Ausiebelle - Reading

[tictacs]

Met Belle back in April.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Meeting arranged about a week prior. Followed her simple booking process as detailed on her Adultwork profile and secured an hour incall for £120.

Her flat was a very short distance from the station. I've punted in this building before and it's a great location as very central but still discreet.

Belle looks exactly like her pics. I'd say her stated sizes are correct. She is curvy in all the right places. Love her big boobs if you are a boob man you won't be disappointed. I agree with the previous reviewer that her most recent gallery picture with the white garter gives you an excellent representation of her figure. Facially she is very cute.

She immediately made me feel welcome. Began with some kissing while we slowly undressed each other. I couldn't keep my hands off her curves. Settled onto the bed and she gave me amazing OWO. She's really skilled at this and before long I could feel myself getting close. Asked her to stop as wanted to try a few positions with her first.

Condom on and I was soon enjoying a fantastic view of her tits as she rode me in cowgirl, slowly at first and then building up the intensity. Switched to doggy and I pounded away now with a lovely view of her arse. Finally moved into missionary and came hard as she wrapped her legs around me.

Had a chat and a cuddle for a few minutes but I was soon getting hard again. Played with Belle's tits as she slowly wanked me off to a second finish.

Another break to catch my breath and then Belle gave me some more OWO. I was really getting into it and there were points when I thought I might manage a third cum in an hour which would be a new one for me! Sadly it was not to be but Belle kept it up right to the end of the booking. I left just over an hour after we started.

Will definitely be returning for a second time when she's back in the area. I'm not used to booking ahead so need to get more disciplined. Sadly on her more recent visit to Reading she was fully booked before I could make a request! Clearly proving popular with the locals. 

[Cunning Punt]

Belle looks exactly like her pics. I'd say her stated sizes are correct.

Up to a point.

She has put on a couple of sizes since the original pictures she had on her profile including the one of her sideways on in black pants.

There is no way the stated size of 14 is correct either. She is comfortably a size 16 as the more up-to-date pictures show.

I agree the picture of her in white is the most indicative of what she looks like, though it covers up the stomach a bit.

Hidden Image/Members Only

She is very pretty plus is a nice girl gives a reasonable service, and personally I like "the larger lady" but it might bother some.

[switftjake]

Saw her 3 month ago an she was def 14then. her height and broad frame carried it very well

Personally that pic above is very unflattering but if that’s her now I’ll ask her not to wear that white outfit. Its horribld

[Veritas]

I agree about the white outfit and the pic generally...it is not remotely appealing.  While I’m all for honest marketing (and there is precious little of it on AW!), that’s enough to move her from “possible” to “i’ll Pass” for me.

[switftjake]

I agree about the white outfit and the pic generally...it is not remotely appealing.  While I’m all for honest marketing (and there is precious little of it on AW!), that’s enough to move her from “possible” to “i’ll Pass” for me.

Yeah I understand. I passed on someone based on poor pics and was told it was mistake as they are not representative of the girl. So I would say same for this white lingerie pic. But if you do passs that’s more chance for me to book her in Reading before she snapped up

[DrConners]

Up to a point.

She has put on a couple of sizes since the original pictures she had on her profile including the one of her sideways on in black pants.

There is no way the stated size of 14 is correct either. She is comfortably a size 16 as the more up-to-date pictures show.

I agree the picture of her in white is the most indicative of what she looks like, though it covers up the stomach a bit.

She is very pretty plus is a nice girl gives a reasonable service, and personally I like "the larger lady" but it might bother some.

I haven't seen this girl CP but I have to agree with you here, plus most of her pictures have been altered with some sort of photoshop to disguise the fact that her waist isn't nearly as trim as the pictures suggest - You said she's 'curvy' OP - You really meant she has a bit of a gut ?

She still looks hot but I'm not impressed when a WG disguises the truth like this - Ain't nothing wrong with a curvy girl, but rocking up expecting a slim thing & a belly imerges out of nowhere is false advertising IMO     


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Warm-Hands]

I am not sure what I am looking for DrC - what are the bits you have highlighted? I ask because I am a bit of a sucker for photoshopped pics, and can never spot when they have been altered.

[Cunning Punt]

I am not sure what I am looking for DrC - what are the bits you have highlighted? I ask because I am a bit of a sucker for photoshopped pics, and can never spot when they have been altered.

I think he's made it clear - he's ringed where he thinks she has done some airbrushing.

I'm not sure whether they are photoshopped or just old pictures - that isn't really the point. The fact is she is much larger, ie 16 not the 12 that the pictures suggest, and I posted the most realistic picture above.

[switftjake]

Absolutely no way is she a 16 Or wasnt when I saw her earlier this year at least

[Cunning Punt]

Absolutely no way is she a 16 Or wasnt when I saw her earlier this year at least

Well I saw her very recently and if she's not 16 then she's an extremely large 14. She is a big lass and much, much bigger than the older photos, as others have said.

It doesn't bother me but may others, so we're just making clear to punters what to expect.

[contentguy]

I think he's made it clear - he's ringed where he thinks she has done some airbrushing.

I'm not sure whether they are photoshopped or just old pictures - that isn't really the point. The fact is she is much larger, ie 16 not the 12 that the pictures suggest, and I posted the most realistic picture above.

I think the areas the good Dr is highlighting are the spots on the photo where straight edges have been distorted where she's adjusted the line of her figure.

In the first pic, hold a straight edge to the left line of the door (left edge where the hinge is) and it curves where she's enhanced her line.

In the second pic, it looks like she's made her bum look BIGGER, the mirror lines bulge outwards when you put a line against them.

I can't see the distortion in the third pic, but it's bad in this one. 
Look at the curve on the left wall on this pic.
External Link/Members Only

Guy

[Cunning Punt]

In the second pic, it looks like she's made her bum look BIGGER

No, no her bum really is THAT big now, even if not then!

[DrConners]

I think the areas the good Dr is highlighting are the spots on the photo where straight edges have been distorted where she's adjusted the line of her figure.

In the first pic, hold a straight edge to the left line of the door (left edge where the hinge is) and it curves where she's enhanced her line.

In the second pic, it looks like she's made her bum look BIGGER, the mirror lines bulge outwards when you put a line against them.

I can't see the distortion in the third pic, but it's bad in this one. 
Look at the curve on the left wall on this pic.
External Link/Members Only

Guy

Sorry I should have added some more explanation so cheers Guy I think you've pretty much summed it up. It seemed pretty obvious to me.

A normal female form has natural curves, when you take a picture next to a inorganic solid object with an even perpendicular surface or edge & that edge is deformed - then some sort of photographic manipulation has obviously occured - and that's definitely the case here.

So supposedly slim waisted hot chick stood next to door frame & that frame is "bent" - means - she ain't got a slim waist 

As I said, I don't like false advetising - Thinking about it now though, what advertising is honest ?   

No, no her bum really is THAT big now, even if not then!

I can imagine !!     

[Dayardie]

Shes been on my HL for ages but yeah false advertising is really putting me off. Shame as its case of great service but no excuse for ps photos. Perhaps lay off da pie floaters for a bit

[ciderhead]

I saw her when she was in Bristol, the larger type lady is normally just not my type of girl at all, but although biggish is quite firm and her attitude was absolutely spot on, great blow job and took a good hard pounding in doggy, ive seen some stunners that have been fucking useless so body types mean very little to me, its quality of service that counts most imo

[Veritas]

The elbow in that first pic DrC showed always has me having to look twice to check she doesn’t have three breasts 

[DrConners]

The elbow in that first pic DrC showed always has me having to look twice to check she doesn’t have three breasts 

Lol, Never saw that but yes, your absolutely correct - I'm thinking the hooker from Mars in the original Total Recall now circa 1990.

       


Hidden Image/Members Only

[switftjake]

Shes been on my HL for ages but yeah false advertising is really putting me off. Shame as its case of great service but no excuse for ps photos. Perhaps lay off da pie floaters for a bit

I can get your meanin and Id have proably passed for that reason but I went off previous reviews and her open attitude when booking was spot on. Fucking glad I wasnt putt off by the photoshop as she my fav punt so far

but yor choice of course

[belletasker]

Hey everyone,

Thought i would send out my apologies now, you guys are correct and some of the photos have been altered slightly. I will be honest, the initial reason was that i thought people assumed that all girls pictures on these sites were altered so if i put up the completely raw ones people would assume they had to add a size of two on that already.

I have been always been conscious of not disappointing anyone and read through reviews and feedback to see if anyone had thought my pictures were not an accurate representation, until now no on had really said anything which is why i had left them.

However, i can see now that i need to make some changes so im going to make a few videos/take some new pictures over the next couple days (will still be at the best angels though haha) and remove the old ones. When they're up i hope DC can give you all the seal of approval that they are not edited

PS I wish i had 3 tits.

[belletasker]

Shes been on my HL for ages but yeah false advertising is really putting me off. Shame as its case of great service but no excuse for ps photos. Perhaps lay off da pie floaters for a bit

  i wish i knew where to get a decent one over hahah but i love that you know what they are

[switftjake]

PS I wish i had 3 tits.

And I had 3 hands!

Everyone expects good angles and lighting to get most flattering pics (there’s a thread about another girl with some terrible pics that put some off)

But yeah altering body shape with photoshop won’t go down well

Look forward to seeing the new shots Better still in person!

[switftjake]

the new profile pics look good and looks exactly how I remember from earlier this year. Cracking  curves whatever the official dress size is!

[Derrick101]

I was about to review a meet with ausiebelle in Southampton a few weeks ago, but couldn't add to anything that's been posted here, only to reiterate the positives, and comment that she was larger than expected!
However, it's refreshing that she has posted here, acknowledging the criticism and a promise to correct.

[DrConners]

Hey everyone,

Thought i would send out my apologies now, you guys are correct and some of the photos have been altered slightly.

You probably wouldn't feel the need to 'apologise' if you hadn't posted some badly photoshopped pictures to hide the fact you like a cake or seven - And it sounds like your guilty conscience talking here as you've been caught out with your false advertising 

I will be honest, the initial reason was that i thought people assumed that all girls pictures on these sites were altered so if i put up the completely raw ones people would assume they had to add a size of two on that already.

Absolute rubbish - While this may be the case in some instances most of the time a reviewer on UKP would mention the accuracy of a SP's looks in relation to her pictures, I know I do. If I take the time & effort to make a booking, turn up on time, clean, showered & hygenic I expect you to look like your fucking pictures figure wise 

I have been always been conscious of not disappointing anyone and read through reviews and feedback to see if anyone had thought my pictures were not an accurate representation, until now no on had really said anything which is why i had left them.

Thanks for playing the helpless maiden victim card  I read through some of your reviews, it would appear the positive 'outweighs' the negatives, they show up, see your much bigger in the flesh, decide to stay to see if your a good fuck regardless - Which would appear to be the case, then let the fact that your a big unit slide as their still recovering from post shag euphoria.

You have probably got many happy clients who like the way you look & the services you provide, good luck to you & them - I don't like shit photoshopped pictures & am happy to point these out when I see them - Soz!

When they're up i hope DC can give you all the seal of approval that they are not edited

Oh get over yourself, I'm not interested in size 14 to 16 girls anyway nor do I have an ego that needs catering too. Your some sort of vacuous narcissist or did one of your fanboys dob this review into you ?

[DrConners]

I was about to review a meet with ausiebelle in Southampton a few weeks ago, but couldn't add to anything that's been posted here, only to reiterate the positives, and comment that she was larger than expected!

You see belletasker, Derrick is a perfect example of the sort of gentleman I'm describing, he really enjoyed meeting you & isn't bothered by the way you looked - or fucked - but he wasn't expecting there to be so much of you. A problem you could avoid & subsiquent comments on reviews like this by being honest in the first place. 

[DrConners]

Cracking  curves whatever the official dress size is!

There are some 'cracking curves' in the frame of the mirror too  - Taken from her 'updated' profile from 11.00 am today 

Prossie logic     C- Must Try Harder   




Hidden Image/Members Only

[switftjake]

You see belletasker, Derrick is a perfect example of the sort of gentleman I'm describing, he really enjoyed meeting you & isn't bothered by the way you looked - or fucked - but he wasn't expecting there to be so much of you. A problem you could avoid & subsiquent comments on reviews like this by being honest in the first place. 

at least she’s done something about it. How many Roms or even Poles would?

We all learn things, what we do with the knowledge defines us

[vw]

There are some 'cracking curves' in the frame of the mirror too  - Taken from her 'updated' profile from 11.00 am today 

Prossie logic     C- Must Try Harder   




Hidden Image/Members Only

so she cannot help her self then

You see belletasker, Derrick is a perfect example of the sort of gentleman I'm describing, he really enjoyed meeting you & isn't bothered by the way you looked - or fucked - but he wasn't expecting there to be so much of you. A problem you could avoid & subsiquent comments on reviews like this by being honest in the first place. 

Derrick was put in my pile of those not to trust anything about appearance reviewers a while back.

[Derrick101]

Respect your view VW, appearance is always subjective and according to taste.

[silk51]

It is really intersting that SP's don't realise that one of the biggest elements for us Punters is the excitment leading up to the Encounter!

When they tweek their photos and then we walk through the door - it kills it! Even if the services where great.

All punters are after something slightly different from a punt and a girl, some want small, some want large, some want specific services.

Please SP's just please be honest about how you look and what you offer!

It would really benefit them as well, as Punters expectations would be meet and are more likley to get repeat business!

[Veritas]

I for one am grateful for the updated pics - they have confirmed that this SP isn’t for me despite my HLing her based on her initial profile and feedback.   That’s down to my preferences rather than saying there is anything ‘wrong’ with her physique but at least I can now exercise my prerogative and not book rather than finding out after taking time off work, hauling over there and waiting for the door to open and having to walk.

That said, I’m sure the new pics have catapulted her straight on to some HLs where punters like a bit to hold onto. 

[contentguy]

There are some 'cracking curves' in the frame of the mirror too  - Taken from her 'updated' profile from 11.00 am today 

Prossie logic     C- Must Try Harder   




Hidden Image/Members Only

And taken down already.
Well spotted Dr C.
She sounds fun but she's off my list.

Guy

[Cunning Punt]

I was about to review a meet with ausiebelle in Southampton a few weeks ago, but couldn't add to anything that's been posted here, only to reiterate the positives, and comment that she was larger than expected!

+1,000

Exactly the same boat as you, Derrick. Punted her but not going to review because can't add to much and, personally, I don't like to add a further praise to an escort who can get booked up.

Also, like you, I found her bigger than expected but it didn't bother me and she gives a good service.

However, as there are punters who don't like big girls and/or want to know what they're going to meet, I've made her real size bloody clear on here.

Thought i would send out my apologies now, you guys are correct and some of the photos have been altered slightly.

As said, you shouldn't have done it in the first place but it's rare that a WG admits some of the photos are photoshopped, let alone replaces them with more realistic px.

[morrisonhotel]

It's interesting the amount of comments this SP photos have generated.  We are rightly a bit miffed that the photos have been enhanced slightly but also some punters are put off by crap galleries.  Recently anaconda of bracknell has got lots of slightly negative comments as her gallery is a bit basic and undersells her.  If I was a SP then I would perhaps feel in a no-win situation.

Anyone who is old enough to remember the bad (or good...!) old days of adverts in the paper that you took a real chance on will perhaps think we are bit spoiled by the instant access to face/fanny/arse pics etc. 

Either way both girls are on my HL as I would happily ride them all day long!

[switftjake]

some punters are put off by crap galleries.  Recently anaconda of bracknell has got lots of slightly negative comments as her gallery is a bit basic and undersells her.  If I was a SP then I would perhaps feel in a no-win situation.

Either way both girls are on my HL as I would happily ride them all day long!

Great point Mr Morrison! I’m guilty of being put off by anacondas pics. Her new ones haven’t changed my opinion but I’m keeping her on the HL cosof overwhelming recommendations here. Your right the WGs probably feel they can’t win. But best advice is be honest and get second opinion on what is sexy. And for me tying your boobs up just ain’t!

[time2play]

So in summary belle, don't make the pics make you look too unflattering or guys won't be interested in seeing you but on the other hand don't make them too flattering or guys will be put off when they meet you.

 

[DrConners]

I was a bit confused by the above posts too, sounded like an attempt to deflect the comments about her figure & the fact she's been caught out putting shit altered photo's on her profile  I think in summary a SP should just be honest about their appearance body wise.

Surely honesty is the best policy ?

[DrConners]

Here's a thought - due to her Australian upbringing - maybe just change her AW name to "Big Sheila" 

[switftjake]

Surely honesty is the best policy ?

When it comes to profile pics absolutely.  but the point made above is that anacondas honest pics do her no favours her honesty makes for  unsettling pics!

Be honest but also know what is sexy

don't make them too flattering or guys will be put off when they meet you.

you don’t have to photoshop pics to make it flattering

[Heph]

If I was a SP then I would perhaps feel in a no-win situation.

No, it's a perfectly winnable situation.
Invest in the core product (+exercise +good photographer -cake); take a wide variety of shots; by all means select the best, but don't actually distort or deceive.

[vw]

No, it's a perfectly winnable situation.
Invest in the core product (+exercise +good photographer -cake); take a wide variety of shots; by all means select the best, but don't actually distort or deceive.

she is in a win situation, most people don't seem to care it seems.

[time2play]

No, it's a perfectly winnable situation.
Invest in the core product (+exercise +good photographer -cake); take a wide variety of shots; by all means select the best, but don't actually distort or deceive.

So assuming she's done all that, people will still carp because, she's not quite fit enough/too fit, didn't hire a good enough photographer/photographer too good, picked her photos too well/ didn't pick them well enough.

You see my point. This isn't an exact science and you're treating it like it is. 

We all have different views but I see little point hammering a girl (no pun intended) who seems to be doing a lot of right things in a punting world where there are lots and lots of girls who are frankly a disgrace to the profession.

[Derrick101]

+1

[vw]

So assuming she's done all that, people will still carp because, she's not quite fit enough/too fit, didn't hire a good enough photographer/photographer too good, picked her photos too well/ didn't pick them well enough.

You see my point. This isn't an exact science and you're treating it like it is. 

We all have different views but I see little point hammering a girl (no pun intended) who seems to be doing a lot of right things in a punting world where there are lots and lots of girls who are frankly a disgrace to the profession.

choosing to shrink the belly is an exact science, it is s yes no decision and she has continues yes.

Do what you want to, and others will pot as they  like, not to suit her or you.   

[switftjake]

choosing to shrink the belly is an exact science, it is s yes no decision and she has continues yes.

Do what you want to, and others will pot as they  like, not to suit her or you.   

He meant personal taste is not an exact science as you’ve already acknowledged above and we all agree altering photos is an exact science. that obvious surely

[Heph]

So assuming she's done all that, people will still carp because, she's not quite fit enough/too fit, didn't hire a good enough photographer/photographer too good, picked her photos too well/ didn't pick them well enough.

You see my point. This isn't an exact science and you're treating it like it is. 

We all have different views but I see little point hammering a girl (no pun intended) who seems to be doing a lot of right things in a punting world where there are lots and lots of girls who are frankly a disgrace to the profession.

You say that, and indeed, it sounds reasonable enough. Except to say that, by and large, the girls who are more straight-dealing in their self-promotion just don't seem to attract the same levels of criticism as those who are aren't. They do attract some criticism, as anyone does who sticks their head above parapet inevitably must (and some of that appears to be regrettably unfairly meted out). But, on the whole, those who conduct themselves honourably...  seem to escape unduly harsh criticism, or else are (doubtless grudgingly) honoured.

[morrisonhotel]

Here's a thought - due to her Australian upbringing - maybe just change her AW name to "Big Sheila" 

Hi Doc - just to clarify I am not defending the actions of false advertising.  I think it is very much a 21st century problem!

I do struggle to understand the logic behind both Aussie Belle and Anaconda's approach to photographic media though: if I was going to post a picture of my arse on the net and was going to enhance it (!) I would not choose a straight edge in the background to highlight I have altered it!  Same for Anaconda of bracknell - 'right I need a sexy pic for AW - lets see - oh yes the one with my boobs tied up with rope.....!'

Either way I am a physical disaster zone to look at so I cannot throw stones in either SP's glass houses.....Happy punting.

[DrConners]

You say that, and indeed, it sounds reasonable enough. Except to say that, by and large, the girls who are more straight-dealing in their self-promotion just don't seem to attract the same levels of criticism as those who are aren't. They do attract some criticism, as anyone does who sticks their head above parapet inevitably must (and some of that appears to be regrettably unfairly meted out). But, on the whole, those who conduct themselves honourably...  seem to escape unduly harsh criticism, or else are (doubtless grudgingly) honoured.

I though the highlighted part of your post was a pun - I realise it's not but still made me smile 

Heph I see your point but your overcomplicating it - this whole thing boils down to the OP saw her, had a good time & wrote a review with link. I read the review & thought - "Sounds good" - Upon clicking on the link to her profile I saw pretty swiftly she had altered a bunch of her pictures to hide her gut. I posted those pictures including highlighting the areas I felt had been altered.

Said postitute confirmed this - and has subsiquently removed them. End of.

Mate, I know lots of WG's alter their pictures but I don't police AW looking for them - If I do I'll try to do my best to bring them to yours/our attention as I personally prefer an honest & accurate representation of whom I'm going to be meeting - I guess I thought you all would too ?

I can see this girl has fans - but fucking hell this is a PUNTERS forum for the benefit of us PUNTERS. 

[contentguy]

I though the highlighted part of your post was a pun - I realise it's not but still made me smile 

Heph I see your point but your overcomplicating it - this whole thing boils down to the OP saw her, had a good time & wrote a review with link. I read the review & thought - "Sounds good" - Upon clicking on the link to her profile I saw pretty swiftly she had altered a bunch of her pictures to hide her gut. I posted those pictures including highlighting the areas I felt had been altered.

Said postitute confirmed this - and has subsiquently removed them. End of.

Mate, I know lots of WG's alter their pictures but I don't police AW looking for them - If I do I'll try to do my best to bring them to yours/our attention as I personally prefer an honest & accurate representation of whom I'm going to be meeting - I guess I thought you all would too ?

I can see this girl has fans - but fucking hell this is a PUNTERS forum for the benefit of us PUNTERS. 

It's a shady practice but at least she put her hands up to it and apologised, oh, then she did it again 
She's taken it to extreme this time though, check out the curves on this mirror!
External Link/Members Only

ROTFLMAO

Actually, checking her likes, she's a bit vanilla for me anyway.

Guy

[DrConners]

Yes perhaps Guy  Or maybe she's stood too close to a black hole - it's distorting gravity, bending light & reducing waist measurements