The AW Fake \ Repeat Account Discussion

[Londonpunter30]

Ive been trying to have a discission about this on the Scam trhread, but I think too many people just use that as an indexing thread and what is being spoken about it being missed.  If the mods dont like a seperate thread then please delete.

It's worth reading the last few pages of this thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=420.10250

AW is now a platform where no new profiles can be trusted.  If you sort by new profiles in any area most of the new ones are either fake profiles or repeat fakes scammers.

dont want to post too many links here as we have a thread for that but these is an example of the fake accounts.

The following are fake accounts using the exact same text and location for over 2 years or more.  Always the same MO, different location but always just a profile and PG.  We know that you cant get credits out of the system until an account has been live for 3 days.  Each account is deleted \ removed after a day at most so the only people who can get access to the credits are AW themselves.  No pimp \ scammer is that stupid to do the same thing daily and not work out how to get the account to last long enough to get the money.  The only people behind this are AW, and they get annoyed if you report the profile as then it falls foul of their automation

External Link/Members Only (fence girl)
External Link/Members Only ( mini girl who was in Scotland this morning)
External Link/Members Only (covered up face girl)
External Link/Members Only ( old slapper nurse)


Then we have the repeat fakes, I already know for the rest of the week there will be 5 profiles created in East Ham, 5 in Croydon, 2-3 in Dorset, 3 in Glasgow 2 in Ltuton.  Plus a few in Ashcombe Park, Peckham and Harrow amoung other areas.   These seem to relate to brothels, multi girl setups, although probably bait and switch.  The Croydon profiles have been going on for 2 years, surly by now after 5 profiles daily, usually with the same pics and text they should have taken some action.  Why cant they post id to get an account verified ?   Makes me wonder if there is trafficking going on, but either way its something dodgy and looks like Sergie makes enough money to put up 10 proifles and day and pay for green and mobile with no loss of income

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only ( the name in the profile doesnt even match the profile name!)
External Link/Members Only ( text says 23, profile age is 43)
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only


This is just ones profiles.

Then we get stuff like this, where is looks like somehow Sergie has worked out how to auto create and verify a profile, but they all join the crap group with no location or text only to be taken over later when others get removed

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Then crap like this.  Verified profile of mimi External Link/Members Only .  Shes been reviewed on her but the profile now has another girl on it.   This verified profile in Croydon External Link/Members Only is using pics from another girl from the same group of West London roms so it isnt genuine.

AW is a platform that cant be trusted and is ending up as bad as viva street and backpage.  We have 60,000 members on here and should use that power to email them and force change.  i will never give them another credit and no one else on here should until they start dealing with this shit.

So far is seems only Lewis and myself recognise and care about this issue.  The largest independant platform for escorts in the UK is overrun with fakes and scammers and dodgy accounts.  This is the sort of crap that could end up with the site being investigated.  Their arrogance says they dont care as they know how big they are.  We should make them know we are 60,000 members and we can without our money and affect their business until they clean up their act

[scutty brown]

And why is this news?
Its been obvious for years, and mentioned here many times before.
ALL the UK prozzie profile sites are full of scammers, con-artists, pimps and traffickers. Not a lot you can do about it except report it when you find it, and when you find cases of trafficking, extortion or slavery report them to the police.

Only way you'll ever get rid of the problem is by shutting the sites - which is unlikely to happen

[LLPunting]

And why is this news?
Its been obvious for years, and mentioned here many times before.
ALL the UK prozzie profile sites are full of scammers, con-artists, pimps and traffickers. Not a lot you can do about it except report it when you find it, and when you find cases of trafficking, extortion or slavery report them to the police.

Only way you'll ever get rid of the problem is by shutting the sites - which is unlikely to happen

Actually, you could execute all the perpetrators, far more effective than shutting the sites, sadly just as unlikely to happen.  Burn them atop a pyre of all their ill-gotten gains at the end of the Six o'clock news.  A little extra intellectual effort and perhaps they could all expire in unfortunate RTAs, I hear Herman is looking for some stimulating conversation.

[Lewis]

Not a lot you can do about it except report it when you find it,

The thing is though, is that AW are starting to disable accounts of anyone who reports fake profiles, as "Such activity goes against the spirit of the club"

See my post, and the full email they sent me.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=420.msg2863432#msg2863432

=====

But they then contradict themselves by sending me another email which is mentioned in this post.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=420.msg2864085#msg2864085

In short, they have disabled an account that I was using to report fake profiles, then follow it up by tell me how to report fake profiles (which I had already been doing). But you can only report fake profiles after you've logged into AW.

Sorry to repeat what's already been posted in the suspected AW scam thread, but I've extracted those two posts of mine in particular as they might have got overlooked when reading through that long thread.

[king tarzan]

use your own sharp judgement... beware if something just does not add up within the realms of normality..

[John Johnson]

Is it just my poor perception or are there dozens of entries in the photo verification threads across the board that feature the same squat, 50 year old woman with spider-leg mascara?

[Londonpunter30]

There is tech now that AW can use to permanently ban this stuff. With the help of Lewis we’ve now linked the B&S operation in North London to the one in Croydon.  They can use cookies, IP , pictures, profile text and phone numbers to ban and stop this appearing again.  If their website is being abused and they don’t bother to look into this it could end up being looked after by the authorities.  The same arrogance was what brought down back page, although there are different laws in the US.

Their failure to act also goes against the anti slavery policy on their own site.  Surely after two years of the same profile being created they have a duty to look into this.  I did report this to the anti slavery hotline but they haven’t acted either.

The other major issue is AW themselves are creating fake accounts.  It’s the same as bots of dating nag sites, why should anyone on this forum give them money if we can’t trust the website. 

We are a larger user base on this forum , instead of saying fuck it we can’t dont anything we should come together and agree not to use the credit system and make that known to AW

[daviemac]

The thing is though, is that AW are starting to disable accounts of anyone who reports fake profiles, as "Such activity goes against the spirit of the club"

See my post, and the full email they sent me.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=420.msg2863432#msg2863432

=====

But they then contradict themselves by sending me another email which is mentioned in this post.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=420.msg2864085#msg2864085

In short, they have disabled an account that I was using to report fake profiles, then follow it up by tell me how to report fake profiles (which I had already been doing). But you can only report fake profiles after you've logged into AW.

Sorry to repeat what's already been posted in the suspected AW scam thread, but I've extracted those two posts of mine in particular as they might have got overlooked when reading through that long thread.

Have I got this right, you set up a fake account and are now complaining AW have disabled a fake account.     Surely all fake accounts should be disabled regardless of the reason behind them being created.

What's the problem with reporting escort fakes using your own normal account. How would AW know if the report is genuine if it comes from a spurious source, people have been known to set up second accounts on sites just to cause problems.

[signy]

AW is now a platform where no new profiles can be trusted.  If you sort by new profiles in any area most of the new ones are either fake profiles or repeat fakes scammers.

I have often wondered how a genuine new escort gets started with all this going on. I (and I suspect many on this board) ignore profiles that only have a few AW reviews. I suppose they can do a few fake bookings with mates, but even that looks bad as the reviewers have few reviews to their name. Are there enough punters willing to take chances on new profiles? Respect to those willing to TOFTT and review on UKP.

[munterhunter]

Love it or hate it AW is one of the best resources to find working girls. It covers the whole UK and lots of other countries. If you go on some dating sites there are potential scammers. Why should AW be any different. With the exception of a very few dating sites there people are in business to make money so it's not in their interest to delete profiles that generate money.
I've used AW for years I want to meet women and have sex it's that simple. I don't want to IM, chat or cam with them first to see if we "click" not really into private galleries. If I find a profile that gives me the slightest concern I'll do a bit of extra research on review sites if all else fails I'll book a half hour meet to test the water before plunging in head first. My point is that to be scammed you have to put yourself in the position to be scammed. If you are unlucky enough to be duped (bad service, refusal to provide serviced offered, bait&switch, overcharged or robbed) then post on sites like these to let everyone know.
AW has its faults but used applying a bit of common sense it is a good resource.
When buying anything remember BUYER BEWARE if something looks to good to be true then it's probably a scam of some sort.

[Lewis]

Have I got this right, you set up a fake account and are now complaining AW have disabled a fake account.     Surely all fake accounts should be disabled regardless of the reason behind them being created.

What's the problem with reporting escort fakes using your own normal account. How would AW know if the report is genuine if it comes from a spurious source, people have been known to set up second accounts on sites just to cause problems.

ok, perhaps I should clarify in more detail.

A genuine verified account was previously being used to report fake profiles. The verified account had been used for doing so for at least 2 or 3 years.

All of a sudden AW disabled the verified account because it broke their terms and conditions, as it was an account that was for seeking services. To quote from their email, this is there excuse for disabling the account.
"Your account has been deactivated as it would appear the sole purpose of this account is to submit reports on other members. Such activity goes against the spirit of the club and we do not want non-genuine members on the site."

After much faffing about, I managed to get the verified account enabled again by submitting the necessary information that AW asked for.

They in turn said in no uncertain terms not to use it again to report fake accounts as it would jeopardise the account again as "it is acting in a manner deemed to be outside the spirit of the club"

So that is why I created a separate account to report fake accounts with, so as not to jeopardise the verified account again. The fake account was not deceiving anyone as it was set to seeking services. In other words, no one could see the profile other than AW.

In between doing all of this, I had been conducting some other tests to see if AW detect multiple accounts registered by one person. Detection by same IP address, or cookie tracking for instance. From my research I honestly think they don't bother with such things. This is why there are also so many repeat fake accounts being created on a daily basis on AW. No checks are being carried out by them. All of this has been mentioned already in the fake/scammers thread.

As mentioned in my earlier post in this thread, and the fake/scammers thread, there is no consistency with what AW tell you. They tell you they don't want fake accounts reporting to them that have the warning marker against them, and those posts are deleted in 48 hours if the account hasn't been verified in that space of time. Believe me, they DON'T delete non verified accounts that are offering services within 48 hours. I've found loads of unverified accounts that go back several months. Try reporting them, and that is also wrong and "acting in a manner deemed to be outside the spirit of the club"

You try and report the daily fakers that continually use the same stolen photos over and over again. That is also wrong.

And then they go contradict themselves by telling you how to report fake accounts in the correct manner. Something I had been doing all along!!!

But you can only report fake profiles if you're logged in. That isn't possible if they've disabled your account for "acting in a manner deemed to be outside the spirit of the club"

In short, they don't want anyone spoiling their money making racket.

[daviemac]

"Your account has been deactivated as it would appear the sole purpose of this account is to submit reports on other members. Such activity goes against the spirit of the club and we do not want non-genuine members on the site."

I must be having a 'blond moment', the point I'm making is if you only set that up account to report others then that leaves the door open for missus. Any account on here that was only used for reporting would raise suspicion of something untoward and be binned pretty quickly.

In fact I'll message AW and check if there's any risk to my account if I report one I think is fake. I see the problem you are having as purely because you don't use the account for every day AW activities but just to report others.

[cunningman]

In fact I'll message AW and check if there's any risk to my account if I report one I think is fake. I see the problem you are having as purely because you don't use the account for every day AW activities but just to report others.

Perhaps we could have a rota, sort of crowdfund the reporting?

Are you going to ask about just one, of the 'all the same' chains?

[Lewis]

I must be having a 'blond moment', the point I'm making is if you only set that up account to report others then that leaves the door open for missus. Any account on here that was only used for reporting would raise suspicion of something untoward and be binned pretty quickly.

Unfortunately you're not seeing the full picture. You would have to read through a few of the pages of the scam/fake thread to get the full gist of what is being discussed here.

The verified account that they disabled, (mine, which was set to seeking services), was also being used to make bookings with WGs, and had 25 positive ratings. So it was not just created for reporting fake members.

Now that I've managed to get it enabled again, I'm not risking getting it blocked again.

In the scam/fake thread you'll see mention of how easy it is to create multiple fake accounts and that AW do not detect previous accounts that had also been created.
I have moderated a few forums over the years, and also been in charge of dealing with new registrations. By use of cookies, I was notified if someone had already had a registered account, or had tried creating one before. ok, not entirely foolproof. If someone was determined to return, such as a spammer, troublemaker, etc, then all they had to do was to delete their cookies from their browser history. This is going back over 15 years, so using cookies for such things is nothing new. It would appear that AW have got nothing like this in place. Hence why they have so many returning fake accounts.

Basically AW don't want to be notified of fake accounts by other members because it will affect their profits being earned by fake PGs, paying for phone numbers to be displayed, and flagging up as being available today if they removed those fake accounts too early.

[cunningman]

If someone was determined to return, such as a spammer, troublemaker, etc, then all they had to do was to delete their cookies from their browser history. This is going back over 15 years, so using cookies for such things is nothing new. It would appear that AW have got nothing like this in place. Hence why they have so many returning fake accounts.

Surely because they just need a template and then a Python script to push it out to AW?

It looks somewhat industrialised to me.

[daviemac]

Unfortunately you're not seeing the full picture. You would have to read through a few of the pages of the scam/fake thread to get the full gist of what is being discussed here.

The verified account that they disabled, (mine, which was set to seeking services), was also being used to make bookings with WGs, and had 25 positive ratings. So it was not just created for reporting fake members.

Now that I've managed to get it enabled again, I'm not risking getting it blocked again.

In the scam/fake thread you'll see mention of how easy it is to create multiple fake accounts and that AW do not detect previous accounts that had also been created.
I have moderated a few forums over the years, and also been in charge of dealing with new registrations. By use of cookies, I was notified if someone had already had a registered account, or had tried creating one before. ok, not entirely foolproof. If someone was determined to return, such as a spammer, troublemaker, etc, then all they had to do was to delete their cookies from their browser history. This is going back over 15 years, so using cookies for such things is nothing new. It would appear that AW have got nothing like this in place. Hence why they have so many returning fake accounts.

Basically AW don't want to be notified of fake accounts by other members because it will affect their profits being earned by fake PGs, paying for phone numbers to be displayed, and flagging up as being available today if they removed those fake accounts too early.

This is that part I just don't understand, is AW wrong in their claim about the account you used to report fakes and it wasn't used purely for that purpose.

"Hello

Your account has been deactivated as it would appear the sole purpose of this account is to submit reports on other members.

Such activity goes against the spirit of the club and we do not want non-genuine members on the site.

As per our User Agreement:

"AW is operated in an open and honest manner as a club for the benefit of the members. Anyone found to be acting in a manner deemed to be outside the spirit of the club or in any way against the interest of the club and its members will be removed and any credits they have accumulated will be forfeited."

If you do wish to report non-genuine members, you shouldn't be concerned about doing so from an account that is actually used to seek services. By reporting members in the way that you have, you are jeopardising any accounts that can be associated with you.

If you want to use the site and seek services, of course we would welcome you back, but you must operate within the Site's Policies & Agreements which you consent to upon registration.

External Link/Members Only

Regards The AdultWork.com Team"

How can they say that if it's evident the account has been used for seeking services and feedback.

I know how easy it is to set up fake accounts on AW and that they don't really give a shit, but how can they say your profile hasn't been used when it has feedback.   

[Londonpunter30]

Must be time for me to do the lottery as I’m clearly psychic, I predicted there would be 5 profiles in East Ham, several in Croydon and a girl in a purple bikini in Derby and every prediction has come true

Daviemac, the reply from AW quoted above states don’t report profiles from your main account that seeks services.  If you setup a second account that gets removed as all it does is report accounts.  There are only two types of accounts seeking or offering services.

Furthermore one of their emails mentions any linked accounts will be removed.   They have the technology to see if multiple accounts are from the same place, but only use it when they can steal credits

[Lewis]

This is that part I just don't understand, is AW wrong in their claim about the account you used to report fakes and it wasn't used purely for that purpose.How can they say that if it's evident the account has been used for seeking services and feedback.

Correct. Their left arm doesn't know what the right one is doing. With each and every email discussion I was having with them, I was getting different answers.
Obviously my email was being picked up by whichever worker was there at the time. A bit like calling BT, NPower, Direct Line, etc. You'll rarely get to deal with the same operative twice. But at least with BT, NPower, etc they generally add notes to your account so they know what's already been discussed. I don't think this happens at AW.

I know how easy it is to set up fake accounts on AW and that they don't really give a shit, but how can they say your profile hasn't been used when it has feedback.   

Buggered if I know  . This is one of the many inconsistences of AW. They seem to just make it up as they go along, and change the rules to their liking. I never did get a straight answer from them when I pointed out the account was also being used for bookings, had positive feedback, etc.

[Lewis]

Must be time for me to do the lottery as I’m clearly psychic, I predicted there would be 5 profiles in East Ham, several in Croydon and a girl in a purple bikini in Derby and every prediction has come true

Don't forget the other regulars in Luton, Stoke On Trent, Derby, and that fake one in Scotland who's created a new fake account every day. Oh, and at least half of the new profiles on the first page.

[Londonpunter30]

Don't forget the other regulars in Luton, Stoke On Trent, Derby, and that fake one in Scotland who's created a new fake account every day. Oh, and at least half of the new profiles on the first page.

Exactly.  At the moment it’s still possible to filter out the scammers, fakes and bait and switch profiles. However I’m seeing more and more fakes created on a daily basis, if this trend continues and some slip through the net, we COULD end up with the site turning into VS or other sites where every profile is fake.  We aren’t there yet which is why AW should be dealing with the problem while the site is still useable 

[Avg_Joe]

i've been waiting for one of those banned/account disabled emails, after i simply stated in a fake profile report that i thought they were creating them to fraudulently make money, but it hasn't materialised yet.


I have been tempted to start reporting those that quite clearly have text on their profile stating they are working, just to see what they would do with that, when they start receiving screenshots of their warning followed by SP saying come fuck me working today!


They are in a sticky legal situation if they are notified of the issue and do nothing, as they have an obligation to deter (as they have done by removing the booking system) meetings.... but, have left the phone numbers up so they can make money from displaying them, and if they don't remove or suspend profiles clearly demonstrating the intention to break the law, then AW has a problem by being the platform owners by which this illegal action is being advertised.

[Londonpunter30]

On this thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=277865.0 it’s dont use the site as the company behind it fill the site with fake profiles

AW are creating fake profiles to get money from PGs so what’s the difference.

If we can’t trust the platform why should we give them any money, and if it starts to get even worse people will stop using it all together

[Lewis]

Looking at the 1st page of AW today (search criteria: order results by registered date)

it's just a repeat of the same profiles that have been re-occurring for the past two months or more.

70 to 80% of the first page is FULL of fake accounts.

AW must be fucking blind not to have noticed.

More of us need to COMPLAIN to them.

They cannot be allowed to keep getting away with it.

Just like some other websites, they need some dedicated volunteer moderators to provide the human element of checking, and not rely on algorithms (or whatever else they use) that clearly do not work.

[Londonpunter30]

5 accounts in East Ham, several in Croydon, plus the same few others in random places.

AW have tried a new pic on their own self created account  External Link/Members Only

No phone number as usual as it’s just to get credits on the PG for AW

[Lewis]

AW have tried a new pic on their own self created account  External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Trying not tot turn this thread into a repeat of the scam/fake one, but that's not a new AW photo.

You know what my photographic memory is like 

She's been borrowing Mini Girl's car and touring the UK in it.

Previous fake accounts (all dead, but the photos of the fake profiles remain)

External Link/Members Only (In Gloucestershire)
External Link/Members Only
--------
External Link/Members Only (In Glasgow)
External Link/Members Only
--------
External Link/Members Only (In Norfolk)
External Link/Members Only
--------
External Link/Members Only (In East Sussex)
External Link/Members Only

[Londonpunter30]

Yet another example of how crap AW are.

Second profile in Croydon that has stolen pics from the well known Rom crew in West London / Northolt.  The fake account is verified too.

 External Link/Members Only

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

The fake one is being accessed from the Netherlands

We can’t trust new profiles, and we also can’t trust verified profiles.  That kind of rules out every profile on the site.

No one on this site should ever use the credits system until this is dealt with and should be telling AW how crap they are

[Londonpunter30]

WTF happened with this one

External Link/Members Only

i suspect there is  away of coding the fakes and sometimes it goes wrong, leading to crap like this profile

[Avg_Joe]

i'll put £10 on that getting verified

 


EDIT:
in fact, lets have a screen grab of that 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Londonpunter30]

Adultfake are going all out today.  They’ve created 5 fake profiles for themselves to get PG money.  Only 3 profiles in East Ham, assume the other 2 will come in later.

Another new profile even has 100s of feedback.  Mainly because  the text has been copied off another profile

[Londonpunter30]

This is one of the profiles I think has been scripted

External Link/Members Only

Has the classic, in your area tag.

Profile name is katya text of profile starts hi I’m emma.

Either the text is copy and pasted from elsewhere or the coding has gone wrong

[scutty brown]

This is one of the profiles I think has been scripted

External Link/Members Only

Has the classic, in your area tag.

Profile name is katya text of profile starts hi I’m emma.

Either the text is copy and pasted from elsewhere or the coding has gone wrong

typical Romanian profile farmer account - made to order
No nationalty entered, so it bypasses the need for verification

[Londonpunter30]

typical Romanian profile farmer account - made to order
No nationalty entered, so it bypasses the need for verification

I thought all accounts had to be verified.  Why does not entering the nationality bypass this ?

Doubt it was created by the SP due to errors in the name, which then makes you wonder if they are trafficked or not.

If the name doesn’t match the profile should be removed.  As should all the ones that state in your area / in your town

[scutty brown]

I thought all accounts had to be verified.  Why does not entering the nationality bypass this ?

Doubt it was created by the SP due to errors in the name, which then makes you wonder if they are trafficked or not.

If the name doesn’t match the profile should be removed.  As should all the ones that state in your area / in your town

there are bugs in the system which enables accounts to be created without completing the profile, so the call for verification doesn't happen. Not entering a nationality is one, not giving a name (as opposed to a profile title) seems to be another.

This is a profile either created off the shelf by a profile farmer for resale, going rate was around £130 last time I checked, or its created by a pimp/trafficker.
You want to get rid of these kind of accounts? Then use them to ID the trafficking gangs. Work out from which addresses they are working from, then tell the police local anti-slavery unit. Use the adverts as tools to identify the gangs

[Londonpunter30]

Yet more crap, the pic on this one is a screenshot of another aw profile

 External Link/Members Only

I’ve reported all the profiles in Croydon and Colindale to anti slavery units before, didn’t see much action taken

[daviemac]

Yet more crap, the pic on this one is a screenshot of another aw profile

 External Link/Members Only

I’ve reported all the profiles in Croydon and Colindale to anti slavery units before, didn’t see much action taken

That one also says she's back for a fresh start so how do you know they aren't her pics from her last profile.   

[scutty brown]

Yet more crap, the pic on this one is a screenshot of another aw profile

 External Link/Members Only

I’ve reported all the profiles in Croydon and Colindale to anti slavery units before, didn’t see much action taken

No good just reporting the profiles.
They need EXACT addresses including building and flat numbers.
Provide that, along with why you think the girls are at risk and something may well happen. The police themselves don't have the resources to track down the addresses - and would be legally barred from pretending to be a punter to collect them

[Londonpunter30]

These two have popped up

External Link/Members Only


 External Link/Members Only

Location is listed as a phone number, the same number for both yet one is in Bristol the other Bexley.

Both are being accessed from France.

Great checking from AW on this one

[scutty brown]

These two have popped up

External Link/Members Only


 External Link/Members Only

Location is listed as a phone number, the same number for both yet one is in Bristol the other Bexley.

Both are being accessed from France.

Great checking from AW on this one

Set up by a profile farmer and waiting to be passed on. Looks like they've fucked up the verification though - I reckon AW will take these down when the 2-day deadline kicks in.
AW can't simply delete them: the terms of use mandate a warning has to be issued, followed by two days to fix any problems

[Londonpunter30]

Set up by a profile farmer and waiting to be passed on. Looks like they've fucked up the verification though - I reckon AW will take these down when the 2-day deadline kicks in.
AW can't simply delete them: the terms of use mandate a warning has to be issued, followed by two days to fix any problems

They could always check them before they become live.  Plus let’s face it, they seem to make the rules up as they go.

Looks like the farmers have been busy today as plenty have completely changed since they were created

[scutty brown]

They could always check them before they become live.  Plus let’s face it, they seem to make the rules up as they go.

Looks like the farmers have been busy today as plenty have completely changed since they were created

Would take two long to check them all, and legit girls want the profiles up ASAP
Actually I think the bots will take these down quickly - they're trying to break the rules by posting a phone number without paying for it - my get the IP address blocked, thats maybe why they were setup using a french IP address

[Londonpunter30]

Would take two long to check them all, and legit girls want the profiles up ASAP
Actually I think the bots will take these down quickly - they're trying to break the rules by posting a phone number without paying for it - my get the IP address blocked, thats maybe why they were setup using a french IP address

Don’t think they do IP address blocking

[scutty brown]

Don’t think they do IP address blocking

Not as such, no - but they do seem to close accounts based on a common IP address.
If one account on an IP is closed, the bots pick up subsequent accounts and also close those. Again it usually takes a couple of days.
It was clear at one stage that they were also using browser fingerprinting - same as oldadmin was doing here to pick up returnees - I presume AW still do