Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: HoD Amelia - Victoria SW1V - Cute brunette GND (TOFTT)  (Read 2028 times)

Offline Shadow314

Link External Link/Members Only

Saw new girl Amelia on the rota with some nice candid pictures so decided to sample. Usual HoD location, £150 for the hour.

Amelia is a 23yo 5'4" British brunette GND, a cuddly size 8/10 with little B/C cup breasts and lovely curvy hips. She's very much got the sexy student vibe with various tattoos and unshaved armpits and a bush over her shaved pussy.
She has short hair, a cute face with intense blue eyes, and a friendly flirty persona.

Warm welcome and straight into DFK. This is where she excels, very passionate pushing herself close into my embrace :dance: Undressed her matching bra panty set as we continued to snog, also sucking her tits.
Knew from the profile it was OW only enjoying that in various positions as I admired her body and sexy soles. Lots of eye contact from her, a bit handsy but think that's needed with OW, and balls licked on request.
Switched to RO/fingering getting Amelia nice and squelchingly wet, her mound grinding upon my face. Nice vocal finish, her whole body getting into it, but that could have been for my benefit. Face-sitting might be fun with her.
Slipped inside her in mish. Felt she angled her body a bit restricting depth, but relaxed that when comfortable I wasn't going to pound her. Lots of snogging and eye contact and popped in the bag.

Little intra round chat but then told me she wouldn't be able to go again other than oral :(
Did have some more nice snogging before the promised OW, but no success in changing her mind to jump on top.

Admittedly I didn't confirm a second round with her, but thought that's a given in an hour booking and every other girl I've seen at HoD has done unlimited pops.
Could be a negative for that but kept as neutral, since I actually would recommend her for a 30min booking. Passionate snogging with a 20-something has a nice appeal.

My Ratings
Face 7/10
Body 7/10
Personality 7/10
Service 5/10
Comms 5/5
Location 4/5
TOTAL 35/50

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: April 15, 2024, 10:02:51 pm by Shadow314 »

Offline Fuzzyduck

Cheers for the review. Shame about no OWO, I like her look.

Offline anonymouse72

She does look cute and I like the girl next door student look. Hairy armpits and no second round though!!!

Thanks for the review.

Online finn5555

Good review sounds like your typical girl next door 👍🏻

Offline edc770

Been waiting for a review of this one, thanks   :thumbsup:, right up my street. Onto the 'to do' list, 30 minutes obviously.

Offline Saltnpepper

Cheers for the review , did she give the reason why no 2nd pop ?

Offline MysteryManNo.7

Good review and intel. I am tempted by her despite OW only and her apparently only allowing 1 pop as I'm a one and done bloke anyway and much prefer foreplay. It does seem very cheeky to say the least however that in a 1 hour booking she denied you a second round of penetration despite you saying you weren't pounding away.

The unshaved armpits are a bit of a turnoff however the promise of a neatly maintained patch of pubic hair sounds rather nice as that appears to be an almost complete rarity nowadays especially amongst younger escorts. Can't remember the last 'girl next door' type escort I saw and they are a nice treat.

Online Ron89

I feel the need to add my two cents. Visited last week, I ended up walking due to her being a bit less attractive facially than I expected and her curves being less also (flat arse). I then got a call from HOD receptionist fuming with me for walking and telling me not come back as I’ve wasted her time. Absolute joke and implies that punters don’t have the right to observe and change their mind.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2024, 12:41:55 pm by Ron89 »

Offline MysteryManNo.7

I feel the need to add my two cents. Visited last week, I ended up walking due to her being a bit less attractive facially than I expected and her curves being less also (flat arse). I then got a call from HOD receptionist fuming with me for walking and telling me not come back as I’ve wasted her time. Absolute joke and implies that punters don’t have the right to observe and change their mind.

They have a basically uncensored face pic up of her on the HOD twitter from yesterday and she looks good to me however, stating the obvious, beauty is of course subjective. She does look and sound from all accounts like your classic 'Girl Next Door' escort and not a stunning, curvy, drop dead gorgeous individual but certainly not unattractive IMO. 

Online patelprat

I love fuzzy armpits. I hope she keeps.

Offline MysteryManNo.7

I love fuzzy armpits. I hope she keeps.

I imagine they're quite a rarity too so seems you've got lucky there.

Offline anonymouse72

I love fuzzy armpits. I hope she keeps.

Fuzzy pits. Extra £20 baby :D

Online Ron89

They have a basically uncensored face pic up of her on the HOD twitter from yesterday and she looks good to me however, stating the obvious, beauty is of course subjective. She does look and sound from all accounts like your classic 'Girl Next Door' escort and not a stunning, curvy, drop dead gorgeous individual but certainly not unattractive IMO.
That’s fine, it’s all subjective. My point stands re once you’re booked you’re committed unless you’re okay with ruffling feathers

Offline MysteryManNo.7

That’s fine, it’s all subjective. My point stands re once you’re booked you’re committed unless you’re okay with ruffling feathers

Yeah that is also my take with HOD that once you've confirmed, that's it basically and whilst you can walk of course don't be surprised if your number gets blacklisted.

Offline LauraHoD

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 178
  • Likes: 49
I probably depends on few things like how long you booked and if you declined her in an offensive manner.  Did you tell her that your leaving cos you think she is ugly? Or were you more diplomatic? I have met her I think she is a pretty and young looking girl. The photos in the white bodysuit are taken at HoD so they are very recent. So I don't think the photos are misleading.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2024, 03:39:35 pm by LauraHoD »

Offline anonymouse72

Yeah that is also my take with HOD that once you've confirmed, that's it basically and whilst you can walk of course don't be surprised if your number gets blacklisted.

Nothing a new PAYG or cloud SIM doesn't sort out.

Offline MysteryManNo.7

Nothing a new PAYG or cloud SIM doesn't sort out.

Yes of course, I thought that myself but (assuming he plans to try this) he now runs the risk of running into the same maid who gave him a bollocking to begin with which may mean getting turned away again. No idea how many maids are employed in total at HOD though and there seems to only ever be one maid on duty now and they tend to hang around in the 1st floor flat most of the time.

Offline anonymouse72

Yes of course, I thought that myself but (assuming he plans to try this) he now runs the risk of running into the same maid who gave him a bollocking to begin with which may mean getting turned away again. No idea how many maids are employed in total at HOD though and there seems to only ever be one maid on duty now and they tend to hang around i byn the 1st floor flat most of the time.

On reflection a screenshot from CCTV would be more of a concern to me than a phone number being saved. One for the rogues gallery.

Offline MysteryManNo.7

On reflection a screenshot from CCTV would be more of a concern to me than a phone number being saved. One for the rogues gallery.

Ah yes, good point. Forgot about that!

Online Ron89

I probably depends on few things like how long you booked and if you declined her in an offensive manner.  Did you tell her that your leaving cos you think she is ugly? Or were you more diplomatic? I have met her I think she is a pretty and young looking girl. The photos in the white bodysuit are taken at HoD so they are very recent. So I don't think the photos are misleading.
Of course I didn’t do it offensively. The pictures of her rear are cleverly angled and misleading

Online patelprat

Of course I didn’t do it offensively. The pictures of her rear are cleverly angled and misleading

What did you say out of interest to excuse yourself?
If she really is not much like the photos, then I don't see why you should be committed. I read on another thread that another SP had lots of tattoos, which don't show on the HOD photos. Another valid reason for walking if you aren't into tattoos (I don't personally have a problem with that, just using it as an example).

« Last Edit: April 20, 2024, 06:36:37 pm by patelprat »

Online finn5555

It’s well documented that HOD Photoshop, I would walk if they were misleading but then again I wouldn’t go to HOD if that was the last place on earth to get pussy 😂

Offline LauraHoD

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 178
  • Likes: 49
Does anyone not photoshop? Obviously professional photos are gonna be retouched but with the technology  now anyone can edit their photos that they have taken themselves on their smartphones. BTW I don't photoshop my twitter pics( partly cos I don't know how!) But I do make sure I get a flattering angle and lighting to avoid looking too fat or cellulite ridden. Same with personal social media most people aren't going to want unflattering pictures online.

Online finn5555

Does anyone not photoshop? Obviously professional photos are gonna be retouched but with the technology  now anyone can edit their photos that they have taken themselves on their smartphones. BTW I don't photoshop my twitter pics( partly cos I don't know how!) But I do make sure I get a flattering angle and lighting to avoid looking too fat or cellulite ridden. Same with personal social media most people aren't going to want unflattering pictures online.

Plenty don’t as they know the risk of punters walking. There is a difference between flattering angles and blatant editing for sure.

I admire your determination to stick up for your employer Laura although it’s not necessary as they seem to do OK

Offline LauraHoD

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 178
  • Likes: 49
I'm not sticking up for them as such more for the girl in this review. I think the photos of her are representative although to be honest I didn't really get a very good look at her arse. Everyone is going to put what they consider the best photos they can on their profile. Hers are
probably some of the least retouched photos on the HoD site as they are all non professional

Online finn5555

I'm not sticking up for them as such more for the girl in this review. I think the photos of her are representative although to be honest I didn't really get a very good look at her arse. Everyone is going to put what they consider the best photos they can on their profile. Hers are
probably some of the least retouched photos on the HoD site as they are all non professional

OK, I am with you now. To be fair her photos don’t look overly photoshopped and if she didn’t work for that cunt of a pimp I would happily book her 👍🏻👍🏻

Offline Shadow314

Cheers for the review , did she give the reason why no 2nd pop ?

No good reason, seems it's just her way of doing things.  Whilst she's new at HoD got the sense she's not new to the industry so probably had this approach at her past gigs.

Offline Shadow314

I thought the photos were decent in terms of her looks, especially the ones in white.  Actually liked that they were more candid than the usual studio shots.

Her butt does looks better arched than standing. The mirror selfie probably over-accentuates things, but I'd always expect any WG pics to be their most flattering angles.

Offline Saltnpepper

She has reveled herself fully now, gnd. I'd defo give her a try. Only issue for me is the armpit hair.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only