Informative Reviews, False Reviews, Leeches and Liars?

[Beamer]

Have been looking at the differences between the many West Midlands punters who contribute valuable reviews, those that don't and the obvious leeches who unashamedly take information from the site for their benefit .

Most well established punters also have track records of providing support beyond reviews in various discussion threads etc.  Their average reviews per month seems to be a tad less than two, this is averaged over their period of membership and this all seems pretty normal.

But, what I am now seeing are some examples of newish members (typically with less than 12 months) showing over 5 reviews per month.
These exclude any repeat visits and non-reviewed wg's.

To me this rings alarm bells?
 
IMO there would appear to be the distinct possibility that some are false reviews.

I guess we all accept that some idiots will always put up false reviews to make themselves look good?
Obviously I have no clear proof but if this is happening at an increased rate it further reduces the value of this brilliant forum.

Apart from the cost of funding 5+ new bookings every month (which wouldn't be a problem for me)  it must be a logistical time management challenge if they are still seeing regulars as well.

Each to their own but, I don't believe that any punter would happily rely on 5+ new wg's a month as a sensible punting strategy.

Has anybody else felt that an increasing number of recent reviews are false?

[James]

What are rules on repeat visits.  Thought u caen only do one review per girl

[Littlefoot]

What are rules on repeat visits.  Thought u caen only do one review per girl

Rules are at the bottom of the page.......

[Juankerr]

what I am now seeing are some examples of newish members (typically with less than 12 months) showing over 5 reviews per month.
These exclude any repeat visits and non-reviewed wg's.

To me this rings alarm bells?
 
IMO there would appear to be the distinct possibility that some are false reviews.

I guess we all accept that some idiots will always put up false reviews to make themselves look good?
Obviously I have no clear proof but if this is happening at an increased rate it further reduces the value of this brilliant forum.

It is difficult to prove as you say but sometimes there are signs that some who are relatively new members are previously banned members from their posting style, whether that means the reviews are false or not I don't know. There are also those with one review that are rarely heard from again that raise suspicion.

I guess if you think someone is dodgy you can always ask the Mods to have a look at them.

[pbrown355]

Beamer may have a point but there is also the possibility that, as I have just written in another thread, I can't find punts to review and it's not for the want of trying. I don't know how quickly I racked them up at the beginning, but it was certainly quicker than I add them now. That may be the same for others. It's a long while since anyone questioned one of mine as possibly fake, but that may also slow some down after a fast start.

[Beamer]

IMO there are a load of active and relatively long standing members who write sensible, believable and helpful reviews.
I just think that an average of 5+ new reviews per month has to be questionable. 

[James]

It is difficult to prove as you say but sometimes there are signs that some who are relatively new members are previously banned members from their posting style, whether that means the reviews are false or not I don't know. There are also those with one review that are rarely heard from again that raise suspicion.

I guess if you think someone is dodgy you can always ask the Mods to have a look at them.

the 5 reviews per month may be horny members, have a lot of spare cash to waste on whores.
i have given up in bham anyway. i have been testing the big smoke and found a gem there. expensive but now going to save up

[pbrown355]

In fairness, if there were 5 girls a month I fancied, I would be posting that many reviews. As it is I probably punt 3-4x per month. Maybe I should start at the beginning of my already reviewed girls if they are still around!

[RedditchJay]

the 5 reviews per month may be horny members, have a lot of spare cash to waste on whores.
i have given up in bham anyway. i have been testing the big smoke and found a gem there. expensive but now going to save up

5 reviews a month is like £400 - £500 per month which is unusual punting behaviour - most punt once or twice a month on average i recon  -Beamer has a very good point and one many of us had missed

[Beamer]

5 reviews a month is like £400 - £500 per month which is unusual punting behaviour - most punt once or twice a month on average i recon  -Beamer has a very good point and one many of us had missed

......and that's just on seeing new WG's. If they have regulars then that adds another £wack if the reviews are genuine.

[pbrown355]

Most of mine are 30 mins (1 pop guy) so £200-£300 a month. 2 £150s would be the same. Would do more if there were new choices.
I only want size 6 with firm C-D cups, surely not too much to ask (well apparently it is at the moment)

[James]

......and that's just on seeing new WG's. If they have regulars then that adds another £wack if the reviews are genuine.

the problem is though that there is not anyone here that you can make a regular. Need variety and different hunnies to shag.

[pbrown355]

That's half the point for me

[Beamer]

the problem is though that there is not anyone here that you can make a regular. Need variety and different hunnies to shag.

I think you are missing the point which is .......are those that "review" 5+ new WG's every month real or fake ?

[James]

I think you are missing the point which is .......are those that "review" 5+ new WG's every month real or fake ?

Cant speak for others.  Mine are genuine.  This site has saved me money and i have found a good place for hunnies. 2 of my last ones were no shows.
One i walked away. So didnt spend any cash.

[Jumping Jack Flash]

Cant speak for others.  Mine are genuine.  This site has saved me money and i have found a good place for hunnies. 2 of my last ones were no shows.
One i walked away. So didnt spend any cash.

Your 1,200+ posts doesn’t make you look anything other than genuine. I do agree with the OP but I’d have thought that any fake reviews would have been called out by now. It does look suspicious but how can we prove it either way?

[Pablo02]

the 5 reviews per month may be horny members, have a lot of spare cash to waste on whores.
i have given up in bham anyway. i have been testing the big smoke and found a gem there. expensive but now going to save up
[/quote

Care to share? 

[Pablo02]

When I first joined up and started to punt I was spending ££££ it was something new to me and I was ticking them off my HL
I was reviewing quite a few wgs
However now the nostalgia has worn off and I’m bored.

[Rangers54]

May be a bit of kilter with this, however I've got my own business, I've been around about 10 years and I have always made a good living from word of mouth.


recently started to engage in modern technology, which meant twitter, google, Instagram, fb, etc. Now I have never had anything but great reviews, soon has I opened google there they were, awful reviews.

Looking into it deeper with my tech friends, we came to the obvious conclusion that every 5 star review online you receive is obviously computer generated by yourself or now they are from what we setup.  1 star awful reviews are your competitors. The in between reviews are  ones that you need to be happy with.

So in conclusion I believe this site is priobably similar, new reviewers are to be taken with pinch of salt, really dire ones are another questionable source ,then you get the reviews from long time members that you can rely on.

Not complete science however one I stick with from my own experiences

[Sebco]

Sometimes I question the reviews on here, I been round the block and then some. I got to admit I’m lazy when it comes to putting reviews up, and I got to admit, I go back to just 1 girl who rocks my boat and loves it just as me. Who would give their best secret away, that’s just shooting your self in the foot. If I ever have had a bad experience I would put it on here for sure. Hate to be mugged off or for someone else to go through what I went through. Ultimately this site is to stop people getting ripped off.

[petermisc]

What are rules on repeat visits.  Thought u caen only do one review per girl

Used to be the case, but that rule was dropped awhile back when the site changed hands.

[James]

the 5 reviews per month may be horny members, have a lot of spare cash to waste on whores.
i have given up in bham anyway. i have been testing the big smoke and found a gem there. expensive but now going to save up
[/quote

Care to share? 

I seen a few agency girls.  Expensive but different. I have reviewed.

I had a lot of days of work so was punting more to find a decent one .
So when i go back and limited time i can just choose one.  I have reviewed each visit to help people. If they think it's fake then i will stop

The guy who started this thread ain't reviewed for ages and moaning at others. 

Also he makes some weird comments on other post

[petermisc]

I think you are missing the point which is .......are those that "review" 5+ new WG's every month real or fake ?

I could believe it for a month or two.  When I was younger, it was the thrill of the "new" that did it for me. 

Someone who has just joined may be posting a backlog of visits, to enhance their credibility.  Someone who tours the country regularly on business will have a greater opportunity.  But someone who is routinely seeing 5+ new WGs in the same area for months on end might look suspicious,.

[Beamer]

I have reviewed each visit to help people. If they think it's fake then i will stop

The guy who started this thread ain't reviewed for ages and moaning at others. 

Only you know if your reviews are fake!
Your writing style is familiar and could indicate you have been here before?
What was your previous name on here?

So my last review which was just over 3 months ago is "ages" in your view???
What planet are you on?

[Beamer]

5 reviews a month is like £400 - £500 per month which is unusual punting behaviour - most punt once or twice a month on average i recon  -Beamer has a very good point and one many of us had missed

Perhaps facts will become known ?

[pbrown355]

Sometimes I question the reviews on here, I been round the block and then some. I got to admit I’m lazy when it comes to putting reviews up, and I got to admit, I go back to just 1 girl who rocks my boat and loves it just as me. Who would give their best secret away, that’s just shooting your self in the foot. If I ever have had a bad experience I would put it on here for sure. Hate to be mugged off or for someone else to go through what I went through. Ultimately this site is to stop people getting ripped off.
The point about not reviewing a new find has been discussed in another thread. I always do, even at the risk of shooting myself in the foot. If we are benefitting from the experience of others surely we can pay a little back by reviewing even when it may make our new favourite busier and more difficult to book

[pbrown355]

Obviously the second para of my last post is not a quote, only the first para

[Beamer]

Obviously the second para of my last post is not a quote, only the first para

That's the way I read it but thanks for clarification.

[millbush]

Not sure why anyone would make a review up.

[Beamer]

Not sure why anyone would make a review up.

They think it's clever and hope it helps to raise their own profile, reputation etc.

Suffer from an inferiority complex or personality disorder, in which case they need professional help.

.....or they simply are 1st Class idiots.

[Juankerr]

the 5 reviews per month may be horny members, have a lot of spare cash to waste on whores.
i have given up in bham anyway. i have been testing the big smoke and found a gem there. expensive but now going to save up

Yeah, there will always be some who have more than others to spend on punting and if they are willing to do so then good luck to them.

[tesla]

5 reviews a month is like £400 - £500 per month which is unusual punting behaviour - most punt once or twice a month on average i recon  -Beamer has a very good point and one many of us had missed

I have punted four times in one day, when I was younger and had more disposable income, so i don't think  you can just say 5 times a month is unusual behaviour

[Moby Dick]

Why would reviews be false?
1) To become a credible member (to hide the fact they aren’t a punter?)
2) To tout or advertise a WG
3) To win favour with a WG
4) To drive business away from a WG (rival WG/pimps)
5) Revenge reviews from unhappy punters / stalkers / spurned fluffy cunts
6) other?

It’s up to established members to call these cunts out .
Sure naive newbies may get upset with accusations etc, and established members may get fed up with all the posts that can derail threads but that has to happen to keep the integrity of this site IMO.

[Beamer]

I have punted four times in one day, when I was younger and had more disposable income, so i don't think  you can just say 5 times a month is unusual behaviour

My understanding is that it was 5 new plus regulars. When I was able I managed 3 in a day but 4 was never tried. Lucky to make two nowadays!

[James]

Only you know if your reviews are fake!
Your writing style is familiar and could indicate you have been here before?
What was your previous name on here?

So my last review which was just over 3 months ago is "ages" in your view???
What planet are you on?

I have never been on here before. I decided to review because i used to browse and a lot of reviews helped me out.

As to writing style. I write in English like everyone here.  I use the same words as anyone else.

Reviews are credible and genuine.
Anyway im done with this thread.  I know where to go to Get hunnies and will do that. 

I don't have any reviews planned anymore or will write limited.  There are so many users here who ate not writing recent reviews at least i am.

[BrumTallGuy]

All i can say for myself is i review when i punt and if i dont punt for one of a few reasons i dont.
What appears to me quite odd recently is certain postive reviews on obvious imo shithole gaffs for fbsm that get a brief moment of fame and then disappear never to be seen again, as they get followed by a shitload of negatives. That pattern has just looked odd to me.
Just my 10p worth.

[millbush]

They think it's clever and hope it helps to raise their own profile, reputation etc.

Suffer from an inferiority complex or personality disorder, in which case they need professional help.

.....or they simply are 1st Class idiots.

Possible if you've nothing better to do I suppose,this raises the fact that as there are no new regos a WG not registered here cannot make a rebuttal to a false review.

[DAlpine1980]

All i can say for myself is i review when i punt and if i dont punt for one of a few reasons i dont.
What appears to me quite odd recently is certain postive reviews on obvious imo shithole gaffs for fbsm that get a brief moment of fame and then disappear never to be seen again, as they get followed by a shitload of negatives. That pattern has just looked odd to me.
Just my 10p worth.

I do feel like there are a lot of fbsm reviews compared to full service bookings. As these are genuinely cheaper that might explain some of Beamer's point. But not all perhaps.

I think many like me might have become more active on seeking rather than escorting due to not beig able to get the appointments I want.

[Beamer]

Reviews are credible and genuine.
Anyway im done with this thread.  I know where to go to Get hunnies and will do that. 

I don't have any reviews planned anymore or will write limited.  There are so many users here who ate not writing recent reviews at least i am.

James.
It takes all sorts of punters with differing requirements that makes UKP a massively popular and helpful website.
All punters have their view on either making a  contribution or simply leeching.

After your various comments I looked at your details.
Interestingly you rate nearly 70% of your 52 reviews as either negative or neutral.  Just 9 of your 28 punts in WM were rated as positive.
This is helpful information to other punters, but does this mean you are not learning which wg's meet your requirements to achieve a positive rating?

I would have thought you could see from the wg's profile if she was your type or have you been terribly unlucky and in some cases wasted both your time and money ?
My preference is to enjoy fbsm wg's who go futher, It suits me.
But Hey ho let's all enjoy our punting, however it's defined.

[James]

James.
It takes all sorts of punters with differing requirements that makes UKP a massively popular and helpful website.
All punters have their view on either making a  contribution or simply leeching.

After your various comments I looked at your details.
Interestingly you rate nearly 70% of your 52 reviews as either negative or neutral.  Just 9 of your 28 punts in WM were rated as positive.
This is helpful information to other punters, but does this mean you are not learning which wg's meet your requirements to achieve a positive rating?

I would have thought you could see from the wg's profile if she was your type or have you been terribly unlucky and in some cases wasted both your time and money ?
My preference is to enjoy fbsm wg's who go futher, It suits me.
But Hey ho let's all enjoy our punting, however it's defined.

Im trying new girls and it's not working out hence negatives. I need to rethink strategy.

I have had repeat visits to hanah deluxe and chardonnay. I didnt review them as i already reviewed once and was under impression i cant review again

[tesla]

I didnt review them as i already reviewed once and was under impression i cant review again

yes you can

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only criteria is that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc and massage establishments where providers do not have names
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

[JontyR]

When younger I was a lot more obsessed with how many women I'd shagged. And a lot of lads conversations were around who had done what, with how many and how often.

If you weren't able to join in these conversations I think its quite realistic to think there will be young bucks wanting to dip their wicks on a regular series of pump and dumps. Especially with lots of ready cash with a job, no debt and no mortgage because they are still at Mum and Dads.

Problem is you can't highlight your worldliness to all your mates in the same way. Posting reviews is a decent substitute for that peer recognition though. No aspersions on anyone here btw. But it could be one explanation.

[shroplad]

What I find annoying are the positive reviews which highlight how wonderful the experience was however also adding that the girl in question has more than likely moved on due to the rotating of staff this means  there is little opportunity to test out the review yourself which in my opinion questions it’s authenticity as per Beamer’s suggestion

[GingerNuts]

What I find annoying is that someone with one review in five years has the cheek to post in this thread and cast doubt on the authenticity of other members' reviews.

[Beamer]

What I find annoying are the positive reviews which highlight how wonderful the experience was however also adding that the girl in question has more than likely moved on due to the rotating of staff this means  there is little opportunity to test out the review yourself which in my opinion questions it’s authenticity as per Beamer’s suggestion

With one review since you joined in 2015 and loads of questions I am  not sure what validity any comment from you holds.

[shroplad]

One review that’s genuine 

[Beamer]

One review that’s genuine 

Not sure what you are insinuating?
Say what you mean!!
But 1 review in 5 years and your never-ending questions smells like a move to lurker/leech status!

[shroplad]

Except for a visit to Star Thai once where I posted a request from the masseuse (wrongly as I shouldn’t have done) I have seem the same girl Jessy so I don’t see the need to re review as there are plenty of her with much about the same detail.
I must admit to posting questions but only to see if I can glean more information to tempt me elsewhere which so far haven’t
Leech and Lurker if that’s how I appear I’ll hold my hand up but if I do at some point try a different establishment a review would certainly be forthcoming

[GingerNuts]

Except for a visit to Star Thai once where I posted a request from the masseuse (wrongly as I shouldn’t have done) I have seem the same girl Jessy

Sophie, Sally, Natalie, Pinky. Seems like more than one.

[shroplad]

That was before I knew about posting reviews and you of all people know that through our pm’s