Secretary-4-u - Chesterfield. The great debate revealed!

[NottsB]

External Link/Members Only - £90/half hour - Chesterfield

So Jenna is very pretty and in good shape! I asked for her to dress in cycling gear as seen this on her insta and it's hot. She's a very odd person, not very proactive and a little awkward so you kinda have to make a move on her just to shag her... which is odd when you've paid for the privilegde.

This girl pretends to be a girl but isn't, hence being on this page...

The clues are all there. big hands, roundish belly that just seems strange, and her wanting to keep her skirt on. Bit odd but I could care less.

For a Tranny (yes I'll post this again on the transexual page but probably should sit on both) she is fit for an older bird (do I still say bird??). Sex was completely average as she rode my cock well after some acceptable OWO.

Good personality and in great shape - whatever she really is.

Really odd one, wouldn't return but still a positive for me.

[Captainhowdy666]

2nd review form you and I’m still confused.
Does she have a cock?
Does the other one have a cock?

[NottsB]

If she had a cock I don't think there would be much of a debate would there?

[Dazzels89]

Thanks for the review and for letting us know about the trans thing.

Shame as it's not my thing and she looks very hot in her pictures.

I agree it should be reviewed on both trans and escorts as she is advertising as female.

[shed]

If she had a cock I don't think there would be much of a debate would there?

So she hasn't a cock 

[daviemac]

(yes I'll post this again on the transexual page but probably should sit on both) 

You can't review the same punt twice, it cocks the review count up and shows them as having more positives than they actually have. I've left this one in the TS section and deleted the other one.

You have to choose which section you want it in but it can't be in both, if you want it back in escort reviews just say and it will be moved, but in future remember one punt one review.

[jeanphillipe]

So she is definately born a man? Or just OPs suspicion.?

Or is she just a manly woman cause those do exist too

[Cappadonna]

it cocks the review count up

Waiting to hear if she has a cock still??!!

Maybe she’s post op, but the AW profile says female. Bit naughty if she was born a male..

[SpaceRaiderDave]

.....I've left this one in the TS section and deleted the other one.

My understanding is that this individual has a vagina not a cock but it is highly likely that the vagina was obtained via surgery

IMHO I think it more appropriate if the TS section was kept for those sp's with a cock but as long as there is a warning/clarification in the review I suppose it doesn't matter

[NottsB]

She doesn’t have a cock. She is a post op.

Agree with comments above as it’s not easy to know where to post this. Definitely will be some that fit into two categories, when SP are being disingenuous about themselves.

[NottsNylonLuvr]

I'd say pre op and post op belong in Transgender section.
I'm up for trying anything but for those who aren't interested in banging Sam who used to be Stan, I'd say keep them away from reviews on (and I state) women/female SP's.

[Iloveoral]

I'd say pre op and post op belong in Transgender section.
I'm up for trying anything but for those who aren't interested in banging Sam who used to be Stan, I'd say keep them away from reviews on (and I state) women/female SP's.

Totally agree

I would like to know if a post op is a post op rather than book on the advertisement it’s a woman, I think both pre and post op Stan should always be in the TS section

I did fall for this trick before I’d actually tried or wanted to try a ts, it was a bit of a shock to the system for a few weeks if I’m honest.

[soppyget]

I agree that pre or post op, both should be in the ts section.

The real problem here though id that she's been kicking about for years now with many posing the question "is she/isn't she?" But I don't recall seeing any confirmation either way of her status..... from the sp herself, or anyone else.

What was also evident, if memory serves, is that she consistently gave a mediocre to crap service so I guess the bigger question being, 'why go to her in any case?'.  She's changed titles a few times and seems to have dipped in and out if service over the years too, both signs that business isn't great.

[bgg111]

I’m very glad you wrote this review, I rang her to arrange a meet, thought the voice on the phone sounded very much like a trans or a heavy smoker, so came on here to check and probably saved me a drive and disappointment