Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Sarah of Gracies Girls  (Read 2697 times)

Still-alive

  • Guest
I'm not going to do one of my long reviews as frankly there isn't a lot to tell about this punt.

External Link/Members Only

I saw Sarah in the Hartlepool flat. I had been looking forward to the punt as she looked gorgeous in her pics, and she was a very attractive lady. She welcomed me in wearing a long black dress which after a little chat, paperwork, and some FK, came off to reveal some very pretty matching underwear and stockings with suspenders. Sarah has a really good body, she could put many younger WGs to shame.

It was onto the bed for some more kissing, followed by OWO when she offered CIM but I don't do that so I declined. I asked to do some RO and she quite happily let me. After that it was on with the condom and some slow mish until she finished me by hand.

On the surface, a decent punt, so why neutral? Well there were just too many moments when it felt like she was going through the motions, there was no click and no feeling of genuine enthusiasm from her. She was very professional apart from one instance, during the hand relief as I started to cum she immediately stopped stroking, which in my book is a major sin for a WG to commit. The stimulation should go on right through the orgasm.

So, a mildly enjoyable punt but not as good as I had hoped for, after the bubbling enthusiasm and liveliness of Sasha maybe I was expecting too much from an agency girl, but I just got the impression that this was a WG who had been doing the job for so long that it had become mechanical. Can't fault her on looks, cleanliness, and she was reasonably chatty, but the spark was missing.

Offline OscarC

I saw her 3 or 4 times about 3 years ago. Stopped seeing her for that exact reason - she became far too mechanical/going through the motions. She couldn't even remember my name over the course of an appointment.

Offline Sammee69

Shame about that guys, doesn't really reflect the one punt I had with her a few weeks back, I thought she was one of my best punts ever! It does make you wonder how the girls keep on going day after day for years on end. No wonder they often take a break!

Looking4fun

  • Guest
Good review & I think your last paragraph sums up why it was a neutral, spot on

Offline sesalovdarlo

Yea I do remember my last app with her (and will be my last) she was more mechanical that previous apps. my reason for not returning though is for a different reason. I was sucking on her perfect tits when I kept getting a fishy / cheesy wiff. It wasn't until later in the appointment I clicked that it had to of been someone else's jizz, someone had shot there muck on her chest and she didn't even shower after. to be honest I didn't punt for some time after it. :vomit:

Offline OscarC

Yea I do remember my last app with her (and will be my last) she was more mechanical that previous apps. my reason for not returning though is for a different reason. I was sucking on her perfect tits when I kept getting a fishy / cheesy wiff. It wasn't until later in the appointment I clicked that it had to of been someone else's jizz, someone had shot there muck on her chest and she didn't even shower after. to be honest I didn't punt for some time after it. :vomit:

Gross.  :vomit:

NNE were notorious for only allowing a min amount of time between appointments (typically 10 or 15 mins). No wonder a shower might have been skipped on, and a once over with a wet wipe might have been all there was before next client.  No idea if Gracie's operate in the same fashion as NNE did.

Still-alive

  • Guest
Yea I do remember my last app with her (and will be my last) she was more mechanical that previous apps. my reason for not returning though is for a different reason. I was sucking on her perfect tits when I kept getting a fishy / cheesy wiff. It wasn't until later in the appointment I clicked that it had to of been someone else's jizz, someone had shot there muck on her chest and she didn't even shower after. to be honest I didn't punt for some time after it. :vomit:

sesalovdarlo
Posts: 898
Reviews: 11

Re: Sasha, Gracie's Girls
« Reply #11 on: April 18, 2016, 10:03:36 am »
Quote
Her hygiene was horrendous when I saw her put me off punting for a while. Remember sucking and licking her boobs and there was a stale fishy cheesy smell, then I clicked this was obviously someone's 'DNA'  :vomit:


Almost exactly what you once posted about Sasha of Gracies Girls. Troll alert methinks!

Offline daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,021
  • Likes: 369
  • Reviews: 24


Almost exactly what you once posted about Sasha of Gracies Girls. Troll alert methinks!

Just out of curiosity how do you know he's not telling the truth when the agency concerned was renowned for not leaving enough time for a shower between bookings .   :unknown:

Just because you didn't find a problem with hygiene doesn't mean no one else did.

If he is a troll then he's escaped admin's attention for an awful long time.   :hi:

 

Looking4fun

  • Guest
I think reporting a long time member for trolling is out of order to be honest

Offline daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,021
  • Likes: 369
  • Reviews: 24
I think reporting a long time member for trolling is out of order to be honest

Totally agree L4F, accusing a long standing member of being a troll just because you don't agree with his opinion seems a bit WK'ish to me.

There's nothing in  sesalovdarlo's previous posts to suggest he's a troll. He's been a member for nearly 3 years think admin would've sussed him by now if he was.

Offline Sammee69

Yea I do remember my last app with her (and will be my last) she was more mechanical that previous apps. my reason for not returning though is for a different reason. I was sucking on her perfect tits when I kept getting a fishy / cheesy wiff. It wasn't until later in the appointment I clicked that it had to of been someone else's jizz, someone had shot there muck on her chest and she didn't even shower after. to be honest I didn't punt for some time after it. :vomit:

One reason why I try and get the earliest booking these days.

PS hope it wasn't mine!  :angelgirl:

Still-alive

  • Guest
I reported him because he used almost exactly the same words about two girls from the same agency. I have been with both and IMO their hygiene was immaculate. I can't imagine either not cleaning up properly between punts even if time was short. Seems a bit too coincidental that only this member found this problem with them. Long term member or not, I have my own opinion on some of the stuff he posts. Anyway, its up to admin whether or not he agrees with me that this guy sometimes gives false information for his own amusement, which I personally believe that he does.

Still-alive

  • Guest
Totally agree L4F, accusing a long standing member of being a troll just because you don't agree with his opinion seems a bit WK'ish to me.

There's nothing in  sesalovdarlo's previous posts to suggest he's a troll. He's been a member for nearly 3 years think admin would've sussed him by now if he was.

I'm not white knighting anybody, and I take offense at that remark! If I was a white knight then Sarah wouldn't have got a neutral review!
« Last Edit: May 03, 2016, 02:12:39 pm by Still-alive »

Offline daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,021
  • Likes: 369
  • Reviews: 24
I'm not white knighting anybody, and I take offense at that remark! If I was a white knight then Sarah wouldn't have got a neutral review!

I didn't say you were  :dash:  I said
Quote
accusing a long standing member of being a troll just because you don't agree with his opinion SEEMS a bit WK'ish to me

The fact remains you're accusing him of being a troll because his experience with 2 prossies differs from yours. He may have seen them when they were with NNE hence no time to clean up properly. GG may have changed to allow more time between bookings or you may have seem them at different times of the day or when they were quieter.

Punters can only speak as they find at the time, you found no problem with hygiene he did.   

coolguy1990

  • Guest
I didn't say you were  :dash:  I said
The fact remains you're accusing him of being a troll because his experience with 2 prossies differs from yours. He may have seen them when they were with NNE hence no time to clean up properly. GG may have changed to allow more time between bookings or you may have seem them at different times of the day or when they were quieter.

Punters can only speak as they find at the time, you found no problem with hygiene he did.

He's not accusing him because his opinion differs, it's because he's said the same thing about two girls, which SA rightly questions, but may have been a bit hasty in accusing him of being a troll/reporting him.

More than likely SD has just mixed the two girls up. Sarah is immaculately clean in my opinion, having seen her before.

Still-alive

  • Guest
Well there's a bit more to it than just two posts, which I've explained to Daviemac in a PM, but looking at it logically, how many of you, in all your punts, have ever smelled the last punters spunk on a WGs tits? If the last punter came on her tits then any professional WG would clean this off first and thoroughly, and both these girls are very professional long standing WGs, not back street druggies. If he'd said they both had fishy fannys I might have been more inclined to believe him, but jizzy tits?  And two of them? And its only happened to SD? Believe what you like, I know what I think.

Still-alive

  • Guest
I'm not going to put any more posts on this thread. Let admin sort it out and decide what he believes!

Looking4fun

  • Guest
Your taking it way to personal mate, you've reported a member of 3 years for trolling because he's posted on your review something you don't like. Their is agencies out there that only give escorts 15 minutes between bookings, maybe he was unlucky on more than one occasion, or he's confusing the 2 ladies ?
You write your experiences in your review but that doesn't mean some other punter hasn't had a bad experience with the wg your reviewing,it happens occasionally
 

Offline sesalovdarlo

sesalovdarlo
Posts: 898
Reviews: 11

Re: Sasha, Gracie's Girls
« Reply #11 on: April 18, 2016, 10:03:36 am »
Quote
Her hygiene was horrendous when I saw her put me off punting for a while. Remember sucking and licking her boobs and there was a stale fishy cheesy smell, then I clicked this was obviously someone's 'DNA'  :vomit:


Almost exactly what you once posted about Sasha of Gracies Girls. Troll alert methinks!

my dear God!! You are quite right!!! I am extremely embarrassed this is Infacta review on "Sarah" not "Sasha". If I can put the record straight my above experience was with "sasha" different girls. I need to take liability for this mess  :cry: genuine mistake from speed reading / commenting posting / when on the bog at work.

please don't condem still alive he was right to point this out, it looks terrible. I have indeed seen Sarah (Milf) once before and it was an ok punt. This is more for Sarah's benefit also that the above is untrue for her.

« Last Edit: May 03, 2016, 08:11:10 pm by sesalovdarlo »

Still-alive

  • Guest
Hmmm....well I still find it hard to believe that the Sasha I met could be so negligent about cleanliness, but OK maybe she had an off day with you or something. I guess I over-reacted but two girls from the same agency seemingly being accused of the same thing in almost exactly the same words, you can see why it rang alarm bells, especially as I'd punted with both and done RO on both and not had a hint of bad hygiene with either. I'm no white knight but I will defend any girl I think is being wrongly slagged off. Hopefully we can now bury this.

coolguy1990

  • Guest
Well I'm glad everything's sorted, 'coz I'll be posting a review of Sarah soon. When I suss out why it won't let me.

Offline sesalovdarlo

Hmmm....well I still find it hard to believe that the Sasha I met could be so negligent about cleanliness, but OK maybe she had an off day with you or something. I guess I over-reacted but two girls from the same agency seemingly being accused of the same thing in almost exactly the same words, you can see why it rang alarm bells, especially as I'd punted with both and done RO on both and not had a hint of bad hygiene with either. I'm no white knight but I will defend any girl I think is being wrongly slagged off. Hopefully we can now bury this.

yea I have to take responsibility for the above, Sarah, sasha when you breeze through forum mix up simple as that. For that I apologise

Iv seen Sarah before, I just remember her being a great looking Milf like a teacher you used to beat of over. Average skills and services though very similar to what you describe above.

as for sasha it wasn't really her 'intimate' hygiene that was a problem here. I was further north. I'm afraid you are a bit nieve if you think a agency girl has anything more than a wipe during their 15 minute gap.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2016, 10:18:09 pm by sesalovdarlo »

Offline bigkstyle

I saw Sarah a week ago. She didn't quite live up to my expectations. Shes lovely and a great body and good at what she does but just not quite my type. It's unlikely I'll go back