Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Louise Caplan, supreme scammer jailed  (Read 3825 times)

Online scutty brown

Escort, 34, who defrauded millionaire ‘sugar daddy’, 68, out of £2.5m jailed for more than 5 years

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline PunterNumber69

The guy was a bit of a dick though to believe all of what was going on.

It's a business transaction. Sex for money.

If you're looking for a wife going dating.


Offline theejaculator

The defense counsel summed it up, partly...

"He made decisions that were disastrous and astonishing for a man with his expertise and background. The decisions he made were not made using his head, that is for sure."

Offline Vice Admiral

On a minor note, I do wish the media would stop referring to the most important and life-enhancing website on the net as "Adult Works".  (This isn't the first time I have seen this usage.) 

The piece in today's Times also uses this variant, so all three newspaper reports probably derive from the same news agency source.

A moment's reflection would, however, surely have led any sub-editor with good instincts to wonder whether an escorting website would really have such a clunky name – and it would have taken only a few seconds to check.

« Last Edit: October 09, 2021, 12:52:38 pm by Vice Admiral »

Offline punter6199

I don't understand why men would want to be a sugar daddy your pretty much the girls bitch 24/7.

Offline Taggart

Sad case, massive sums involved but he won’t be the last. Must have been a lonely bloke.

Wonder if she’ll face a proceeds of crime hearing?

Offline A Decent Fist

Quote
any sub-editor with good instincts

Looking back on my former career in that illustrious profession, I may well have let the error go to avoid revealing my inside knowledge. It would not surprise me if many of the present generation are in a similar position.

Offline Strawberry

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,790
  • Likes: 47
On a minor note, I do wish the media would stop referring to the most important and life-enhancing website on the net as "Adult Works".  (This isn't the first time I have seen this usage.) 

The piece in today's Times also uses this variant, so all three newspaper reports probably derive from the same news agency source.

A moment's reflection would, however, surely have led any sub-editor with good instincts to wonder whether an escorting website would really have such a clunky name – and it would have taken only a few seconds to check.

Over many years I have noticed quite a few people use the plural Adultworks in forum posts, and occasionally other forms of communication - but not usually the words disconnected.

Offline Blackpool Rock

I'm surprised she even went to jail, clearly she played then guy for a total Sap with EAS and recognised it from day 1 but loans without any paperwork or legal agreement  :unknown:
What's the difference here between any relationship where the guy splashes loads of cash on expensive holidays; trips and meals out; jewellery etc then the girl dumps him  :unknown:

Thing is if I was going to splurge that much cash on a girl then i'd make sure she was a damned site better looking than that one  :hi:

Offline Blackpool Rock

Looking back on my former career in that illustrious profession, I may well have let the error go to avoid revealing my inside knowledge. It would not surprise me if many of the present generation are in a similar position.
The thing is surely any Journo worth his salt should be fully aware of what Adultwork is  :unknown:

Offline Lou2019

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 532
  • Likes: 54
The guy was a bit of a dick though to believe all of what was going on.

It's a business transaction. Sex for money.

If you're looking for a wife going dating.

 :thumbsup:

Offline MrT222

Christ, he agreed to pay £10,000 per month to be her sugar daddy! For that kind of money you could literally see a different escort every single day and still have money leftover.

It's not even like she's exceptionally good looking. What a donut.

Whenever I read articles like this I'm reminded how some people just have far more money than sense.

Offline Straightsix

There are some guys on this site paying over a hundred quid on an escort that doesn't allow kissing and warrants a negative.
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Straightsix

The thing is surely any Journo worth his salt should be fully aware of what Adultwork is  :unknown:
Imagine the effect on society if AdultWork became a household name!
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline GingerNuts

There are some guys on this site paying over a hundred quid on an escort that doesn't allow kissing and warrants a negative.

Not if kissing isn't a service offered.

Online badsin

Imagine the effect on society if AdultWork became a household name!
In a local co-op a few nights ago and quite a fit blonde on a till was telling her colleague about Sugar Daddies and getting supported through that..... It probably is known about more than we may imagine

*I did log into my SA account to see if I could spot said blonde  :hi:

Offline finn5555

Another fine example of why NO pro$$ies can be trusted  :drinks:

Offline Stevelondon

Another fine example of why NO pro$$ies can be trusted  :drinks:

As if every punter isn’t gullible  :D :D

I can’t even be bothered to read the story. As if it’s important in the greater scheme of things.

On the topic of sugar daddies. I do know someone in an arrangement like this. He is certainly no millionaire but well off…… yes.
It’s a fetish involvement though……. Not your vanilla sex thing.
It works for him so I guess the important thing is wether the agreement works and it’s not making you fall into financial hardship.

Not something for me but then I’m a tight feckin git.  :lol:

Offline Comicman

The sad thing is i can't say I'm surprised  :dash:

Online scutty brown

Anyone able to ID her on AW? It would be interesting to see if she's been reviewed on here

Offline Straightsix

Not if kissing isn't a service offered.
Huh? Surely you wouldn't book someone if that's what you're after?
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Straightsix

In a local co-op a few nights ago and quite a fit blonde on a till was telling her colleague about Sugar Daddies and getting supported through that..... It probably is known about more than we may imagine

*I did log into my SA account to see if I could spot said blonde  :hi:
I think most women realise they can sell sex and do. Especially the good looking ones. Why give it away for free? Hell! Just marry him!
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Lou2019

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 532
  • Likes: 54
I think most women realise they can sell sex and do. Especially the good looking ones. Why give it away for free? Hell! Just marry him!

I wouldn’t say most women

Offline Straightsix

Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline the_exile

No fool like an old fool, as they say.

Offline GingerNuts

Huh? Surely you wouldn't book someone if that's what you're after?

Your post was badly worded if you meant SPs who offer/promise a service and don't deliver. It suggests all SPs who charge over £100 and don't allow kissing should receive a negative review.

Offline Straightsix

Your post was badly worded if you meant SPs who offer/promise a service and don't deliver. Yes, sorry about that. It was badly worded and could also have meant this. And that was infact what I meant although I'm surprised you chose to infer as you did. Why would a punter leave a negative rating because a service not listed wasn't offered? (Actually I think it does happen, rarely though😆 and generally with no 'happy ending') It suggests all SPs who charge over £100 and don't allow kissing should receive a negative review. No it doesn't,  how?
« Last Edit: October 09, 2021, 07:08:11 pm by Straightsix »
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline GingerNuts

No it doesn't,  how?

That's what it said.

There are some guys on this site paying over a hundred quid on an escort that doesn't allow kissing and warrants a negative.

Offline Straightsix

There are some guys on this site paying over a hundred quid on an escort that doesn't allow kissing and warrants a negative.

What it should have read:

There are some guys on this site paying over a hundred quid on an escort that refuses to kiss despite advertising this service and having a negative rating.

Is that better 👍?
« Last Edit: October 09, 2021, 07:20:28 pm by Straightsix »
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline geostorm1

I don't get the sugar daddy thing either. I'm doing okay financially (not loaded but could afford to lose a few 100 every month) and I recently dabbled on SA but it just feels way too risky. They all want your face picture over WhatsApp (and then the obvious case of wanting some form of payment for their arrangement which you either setup a 2nd PayPal account or risk identity leak with bank transfer). It just doesn't feel worth the risk. SA banned my account for soliciting sex in exchange for compensation, and to be honest I'm glad and I don't think I will create a new account.

It only takes one bitch to track down who you are and send a chat screenshot with your photo to your wife and you're fucked.

Online Colston36

Escort, 34, who defrauded millionaire ‘sugar daddy’, 68, out of £2.5m jailed for more than 5 years

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Can't break my heart over a tax accountant being robbed ....

Offline kojak71

The article in The Sun describes the victim as 'wily' after saying he negotiated her proposed £150k p.a. down to £10k per month.

Very below the belt, although I suppose it's too be expected from The Scum Newspaper. Guy got rinsed of a massive amount of cash and is publicly embarrassed. Doesn't need shit like that on top, in my opinion.

Offline lillythesavage

The article in The Sun describes the victim as 'wily' after saying he negotiated her proposed £150k p.a. down to £10k per month.

Very below the belt, although I suppose it's too be expected from The Scum Newspaper. Guy got rinsed of a massive amount of cash and is publicly embarrassed. Doesn't need shit like that on top, in my opinion.

They are only reporting his own words in court :unknown:

Offline CMiller

Why give it away for free?
Sex always has a cost. Sometimes the cheapest sex is the sex you pay for.

Offline Al

Just to be clear, she wasn't prosecuted for the sugar daddy elements but for taking 2.5m off him for business deals that never occurred.



Offline finn5555

Just to be clear, she wasn't prosecuted for the sugar daddy elements but for taking 2.5m off him for business deals that never occurred.

Ok Colombo 😂😂😂

Offline Gordon Bennett

On a minor note, I do wish the media would stop referring to the most important and life-enhancing website on the net as "Adult Works".  (This isn't the first time I have seen this usage.) 

The piece in today's Times also uses this variant, so all three newspaper reports probably derive from the same news agency source.

A moment's reflection would, however, surely have led any sub-editor with good instincts to wonder whether an escorting website would really have such a clunky name – and it would have taken only a few seconds to check.

Maybe the journalist is Eastern European? They seem to mix up their plurals, y'know, "I don't see black mans" kind of thing.

Offline Straightsix

Sex always has a cost. Sometimes the cheapest sex is the sex you pay for.
And i agree!...Try telling that to the girls here!...lol! 😆
« Last Edit: October 10, 2021, 11:49:50 pm by Straightsix »
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline lillythesavage

Just to be clear, she wasn't prosecuted for the sugar daddy elements but for taking 2.5m off him for business deals that never occurred.

Cannot see the problem, she did invest the money, in property , art and designer gear.  :D

Offline lillythesavage

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only.


According to a post today on a review of hers this is the one.

UKPunting »Discussions & Reviews »Escort Reviews »South East »Sexy Auralia - Gerrards Cross
« Last Edit: October 19, 2021, 03:46:02 pm by lillythesavage »


Offline Stevenoob

She’s a greedy bitch

He’s a silly sausage

They’ll both learn from this - her through 5 years drinking from the hairy goblet and him from having to dip into a state pension.

Anyone else get scammed by her?

Offline GingerNuts

She’s a greedy bitch

He’s a silly sausage

They’ll both learn from this - her through 5 years drinking from the hairy goblet and him from having to dip into a state pension.

Anyone else get scammed by her?

Does it say anywhere she took all his millions? Presumably he'll also be able to claim the house, artwork etc. she acquired as the proceeds of fraud.

Offline Payyourwaymate

Maybe the journalist is Eastern European? They seem to mix up their plurals, y'know, "I don't see black mans" kind of thing.

Funny you mention that, as a WG this woman had an NBA  :lol:.

Offline lillythesavage

Does it say anywhere she took all his millions? Presumably he'll also be able to claim the house, artwork etc. she acquired as the proceeds of fraud.

The local paper in the thread mentions the 2.5 million, guess he had more, but also points out he was high on the on the autistic spectrum, which the national press did not seem to.

Offline elnukky

If they only had sex at least 6 times, that's £417k per punt!!
Even if he manged to have sex with her once a week since 2017, that's £12,000 per punt!!

Offline The Owl

Christ, he agreed to pay £10,000 per month to be her sugar daddy! For that kind of money you could literally see a different escort every single day and still have money leftover.

It's not even like she's exceptionally good looking. What a donut.

Whenever I read articles like this I'm reminded how some people just have far more money than sense.

I reckon a sugar daddy who pays one woman £10K a month is hopelessly in love and living in fantasy land, thinking his money can replace real feelings. They're just meal tickets for prostitutes who know how to manipulate people for extended periods of time and handle the head fuck of acting constantly with someone they wouldn't be seen dead with if no money was exchanged.

We've seen quite a few deluded punters on this forum who got very upset when their money didn't buy them the love they wanted.

Offline tynetunnel

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only.


According to a post today on a review of hers this is the one.

UKPunting »Discussions & Reviews »Escort Reviews »South East »Sexy Auralia - Gerrards Cross

It can’t be her… the stated age on AW matches the age in the news report!!

Offline tynetunnel

I think we all know why she’s listed as “NOT WORKING” on Friday 8th October….



Hidden Image/Members Only