Does fluffy cheerleading put you off a wg?

[tonysoprano]

I think Hendrix has brought up a very salient point regarding fluffy reviews that they fuel stalkers and the generally unhinged, for both punters and WG's.

I suspect the fluffy reviewers are the the most likely candidates to be stalkers. There's a few on here that I wouldn't trust an inch. Absolute cunts. 'Fluffy' is quite often usually a disguise for 'nutter' IMO.

[MintRoyale]

As punters, isn't there something in the back of our minds that hate the idea of having sloppy seconds? Cheerleaders kinda support that as the girl in question becomes enormously busy and no one likes being punter number X of the day.

There's also the idea that no one wants what everyone already has; in a loose sense.

[shagbambi]

There's also the idea that no one wants what everyone already has; in a loose sense.

Good pun.

[rockharders]

In short yes.

I hate fluffy cunts and I don't read fluffy cunt reviews. They are long winded, waffly, boring, and almost certain to give the impression it's some insecure sad loner fuckwit whos trying to come across as a gentleman lover, whatever the fuck that is.

From my point of view, fluffy reviews are near useless because it's so heavily biased towards a perception in the fluffers mind that the encounter was as perfect as could be. So perfect, that I seriously wonder if fluffies have ever had a proper girlfriend before. Because nothing can top sex with someone who passionately loves you. No SP will beat that, but fluffy cunts don't realise that. Fluffy cunts don't realise that at the end of the day, we are paying to deposit our cum somewhere and she's doing this for the money. If she puts on a good show, well done, but make no fucking illusion she's in love with you and is your best fuckbuddy friend forever.

If you like fluffy FB, go to AW. Plenty there and we know how useless it all is.

Secondly, if a WG does have her legion of white knights and fluffies, it does put me off the WG and she goes down on the priority list.

Why?

I guess I like trying out new girls and adventuring the world of punting so to speak. Booking popular WGs is hard enough already, why should I go through the hassle of getting that booking and jumping through hoops, when instead I could be TOFTT in my search for a new gem. UKP is the most valuable trove of reviews anywhere on the net. Each new girl tried and tested adds to that field of knowledge, negatives and positives. I'm quite happy to contribute to it.

Back to the topic of arselicking fluffies:

What I personally feel is SO WRONG, is when punters post a negative with a popular WG, the type that has her legion of fluffy cunt followers. The fluffy cunt white knight TAKES IT SO PERSONALLY that he will attack the reviewer as if the negative review was an attack on himself. These guys are CRAZY, SAD, LONERS.

FFS, let reviewers POST THEIR EXPERIENCES OF A PUNT AS THEY EXPERIENCED IT. If even the best WG ever gave a shit service, she deserves that negative.  But white knight cunts won't accept that.

Some girls I had a great punt with and I wrote positively about, some other reviewers then posted negatives or neutrals, and vice versa. And do I give a shit? No. I might be surprised if she got a neg, but thats none of my business and I frankly don't care. I had a good time, they didn't, prospective punters can make up their mind and what we wrote. And there are plenty more girls to go around.

Sorry if I'm blethering. Fluffies make me want to puke.

[Marmalade]

Excellent post.

[rockharders]

As punters, isn't there something in the back of our minds that hate the idea of having sloppy seconds? Cheerleaders kinda support that as the girl in question becomes enormously busy and no one likes being punter number X of the day.

There's also the idea that no one wants what everyone already has; in a loose sense.

This is so spot on. Although all WGs are sloppy seconds, I would prefer a girl that's at least fresh and not fucked out from that days proceedings and had 5 loads of spooge in her mouth from the other blokes just before me. The thought of getting a OWO BJ where some other dudes wiggling sperm and precum is still fresh in her mouth is a turn off, FFS it's going to be from all of Tom, Sergei, Abdul, Mohammed and Obongo put together. This is one of the reasons why I'm almost always an OW guy

If I call up a girl and the only free slot for the day is something like 3 to 3:30 pm then I know I'm going to be in and out the door sharp as punter #5 on the conveyor belt.

I'm usually hunting around for girls that are less busy or at best, on the least busiest days. The type that might only get one booking or only a few a day. Usually that means we can be more chilled out with timings and she won't be thinking through how awful Abdul was from the previous hour.

I have no idea how popular girls can go through so many punters every single day giving excellent service for all. They must have incredible stamina and work ethic but well done if they can do it.

[CupidStunt]

where some other dudes wiggling sperm and precum is still fresh in her mouth is a turn off,

So no DFK either?

[rockharders]

So no DFK either?

Nope. DFK for my OH only.

[bokkaboy]

Top post Rockharders

[EnglishRebecca121]

This is so spot on. Although all WGs are sloppy seconds, I would prefer a girl that's at least fresh and not fucked out from that days proceedings and had 5 loads of spooge in her mouth from the other blokes just before me. The thought of getting a OWO BJ where some other dudes wiggling sperm and precum is still fresh in her mouth is a turn off, FFS it's going to be from all of Tom, Sergei, Abdul, Mohammed and Obongo put together. This is one of the reasons why I'm almost always an OW guy

If I call up a girl and the only free slot for the day is something like 3 to 3:30 pm then I know I'm going to be in and out the door sharp as punter #5 on the conveyor belt.

I'm usually hunting around for girls that are less busy or at best, on the least busiest days. The type that might only get one booking or only a few a day. Usually that means we can be more chilled out with timings and she won't be thinking through how awful Abdul was from the previous hour.

I have no idea how popular girls can go through so many punters every single day giving excellent service for all. They must have incredible stamina and work ethic but well done if they can do it.

The part about if they only have a 30 min space at 3pm means u are number 5 in the queue is untrue, i see 2 to 3 men a day my 1st slot being 3pm after real work.if i have a 5pm id say i have 3o mins at 3,but id only be seeing 3 men that day....

[rockharders]

The part about if they only have a 30 min space at 3pm means u are number 5 in the queue is untrue, i see 2 to 3 men a day my 1st slot being 3pm after real work.if i have a 5pm id say i have 3o mins at 3,but id only be seeing 3 men that day....

Fair enough for you.

This is going off topic but I will elaborate

Many girls who are marked as working and available for the day start at 12 noon or even earlier. Say I call them up and the ONLY slot I can come visit them is 4pm. Surely we can deduce that there's a bunch of guys who've already booked their slots before and after the 4pm slot, and that by the time I get there Abu Hamza, Fluffy Cunt, John, Harjit and Obongo have already put their morning shots up her nose.

I find it much easier to call up, I choose the time at my convenience, she's available for it and thats that.

[Malvolio]

As punters, isn't there something in the back of our minds that hate the idea of having sloppy seconds? Cheerleaders kinda support that as the girl in question becomes enormously busy and no one likes being punter number X of the day.

There's also the idea that no one wants what everyone already has; in a loose sense.

That's the nature of punting - you're deluding yourself if you think you're always the first of the day.  As long as the WG is clean when I see her and offers a good service, I don't care about what she was doing with some other punter in the previous session.

[NightKid]

While we're at it, does anyone know what happened to the reviews section on UKE? Seems like it's been removed and the fluffers are bringing their tripe back here. 

[EnglishRebecca121]

Admin decided to not allow reviews on uke not sure why tho x

[rockharders]

While we're at it, does anyone know what happened to the reviews section on UKE? Seems like it's been removed and the fluffers are bringing their tripe back here. 

Is there any way we could section off the fluffies into their own subforum?

A place where they can circle jerk and pat each other on the back about how fabulous their harem of paid for lovers are.

[tonysoprano]

Is there any way we could section off the fluffies into their own subforum?

A place where they can circle jerk and pat each other on the back about how fabulous their harem of paid for lovers are.

I suggested similar once before. A reviews section for what most of us would call a 'review'. And then a separate 'my punting experiences' section for Unclesweetoldfart and the other fantasists to post up their personal punting fairytales.

[MintRoyale]

That's the nature of punting - you're deluding yourself if you think you're always the first of the day.  As long as the WG is clean when I see her and offers a good service, I don't care about what she was doing with some other punter in the previous session.

Hey, I never said I would be first of the day. And of course it's the nature of punting.

Another analogy would be queuing for a roller coaster for hours, and while queuing you hear people walking by who've been on said roller coaster and can't stop talking about it. It'll either excite you to enjoy the experience, or slightly ruin it because the experience is repeated verbally

[MintRoyale]

I suggested similar once before. A reviews section for what most of us would call a 'review'. And then a separate 'my punting experiences' section for Unclesweetoldfart and the other fantasists to post up their personal punting fairytales.

Seconded! Fluffies share their experiences instead of review! Thats nailed it right on the head

[Owwhatanight]

There have been lots of fluffy reviews on East Mids and this section by a certain op, many applauded by some of you guys no one ever crittersisd him ??? Because it's fun and entertaining.
I do understand where you coming from but personally think your going OTT.
We all have a bit of fluffy in us ask Raddy or Cool Tiger.

[385North]

Personally I would rather read an experience than a dry review, but each to their own. Given we all punt to suit ourselves I don't see any cause to lecture others on what they should or shouldn't do as long as they are within the site rules. If you went seeking services and had a fun time, what's wrong with making it fun to read about? It would be a dull place if all reviews were written in the same dry language. But again, that's just my personal preference.

[Eiltedongster]

In my view what somebody said about many UK men being naiive, virginal, mommies boys  when it comes to women in general has spoilt the market and given rise to a ' fluffy ' culture where a pathetic owo blowjob by a so called PS escort along with the fake moans makes their decade, not having dated any pretty women in their useless lives. Then they grovel to said women making triple bookings and buying all sorts of expensive gifts.

The WG is laffing all the way to the bank giving ' soft ' fucks for silly money.

This leaves the occasional but not desperate punter ( the kind that can pull but can't be bothered to) with a false market with overpriced hookers and devaluing services.

The fluffies are too gay they can't resist grovelling and sniveling to these women - they are to  blame.

[CoolTiger]

There have been lots of fluffy reviews on East Mids and this section by a certain op, many applauded by some of you guys no one ever crittersisd him ??? Because it's fun and entertaining.
I do understand where you coming from but personally think your going OTT.
We all have a bit of fluffy in us ask Raddy or Cool Tiger.

Indeed, and proud of it.

However, having migrated from the other site to UKP in 2012, when I look back on there again, or even UKE, I realise that whilst I'm still a fluffy, it's not as extreme as some of the posters on UKE.
For this reason, most of my posts on there in the EM section are usually to get info posted on the board about availabilities, etc.
 
Perhaps UKP has hardened me over the past few years. I am pleased to say that I have taken on fair bit of advice on here which I would have never considered in the past... e.g. be prepared to walk away at the beginning of a punt (it's not happened yet).

[385North]

In my view what somebody said about many UK men being naiive, virginal, mommies boys  when it comes to women in general has spoilt the market and given rise to a ' fluffy ' culture where a pathetic owo blowjob by a so called PS escort along with the fake moans makes their decade, not having dated any pretty women in their useless lives. Then they grovel to said women making triple bookings and buying all sorts of expensive gifts.

The WG is laffing all the way to the bank giving ' soft ' fucks for silly money.

This leaves the occasional but not desperate punter ( the kind that can pull but can't be bothered to) with a false market with overpriced hookers and devaluing services.

The fluffies are too gay they can't resist grovelling and sniveling to these women - they are to  blame.

Too gay?