Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: RaquelBusty36EE (formerly Busty Raquel) - Stratford  (Read 1459 times)


29 review(s) for RaquelBusty (21 positive, 6 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Profile link: External Link/Members Only
£70 for 30 mins

First time seeing Raquel in 18+ months. I was somewhat of a regular 2015-16. Was never particularly attracted to her...but throwaway price, seemingly good availability, convenient location between work and home at the time, decent head/DT/throatfucking and new explorations of rimming (receiving), along with a decent enough 'use me for sex' body...had me regularly seeing her.

Sidenote, if you wanna see her...she's been on your HL for a while etc...do it soon as according to another punter she is going back to Brazil soon for an unspecified length of time.


Comms and Venue -

Texted to arrange. Was originally after an hour but had a mare with traffic and what not (that neck of the woods is no longer on my path). In the end I was over 30 mins late, but she was v understanding. Didn't seem to begrudge for shortening to 30 mins either. In the end prob good it was only 30 mins; recon I would have left before the hour (due to looks-- see further below).

Decent enough apartment in post 2012 Straford. In the past when I've seen her she's been at diff apartments and one hotel on the High St...so yeah, location changes every now and then but always same rough location.


Formalities, Looks and the Meet itself -

Pleasant greeting. Never has been one to ask for or count money etc, but as always I get it out of the way.

Lookswise, boy oh boy she's fallen off. Long story short, she's now fat as opposed to phat in my opinion. Pics are certainly not accurate. There have been questions over the extent of photoshopping in the past, but either way the pics are long out of date at this point.
Her ass, which some regard as somewhat of a USP...while it is large, I am no longer impressed. It is riddled with fat and cellulite now. Just imagine cottage cheese (her skin tone during the winter months making it quite literal).
Decent face (ageing rapidly, looking worse for wear).
Stomach- forget about it. Sidenote, pretty bad C section mark(s) straight across. Her stomach flab actually covers it most of the time/makes it hard to notice.
Arms- flabby chicken wings that could blow in the wind.
Legs- too stumpy even for a BBW or what not. Too wide below the knee.


During the booking did:
- OWO. Still good. Can/willing to DT. Somewhat submissive, wanting you to thrust etc. Eyes watering, the lot.
- Mish. Likes to pull her legs back etc.
- CG. Felt like I was being crushed tbh.
- Doggy. Still managed to put the past-sell-by-date ass to use and managed to cum.
Overall, pussy was loose. Never was particularly tight, thus can take a pounding.
Never has been loud in terms of moans, but does get noisy with "fuck me hard" and other encouragement/shouts in (I assume) Portuguese.

Long story short, her mileage is near its end. Seems if a WG doesn't lose it mentally, she does so physically.

Other services not done on this occasion but have indulged in the past:
-Kissing (still listed). Certainly is on the table still as she tried to initiate, but I wasn't feeling it on this occassion. In the past was pretty much full on DFK.
-Rimming receiving (still listed) is on the table as mentioned and from past experience she's good and seems to enjoy it ...so if that's your thing, yeah.
-Also in past done swallow but seems to have now been removed from 'likes'.


Ratings -

Looks: 4/10
Attitude: 10/10
Service: 6.5/10

Looks ultimately it's horses for courses. But in her prime, firm body etc...she was maybe touching a 7 in my book. Now...forget about it.
Attitude...can't think of a single reason to mark her down.
Service...apart from good oral skills there's nothing else to write home about, so she just scrapes a 'pass'.

Cheers,

Axe

Overall: 20.5/30

Looks/Attitude/Service rankings to date:
1) Lottie Lovelace 27/30
=2) x beautiful nicole x 26/30
=2) Suzy Cortez 26/30
4) Anna Flower 25.5/30 (YMMV warning)
5) Maggie 24.5/30
6) PETITE PERFECTION (Pola) 24/30
7) SexiiMixedMegan 22.5/30
8) RaquelBusty36EE 20.5/30
=9) Polish Horny Maya xx 20/30
=9) MAYA E13 (Vivastreet) 20/30
11) Polish Amanda 5.5/30

Top 3 Looks: Suzy Cortez (8.5), Lottie Lovelace (8), and x beautiful nicole x (7.5).
I wanna see some stunners...any recommendations would be much appreciated!

Top 3 Attitude: Lottie Lovelace (10), BustyRaquel36EE (10), x beautiful nicole x, Anna Flower, and PETITE PERFECTION/Pola (all 9.5).

Top 3 Service: Anna Flower (9.5), Lottie Lovelace (9), x beautiful nicole x (9).
« Last Edit: March 24, 2018, 11:05:59 pm by DylanPerry »

Offline Sinz

Looks like you have added the incorrect link in your review.

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Looks like you have added the incorrect link in your review.

Yes, my mistake...have corrected now. Hope you can clean up the indexing.


Offline peter purves

Hmmm...Interesting...Very interesting!!
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Pretty happy with how my ratings system is working out. If I had to recommend said WGs off the top of my head, they would literally be in that order, including the ties.

Offline peter purves

Pretty happy with how my ratings system is working out. If I had to recommend said WGs off the top of my head, they would literally be in that order, including the ties.

As for 'stunners'  :angelgirl: I always maintain very hard to come by IMHO
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

DylanPerry

  • Guest
As for 'stunners'  :angelgirl: I always maintain very hard to come by IMHO

& also horses for courses factor as well. My scale is probably a harsh one at large...and on the flip I'm sure some probably think I gave one or two, too high a rating.

There's one (non 'pornstar', British) WG that I haven't reviewed/shared which I would describe as a serious hottie. But aside from her, don't think there's any (non 'pornstar') WGs that I've punted, at least of late, that are anything to write home about in the looks department. Punter's Alienation, eh!
« Last Edit: March 24, 2018, 11:31:04 pm by DylanPerry »

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Within looks I forgot the tiddies. Large and soft. Getting sloppy due to her increased weight though.

Offline 0mard3000

I'd have to agree 100% with Axelrod on this one. Mad cool but definitely a big unit!

Would love some links to Lottie lovelace and beautiful Nicole if you don'y mind.

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Would love some links to Lottie lovelace and beautiful Nicole if you don'y mind.

You that lazy? lol. Could have just looked at my reviews and any others...everything always attached with pics by Sinz or whomever nowadays.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=190319.0 - Nicole, skinny and petite with not an ounce of fat on her as mentioned. Pics are refreshingly accurate. Face nothing to write home about but above average looking, can be described as 'pretty'.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=189192.0 - Lottie when I saw her had the blonde shortish hair (wig) as per the first few pics in Sinz' attachment (I believe those pics were taken the week of which I saw her in fact).
But nonetheless my high rating for her was due to the body anyway. I called the body a 9.5, and the face a 6.5, hence the 8 overall.
She hasn't got any recent porn work so you can't really see her current shape on film...but I would say she was more petite and skinny than I was expecting, but yet exists a dichotomy of curves in the right places (something Nicole lacks)...with a peachy-ish ass and quite stellar tiddies.
There was a period way back when where she had red hair (wigs?) and bad teeth in her porn work...looking terrible and skanky overall imo. Since then she's certainly improved facially, and I would say has had cosmetic work done on the teeth.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2018, 02:31:30 pm by DylanPerry »