Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Big changes ahead at AW  (Read 11471 times)

Offline Cunning Stunts

There are loads of verified escorts who don’t have anything to do with porn or webcams, sure they may sell a few movies, PG to pay for their phone numbers to be displayed but fucking punters is their main source of income and I fail to see why they wouldn’t sign a form to say the images are of them, they are over 18, and have consented to post their own pictures.

Are you mad ?  Have you seen this ?

There are content providers on AW who are going to have to recruit teams of admins just to keep up with AW.s compliance requirements.

They will basically have to fill in a form for every pic and clip on their profile and create a file for every person whos in each one and that's before they have to start contacting and getting written permissions from everybody who appears in any way on their profile and right now theyre giving people less that a week  to do it.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline SeekingSteve

Reading that it looks like box ticking to be fair. They are not asking for proof of consent to be uploaded, only upon request. As long as the SP/CC has 2 braincells they can soon fake fill a form to upload. If not, just delete the questioned content, problem solved.

Offline Moby Dick

Are you mad ?  Have you seen this ?

There are content providers on AW who are going to have to recruit teams of admins just to keep up with AW.s compliance requirements.

They will basically have to fill in a form for every pic and clip on their profile and create a file for every person whos in each one and that's before they have to start contacting and getting written permissions from everybody who appears in any way on their profile and right now theyre giving people less that a week  to do it.

Hidden Image/Members Only
I probably am Mad,  yet I am sane enough to read that and know it wont be a problem for most verified WG. Even if they do have pictures of other people on their profile (not common for the ones in my HL) they just have to tick a box to say the will keep records of who they are, nothing to upload or get verified, no written permissions to submit unless requested. Almost easier than deleting the photos/movies of punters coming in their mouths.
I suggest you read it again before raising questions about my mental health  :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: October 06, 2021, 09:22:00 pm by Moby Dick »

Offline 90125

  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,548
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 0
I probably am Mad,  yet I am sane enough to read that and know it wont be a problem for most verified WG. Even if they do have pictures of other people on their profile (not common for the ones in my HL) they just have to tick a box to say the will keep records of who they are, nothing to upload or get verified, no written permissions to submit unless requested. Almost easier than deleting the photos/movies of punters coming in their mouths.
I suggest you read it again before raising questions about my mental health  :sarcastic:

That was my take on the revised process as well. They will probably check a few accounts so they can say they have an audit process in place.

Offline Brian Stone

Let’s be honest, who actually solely uses MasterCard?

If this was Visa I would be more concerned.

Hi Guys,

New here, but I have been in the regulation of a very different area for many years and I can tell you that it is *very* likely that VISA will do what Mastercard have just done - and soon. The reasons are (i) they are in the exact same business environment as Mastercard and they are subject to the exact same pressures and risks, and if it was good for Mastercard, it's good for them too and (ii) VISA will not want to be seen to be slacker than Mastercard. All it will take is for one underage girl to get some money from VISA through an adult website and for this to get in the news and their share price will take a major hit, that very same day. It's just not a risk worth taking. All kinds of sex transactions are risky for MCard and VISA in the Me Too era and so they want to minimise that risk with regulation.   You can expect more of the same in the future.

You may ask yourself, will AW (and othrs like them) actually enforce this? And my answer is, yes, I think they will. The reason is that AW seriously want that revenue flow, and they simply cannot have Mastercard cutting them off. Simple as that. So, you will see systematic and uniform action from AW.


But, the way this newbie sees it, the regulation is a good thing.

First, we will get profiles that are more truthful, and who doesn't want that?

Second, the fakers and the scammers will get scared because they will fear AW (nd othrs like them) will cut them off for good

Third, we will be protected against having sex with an underage girl (for which the law will rightly cut your bollocks off with a rusty hacksaw blade).

Fourth, the entire environment will change for the providers and the punters. The providers will realise they are in a regulated space and they will wonder if it is a good idea to lie and bend rules *in all areas*. Punters will find there are less girls, but the ones that are there are genuine.

You see, to me, I don't need 900 WG in my area, where a lot of them are fake and scamming. I just need a few who are genuine and have what it takes to run their show like a proper business...Girls that, in any other line of business, would be called "professionals".

Brian

   
 

Offline Gaffer58

Let’s be honest, who actually solely uses MasterCard?

If this was Visa I would be more concerned.
Have you not noticed though that many who only cam also tick the escort box to increase coverage .

Offline Cunning Stunts

Decimated is the word that best describes it i think. Made many times worse by what appears to be a non-deliberate problem with the 404 issues when you attempt to go to a profile via a link like the ones regularly posted on here.

 
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=325157.0

I think AW will come to regret going about it this way in a very short time i.ll bet. They would have better spent their time and resources finding a way to get around Mastercards changes all it would have needed to keep MC out of the courts would have been a third party site inserted into the chain.

The interesting bit will be what happens to the likes of Neosurf where you can still buy credits using a Mastercard and then spend them on AW they must feel they are safe or surely they wouldn't have got into bed with AW when Paysafecard pulled out who must have taken the opposite view a month back.

The reason more content than expected has disappeared is that the verification button that was supposed to be in place before today's changes apparently still isn't there.

Offline Moby Dick

All my regulars and Must doos are still there.
OK lost quite a few from my done list but I won’t miss cos they haven’t been active, and a few pornstars etc who I probably haven’t seen for 5 or so years.

Risk is more traffic goes to the verified, timewasters included, WG will put prices up.

Offline Crazyoldhaag

All my regulars and Must doos are still there.
OK lost quite a few from my done list but I won’t miss cos they haven’t been active, and a few pornstars etc who I probably haven’t seen for 5 or so years.

Risk is more traffic goes to the verified, timewasters included, WG will put prices up.

I've just checked mine and I lost about 10!  :scare:

AW has been dying a slow death for a while now and this is just going to accelerate it's demise

Offline Moby Dick

I've just checked mine and I lost about 10!  :scare:

AW has been dying a slow death for a while now and this is just going to accelerate it's demise
I don’t know, it depends what you punt.
For me it gets rid of the dross, the scammers, the ones I have no interest in.

If I punt someone new I nowadays would select based on reviews on here, all of which i have met in the past are still verified and still in my done list.
I don’t tend to TOFTT, punt young newbies, or foreign WG. Mainly established English WG who moved from Parlours to AW.
« Last Edit: October 15, 2021, 08:33:54 pm by Moby Dick »

Offline Crazyoldhaag

I don’t know, it depends what you punt.
For me it gets rid of the dross, the scammers, the ones I have no interest in.

If I punt someone new I nowadays would select based on reviews on here, all of which i have met in the past are still verified and still in my done list.
I don’t tend to TOFTT, punt young newbies, or foreign WG. Mainly established English WG who moved from Parlours to AW.

Most are still there for me too. All the established lasses are anyway. The number tends to fluctuate a bit but about 11 in a couple of days is the biggest drop I've seen so far.

Offline King_Dong

Just had a look through my HL on aw and although I can still see them listed on my HL, of the 60 girls added, all but 5 or 6 are 404'd when I click their link.

edit - some profiles are visible sometimes and then the next time I try to view their profile it's 404'd.
« Last Edit: October 15, 2021, 09:01:36 pm by King_Dong »

Offline Moby Dick

Just had a look through my HL on aw and although I can still see them listed on my HL, of the 60 girls added, all but 5 or 6 are 404'd when I click their link.

edit - some profiles are visible sometimes and then the next time I try to view their profile it's 404'd.
Yep, it’s playing up. I use a phone and have favourites linked, sometimes they work, a minute later not, and then work again. Same WG, same link not doing anything differently.

Offline scutty brown

Interestingly for Lancashire, Vivastreet jumped overnight to it's highest ever number, 244. I think that is around 10% up

Offline Cunning Stunts

Looks like they've managed to sort out the issue with getting the 404 notice when you try using a link to get to a profile.

Still no sign of the promised certification/verification button yet tho apparently. But i don't see how they can take any action against profiles when the button they promised hasn't materialised.

Offline MissWolf

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 341
  • Likes: 138
Looks like they've managed to sort out the issue with getting the 404 notice when you try using a link to get to a profile.

Still no sign of the promised certification/verification button yet tho apparently. But i don't see how they can take any action against profiles when the button they promised hasn't materialised.

I'm a little confused,  how would you know there is no sign of the button yet, I wasn't aware punters had to be verified or tick the same boxes as providers regarding photos 🤔

Offline Moby Dick

I'm a little confused,  how would you know there is no sign of the button yet, I wasn't aware punters had to be verified or tick the same boxes as providers regarding photos 🤔
Only a little?

Offline Cunning Stunts

I'm a little confused,  how would you know there is no sign of the button yet, I wasn't aware punters had to be verified or tick the same boxes as providers regarding photos 🤔

Yes if you have content on your profile you fall under exactly the same terms as the lady service providers do.

Offline Moby Dick

Yes if you have content on your profile you fall under exactly the same terms as the lady service providers do.
What content would a punter have on his profile?


Offline MissWolf

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 341
  • Likes: 138
Yes if you have content on your profile you fall under exactly the same terms as the lady service providers do.

 :thumbsup:

Offline MissWolf

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 341
  • Likes: 138
What content would a punter have on his profile?

Some guys like to upload pictures of their kit in all its glory  :unknown:

I had an email today from a guy who had 30+ pictures on his profile,  mostly of him receiving a bj, some of him fucking and lots of a woman or women in BDSM situations  :unknown:

Offline Moby Dick

Some guys like to upload pictures of their kit in all its glory  :unknown:

I had an email today from a guy who had 30+ pictures on his profile,  mostly of him receiving a bj, some of him fucking and lots of a woman or women in BDSM situations  :unknown:
Thanks :thumbsup:
 
Never new that was a thing....
 .... and now i can see (not literally) why OP has been so melodramatic about these changes.
He’s going to have to hire a team of discrete admins to remove all his Dick Pics , and verify he looks nowt like George Clooney, more like Wayne Rooney
« Last Edit: October 16, 2021, 11:31:37 pm by Moby Dick »

Offline Cunning Stunts

Thanks :thumbsup:
 
Never new that was a thing....
 .... and now i can see (not literally) why OP has been so melodramatic about these changes.
He’s going to have to hire a team of discrete admins to remove all his Dick Pics , and verify he looks nowt like George Clooney, more like Wayne Rooney

Actually, my profile is fully compliant as there are no pics of the sort you imagine on it never have been and all i.m waiting for is the button to be able to verify the fact to appear as promised.

Its been reported that today AW are admitting on the live chat facility that it hasn't gone as well as they'd hoped but they're on top of the issues that have come up like the 404 one and that the buttons and the promised forms should become available over the weekend.

Offline Strawberry

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,790
  • Likes: 47
Actually, my profile is fully compliant as there are no pics of the sort you imagine on it never have been and all i.m waiting for is the button to be able to verify the fact to appear as promised.

Its been reported that today AW are admitting on the live chat facility that it hasn't gone as well as they'd hoped but they're on top of the issues that have come up like the 404 one and that the buttons and the promised forms should become available over the weekend.

The report I read yesterday by a person who had had a chat with AW on Friday said 'after the weekend', does not mean it won't appear sooner. A few who sell movies have been able to find a consent button in the movies section of their profile, and a few others found it near the profile photos section. Everyone else is just waiting. AW tend to have reduced customer service at weekends, perhaps they'll work overtime who knows.

Offline Moby Dick

Actually, my profile is fully compliant as there are no pics of the sort you imagine on it never have been and all i.m waiting for is the button to be able to verify the fact to appear as promised.

Its been reported that today AW are admitting on the live chat facility that it hasn't gone as well as they'd hoped but they're on top of the issues that have come up like the 404 one and that the buttons and the promised forms should become available over the weekend.
So enlighten me, whist you are sat there “waiting for the button” what type of pics do you put on AW and why?
« Last Edit: October 17, 2021, 11:08:11 am by Moby Dick »

Offline ladiesman020

I just tried to log in to my AW account after 3 month and it's been suspended
Banned reason: Undesirable, covertly filming bookings
Banned by: daviemac

Offline lamboman

Some guys like to upload pictures of their kit in all its glory  :unknown:



I've had a couple of SPs suggest I do this but I don't feel I need to or want to.
Banned reason: Shit stirrer and blocking moderator's PMs
Banned by: daviemac

Offline tynetunnel

So enlighten me, whist you are sat there “waiting for the button” what type of pics do you put on AW and why?

He’s logged in today, seems like we will be waiting a long time to find out  :hi: