You can join for free which enables you to view the girls profiles and let them see yours and lets you see what's out there. Personally I've only had a couple of social meets, one I didn't fancy and the other her circumstances changed so no longer needed a sugar daddy. What I will say, is that there is a mixture on there from ones looking for romance, casual hook ups, some may not want paid and basically part time escorts. It is time consuming and corresponding with some of them once you get them on WhatsApp is fun and exciting, especially then they send photos. It just depends what floats you boat really, there is more of a connection as you are corresponding more. You may be lucky and meet with girls described on this thread, you may not, but's that part of the fun.
Sounds exactly like the time-consuming hassle and bore of Tinder then. But at least with Tinder, you're not charged to ask girls if they want to fuck, nor are you charged even more when they actually do.
I might explore this further, but everything I've seen from the site so far - and read here - very much makes it seem like the shite halfway house that satisfies neither end, that I'd always presumed.
Older, fatter/uglier or married punters might not have such a clear choice. But for those of us still young, single and good-looking enough to pull something decent on a night out, the options have always been obvious:
You either put up with the time, hassle - potentially average-looking/potentially stunning, potentially awesome sex/potentially crap sex - and the massive mixed bag of all the other shite that goes with civvy street shagging - whether it be via Tinder, more serious dating apps, hanging around bars or another other means
for free... ------- or --------
You pay for the convenience and assurance of getting a hot girl and a good shag (confirmed by UKP, or past visits) with the
right punt.
There is
no in-between with the benefits of both. There aren't even any compromises. Seeking.com suggests
there are only varying hybrids with all the worst aspects of both.You also need to look at it from the birds' perspective - the key to any case is usually in the motive of the other party. While there may be a few relatively level-headed girls on there who will accept the fact they're basically whoring - but aren't so reliant on the income that they're happy to charge less to ride guys they actually quite like - these will be very few and far between.
Far more will be made up with varying amounts and degrees of smug hoors who think they're too high class for hooring sites and charge accordingly, and civvy girls who've effectively mistaken it for a conventional dating platform. And then there's the massive crowd of tidy but daft, vain wee lassies of 19-22, who like the idea of being paid to be physically adored - but don't realise there's a massive difference between hooring themselves on Instagram amongst their internet "friends" for social currency, attention and adulation - then actually swallowing spunk for money.
The vast majority of profiles, however, will simply be scams where some cunt in the Philippines takes your money in return for fake pics - and that's only if it's a live scam that actually replies.
Everything in this game (and life) benefits from a perspective of perpetual cynicism. If a girl simply wants a shag (and very few do in relation to blokes), then she hasn't far to go to the nearest pub to drop her knickers. If she fancies getting paid to do so, and is worth getting paid to do so at standard whoring rates, there's a queue of us round the block to facilitate that also. So as I'm sure you've guessed by now, the chance of finding anything in between, in my view, is so rare it simply wouldn't be worth the time and effort to seek it out.