What Constitutes an accepted booking?

[AnthG]

This is probably one of those questions where people will think, is he having a laugh. Isn't it obvious what constitutes an accepted booking.

But in my eyes, it's not 100% clearcut and straight forward in every instance hence why I am asking now to confirm 100% (I suspect other punters may have these thoughts too maybe).

But anyway, if you send a booking request, saying, can I book you for an outcall for 2pm someday this week when you are available.

And the girl comes back and says, I am unavailable this week, but I can either see you on 2pm next Monday for an outcall, or I am offering incalls on the Monday after that. Does either one of them sound ok to you. And you reply back saying, great, I will take the Monday after that incall please for that time. I will confirm it the day before on the Sunday.

Tumbleweeds roll for 5 days. Totally ignored after sending that message.

Girl gets back after 5 full days and says, sorry for the late reply, but someone else has booked me now for that time. Girl therefore says, I am seeing about setting up another incall day for the following Monday after that, how about that. So you say, great will book you for that then same time.

Tumbleweeds roll again for 5 days. Girl comes back and says, sorry, someone has now booked me for an outcall so I am not doing the incall day no more.

You say ok, can I book you for any day that you are next able, you tell me a day will be available and I will setup an outcall at a hotel for it. Girl says, sorry I am now retiring after that outcall.

Does any of that constitute a booking? As it is totally messing someone about. Or does a booking need the girl to come back after you say, great I will see you for the 2pm for the offered incall, with a response of, great, confirmed, I've put it in my diary to see you then, before it becomes a booking?

[datwabbit]

If it's not a review, you can still put it in the general part of the region. Not all girls stay retired and when they return, it can still be linked to.

Maybe a mod can answer but see if you can put it into the review section and have it moved if it's not right.

Btw I think it's confirmed.

[Al R]

The way I work when booking in advance - and am in the process of doing so now - is provisionally agree a date and time for the meet, and say I will confirm everything is going ahead a couple of days before. If at that point I get a reply saying good to go, then that is my confirmation the meet is going ahead, but I’ll also confirm on the day before setting off. Radio silence on anything after the confirmation will result in a negative, cancellation after that point may or may not, depending on whether I believe the reason / how much notice was given.

More recently I’ve booked on the day or the day before, so the above doesn’t really apply - I just confirm on the day of the booking.

[AnthG]

Maybe a mod can answer but see if you can put it into the review section and have it moved if it's not right.

Thing is, I am trying to avoid drama, and if I put up a not allowed review as a review for a very popular golden girl. It will kick up a massive storm.

And then don't want it to be; none of that was a confirmed booking, you are one complete moron AnthG for posting that and causing all that kick off to occur

[Clattypats]

This is probably one of those questions where people will think, is he having a laugh. Isn't it obvious what constitutes an accepted booking.

But in my eyes, it's not 100% clearcut and straight forward in every instance hence why I am asking now to confirm 100% (I suspect other punters may have these thoughts too maybe).

But anyway, if you send a booking request, saying, can I book you for an outcall for 2pm someday this week when you are available.

And the girl comes back and says, I am unavailable this week, but I can either see you on 2pm next Monday for an outcall, or I am offering incalls on the Monday after that. Does either one of them sound ok to you. And you reply back saying, great, I will take the Monday after that incall please for that time. I will confirm it the day before on the Sunday.

Tumbleweeds roll for 5 days. Totally ignored after sending that message.

Think you mean "send an email"...

Anyway, when she came back to you with the 2 Monday options, and you agreed to one of them (by email I take it)... Did she read the email at all, or was it unread for the ensuing 5 days?

[daviemac]

Thing is, I am trying to avoid drama, and if I put up a not allowed review as a review for a very popular golden girl. It will kick up a massive storm.

And then don't want it to be; none of that was a confirmed booking, you are one complete moron AnthG for posting that and causing all that kick off to occur

The way I interpretate the rule as it's written is the booking has to be agreed, as in accepted by the SP, to take place on a specific day at a specific time for a specific duration. If those criteria are met then a review can be left whether or not the meet goes ahead.

A non specific reply to an enquiry such as "I can see you sometime next week" would be an agreement to accept a booking in the future not an actual booking. In a case such as this then a review can't be left though a warning can be posted in general discussions if need be.

[Clattypats]

The way I interpretate the rule as it's written is the booking has to be agreed, as in accepted by the SP, to take place on a specific day at a specific time for a specific duration. If those criteria are met then a review can be left whether or not the meet goes ahead.

A non specific reply to an enquiry such as "I can see you sometime next week" would be an agreement to accept a booking in the future not an actual booking. In a case such as this then a review can't be left though a warning can be posted in general discussions if need be.

I don't see it as an agreed to booking either, as she didn't get back to him, therefore it's not a "set in stone" booking

[Doc Holliday]

Thing is, I am trying to avoid drama, and if I put up a not allowed review as a review for a very popular golden girl. It will kick up a massive storm.

And then don't want it to be; none of that was a confirmed booking, you are one complete moron AnthG for posting that and causing all that kick off to occur

Surely too late to avoid a storm as normally on here you will be pushed to name anyway now you have told the story? 

Just find her last review thread and post it as a comment then stand back and watch the fireworks 

[AnthG]

A non specific reply to an enquiry such as "I can see you sometime next week" would be an agreement to accept a booking in the future not an actual booking. In a case such as this then a review can't be left though a warning can be posted in general discussions if need be.

I don't see it as an agreed to booking either, as she didn't get back to him, therefore it's not a "set in stone" booking

That was my thoughts too. I was just wanting to 100% confirm it though as I was thinking I could be wrong though as its a bit nuanced and you are getting proper messed about thinking bookings are in place when they are not. Especially with the stupid 5 day wait

Thanks guys.

[Clattypats]

That was my thoughts too. I was just wanting to 100% confirm it though as I was thinking I could be wrong though as its a bit nuanced and you are getting proper messed about thinking bookings are in place when they are not. Especially with the stupid 5 day wait

Thanks guys.

Still, just out of curiosity, did she read your email in the space of that 5 days?

[AnthG]

Still, just out of curiosity, did she read your email in the space of that 5 days?

Don't know it wasn't an email, it was a booking request PM on another forum than this one and that does not show read receipts or last login time.

So could have read it, could have not. But either way commonsense would dictacte if you say to someone I can see you either for an outcall on Monday at 2pm, or the following Monday for an incall at 2pm. You'd not just go, I am not going to even login for almost a whole week to see what they say about that. As that is just messing the punter about big style.

[daviemac]

I don't see it as an agreed to booking either, as she didn't get back to him, therefore it's not a "set in stone" booking

It's a bit difficult to tell when he's being hypothetical with some of it.

For instance if a booking is agreed and accepted for say Monday 23rd at 2 pm for an hour, but you are required to confirm on the morning before 10 am. Then when you try to confirm you get no response then you can review as you had the agreed booking.

If you try to make a booking for Monday 23rd but she says it may be possible, not really sure, you have to book on the day, then when you try to book you get no response you can't review as no booking was agreed.

[datwabbit]

Thing is, I am trying to avoid drama, and if I put up a not allowed review as a review for a very popular golden girl. It will kick up a massive storm.

And then don't want it to be; none of that was a confirmed booking, you are one complete moron AnthG for posting that and causing all that kick off to occur

As DM says, you can make it a warning.

In terms of drama, what you've described isn't drama so if you stick to the same language, you'll be ok.

As for the girl, she's retiring so who cares what she thinks or any of her fanboys. You're basically posting a warning for if she returns.

[AnthG]

As for the girl, she's retiring so who cares what she thinks.

Like I said on another forum, that did kick off a mass drama, these girls are usually back within 6 months. < Its not that girl by the way, its a different one who is also retiring at the same time it seems.

[Clattypats]

Don't know it wasn't an email, it was a booking request PM on another forum than this one and that does not show read receipts or last login time.

So could have read it, could have not. But either way commonsense would dictacte if you say to someone I can see you either for an outcall on Monday at 2pm, or the following Monday for an incall at 2pm. You'd not just go, I am not going to even login for almost a whole week to see what they say about that. As that is just messing the punter about big style.

ok, gotcha... Thought it was maybe AW email...

[Clattypats]

It's a bit difficult to tell when he's being hypothetical with some of it.

For instance if a booking is agreed and accepted for say Monday 23rd at 2 pm for an hour, but you are required to confirm on the morning before 10 am. Then when you try to confirm you get no response then you can review as you had the agreed booking.

If you try to make a booking for Monday 23rd but she says it may be possible, not really sure, you have to book on the day, then when you try to book you get no response you can't review as no booking was agreed.

yeah, that's how I would interpret it aswell...

[Moby Dick]

I would put her aw link up on this thread just so we are all aware of her shit comms.
Sounds like she got a better offer and did not accept your booking.
She should have come back to you sooner but this stuff happens.
Popular WG about to retire will be giving regulars priority.

[daviemac]

Like I said on another forum, that did kick off a mass drama, these girls are usually back within 6 months. < Its not that girl by the way, its a different one who is also retiring at the same time it seems.

There you go again, no doubt some do return after a short while but you were given examples of loads who haven't returned at all. You have it in your mind that they do and just can't accept that quite a lot don't. Oh and coming back to try and run an agency doesn't count, that is not the same as escorting.

Back to your current dilemma, if she's ignored you booking request you can't review, if she said yes I can see you on xx day at xx time for xx duration, then you can.

[AnthG]

Back to your current dilemma, if she's ignored your booking request you can't review, if she said yes I can see you on xx day at xx time for xx duration, then you can.

Word for word from the response email

"Next Monday, 2nd Sep, I’ll be getting an early finish but that’ll not get me back to Newcastle until about 2pm, but the following Monday 9th I am doing incalls in North Shields on the Quayside. It’s a self contained flat rather than a shared one ([Anthother Girl] would be in her own flat next door). Would the incall day suit you? Sorry I know it’s a good 2 weeks away and not what you asked for!"

[Moby Dick]

Word for word from the response email

"Next Monday, 2nd Sep, I’ll be getting an early finish but that’ll not get me back to Newcastle until about 2pm, but the following Monday 9th I am doing incalls in North Shields on the Quayside. It’s a self contained flat rather than a shared one ([Anthother Girl] would be in her own flat next door). Would the incall day suit you? Sorry I know it’s a good 2 weeks away and not what you asked for!"

That’s just her availability?

[AnthG]

That’s just her availability?

I know, and like I said, I replied back saying can I see you for the incall day at 2pm. And 5 full days later she comes back saying, sorry, booked out now for that day. But I am going to be setting up another day on the 16th.

So I say, can I book now for that, another 5 days pass, and now its, sorry, someone booked me as an outcall now so not doing it. So I say, can I book you anytime you are free.

And then its, sorry retiring after that outcall.

Thus 2 weeks of total mess around. Which is annoying as hell. If this took place in 24hrs that would be something. But a two week mess around is irksome in the extreme.

[Moby Dick]

I know, and like I said, I replied back saying can I see you for the incall day at 2pm. And 5 full days later she comes back saying, sorry, booked out now for that day. But I am going to be setting up another day on the 16th.

So I say, can I book now for that, another 5 days pass, and now its, sorry, someone booked me as an outcall now so not doing it. So I say, can I book you anytime you are free.

And then its, sorry retiring after that outcall.

Thus 2 weeks of total mess around. Which is annoying as hell. If this took place in 24hrs that would be something. But a two week mess around is irksome in the extreme.

No booking agreed then. You tried but she did not respond.
I would Just post her link up and move on.

[datwabbit]

Like I said on another forum, that did kick off a mass drama, these girls are usually back within 6 months. < Its not that girl by the way, its a different one who is also retiring at the same time it seems.

I'm assuming she's something to do with red.

[AnthG]

I'm assuming she's something to do with red.

You assume correctly

[DaVINCI]

OP, of course it is confirmed bookings, the SP  is just another in a line of WG with shit communications. I would have had a Neg up immediately in the same situation. As you know, there is a very good chance she’ll be back in the future.

[datwabbit]

I know, and like I said, I replied back saying can I see you for the incall day at 2pm. And 5 full days later she comes back saying, sorry, booked out now for that day. But I am going to be setting up another day on the 16th.

So I say, can I book now for that, another 5 days pass, and now its, sorry, someone booked me as an outcall now so not doing it. So I say, can I book you anytime you are free.

And then its, sorry retiring after that outcall.

Thus 2 weeks of total mess around. Which is annoying as hell. If this took place in 24hrs that would be something. But a two week mess around is irksome in the extreme.

That just looks like messing you about but not a booking. I'm not sure what a warning will achieve either. Frustrating for you.

[daviemac]

OP, of course it is confirmed bookings, the SP  is just another in a line of WG with shit communications. I would have had a Neg up immediately in the same situation. As you know, there is a very good chance she’ll be back in the future.

And it would be removed and possibly deleted altogether for deliberate flouting of the rules, despite clear explanations here. She did not say yes to a specific date, time and duration so it was not an agreed booking. All she has done is state when she might be available.

I honestly don't know what people find so difficult to understand, it can only be an agreed booking if both parties agree.   

[AnthG]

I honestly don't know what people find so difficult to understand, it can only be an agreed booking if both parties agree.   

Because it can possibly/maybe be argued there was an implied agreement by making that statement of I can do it on the 9th as an incall, is that ok?

She was expecting a yes or no response to that, and clearly, if it was a yes, then that would be it setup then in stone. Or at least that is one way to look at it. And how I looked at it, at the time to be honest

She got the yes response, and then just ignored it for 5 days and setup other bookings by other means knowing there was a response to this offer sitting there.

I am not saying that do dispute what anyone says, so please nobody come back saying, you've been told. Why you disputing this now. As I am not.

I am just explaining my position a little more on it. As to say it one more time, to do this over two full weeks is bloody annoying in the extreme. It feels like reverse timewasting, and if a punter messed around a WG like this their phone number would be up on Saafe with a timewaster statement next to it in my opinion.

[daviemac]

Because it can possibly/maybe be argued there was an implied agreement by making that statement of I can do it on the 9th as an incall, is that ok?

FFS Answer this, did she yes I will see you at a given time on a given day for a given duration. Yes or no it's very simple.

[AnthG]

FFS Answer this, did she yes I will see you at a given time on a given day for a given duration. Yes or no it's very simple.

I have already said, no.

But she implied it very strongly.

I know I cannot write a review. I am just moaning now is all.

[smiths]

This is probably one of those questions where people will think, is he having a laugh. Isn't it obvious what constitutes an accepted booking.

But in my eyes, it's not 100% clearcut and straight forward in every instance hence why I am asking now to confirm 100% (I suspect other punters may have these thoughts too maybe).

But anyway, if you send a booking request, saying, can I book you for an outcall for 2pm someday this week when you are available.

And the girl comes back and says, I am unavailable this week, but I can either see you on 2pm next Monday for an outcall, or I am offering incalls on the Monday after that. Does either one of them sound ok to you. And you reply back saying, great, I will take the Monday after that incall please for that time. I will confirm it the day before on the Sunday.

Tumbleweeds roll for 5 days. Totally ignored after sending that message.

Girl gets back after 5 full days and says, sorry for the late reply, but someone else has booked me now for that time. Girl therefore says, I am seeing about setting up another incall day for the following Monday after that, how about that. So you say, great will book you for that then same time.

Tumbleweeds roll again for 5 days. Girl comes back and says, sorry, someone has now booked me for an outcall so I am not doing the incall day no more.

You say ok, can I book you for any day that you are next able, you tell me a day will be available and I will setup an outcall at a hotel for it. Girl says, sorry I am now retiring after that outcall.

Does any of that constitute a booking? As it is totally messing someone about. Or does a booking need the girl to come back after you say, great I will see you for the 2pm for the offered incall, with a response of, great, confirmed, I've put it in my diary to see you then, before it becomes a booking?

IF a WG accepts your booking and a date and time is agreed with her but she reneges on it for any reason a negative review can be done is my understanding of the rules. But it must be a specific date and time agreed, not some vague maybe off the WG and the punter.

The main reason punts I book don't happen nowadays is because I get dead comms when in her area off a WG even though I would of rang her to confirm my booking and say I am on my way often only an hour before the punt start time. I know such WGs are still working later as I may ring them using another number to check, I assume they got a better offer after taking my booking. Whatever the real reason its always a negative review off me, and such WGs are low lifes in my book. And I hardly ever give the benefit of the doubt anymore, once only in the last few years. I don't just blindly believe any excuses given even if I do get an excuse. I compare WGs with civvy women I do business with outside punting, funny how they very very rarely fuck me about, so why percentage wise do some WGs much more. Its because they can with no legal or regulatory comeback, its still like the wild west in punting sadly.

I am not a braindead moron and don't appreciate being fucked over and about. If a WG agrees my booking I expect her to honour it, I always honour it with good WGs. Over the years its rare a regular has fucked me about.

[Moby Dick]

Because it can possibly/maybe be argued there was an implied agreement by making that statement of I can do it on the 9th as an incall, is that ok?

She was expecting a yes or no response to that, and clearly, if it was a yes, then that would be it setup then in stone. Or at least that is one way to look at it. And how I looked at it, at the time to be honest

She got the yes response, and then just ignored it for 5 days and setup other bookings by other means knowing there was a response to this offer sitting there.

I am not saying that do dispute what anyone says, so please nobody come back saying, you've been told. Why you disputing this now. As I am not.

I am just explaining my position a little more on it. As to say it one more time, to do this over two full weeks is bloody annoying in the extreme. It feels like reverse timewasting, and if a punter messed around a WG like this their phone number would be up on Saafe with a timewaster statement next to it in my opinion.

Emails back and forth to check availability.
You requested day:9th, time: 2pm, duration??
No response for 5 days.
Did you send other messages or try to phone her in that 5day time period?
No booking made. She probably thought you were a timewaster

[tynetunnel]

I'm assuming she's something to do with red.

Anth’s own golden girl, rather than red!  Anyway I don’t think you had a booking Anth. Just my thoughts,

[AnthG]

Did you send other messages or try to phone her in that 5day time period?
No booking made. She probably thought you were a timewaster

I honestly assumed it was all setup and done and dusted.

The girl knows I am not a timewaster as I have booked her multiple times before. And gave glowing positives each time (to the extent people probably needed vomit bags afterwards on reading them they were so saddo mushy fluffy) And also she knows who I am from the forums and I sent the booking request via the forums.

Timewaster is not the reason. She just did not want to accept the booking and thus mess me around hoping I would give up trying.

[waynekerr600]

She just did not want to accept the booking and thus mess me around hoping I would give up trying.

I think that is probably the case.

Give up on her and move on.

[Moby Dick]

I honestly assumed it was all setup and done and dusted.

The girl knows I am not a timewaster as I have booked her multiple times before. And gave glowing positives each time (to the extent people probably needed vomit bags afterwards on reading them they were so saddo mushy fluffy) And also she knows who I am from the forums and I sent the booking request via the forums.

Timewaster is not the reason. She just did not want to accept the booking and thus mess me around hoping I would give up trying.

Ahhh a lot more to this than first disclosed.
Ignored by a reg?
Complacency, can’t be arsed with you, preferred to see someone else.
I wouldn’t create a drama (coming across as a case of sour grapes) just move on. Plenty of others you can be fluffy over.

[tynetunnel]

Ahhh a lot more to this than first disclosed.
Ignored by a reg?
Complacency, can’t be arsed with you, preferred to see someone else.
I wouldn’t create a drama (coming across as a case of sour grapes) just move on. Plenty of others you can be fluffy over.

 

[AnthG]

 

I won't say no more. So any potential drama averted. Got my answer now so I don't need nothing else on this.

[Moby Dick]

I won't say no more. So any potential drama averted. Got my answer now so I don't need nothing else on this.

Perhaps we should consider renaming the thread to:
Regular not accepting my bookings, can I post a “revenge” neg?
 
Who was she anyway?

[AnthG]

Perhaps we should consider renaming the thread to:
Regular not accepting my bookings, can I post a “revenge” neg?
 
Who was she anyway?

A: She is not a regular, I have seen her multiple times before, but its a case of one booking per year for the last three years. That in my eyes is not a regular. Its just someone you've seen before multiple times.

B: It would not be a "revenge neg" if it is for someone who messed you around for two weeks. If she said, nope sorry, don't want to accept a booking from you. That would be one thing.

But not going about that by implying bookings are setup when thet are not. As in how about next Monday, or the following. Yeah great I will do the following. And then 5 days later, nope booked out now, sorry. How about the week after I can to that.....Yep great book you now for that......5 days later again, no sorry booked out again, now.

So then I say, ok anytime you are free I will set it up....nope sorry, retiring now.

Over two weeks. I think, maybe not you, but I think is worthy of a negative.  It was deliberately messing someone about. Hence why I asked and started the topic to get an official answer on it one way or the other. But I cannot give it as the messing about wasn't a booking so cannot give it. End of story.

The people in the north east all know who she is.

[waynekerr600]

She's still showing Monday availability on her aw and last logged in on Thursday.

Her duo partner logged in today and it's showing duo availability with her.

[Moby Dick]

A: She is not a regular, I have seen her multiple times before, but its a case of one booking per year for the last three years. That in my eyes is not a regular. Its just someone you've seen before multiple times.

B: It would not be a "revenge neg" if it is for someone who messed you around for two weeks. If she said, nope sorry, don't want to accept a booking from you. That would be one thing.

But not going about that by implying bookings are setup when thet are not. As in how about next Monday, or the following. Yeah great I will do the following. And then 5 days later, nope booked out now, sorry. How about the week after I can to that.....Yep great book you now for that......5 days later again, no sorry booked out again, now.

So then I say, ok anytime you are free I will set it up....nope sorry, retiring now.

Over two weeks. I think, maybe not you, but I think is worthy of a negative.  It was deliberately messing someone about. Hence why I asked and started the topic to get an official answer on it one way or the other. But I cannot give it as the messing about wasn't a booking so cannot give it. End of story.

The people in the north east all know who she is.

No problem.
Like someone else said just put a negative comment about her timewasting comms on her last review.
Otherwise we could go around in circles all day.

Maybe she ain’t really retiring so how about that link
I am not from the NE but the opportunity sometimes arises (nothing too regular  ).

[Clattypats]

A: She is not a regular, I have seen her multiple times before, but its a case of one booking per year for the last three years. That in my eyes is not a regular. Its just someone you've seen before multiple times.

B: It would not be a "revenge neg" if it is for someone who messed you around for two weeks. If she said, nope sorry, don't want to accept a booking from you. That would be one thing.

But not going about that by implying bookings are setup when thet are not. As in how about next Monday, or the following. Yeah great I will do the following. And then 5 days later, nope booked out now, sorry. How about the week after I can to that.....Yep great book you now for that......5 days later again, no sorry booked out again, now.

So then I say, ok anytime you are free I will set it up....nope sorry, retiring now.

Over two weeks. I think, maybe not you, but I think is worthy of a negative.  It was deliberately messing someone about. Hence why I asked and started the topic to get an official answer on it one way or the other. But I cannot give it as the messing about wasn't a booking so cannot give it. End of story.

The people in the north east all know who she is.

By your own account of having "Saddo, mushy, fluffy" reviewed her and reply#23 it's not too hard to work out who you mean...

She should have been clearer and just told you she didn't want to see you again, for whatever reason there may be, instead of thinking you'll perhaps lose interest... Still, none of the bookings were confirmed so no 'Neg' review can be left...

[Al R]

By your own account of having "Saddo, mushy, fluffy" reviewed her and reply#23 it's not too hard to work out who you mean...

She should have been clearer and just told you she didn't want to see you again, for whatever reason there may be, instead of thinking you'll perhaps lose interest... Still, none of the bookings were confirmed so no 'Neg' can be left...

Personally I’d have two goes max to make a confirmed booking. After that I’d be looking elsewhere.

[Milfman1112]

Not confirmed, you said you would take booking, she didnt come back to accept it.

[Hobbit]

This is probably one of those questions where people will think, is he having a laugh. Isn't it obvious what constitutes an accepted booking.

But in my eyes, it's not 100% clearcut and straight forward in every instance hence why I am asking now to confirm 100% (I suspect other punters may have these thoughts too maybe).

But anyway, if you send a booking request, saying, can I book you for an outcall for 2pm someday this week when you are available.

And the girl comes back and says, I am unavailable this week, but I can either see you on 2pm next Monday for an outcall, or I am offering incalls on the Monday after that. Does either one of them sound ok to you. And you reply back saying, great, I will take the Monday after that incall please for that time. I will confirm it the day before on the Sunday.

Tumbleweeds roll for 5 days. Totally ignored after sending that message.

Girl gets back after 5 full days and says, sorry for the late reply, but someone else has booked me now for that time. Girl therefore says, I am seeing about setting up another incall day for the following Monday after that, how about that. So you say, great will book you for that then same time.

Tumbleweeds roll again for 5 days. Girl comes back and says, sorry, someone has now booked me for an outcall so I am not doing the incall day no more.

You say ok, can I book you for any day that you are next able, you tell me a day will be available and I will setup an outcall at a hotel for it. Girl says, sorry I am now retiring after that outcall.

Does any of that constitute a booking? As it is totally messing someone about. Or does a booking need the girl to come back after you say, great I will see you for the 2pm for the offered incall, with a response of, great, confirmed, I've put it in my diary to see you then, before it becomes a booking?

Reading this makes me dizzy as it just constitutes unnecessary stress. If someone was messing me around with dates and times I would not bother with them.

I simply contact them, give them dates and times when I would be available. She then selects a date, we then get it booked in either by an AW booking or a clear written text message saying booking is confirmed. Simple as that, no need to make a drama out of it.                             

[Cellular40]

Not confirmed, you said you would take booking, she didnt come back to accept it.

I agree with this.

[O30303]

Just makes you wonder how a sp would respond if they had a tradesman booked in at a time they have booked off of work or their car booked in at a garage ect, and god forbid but if the workman or garage booked someone else in in the allocated slot, to me, if its booked on aw and confirmed then it should be held to, unless both parties agree

[daviemac]

Just makes you wonder how a sp would respond if they had a tradesman booked in at a time they have booked off of work or their car booked in at a garage ect, and god forbid but if the workman or garage booked someone else in in the allocated slot, to me, if its booked on aw and confirmed then it should be held to, unless both parties agree

Have you read the thread.  It wasn't through AW and he didn't have a booking in any case.

[O30303]

Have you read the thread.  It wasn't through AW and he didn't have a booking in any case.

yes mate, iv read it, that's why I asked the question about wondering how a sp would react if they had an appointment cancelled on them that was booked but not booked, hence why I finished by offering my answer to when a booking is a booking, not just an empty promise, iv read the thread, the op asked a question