Lorretta Armour?

[Wellydogg]

Anyone had any experiences before?

External Link/Members Only

[AgedCases]

Perfect height, nice tits, very tempting. She's over 40 but then again so am I!

TOFTT!

[jarrovian]

Looks like this could be "princess Lola" of aw Durham. Sorry can't do links

[bronson24]

Looks like this could be "princess Lola" of aw Durham. Sorry can't do links

it is her. same pics in her gallery of red bra and black suspender belt


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[daviemac]

it is her. same pics in her gallery of red bra and black suspender belt


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

And another example of pure greed, not content with saving the commission she would pay the agency she has to put the price up as well.   

[jarrovian]

I messaged her a while back asking if everything was included in the price as I may be interested in a meeting. In her reply she just asked if i wanted incall or out call and never answered my question so i took it there would be extras to pay so i didn't bother with her

[bronson24]

I messaged her a while back asking if everything was included in the price as I may be interested in a meeting. In her reply she just asked if i wanted incall or out call and never answered my question so i took it there would be extras to pay so i didn't bother with her

she never gave me a straight answer too when i contacted her before, she seems to have decent feedback on her adultwork profile though, but no cim is a no no for me

[Toshiba]

not my cup of tea at all, and the price is a piss take when you can book her cheaper elsewhere   

limited services anarl, no chance , dont bother

[AnthG]

the price is a piss take when you can book her cheaper elsewhere   

It literally is so absolutely infuriating when girls do this. Its just total greed. And its treating punters as they think we are thick.

I am starting to think we should have a topic listing all of the girls on Amour's, Diamonds and Alllure's books who do this.

[daviemac]

It literally is so absolutely infuriating when girls do this. Its just total greed. And its treating punters as they think we are thick.

I am starting to think we should have a topic listing all of the girls on Amour's, Diamonds and Alllure's books who do this.

Don't know about Diamonds or Allure but 2 of the most popular and well reviewed on Amour's site charge the same. Could it be the others are trying to make up for a bit of 'dusty phone syndrome' ?

[AnthG]

Don't know about Diamonds or Allure but 2 of the most popular and well reviewed on Amour's site charge the same. Could it be the others are trying to make up for a bit of 'dusty phone syndrome' ?

I wasn't sure who you exactly meant. But I have just checked AW and seen EvaBello is doing it too. (I seen ToriTaylor is not doing it, who I personally guessed who you were meaning by popular and well reviewed, which shows all the top/good girls don't suddenly become greedy).

Its just disrespectful to punters in the absolute extreme when WGs do this. Its treating punters goodwill as if they think we are truly mugs because punters sometimes think if they like the girl they want to book her direct so she gets all the money and the agency doesn't get their cut. And yet by going direct there is a £20 or £30 extra fee ontop.

If they are prepared to work for £50 - £70 per hour through an agency then there is no justification whatsoever to knock an extra £50-£70 on that amount they'd get from an agency booking for guys to see them direct.

[wheatbeerlover]

I don't get why you are all so bothered, just book the cheapest option. It's the same as different websites selling the same product at different prices

[Toshiba]

I don't get why you are all so bothered, just book the cheapest option. It's the same as different websites selling the same product at different prices

i think we are more trying to point punters in the cheapest direction tbh, i couldnt give a fuck either way

[AnthG]

I don't get why you are all so bothered, just book the cheapest option. It's the same as different websites selling the same product at different prices

Its not like that at all though. When stores have deals they achieve them through two means. The first is loss leaders. Which is they sell items literally as a loss as a means to achieve positive advertisement via it or in the hope people will come in and buy other items at the same time. Or the other means is, if they are a big retailer they bulk buy and get a bulk buy discount that they pass on.

Prostitution however is a service, and a service that has quite literally and practically zero expenditures and 100% profits. It is also a service that costs an obscene amount of money for those guys paying.

And thus WGs treating punters as if they are daft by literally doubling their money is an insult.

If I went to a punt with £100 in real cash, and £20 in monopoly money. And then the girl looked at it all and said alll ok, and started the session. She would have good grounds to be annoyed later on down the road when she found out she had been duped and I was long gone. I would expect her to kick off if I tried to book her again.

Equally so the same applies in reverse. If I look on Adultwork and see a girl for £120. I book her and leave and then see that same girl on one of the agencies for £100 for that same session I equally have the same rights to be aggrieved.

There is literally no reason for them to want that extra £20 to make it £120. Do they honestly not think £100 for an hour is enough. That is an obscene amount of money in anyone's eyes. They are not doing anything different in independent bookings than they will be in agency bookings.

The only reason they are charging more is they are greedy, and they have total disrespect and disregard for their customers, which really does annoy me in all honesty that they do.

[Mansell]

Totally agree, what's even more annoying is that if you book through the agency at the lower rate they get even less. I just don;t understand it. I could see it if they did it the other way ie Amour £ 100 and through AW £ 80 that makes sense.

But hey it's becoming obvious to me that normal business model and escorting just don;t go together 

[AnthG]

Here is another theoretical question for people to mull over. If it suddenly came out tomorrow that the agencies in the region charged the regions golden girls on its books e,g girls like ToriTaylor or LillyD less rates per booking.

So for example for a one hour session the girl got £90 and the agency took £10.

But all other girls on their books it took the normal £30 and the girl got £70.

Do you think all those other girls getting the £70 rate would go, "well you know those other girls are well liked and popular so they deserve to pay less". Everyone knows that would not ever happen. They would be flpping their lids and the catfights would be immense. They'd be arguing like crazy that they are doing the exact same work and offering the exact same service as the golden girls so they want the same rates applied and they want all that money back they paid extra compared to them.

Everyone can guess the level of arguments, moanfests and catfights that would kick off if this occurred.

And yet for punters a load of girls think its totally ok for us to shell out more money for the exact same booking just because we don't know they also work for an agency and charge way less via it. Its not right.

(to make this clear, this is just a theoretical example picked out of thin air to show what I am meaning, I felt I better clarify that again).

[Mansell]

Bloody hell Anth I started writing something along those lines in my post and then deleted as I thought it would be too much !!

I was thinking the same and it's one of the reasons I have changed who I see, why pay more when you can see some of the very best for the standard £ 100 ie Tori Taylor, Savannah, Keeva etc etc.

Actually I was going to suggest why aren't the agencies charging less for the new / less well know girls who are not as popular ?

[wheatbeerlover]

It's up to you how much you pay to see someone, many service professions charge different prices for the same service. It's how business works, just because you don't like it, it won't change.

Granted £100 an hour is a lot but would u let some random, possibly horrible person fuck you?

[AnthG]

It's up to you how much you pay to see someone

Its up to me because I know which girls on AW charging £120/£130 per hour are also on agencies charging £100 per hour because of largely this forum. But many other punters don't. And I do think its kind of our responsibility as punters to let other punters know what is going on. And to show the girls doing it, that its wrong, and they will be criticized for it. Hence why I and others bang on about it so much.

Granted £100 an hour is a lot but would u let some random, possibly horrible person fuck you?

The girls doing this job have already made that decision, and made it for accepting between £50 to £70 per hour from agency bookings.

Therefore wanting £120/£130 per hour for the same bookings does not mean they don't see the horrible ones. It just means they are being greedy as they have already made that decision and are happy to see that horrible person if simply he was smart enough to check the agencies for her and book via them.

I know this is way-way before your time but I still remember the time when RedAlert posted he was going to quit punting and come back only when the rates were £50 per hour. Everyone said he was mad as girls wouldn't do this for £50 per hour. But the thing is, they are doing this for £50 per hour. Just we never see it. And it just rubs more salt into any wounds when those accepting £50 per hour are wanting us to shell out £120/£130 per hour to them independently when they could just use a modicum of commonsense and repress the greed they clearly have and just charge £90 per hour to undercut the agency, but they come away with more.

[daviemac]

I don't get why you are all so bothered, just book the cheapest option. It's the same as different websites selling the same product at different prices

This site does it's best to help punters and any ripoff is reported for the benefit of others as is bad service etc, it's the way the site works.

No one here has or would complain when the same price is charged by the agency and by the same girl as an indie, even though she saves the commission and earns more, but when they try to almost double their income for the same service that is just a ripoff.

Don't forget prossies read this site and it might just filter back to the greedy twats that we know about it and don't like it, all bad publicity.

[Sar-Major]

I had wanted to see this lady when I arrived on Sunday but Stacey said she had other things planned. So that was when Nicky was put in the frame

    

[stanleyjohn]

Back to the OP,if this is the same WG then she is a WG that has been discussed on here many times before, she did offer BB originally. Her fingers were a source of much discussion as were her services . I had tried to see her on several occasions(without knowing about the BB) but she cancelled at short notice both times and her comms are terrible.
Anyone remember the thread ?

[stanleyjohn]

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=51167.0

As I said if it is the same WG then she has been discussed at length.

[shengfan]

It's up to you how much you pay to see someone, many service professions charge different prices for the same service. It's how business works, just because you don't like it, it won't change.

Granted £100 an hour is a lot but would u let some random, possibly horrible person fuck you?

I agree, so what if they charge different rates, you don't have to book them do you, and with the best will in the world it is NOT  just a business for the most obvious reason. Not all of us Punters are Brad Pitt lookalikes and if the girls are greedy as you say keep away.

[OscarC]

Lorretta taken down off Amour site for unknown reason.

Now seems to have turned up at NNE as Lola - looks like the same girl to me.  (but not my type).

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[Mackydees]

Its not like that at all though. When stores have deals they achieve them through two means. The first is loss leaders.

Firstly, I couldn't really give a monkeys either way, let them charge what they want when they want to, if a punter has any sense then they'll use the cheaper of the options.

I would though argue the opposite of your point above, if a girl is on AW and then goes onto an agencies books as well then she hasn't increased her price above the agencies, she's taken a reduction for that work, this could be classed as a loss leader. Take Keeva for example, she only works one day per week for Amour, her pictures, feedback and name however are on Amours site 24/7, her profile is seen by thousands of local punters on a daily basis who may well then go and book her through AW. The commission she pays Amour is simply her advertising costs.

Prostitution however is a service, and a service that has quite literally and practically zero expenditures and 100% profits. It is also a service that costs an obscene amount of money for those guys paying.

100% profit? Premises, advertising, website, condoms, clothing, make up, motor costs for outcalls, toys, 2nd mobile...there's probably a load more I haven't thought of. That aside, yes the money is still pretty fucking mental though.

The only reason they are charging more is they are greedy, and they have total disrespect and disregard for their customers, which really does annoy me in all honesty that they do.

I don't see how it's disrespectful, its economics, is it Disrespectful of Adidas to sell NUFC tops to Fenwicks who'll mark them up at £45 and to Sports Direct who'll sell them for £30 (and lob one of those irritating catalogues in as well)?

[Sar-Major]

It would seem "Lorretta" has turned up at Pink Ladies, as A N Other "Lola"........

NO photos YET but her stats are!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   

External Link/Members Only

    

[AnthG]

I don't see how it's disrespectful, its economics, is it Disrespectful of Adidas to sell NUFC tops to Fenwicks who'll mark them up at £45 and to Sports Direct who'll sell them for £30 (and lob one of those irritating catalogues in as well)?

A better analogy of this is Adidas selling the tops to Fenwicks and Sports Direct for £30. And then Fenwicks and Sports Direct selling them for £45 to customers.

But Adidas then selling them direct to customers for £60.

Customers have a choice to book via the agency and direct only if they know she works via an agency. The problem is these girls often use different names on AW to what they do on the Agency to make it clearly as difficult as possible for punters to know they can be booked cheaper. I think that is what is disrespectful.

If a girl said on her profile - which to be fair is what LilyD and EvaBello do so fair to play to both of them. "I also work for Amour Agency" this allows the person to know they are on there to book for the cheaper rate.

Girls that try and hide that they are also on the agency just so they can charge more direct I think are deserving of the word greedy.

Obviously I may be in a minority who thinks that way. But I do think that way.

[daviemac]

Take Keeva for example, she only works one day per week for Amour, her pictures, feedback and name however are on Amours site 24/7, her profile is seen by thousands of local punters on a daily basis who may well then go and book her through AW.

Keeva is one of the few who charge the same on aw as amour do, always has done. When I first saw Keeva I tried to book her from aw (she wasn't called Keeva then on aw) but she asked me to book her as Keeva on Amour so she pushed me to the agency, it was the same price though.

100% profit? Premises, advertising, website, condoms, clothing, make up, motor costs for outcalls, toys, 2nd mobile...there's probably a load more I haven't thought of. That aside, yes the money is still pretty fucking mental though.

Expenses are the same whether they work for an agency or as an independent, just the likes of Keeva are happy with the extra 30% the agency would've taken.   

[Pimpmasterflex]

Its not like that at all though. When stores have deals they achieve them through two means. The first is loss leaders. Which is they sell items literally as a loss as a means to achieve positive advertisement via it or in the hope people will come in and buy other items at the same time. Or the other means is, if they are a big retailer they bulk buy and get a bulk buy discount that they pass on.

Prostitution however is a service, and a service that has quite literally and practically zero expenditures and 100% profits. It is also a service that costs an obscene amount of money for those guys paying.

And thus WGs treating punters as if they are daft by literally doubling their money is an insult.

If I went to a punt with £100 in real cash, and £20 in monopoly money. And then the girl looked at it all and said alll ok, and started the session. She would have good grounds to be annoyed later on down the road when she found out she had been duped and I was long gone. I would expect her to kick off if I tried to book her again.

Equally so the same applies in reverse. If I look on Adultwork and see a girl for £120. I book her and leave and then see that same girl on one of the agencies for £100 for that same session I equally have the same rights to be aggrieved.

There is literally no reason for them to want that extra £20 to make it £120. Do they honestly not think £100 for an hour is enough. That is an obscene amount of money in anyone's eyes. They are not doing anything different in independent bookings than they will be in agency bookings.

The only reason they are charging more is they are greedy, and they have total disrespect and disregard for their customers, which really does annoy me in all honesty that they do.

Seriously think about it greed ? No how does the girl get to you on an out call brass buttons time and money both ways I'd want to walk away with a full hours wage without having to take out my time and travel to get to an appointment ....don't want to pay don't book simples!

[daviemac]

Seriously think about it greed ? No how does the girl get to you on an out call brass buttons time and money both ways I'd want to walk away with a full hours wage without having to take out my time and travel to get to an appointment ....don't want to pay don't book simples!

Think your missing the point here were're talking incall prices, amour charge £50 and £100 incall and £120 outcall (the extra 20 covers travel) out of that they get £35 and £70 + 20 if outcall. Some girls on their site charge up to £70 and £130 for incalls and £160 outcall as independents.  They do 30 min incall through agency and get 35 but want double if booked direct. All their expenses are the same regardless of how they're booked and that's not greed ??

If they want to work for a higher rate then no probs just stay independent and leave the agency or do as some of the most popular girls do and charge the same when working as independents and be happy with the commission they save.

Some have changed their name on aw to hide the fact they work for an agency and can be booked cheaper.

[HouseofUsher]

Just to go back to the subject of the lady, looks quite smart as milfs go - has anyone seen?

[stanleyjohn]

Suggest you view the link I posted as she has been discussed on here quite a bit over many months, she keeps popping up.

[HouseofUsher]

Suggest you view the link I posted as she has been discussed on here quite a bit over many months, she keeps popping up.

Sorry in all the posts about prices I must have rolled past yours first time. Doesn't sound too good.

[Gothic D]

Suggest you view the link I posted as she has been discussed on here quite a bit over many months, she keeps popping up.

I remember the original thread about her.I tried several times to get some sort of sense out of her but gave up in the end.Comms are shit and she writes/texts like English is her second language.