Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Unblurred Photos on AW  (Read 1433 times)

Offline davey.edwards1969

Is it just me !!

Seems odd that some girls show their face on their main page or movies and yet choose to blur it in their public gallery

Here is an example

/www.adultwork.com/765755 or External Link/Members Only


14 review(s) found for Nicole Summers linked to in above post (11 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative)

Offline oddson1970

l have never understood that either.Off topic  ,l know but she has a strange pricing structure too

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,288
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
Is it just me !!

Seems odd that some girls show their face on their main page or movies and yet choose to blur it in their public gallery

Here is an example

/www.adultwork.com/765755 or External Link/Members Only
If it bothers you message her and ask her why.   :unknown:


14 review(s) found for Nicole Summers linked to in above post (11 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative)

Online Blackpool Rock

I've never really made sense of that either however her profile is about 12 years old so perhaps her face pics were blurred nearer the start and now she doesn't give a fuck or people now know what she does etc  :unknown:

Clickable numerical link
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Offline magnetico

her profile is about 12 years old so perhaps her face pics were blurred nearer the start
yes they're probably just old pics, and either she's lost the original non-blurred pics, or she looks worse now so she doesn't want people to see that she's got the face of a 20 years old in the old pics ?

Offline Nightingale

l have never understood that either.Off topic  ,l know but she has a strange pricing structure too
I’ll have 2 forty five minute sessions please.

Offline tynetunnel

I’ve noticed this many times and scratched my head wondering why the text states that there are no face pics to “protect my privacy” then in the free gallery or on the movie thumbnails: there’s the face, for anyone to see

This Nicolaa has a very scrappy profile. It’s plainly been added to at various times without reading it through. The ‘no texts’ instruction is repeated many times, with the advice to call instead. Although at the time of posting, her number is not displayed, so I could neither text nor call if I wanted to book her

“Q. How do I make a booking   A. Please call me to make a booking, I do not take bookings via texts or emails. A phone call is always best”  :unknown:

Outcall service requires you to have at least 4 positive escort feedbacks. Although later in the same paragraph that changes to 5. Plus a £100 deposit by bank transfer

Perhaps this explains why in 12 years of AW membership she only has 56 feedback. Not even 5 a year…

Offline marc_hotsteppa


Perhaps this explains why in 12 years of AW membership she only has 56 feedback. Not even 5 a year…

Wouldn't read too much into the numbers as some WG's don't want feedback leaving at all after they have got 50 or so and just leave it at that number.  Have seen several profiles stating as much.  A lot of punters just get the number for a WG from AW and book direct anyway so no need for feedback either way.

Banned reason: Continued abuse despite warnings.
Banned by: daviemac