It’s not 2 separate reviews - if you read it , the 2nd review is referring to the 1st one left, and is the same user name as 1st, (poptin8 says). I commented on the 1st feedback - you had 30 mins, and the 2nd feedback is in response to that ( 10 mins of them 30) therefore contradicting him apparently being ‘chucked out’ after 10 mins, he admits he had a 30 min booking.
Ah, I didn't read it closely and just saw the separate usernames - you're obviously right that it's the same person.
Having now read it properly - he doesn't contradict himself. I think he just doesn't word it very well and that's obviously not helped by the restrictive character limit when leaving feedback.
His first feedback says he got 15 mins of a 45 min booking. You counter saying he got 30 mins of the 45 and admitting you did kick him out early: "You actually had 30 mins of a 45 min booking, you weren’t going to come again in the last 15 mins - I can’t control when you come"
His 2nd feedback then says "10 of the 30 mins was you leaving the room, then arguing about HIDDEN cum limits. Can't be trusted!"
That's clearly not him admitting he got 30 mins - he's still saying it was 15 (or maximum 20 mins) with rest of your claimed 30 mins being when you weren't even in the room so don't actually count. Clearly he only got about 15 mins of service despite asking and paying for 45 mins. The only reason he mentioned 30 mins was because that's what you claimed he got and so he responded. In your first response you admit he did actually book 45 mins. Your 2nd response doesn't go against that either: "Are you seriously STILL going on? Over £15? No1 EVER complains. I have lots of regs, your opinion doesn’t count babe. Get over it! Weirdo"
Only on here have you denied having a cum limit. You didn't do it in your responses to his feedback. Clearly you're just trying to lie and backtrack.
if people are so scared to leave bad feedback then what is the point of the feedback at all?
Yes, the system is very flawed. Few punters actually take it seriously, they just pretend otherwise. Sometimes though it is only they have to go on. The blatant flaws even work both ways to some extent (but still more in the girl's favour), proof of that is the fact that the guy you saw has 6 positive feedback from 6 different girls (and no negatives or neutrals). It's funny that none of the other girls he saw mentioned him stinking or being abusive or a weirdo etc.
So if I say he stunk I’m lying but I prove I’m being truthful then I’m disrespectful to myself?
Why the fuck would you give any service to a guy who stunk? Once you realised, if you had any self respect you would have told him to have a shower or just refused further service. Either you're lying about him stinking (very likely) or you're a skank who's happy to service smelly clients while also short changing them on time.
No I’m just respectful to my clients - they pay my bills after all. xxx
You weren't respectful to this guy - you took his money for a 45 mins booking only gave him 15-20 minutes of service and then kicked him out. You then slag him off with your responses to his (very likely) honest and accurate feedback and on here.
my client base obviously don’t use this site - hence me ever having a bad or good review on here
Are you so thick that you don't realise you're commenting in a review of yourself right now? Perhaps, you don't realise because you know it's fake. Anyway, no one bothers to review all their punts on here. Also reviews work best when they're anonymous so the guy can feel free to be totally honest without risking repercussions, especially if he wanted to point out some negative aspects about the girl but still wanted to see her again at some point. In those cases many people either wait a good while before posting or don't bother at all/forget.
my clients in Essex are generally young and gorgeous and to be honest, mostly I feel like I should be paying them
Well done for putting off lots of middle aged or older people who might still have wanted to see you
You know what I’d like, a website for the escorts to sit and slate all your appearances, body parts and sexual talents - if we spoke about you, the way you do about us, you’d probably never have any kind of confidence or sex again
Ah right, you were just bullshitting with your last comment about "gorgeous" clients then - you actually would like to slate them. As VW has pointed out, you already have SAAFE. You could also set one up yourself if you really wanted. I doubt many girls would actually care though.
Anyway, why would any guy give a flying fuck about what a prostitute thinks about him?
The texts proved he stank as he doesn’t deny but collaborates what I’m saying
No they don't. All he said was that he was "glad he didn't bother to spruce up". That could mean a lot of things, probably just that he didn't bother to have a shower at the start, that doesn't at all prove he stank. Also, why didn't you say he was smelly when you responded to his AW feedback (you had two opportunities to do so but didn't) and why didn't you give him any feedback to warn other girls? Let's be honest, it's pretty obvious you just made it up to get back at him after he was abusive to you via text (which was pointless on his part though). Obviously it didn't work but you were probably just trying to destroy his confidence or whatever:
if we spoke about you, the way you do about us, you’d probably never have any kind of confidence or sex again
