give up punting!..

Offline daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,013
  • Likes: 369
  • Reviews: 24
So without much detective work ive discovered a few members on here who portray safety only to be closet BB's. My dilemma is that this site reports on any escorts that openly or discreetly offer such services - so having made my discovery i believe that other members have the right to know ???
If you are talking about male members you will need irrefutable evidence that it is true not just malicious rumours from other sites.

Offline scutty brown

have you stumbled over the thread on the specialist forum??
Disregard it - it's one guys revenge for getting banned from here multiple times

Goldwing1 was one of his ID's, and I think LeeVanCleef was another
The twat outed a punter on another forum by posting a photo of him
« Last Edit: October 15, 2021, 09:51:52 pm by scutty brown »

Offline Stevelondon

So without much detective work ive discovered a few members on here who portray safety only to be closet BB's. My dilemma is that this site reports on any escorts that openly or discreetly offer such services - so having made my discovery i believe that other members have the right to know ???


Come on...we can't all be that naive to think all SP's are squeeky clean and that all punters (our friends on here) have each others interests at heart.
But read Daviemacs post please before doing anything else.

Offline cotton

Bareback is vigorously condemned on this site so it would be natural in the circumstances for members who do BB to hide the fact rather than attract loads of flak from other forum members . Wether its a legitimate cause to unearth and expose closet auto-censored members is another question.  Personally id say in the case of members proactively found to be condemning others for BB and then found to be secretively doing it themselves then there might be some point to it in terms of exposing hypocrasy and double standards (subject obviously to what Davie said re evidence).  But where members are just closet BB'ers keeping quiet about it for an easy life then id say this is essentially what the forum encourages and is itself an acknowledgement that BB is not to be encouraged so an acceptable accomodation from that pov, overall id say the general ongoing ethos of the site discouraging bareback in general terms is the more important consideration , rather than exposing every member who barebacks like a witch-hunt , after all as has been said before everyone barebacks someone sometime , its not the worst crime against humanity after all.

Offline signy

What would be the point, or advantage to punters who use this forum?

UKP punters are only a small fraction of all UK punters. Of all the punters in the UK, we can be sure many BB, and then many of those will go on to see escorts who don't allow BB, without revealing their previous history. Then there are many (most?) escorts who BB with someone, whether it be a partner, "porn professional", or regulars without advertising the fact. The whole activity is a mash-up of BB, non-BB and the full range inbetween. Outing a handful of UKP punters who may, or may not, have indulged in BB on occasion will not alter the overall situation one iota. I suspect that it would just descend into a slagging match which would benefit no-one.

All we can do as individuals is take the precautions we each feel necessary for our own health, whilst recognising that there will always be risks involved regardless of how careful we are.
« Last Edit: October 16, 2021, 07:14:12 am by signy »

Offline scutty brown

More to the point, most of the claims on that other forum are false and malicious, deliberately intended to stir up problems on here.

Offline daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,013
  • Likes: 369
  • Reviews: 24
If relying on members of a certain specialist forum having the same name as a member here, the first thing that would have to be proved is that they are if fact one and the same.

User names are not copyrighted, anyone with a grudge can join another site and use the same name as the person they have the grudge against. Sensible punters use different names for different sites.

Offline Hobbit

So without much detective work ive discovered a few members on here who portray safety only to be closet BB's. My dilemma is that this site reports on any escorts that openly or discreetly offer such services - so having made my discovery i believe that other members have the right to know ???

Rather than focusing on what punters do, I would suggest you carry on contributing to the forum and writing reviews. Everything else is just he said she said Bullshit!

Offline dubhcarr

this is a diversion OP all you can do in this hobby is take care of your own health and target punts. If you are not getting regularly STI tested maybe that is the place to start to help protect the punting environment.   :hi:

Offline simping

I suspect most of the guys here partake in BB; I wouldn't be surprised if they use the regional BB avoidance threads to meet new girls... :unknown:

Offline scutty brown

I suspect most of the guys here partake in BB; I wouldn't be surprised if they use the regional BB avoidance threads to meet new girls... :unknown:

FFS stop trolling you shitstirrer

Offline tynetunnel

I suspect most of the guys here partake in BB; I wouldn't be surprised if they use the regional BB avoidance threads to meet new girls... :unknown:
Based on what exactly? A damp finger in the air? Intuition? Or your own preferences? I think you’ve just outed yourself   :bomb::hi:

Offline hullad

I look on the BB site .....


May has some info on current bb girls and thus ones to avoid. I have never posted or pm anyone never will I am purely being nosey. I suspect many other UKPUNTERS do the same and anyone using info to out anyone even barebackers is wrong.

Offline simping

Based on what exactly? A damp finger in the air? Intuition? Or your own preferences? I think you’ve just outed yourself   :bomb::hi:

Based on comments like this...
I love how this thread morphed from 'warning - this WG offered me BB so avoid' to 'here is a WG that is advertising BB. Enjoy'

Just helping the guys who seek out bareback escorts. I actually think that is the real purpose of this thread. Barebackers sharing information in plain view.

Yep, they pretend to be outraged by BB then create a useful thread highlighting all the women offering BB.
[/quote/]


Offline Punterperson1971

I suspect most of the guys here partake in BB; I wouldn't be surprised if they use the regional BB avoidance threads to meet new girls... :unknown:
WTF I don’t BB any wg’s I see or have seen and certainly try not to see any who offer it
Simpling I think you miss spelt your user name when you joined shouldn’t it have been simple been here for six moths and throwing fucking accusations around  :dash: :dash:
« Last Edit: October 16, 2021, 01:23:37 pm by Punterperson1971 »

Offline scutty brown


Offline Punterperson1971

hardly "most of the guys here"
He’s dodgy himself possibly likes to troll people to gain a reaction


Offline tynetunnel

I suspect most of the guys here partake in BB; I wouldn't be surprised if they use the regional BB avoidance threads to meet new girls... :unknown:

Based on comments like this...
Yep, they pretend to be outraged by BB then create a useful thread highlighting all the women offering BB.

“Most of the guys here”: you think three potential examples means that you can accurately extrapolate “most”?  :unknown:

Twat!  :hi:

Offline scutty brown

So without much detective work ive discovered a few members on here who portray safety only to be closet BB's. My dilemma is that this site reports on any escorts that openly or discreetly offer such services - so having made my discovery i believe that other members have the right to know ???

rather hypocritical when read with this review

So have stumbled across a great Rommie in Mk , size 4 tiny but firm only been here a few days and keen. Kept asking if she did ok and so tight hasn’t been worn out yet. Kissing was light but eventually the more she got turned on it became dfk. I’m not massive and it took a bit to get her wet enough to slip in but she enjoyed fingering and made some I think genuine noises. Plus bonus doesn’t use any lube.
The house is discreet seen a few girls here all very professional. Even after sex we lay on the bed whilst I  fingerblasted her to orgasm. £60 for 30 mins but definitely worth it if you like them petite. Was gonna keep it to myself but only fair to share the spoils, as good as jessy and Nicole in Leicester.
Everything was covered but had a great time
. Il definitely be back and hopefully her attitude doesn’t change like so many do as they get tired.
External Link/Members Only
Like I said I’m not massive but I looked huge inside her and she’s so flexible, enjoy .

rather suggests the OP prefers bare

Offline Punterperson1971

So without much detective work ive discovered a few members on here who portray safety only to be closet BB's. My dilemma is that this site reports on any escorts that openly or discreetly offer such services - so having made my discovery i believe that other members have the right to know ???
I think the only dilemma you have op is wether you have a brain cell or not because clearly it’s not working at the minute is it
so why don’t you reply and defend those accusations you’ve made against people on here or are you just laughing now because you’ve got peoples attention
Oh and I’ve reported you by the way and hopefully you will either be gone or they keep any eye on you
« Last Edit: October 16, 2021, 02:02:20 pm by Punterperson1971 »

Offline Punterperson1971

So without much detective work ive discovered a few members on here who portray safety only to be closet BB's. My dilemma is that this site reports on any escorts that openly or discreetly offer such services - so having made my discovery i believe that other members have the right to know ???
Op would you tell people on here that you are a closet BBer in your own wordsI believe you wouldn’t say anything and as you state we have a right to know
This detective work you’ve allegedly done how and where have you done this

Offline Marmalade

If you are talking about male members you will need irrefutable evidence that it is true not just malicious rumours from other sites.
Indeed.

And…
As in zee commandments…
12 Bareback / Unprotected sex
Allowed, but other members have the right to express disapproval of such activities.
24 Allegations against punters
Admin can only judge members based upon their conduct online. The admin is not law enforcement and does not have investigatory powers, and cannot determine whether any 'real-world' allegation against a member is true. Inaction by admin on unverified allegations does not mean endorsement of any alleged misconduct.

At least one member openly seeks out and practices BB and gives a good account of his reasons.
So a member can express disapproval all he wants (politely) but UKP is not a police state.

Offline mrfishyfoo

More to the point, most of the claims on that other forum are false and malicious, deliberately intended to stir up problems on here.

Indeed.

I redcarded a lass many moons ago now and her pimp took great exception to it.

Amazing what utter fucking crap appeared on those sites about me after that.

I still have all the messages the cunt sent me and shared with OLDADMIN at the time.

My point being if you believe everything you read on the Internet then you need your head examining.


Offline mrfishyfoo

rather hypocritical when read with this review

rather suggests the OP prefers bare

Who doesn't in a CIVVIE relationship ??

If the lass is tested and hasn't fucked anyone but me in the last 4 months.

Then she gets it raw.  :yahoo: :yahoo:

.....and FWIW I ain't had a civvie relationship for years and won't be having one as the variety of fanny I get punting far outwieghs the "other" things a civvie relationship entails.


« Last Edit: October 16, 2021, 04:10:20 pm by mrfishyfoo »

Offline LLPunting

So without much detective work ive discovered a few members on here who portray safety only to be closet BB's. My dilemma is that this site reports on any escorts that openly or discreetly offer such services - so having made my discovery i believe that other members have the right to know ???

Why were you investigating other possible UKPers?  And you'd have to be given that you said you did some detective work, implying target and intent.

No punting site, or indeed most any site that's not transacting real-life business via electronic money transfer, requires people who register to prove who they are so whether you've exposed what you think is a UKPer's true identity or someone on a site you're monitoring has claimed something about a UKPer, you can only prove someone's id by tying private information which you shouldn't have access to (protected by GDPR) to someone incontrovertibly identified to be a UKPer i.e. you have probably broken the law.
Apart from an irate partner, their legal representation or their social circle that they've blabbed to the only others who could provide you with that would be either SPs, their management, other punters who can prove they know the UKPer or their communications provider who would then have to show you video evidence of the "accused" actually Bb'ing an SP (your one get out is that the "accused" has posted identifiable BB'ing footage in the public domain).  Pretty much anything less is hearsay, other than possibly post-event confirmation like "babe, so enjoyed fucking you raw when we met".  Sharing of said evidence would be illegal on several levels, beyond the breach of privacy of taking the likely un-consented footage.

So when you say you have "proof"...

That said, if the UKPer has admitted to their UKPer id and gone on to say I BB'd an SP recently (since condemning BBing on UKP) then fair do's.  Or maybe they've posted a feedback confirming they did it raw with an SP on AW and their AW id is undeniably "publicly" linked with their UKP id.  :unknown:
« Last Edit: October 16, 2021, 06:16:12 pm by LLPunting »

Offline tynetunnel

So when you say you have "proof"...

I don’t see where the OP said he has “proof”  :unknown:

Offline daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,013
  • Likes: 369
  • Reviews: 24
I don’t see where the OP said he has “proof”  :unknown:
He doesn't say he has 'proof' but saying - "ive discovered a few members on here who portray safety only to be closet BB's." - is a statement of fact.

Offline bedhedred

I look on the BB site .....


May has some info on current bb girls and thus ones to avoid. I have never posted or pm anyone never will I am purely being nosey. I suspect many other UKPUNTERS do the same and anyone using info to out anyone even barebackers is wrong.

I had a look on the bb site for a bit of diversion one day. They find the ukp bb avoidance thread is more useful than anything they can contribute. They have only about 4k users so tiny by comparison to ukp.

Online guymids-72

OP sounds like he has too much time on his hands to me.

Offline Thephoenix

OP sounds like he has too much time on his hands to me.

All too complicated.

Stick to this fine site and practice safe sex.

The guy needs to get out more.

Offline PumpDump

So without much detective work ive discovered a few members on here who portray safety only to be closet BB's. My dilemma is that this site reports on any escorts that openly or discreetly offer such services - so having made my discovery i believe that other members have the right to know ???

Wow well done sherlock. Next time my house is broken in to and the cops do fuck all to catch the thief I will call upon your superior detective work.

Offline SamOmar

I had a look on the bb site for a bit of diversion one day. They find the ukp bb avoidance thread is more useful than anything they can contribute. They have only about 4k users so tiny by comparison to ukp.

That site is also full of fake news and I have spoken to more than 1 regular who has been distressed due to lots of enquiries off that nature
Banned reason: Undesirable, convicted sex trafficker / pimp
Banned by: daviemac

Offline SamOmar

Wow well done sherlock. Next time my house is broken in to and the cops do fuck all to catch the thief I will call upon your superior detective work.

Too harsh on the OP, especially since you seemed to be obsessed with BB, wouldn't be surprised if "detective work" leads you to having a profile on the other site
Banned reason: Undesirable, convicted sex trafficker / pimp
Banned by: daviemac

Offline PumpDump

Too harsh on the OP, especially since you seemed to be obsessed with BB, wouldn't be surprised if "detective work" leads you to having a profile on the other site

You're the one who just admitted to having an account there  :lol: