Has anyone seen any of these 3 gorgeous (with verification pics) girls?

[Jason]

All three are "outcall-only" and very beautiful. Here is a compilation of their verification pictures:

Hidden Image/Members Only

And here are their profiles (from left to right):
1. ChloeLondonx: External Link/Members Only
2. Cristina.Moss: External Link/Members Only
3. lotus_lilly: External Link/Members Only

I am not having high expectations for useful answers but worth trying asking before spending big. I am more interested about Chloe who is btw the most expensive of the three charging £300ph! But I am OK with it if she provides good service…

[fredpunter]

christina charges £400 for incalls so she's the most expensive. I'm afraid I can't be any more helpful than that, and never likely to be at those prices.

[KentAde]

Jeez, you got money to burn my friend? Ridiculous prices IMHO....

[vt]

That Chloe is stunning...but sadly way out of my price range...showing as accessing from France, but her profile says back in London today 24th. Her verification picis no longer showing.

[Jason]

Cristina is charging £250 for outcalls so is cheaper - she charges £150 extra for the hotel if incall. Chloe’s verification picture is no longer visible because she was showing her passport. Yes, they are expensive but this time I am going for the best looks and hopefully I will not get conned in the service department...

[vorian]

The Chloe one is OW and lots of money making schemes already,  worn knickers £35.  PG £7.

Yes she may be good looking but a good punt hmm,  unlikely. 

[Stealthshagger]

Chloe is facially remarkably similar to khloe Kane.....

[Stealthshagger]

Lotus Lilly did £150 an hour (I saw her feedback or field report mentioned it, don't remember which) but suddenly it jumped to £250. I find it suspect to be honest, and unlikely to be a good punt.

[vorian]

Chloe is facially remarkably similar to khloe Kane.....

Definitely not her, KK has imho has lost her appeal since she had all those tattoos done. Shame she was the best girl on "Wank it now".

[fredpunter]

Cristina is charging £250 for outcalls so is cheaper - she charges £150 extra for the hotel if incall. Chloe’s verification picture is no longer visible because she was showing her passport. Yes, they are expensive but this time I am going for the best looks and hopefully I will not get conned in the service department...

you should tell her about travel lodge - I've had rooms there for as little as £9 a night!

[vorian]

Cristina is charging £250 for outcalls so is cheaper - she charges £150 extra for the hotel if incall. Chloe’s verification picture is no longer visible because she was showing her passport. Yes, they are expensive but this time I am going for the best looks and hopefully I will not get conned in the service department...

Jason, just going for the best looks and hoping you won't get conned in the service department is a brave way to punt, I wish you good luck Sir.

[Stealthshagger]

Definitely not her, KK has imho has lost her appeal since she had all those tattoos done. Shame she was the best girl on "Wank it now".

What is this "wank it now"? I didn't want to google it, as I wouldn't know which was the one you were referring to.

[vorian]

What is this "wank it now"? I didn't want to google it, as I wouldn't know which was the one you were referring to.

A British soft porn site, used to be good now gone down hill.
External Link/Members Only

A couple of links to KK videos from it.

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[Stealthshagger]

It all seems very odd. Why not just do hardcore? Dildoing this, lesboing that. Just do it.

[Anong2014]

Cristina is a fake profile, pics are of model Shanina Shaik.

[vorian]

It all seems very odd. Why not just do hardcore? Dildoing this, lesboing that. Just do it.

Not everyone gets off on one type of porn, the whole jerk off instruction genre is very popular right now. Lots of the yank girls are doing it. Including the ones which only do girl/girl like Georgia Jones.

[jcdmj12]

300/400 quid for OW? No thanks.

Chloe London sounds like a fantasist from her profile.

At least Christina is clear about her overnight - 3 hours sleep, which is ambitious

[Jason]

Regarding facial similarities everyone in this world has a look alike. For examples, read the article below:
External Link/Members Only

As for OW and not OWO, I really don't mind at all. What counts for me most is the overall delivery and passion during sex. French kissing is more important for me than OWO so on that respect Cristina and Lilly seem to be better choices as Chloe has French Kissing only at discretion in her enjoy list. As for the £150 vs £250 in her field report Lilly told me that it was because it was while she was staying in Derby  where the living expenses were lower

Anyway I guess that will finally gamble on Friday with Chloe as she is the one I fancy the most, unless, of course, she proves to be another PG scammer like Blonde Nusha: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=22313.0

[vorian]

Regarding facial similarities everyone in this world has a look alike. For examples, read the article below:
External Link/Members Only

As for OW and not OWO, I really don't mind at all. What counts for me most is the overall delivery and passion during sex. French kissing is more important for me than OWO so on that respect Cristina and Lilly seem to be better choices as Chloe has French Kissing only at discretion in her enjoy list. As for the £150 vs £250 in her field report Lilly told me that it was because it was while she was staying in Derby  where the living expenses were lower

Anyway I guess that will finally gamble on Friday with Chloe as she is the one I fancy the most, unless, of course, she proves to be another PG scammer like Blonde Nusha: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=22313.0

I look forward to reading your review of Chloe,  Jason. She is very attractive for sure.

[random]

Regarding facial similarities everyone in this world has a look alike. For examples, read the article below:
External Link/Members Only

As for OW and not OWO, I really don't mind at all. What counts for me most is the overall delivery and passion during sex. French kissing is more important for me than OWO so on that respect Cristina and Lilly seem to be better choices as Chloe has French Kissing only at discretion in her enjoy list. As for the £150 vs £250 in her field report Lilly told me that it was because it was while she was staying in Derby  where the living expenses were lower

Anyway I guess that will finally gamble on Friday with Chloe as she is the one I fancy the most, unless, of course, she proves to be another PG scammer like Blonde Nusha: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=22313.0

Someone already mentioned Christina is a fake, pics of Shania Sheik. Why risk £400 on her?
Hidden Image/Members Only

The verification pic holding the card looks like it was doctored from this one. Have a close look at the enlarged verification pic and it looks wrong.

[Jason]

Hmmm, extremely strange. I performed a reverse google image search on all Cristina’s gallery pictures and I didn’t come across any google hits. I can’t see how a prossie can manage to doctor a verification picture like this, which also does not show on GRIS. And I can’t see how this can be the job of a scammer as there is no PG or anything to suggest a scam. Bait and switch? Possibly. But does she really think a client expecting to see a Shanina Shaik look alike to pay £250 per hour for a totally different girl? She must really be very confident that her looks are of equivalent level or think that the client is desperate to punt. But paying £250ph for an inferior substitute? NO CHANCE. Anyway I will give her the benefit of doubt as she might really be Shanina's look alike and she just likes to dress and pose like her. I will email to ask her to send me a selfie and if she fails to do so I will report her to AW as a fake. And anyway at least Chloe that I am mostly after is 100% genuine person– I even have the details of her passport. Chloe is available during the weekend only so slight change of plans as I was thinking meeting her on Friday.

In any case I will not go ahead with any meeting without first preparing a good plan B and C with "outcall only" girls that I have already seen. Amazing Mia or Stunning Julie will be good substitutes and for the amount that I am prepared to pay Chloe, Cristina or Lilly for 2 hours I will go for an overnight.

[LL]

The verification pic holding the card looks like it was doctored from this one. Have a close look at the enlarged verification pic and it looks wrong.

Haha, yes you're right - look at the size of her hands!

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Stealthshagger]

Might be good if you wanted an actual massage, I guess. I suspect a woman with hands that size has a hidden extra though.

[Andre 3000]

300/400 quid for OW? No thanks.

Chloe London sounds like a fantasist from her profile.

At least Christina is clear about her overnight - 3 hours sleep, which is ambitious

Seriously. Chloe even says she's not experienced sexually and has been reading books on escorting. 

All three of them seem a little off key Lotus Lily seems to be the best of a weird bunch. That Christina profile should set alarm bells ringing a badly photoshopped verification pic and suspect feedback. 

[vorian]

Seriously. Chloe even says she's not experienced sexually and has been reading books on escorting. 

That was my point, respect to Jason for TOFTT, and yes Chloe looks great but she might by a lay back and think of England type, not a good punt imho. Yes I personally like to punt with young WG, early to mid twenties but I do like them to have a year or so working under their belts. I find that is a good mix of youth and experience. Of course she might be the fuck of the century but the risk factor would be to high for me at that price. Saying that, good luck to Jason, I am looking forward to the review. 

[vt]

Someone already mentioned Christina is a fake, pics of Shania Sheik. Why risk £400 on her?
Hidden Image/Members Only

The verification pic holding the card looks like it was doctored from this one. Have a close look at the enlarged verification pic and it looks wrong.

Good find!! They've reversed the pic and then added the arm with the card on the left-hand side, that's why the arm doesn't look like it's coming out of her shoulder and the hands look all out of proportion.

B&S scam for sure!! 

[Jason]

I thought it was just bad picture quality like the one of Lilly. But how the hell AWank didn’t reject it and how the hell this profile didn't get the alert until full verification with legal documents? Which goes on to prove that AWank verification system is a total joke. Not sure about the gallery pics as GRIS doesn't come up with any hits and GRIS is generally able to detect pics even if they are blurred or several portions of the picture are missing. I have already reported her profile as she is using a fake verification picture. Nonetheless I emailed Cristina and asked her to send me a verification–type selfie telling her that it doesn't matter if she is not the girl in the pictures and that I will judge her from her real ones.

Chloe’s inexperience counts as a positive to me. As a sex grandmaster I will teach her a lesson! I am not sure however, whether, if not negative, I should do a review on her here as it seems that no one else in UKP will ever punt with her due to her high price and most likely I will get troll comments of the type  “not in a zillion years”, … which will almost certainly infuriate me and make me regret about bothering spending time in writing a detailed review. After all anyone really interested in meeting her can PM me as it has already happened many times with other girls I have briefly mentioned/recommended but not bothered to review.

[vorian]

I thought it was just bad picture quality like the one of Lilly. But how the hell AWank didn’t reject it and how the hell this profile didn't get the alert until full verification with legal documents? Which goes on to prove that AWank verification system is a total joke. Not sure about the gallery pics as GRIS doesn't come up with any hits and GRIS is generally able to detect pics even if they are blurred or several portions of the picture are missing. I have already reported her profile as she is using a fake verification picture. Nonetheless I emailed Cristina and asked her to send me a verification–type selfie telling her that it doesn't matter if she is not the girl in the pictures and that I will judge her from her real ones.

Chloe’s inexperience counts as a positive to me. As a sex grandmaster I will teach her a lesson! I am not sure however, whether, if not negative, I should do a review on her here as it seems that no one else in UKP will ever punt with her due to her high price and most likely I will get troll comments of the type  “not in a zillion years”, … which will almost certainly infuriate me and make me regret about bothering spending time in writing a detailed review. After all anyone really interested in meeting her can PM me as it has already happened many times with other girls I have briefly mentioned/recommended but not bothered to review.

Personally I think you should do a review Jason, but thats your choice of course, I would certainly be interested in your feedback on Chloe even if it is by PM only.  I read your thread on classifying beauty and although I disagreed with much of it,  it was interesting neverless.

AW do not give a damn if it is really the girl in the verification picture. All they care about is a due diligence defence if they get accused of having underage girls on the site. I recall seeing a thread recently, where is was quite obvious to anyone with common sense that the verification pictures were just random women they had paid in the street to hold up a card with an AW number on it.

[Jason]

Cristina’s profile is gone. Another one bites the dust!

As I pretty much got my answers I deleted the compiled verification pics as Chloe obviously wants to hide her face and I respect it. But I see the pic is not deleted from my OP despite having already deleted it in imgur where it is hosted. Why? I thought the pic was displayed via image bbcode which links to the host. Also LL’s pic, who said in another thread it is via direct links to adultwork, also has not been deleted despite Christina’s profile is gone. Strange. Does the forum somehow makes copies and hosts the pics internally?

[Jason]

OK. For the pic I uploaded the reason I could still see it was due  to temporary internet files. I deleted them and the pic is no longer visible as expected.

[Gigabyte]

I am not sure however, whether, if not negative, I should do a review on her here as it seems that no one else in UKP will ever punt with her due to her high price and most likely I will get troll comments of the type  “not in a zillion years”, … which will almost certainly infuriate me and make me regret about bothering spending time in writing a detailed review.

Agree with that, had a few comments on a recommendation I gave for a good service girl of she charges too much. Surely its more important to know how good she is. The price we can see from AW and can all make the decision as to whether we can afford it or not. But yes I would be interested in a review. 

[Johny Stone]

Cristina is no longer on AW..

[Stealthshagger]

All three are "outcall-only" and very beautiful. Here is a compilation of their verification pictures:

Hidden Image/Members Only

And here are their profiles (from left to right):
1. ChloeLondonx: External Link/Members Only
2. Cristina.Moss: External Link/Members Only
3. lotus_lilly: External Link/Members Only

I am not having high expectations for useful answers but worth trying asking before spending big. I am more interested about Chloe who is btw the most expensive of the three charging £300ph! But I am OK with it if she provides good service…

I think if lotus Lilly halved her rates, she'd have a lot of business. I wonder why some WGs put a high rate and have a dusty phone, and leave it like that. I imagine people would pay for longer if her rates were halved too.

[TheDoctor]

I've chatted to Lilly. I found organising anything with her a nightmare though and gave up after she no-showed on me. I know she's got a front of house job at a famous restaurant probably due to her looks so I suspect she's not not bothered about the ecorting which is why she put her rates up to discourage. Also this jobs means most evenings she's busy there so you won't get a look in. Not worth the hassle IMO.

[Stealthshagger]

Looking at her profile, she does say she's looking for a sugar daddy. Maybe that's all she's looking to do now.

[Stealthshagger]

Faker is back. Christina moss fake again

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only