Secret WG feedback meanings.

[mystery7]

I have never booked a WG from Adultwork by Email. Therefore I have no feedback (plus' and minus') Sometimes I have a nose at what my Regular WGs write about there clients in there feedback........Always "Nice gentleman", "Wow! friendly guy"......"or blimey what a gargantuan cock" etc.
I wonder if these things have a hidden meaning, Eg. "Lovely gentleman=He came in 2 seconds thank fuck I don't have to do anything but chat for 59 mins 58 seconds now".
Or "Wow! Treat him well ladies"=He's on deaths door, don't get him too excited.
I'm tempted to book this way to see what they would say about me

[Stealthshagger]

It's adultwork, not the Da Vinci code. The feedback there is mostly bullshit. A lot of positive is reassuring, hidden or bad can be an indicator. Some good means nothing really. And the details aren't coded. It's generic shit that means he wasn't a serial killer or she didn't have a hidden cock or an open wound by her anus.

[vorian]

I have never booked a WG from Adultwork by Email. Therefore I have no feedback (plus' and minus') Sometimes I have a nose at what my Regular WGs write about there clients in there feedback........Always "Nice gentleman", "Wow! friendly guy"......"or blimey what a gargantuan cock" etc.
I wonder if these things have a hidden meaning, Eg. "Lovely gentleman=He came in 2 seconds thank fuck I don't have to do anything but chat for 59 mins 58 seconds now".
Or "Wow! Treat him well ladies"=He's on deaths door, don't get him too excited.
I'm tempted to book this way to see what they would say about me

I think it is normally bland bullshit, I'm assuming that the majority of prossies are not organised enough to have some sort of coordinated approach to public feedback. If you see similar things written down, I think it is just a lack of imagination. If they are verified and really wanted to put something that has meaning they would use the notes system, thats the feedback you need to worry about.

[Stealthshagger]

Let's be direct here. Code on adultwork like that? Look at some randomly selected profiles. Many can't spell their own names. Stasy? Aymie? They aren't coding masterminds trained in mathematics to create coded feedback to communicate covertly. There isn't a great code. If there is an enigma involved in  adultwork, it ain't a coding machine, it's the question why there have to be so many fakes and why they use photoshop (other than to get sadgit to go for a walk).

[vorian]

Let's be direct here. Code on adultwork like that? Look at some randomly selected profiles. Many can't spell their own names. Stasy? Aymie? They aren't coding masterminds trained in mathematics to create coded feedback to communicate covertly. There isn't a great code. If there is an enigma involved in  adultwork, it ain't a coding machine, it's the question why there have to be so many fakes and why they use photoshop (other than to get sadgit to go for a walk).

I miss SadGit  he was funny

[Stealthshagger]

He was annoying as fuck and insincere. And those were his best qualities.

[smiths]

He was annoying as fuck and insincere. And those were his best qualities.

Is not was, not been banned so will be back i imagine, thats how people like him or her get their kicks.

[vorian]

He was annoying as fuck and insincere. And those were his best qualities.

Post of the week   

[Stealthshagger]

Is not was, not been banned so will be back i imagine, thats how people like him or her get their kicks.

Who is it people think he used to be known as? I gather some members think he is a specific former/banned member.

[jcdmj12]

Is not was, not been banned so will be back i imagine, thats how people like him or her get their kicks.

So he hasn't been purged?

[smiths]

Who is it people think he used to be known as? I gather some members think he is a specific former/banned member.

Old snide himself Wayang has been mentioned, that twat got banned long ago, lets just say he didnt like me and James, especially at the end.

[smiths]

So he hasn't been purged?

Not as yet that i can see, definitely well dodgy in my view, the use of thick type is an obvious sign, its always telling off time when they post that.

[Gordo987]

I did hear from one prossie that "true gent" means "has trouble getting it up" 

[xCocoMonroe]

I think it is normally bland bullshit, I'm assuming that the majority of prossies are not organised enough to have some sort of coordinated approach to public feedback. If you see similar things written down, I think it is just a lack of imagination. If they are verified and really wanted to put something that has meaning they would use the notes system, thats the feedback you need to worry about.

I'm definitely an organised enough WG to write honest feedback on any punter who leaves me feedback.
So of us are genuinely telling the truth in feedback and being honest.
It helps. As when I'm deciding whether to accept a booking or not if they have feedback I tend to look through it.

[fredpunter]

I did hear from one prossie that "true gent" means "has trouble getting it up" 

I hope not as I've been described as a gent many times in my feedback. It's also been suggested in some of my feedback that I have more trouble getting it to go down than getting it up - which I suspect is more of a bother to most hookers. 

I have been told by more than one prossie that there are a few phrases that are used to pass messages but I expect not many EE wgs straight off the boat would know them. Only this week it was suggested that "treat him well girls" is code for "a fucking head case".

[vorian]

I'm definitely an organised enough WG to write honest feedback on any punter who leaves me feedback.
So of us are genuinely telling the truth in feedback and being honest.
It helps. As when I'm deciding whether to accept a booking or not if they have feedback I tend to look through it.

Ok let us assume that you are part of the minority who spends time giving non generic feedback if the majority don't then it doesn't really help you when deciding if to accept a booking.  The note system is different as that does help you as real FB can be given.

The problem with AW FB in a similar way to eBay is the tit for tat that goes on punter and prossie give each other FB but as a wg can do so separately in a hidden manner she has little incentive to do so publicly,  why would you.  Say a guy pisses you off as a boundary pusher,  next time you won't see him, so your covered, because you want to do the right thing and help other wg you give a note on the hidden system to protect and warn.  However you don't want to start an argument or have the punter leave you bad FB. So something generic goes in like.  Friendly gent, welcome anytime. That is why I don't believe there are any codes as the public FB has little value to wgs it is the notes that count.

The other side the AW FB given by punters is more valid as it is the only option apart from review sites.

[fredpunter]

Ok let us assume that you are part of the minority who spends time giving non generic feedback if the majority don't then it doesn't really help you when deciding if to accept a booking.  The note system is different as that does help you as real FB can be given.

The problem with AW FB in a similar way to eBay is the tit for tat that goes on punter and prossie give each other FB but as a wg can do so separately in a hidden manner she has little incentive to do so publicly,  why would you.  Say a guy pisses you off as a boundary pusher,  next time you won't see him, so your covered, because you want to do the right thing and help other wg you give a note on the hidden system to protect and warn.  However you don't want to start an argument or have the punter leave you bad FB. So something generic goes in like.  Friendly gent, welcome anytime. That is why I don't believe there are any codes as the public FB has little value to wgs it is the notes that count.

The other side the AW FB given by punters is more valid as it is the only option apart from review sites.

is it not the case that only verified wgs can see the AW notes? very many well established women have no desire to become verfied.

[vorian]

I hope not as I've been described as a gent many times in my feedback. It's also been suggested in some of my feedback that I have more trouble getting it to go down than getting it up - which I suspect is more of a bother to most hookers. 

I have been told by more than one prossie that there are a few phrases that are used to pass messages but I expect not many EE wgs straight off the boat would know them. Only this week it was suggested that "treat him well girls" is code for "a fucking head case".

There is no universal code prossies do not all have each others names and numbers,  there is no training manual or code of practice. Even if their was it would come out during pillow talk and be posted on here. FB from wgs about punters is uncoordinated and worthless. What other business attempts to grade their customers in such a way,  can you imagine a restaurant leaving FB on its customers. For safety and security the notes system exists other than that the rest is stupid.

[fredpunter]

There is no universal code prossies do not all have each others names and numbers,  there is no training manual or code of practice. Even if their was it would come out during pillow talk and be posted on here. FB from wgs about punters is uncoordinated and worthless.

of course it's not universal, as I said, newbies are unlikely to know it, but a lot of these girls have been around for a long time, and many of them do know each other, if not as friends then as acquaintances or work colleagues - some of the 'gossip' I heard this week would make your toes curl.   

[xCocoMonroe]

Ok let us assume that you are part of the minority who spends time giving non generic feedback if the majority don't then it doesn't really help you when deciding if to accept a booking.  The note system is different as that does help you as real FB can be given.

The problem with AW FB in a similar way to eBay is the tit for tat that goes on punter and prossie give each other FB but as a wg can do so separately in a hidden manner she has little incentive to do so publicly,  why would you.  Say a guy pisses you off as a boundary pusher,  next time you won't see him, so your covered, because you want to do the right thing and help other wg you give a note on the hidden system to protect and warn.  However you don't want to start an argument or have the punter leave you bad FB. So something generic goes in like.  Friendly gent, welcome anytime. That is why I don't believe there are any codes as the public FB has little value to wgs it is the notes that count.

The other side the AW FB given by punters is more valid as it is the only option apart from review sites.

Notes are the best way to leave feedback yes but only verified members like myself can leave such feedback or even view it and a lot of WGs don't want to verify their profile so best to leave feedback on the profile in which everyone can see.
Also it's even known for WGs to leave "notes" that aren't true so other WGs are put off by it.
I'm sure some WGs don't put an effort in their feedback like some clients don't.
But that's their choice.
I like to be honest and tell it how it is and I'm sure there are many WGs who do the same.

[vorian]

is it not the case that only verified wgs can see the AW notes? very many well established women have no desire to become verfied.

I'm not sure that choice will be an option in the future as AW makes changes. I was under the impression that AW will auto delete profiles if they are not verified within a certain time frame.  You say well established prossies who are not verified,  you may well be right but could you please give me some examples.

[vorian]

of course it's not universal, as I said, newbies are unlikely to know it, but a lot of these girls have been around for a long time, and many of them do know each other, if not as friends then as acquaintances or work colleagues - some of the 'gossip' I heard this week would make your toes curl.

It really wouldn't,  but if the newbies don't know the code then how does it work as a "True Gent" will mean something different to a newbie or those in the know so it is pointless.

[xCocoMonroe]

It really wouldn't,  but if the newbies don't know the code then how does it work as a "True Gent" will mean something different to a newbie or those in the know so it is pointless.

I didn't know the meaning of "true gent" and I've been escorting just under two years lol!
I don't think there are any meanings behind the feedback.

[fredpunter]

go to adultwork, search for female escorts that have logged in during the last 7 days, order by rating, and you will see many with 100s of feedback who are not verified - amongst the first 20 are naughty slut soph, platinum cindy and dee - all of whom have been well reviewed on ukp I believe 

[fredpunter]

It really wouldn't,  but if the newbies don't know the code then how does it work as a "True Gent" will mean something different to a newbie or those in the know so it is pointless.

I give up, doubtless you know best 

[vorian]

Notes are the best way to leave feedback yes but only verified members like myself can leave such feedback or even view it and a lot of WGs don't want to verify their profile so best to leave feedback on the profile in which everyone can see.
Also it's even known for WGs to leave "notes" that aren't true so other WGs are put off by it.
I'm sure some WGs don't put an effort in their feedback like some clients don't.
But that's their choice.
I like to be honest and tell it how it is and I'm sure there are many WGs who do the same.

But not all, so the reliability of a system will be flawed unless all treat it the same. Again who are these established girls who do not get verified. How can AW allow these profiles to carry on and still maintain a due diligence defence. I'm not saying you don't treat FB seriously but if others don't how can you trust it when looking at a punter. Of course if it is bad fair enough but if it is all good doesn't mean the punter is not a bad punter.

[vorian]

go to adultwork, search for female escorts that have logged in during the last 7 days, order by rating, and you will see many with 100s of feedback who are not verified - amongst the first 20 are naughty slut soph, platinum cindy and dee - all of whom have been well reviewed on ukp I believe

Thank you for those examples I will have a look.

[vorian]

I give up, doubtless you know best 

As you wish I do not know best about anything it is simply my opinion, yours is equally valid.

[xCocoMonroe]

But not all, so the reliability of a system will be flawed unless all treat it the same. Again who are these established girls who do not get verified. How can AW allow these profiles to carry on and still maintain a due diligence defence. I'm not saying you don't treat FB seriously but if others don't how can you trust it when looking at a punter. Of course if it is bad fair enough but if it is all good doesn't mean the punter is not a bad punter.

There are plenty established girls.
It's not mandatory to be verified that's probably why adultwork let it happen although any pictures found to be on other websites that are in the free gallery on AW, tend to get closed down quickly.

I don't solely go by feedback I'm just saying it's good to have a look through and see what other WGs have said, and the clients I have had who have had good feedback have been perfectly fine.
Best thing I go by is a woman's instinct lol! It works wonders.
I do agree a lot of people don't take FB seriously though.
But what can you do!
X

[vorian]

There are plenty established girls.
It's not mandatory to be verified that's probably why adultwork let it happen although any pictures found to be on other websites that are in the free gallery on AW, tend to get closed down quickly.

I don't solely go by feedback I'm just saying it's good to have a look through and see what other WGs have said, and the clients I have had who have had good feedback have been perfectly fine.
Best thing I go by is a woman's instinct lol! It works wonders.
I do agree a lot of people don't take FB seriously though.
But what can you do!
X

I think you are spot on the best defence you can have is going with your "Spider Sense" and experience. I'm sure it will serve most girls well. It does concern me when some newbies put things on their profile must have 5 good FB before I will take a booking,  they are putting faith and their safety in the hands of a flawed system.

May I ask what is the difference between a verified SP and a fully verified SP and what you have to provide to become one or both.  Thank you.

[mattylondon]

I have never booked a WG from Adultwork by Email. Therefore I have no feedback (plus' and minus') Sometimes I have a nose at what my Regular WGs write about there clients in there feedback........Always "Nice gentleman", "Wow! friendly guy"......"or blimey what a gargantuan cock" etc.
I wonder if these things have a hidden meaning, Eg. "Lovely gentleman=He came in 2 seconds thank fuck I don't have to do anything but chat for 59 mins 58 seconds now".
Or "Wow! Treat him well ladies"=He's on deaths door, don't get him too excited.
I'm tempted to book this way to see what they would say about me

Many of these prossies do have 'code' for their AW feedback and if you have a fragile ego, it's probably better you don't know! For the most part, it isn't that complimentary! 

[smiths]

I have never booked a WG from Adultwork by Email. Therefore I have no feedback (plus' and minus') Sometimes I have a nose at what my Regular WGs write about there clients in there feedback........Always "Nice gentleman", "Wow! friendly guy"......"or blimey what a gargantuan cock" etc.
I wonder if these things have a hidden meaning, Eg. "Lovely gentleman=He came in 2 seconds thank fuck I don't have to do anything but chat for 59 mins 58 seconds now".
Or "Wow! Treat him well ladies"=He's on deaths door, don't get him too excited.
I'm tempted to book this way to see what they would say about me

I dont play this very stupid game, i am the one paying so a WG having feedback on me is irrelevant as i see it. I dont have any or want any and only book WGs with displayed phone numbers.

Does Asda require FB on me to allow me to shop in their stores, does my builder before doing some work for me, of course not, all they want is my money. Why on earth would i allow a WG to give me FB on a site that is rotten to its core like A/W.

[grandmaster-ram-rod]

He was annoying as fuck and insincere. And those were his best qualities.

will you be meeting him for a drink 

[xCocoMonroe]

I think you are spot on the best defence you can have is going with your "Spider Sense" and experience. I'm sure it will serve most girls well. It does concern me when some newbies put things on their profile must have 5 good FB before I will take a booking,  they are putting faith and their safety in the hands of a flawed system.

May I ask what is the difference between a verified SP and a fully verified SP and what you have to provide to become one or both.  Thank you.

A fully verified SP like myself is someone who has uploaded a verification photo, and uploaded ID to prove who they are. This means they are able to leave and read notes for anyone on AW.

A verified SP is someone who has uploaded just a verification photo and no ID. They won't be able to view or write notes, same for non verified SPs
X

[vorian]

A fully verified SP like myself is someone who has uploaded a verification photo, and uploaded ID to prove who they are. This means they are able to leave and read notes for anyone on AW.

A verified SP is someone who has uploaded just a verification photo and no ID. They won't be able to view or write notes, same for non verified SPs
X

Thanks for the answer makes more sense now, so only fully verified SP's have been aged checked. I thought AW was concerned about underage issues which is why the movies and public gallery rules were changing. Does that mean at some point all SP will have to provide ID or lose their profiles. I know at some point, SS will have to age verify before they can purchase movies and PG's.

[Dani]

Many of these prossies do have 'code' for their AW feedback and if you have a fragile ego, it's probably better you don't know! For the most part, it isn't that complimentary! 

There is but its more of a read between the lines and not a code,   None of it is anything horrible as if it was then I would hope the girl would say.

Nice guy, pleasant would see again means just what it says.  If there is nothing even slightly flattering about the client but it was all positive then it means he was probably one of those who did not speak or move for the whole booking and just laid there as if dead.
Nothing bad but lets the next one know that he is safe to see
However what does piss me off is when a guy has loads of positive feedback but dozens of red notes saying very dangerous, this guy attacked me, guy stalked me and attacked me.  Why the fuck leave positive?  I am now banned from the notes section so have only the feedback to rely on (my fault for helping people on here oops) so I don't. I expect everyone to ring me so I can get a feel for them myself and ignore any feedback now
If prossies leave such fake feedback I can only assume many punters do to for fear of getting a negative.  Get rid of feedback for punters all together as it would make it a much more honest system.  We don't need feedback on clients as I take lots of bookings from my website and I don't get to see feedback on them and use my gut instead which tends to work better

[Jvosta]

Hurts my ego comparing my feedback with other punters.

Feedback for Tom dick and Abdul : "fucktastic time, knows how to please"
Feedback for me: "nice time thanks Hun "

....

[xCocoMonroe]

Thanks for the answer makes more sense now, so only fully verified SP's have been aged checked. I thought AW was concerned about underage issues which is why the movies and public gallery rules were changing. Does that mean at some point all SP will have to provide ID or lose their profiles. I know at some point, SS will have to age verify before they can purchase movies and PG's.

I'm not sure if all SPs will have to age verify themselves but I'm assuming that's how it will be in the near future.
It's not a bad thing in my opinion.
I haven't heard that SS will have to age verify that's news to me but we will see!
X

[vorian]

I'm not sure if all SPs will have to age verify themselves but I'm assuming that's how it will be in the near future.
It's not a bad thing in my opinion.
I haven't heard that SS will have to age verify that's news to me but we will see!
X

They will if they wish to purchase PG or movies but no one knows for sure how this will work yet.

[Uoti2]

Wow = (nothing)
Fun = (nothing)
Genuine = (nothing)
Had a great time = (nothing)
Had an amazing time = (nothing)
Had a fantastic time = (nothing)
Lovely = easily pleased, thank god he doesn't realise what the other bastards make me do for the same money
Lovely lovely = can't believe how little I had to do to keep him happy
Clean = wasn't actually covered head to toe in excrement
Polite = not too drunk
Respectful = didn't beat me up, thank fuck
Always a pleasure = boring but safe
Gentleman = paid without my having to ask
Nice guy = scary and possibly evil
Handsome = (nothing)
Enjoyed sucking your cock = (nothing)
Come back soon = (nothing)
Would definitely see again = (nothing)
May see again = can you imagine how vile this fucker was if I didn't even write "would definitely see again"?
One of the best guys I have seen = I hate this job so I don't care if I upset my other punters
Best guy I have ever seen = I hate this job so much that with this FB I have just effectively told all my other punters to fuck off

[broksonic]

I do check their feedback before I see them , and if it is hidden I definitely won't book

[dilettante]

One I've had:

Very nice man indeed whom I enjoyed getting to know.

... means "A total mug who thinks I give a sh1t about him and is prepared to waste valuable fucking time trying to strike up an acquaintance with me."

... I did see exactly the same FB left for another punter by the same girl - being forrin, she must have copied it from somewhere else on AW.

[dilettante]

I do check their feedback before I see them , and if it is hidden I definitely won't book

No, the OP is asking about FB that WGs have left for us punters, not hiding their own FB.

[cockneybstrd]

Oh dear I was respectful nice gent on one of mine

I guess she had right then

I didnt beat the shit out of her and i paid straight away the evil bit well......

[Daffodil]

There is but its more of a read between the lines and not a code,   None of it is anything horrible as if it was then I would hope the girl would say.

Nice guy, pleasant would see again means just what it says.  If there is nothing even slightly flattering about the client but it was all positive then it means he was probably one of those who did not speak or move for the whole booking and just laid there as if dead.
Nothing bad but lets the next one know that he is safe to see
However what does piss me off is when a guy has loads of positive feedback but dozens of red notes saying very dangerous, this guy attacked me, guy stalked me and attacked me.  Why the fuck leave positive?  I am now banned from the notes section so have only the feedback to rely on (my fault for helping people on here oops) so I don't. I expect everyone to ring me so I can get a feel for them myself and ignore any feedback now
If prossies leave such fake feedback I can only assume many punters do to for fear of getting a negative.  Get rid of feedback for punters all together as it would make it a much more honest system.  We don't need feedback on clients as I take lots of bookings from my website and I don't get to see feedback on them and use my gut instead which tends to work better

You've spouted this nonsense before.

Just like most punters do not use Internet forum, neither do prossies. There is no way to make a universal language known and, if there was, us punters would know about it. You and a few others on saafe or wherever might have a 'code', but it means nothing outside of your circle.

The thought that there is some sort of 'prossie code' is ridiculous 

[vorian]

You've spouted this nonsense before.

Just like most punters do not use Internet forum, neither do prossies. There is no way to make a universal language known and, if there was, us punters would know about it. You and a few others on saafe or wherever might have a 'code', but it means nothing outside of your circle.

The thought that there is some sort of 'prossie code' is ridiculous 

Thats the point I was making, unless everyone knew and used this so called code, it is worthless as a way of communicating. Any punters FB that is the same/similar to others is down to a lack of imagination on the part of the prossie. Nothing more sinister.

[Daffodil]

Thats the point I was making, unless everyone knew and used this so called code, it is worthless as a way of communicating. Any punters FB that is the same/similar to others is down to a lack of imagination on the part of the prossie. Nothing more sinister.

Exactly.

The "prossie code" is complete bollocks outside of a very small circle.

[Dani]

That is why I said there is not a code but it is more of read between the lines on some of the feedback left...  For instance girl A always leaves really gushy feedback such as super sexy, so horny and skilled and is mine all mine or other such rubbish but for one client just put clean and on time, we can read that she did not like him for some reason
or girl B always leaves fairly normal feedback such as pleasant guy, good sense of humour or some such guff and for one client leaves so energetic, don't know where he gets all his energy from if I see him again I would need tons of redbull. then it would probably mean shagged me non stop from start to finish   It is not a code. It is common sense of reading between the lines. 
when I used to used feedback I always checked out what the girl said about the guy and then checked what she had put for other clients so I could get an idea about how truthful she was and if I should believe the feedback or not.

I have never said there is a code.  It would be stupid to think there was as noone would bloody well know it.  What I said was you can often read between the lines

[Gordo987]

"Distinguished, mature gentleman" = Stupid bald headed old twat who needed help to find my fanny without his glasses? 

[Rochdull lad]

"Distinguished, mature gentleman" = Stupid bald headed old twat who needed help to find my fanny without his glasses? 

Been there; but not had that said about me, although it could well have been!

Many of mine have had comments about how much fun it was to be with me!   I don't want it to be fun ; I want it to be sexy!!