Money

[peewee]

So, if i have the same services offered what more do i get if I pay 150 or 200 instead of 100?

[hendrix]

Nothing. But, the devil is in those "service" requirements.

[Trevor12]

A more expensive prossie. But not neccessarily better.

[Jimmyredcab]

So, if i have the same services offered what more do i get if I pay 150 or 200 instead of 100?

Nothing really but some girls are very  popular and will still get punters at £200 an hour.

[smiths]

So, if i have the same services offered what more do i get if I pay 150 or 200 instead of 100?

Nothing and thats why in punting what makes a good WG is her attitude NOT what she happens to charge. Unlike buying an inanimate object a WG is a unique one-off individual and thats why you dont necessarily get what you pay for, throw £200 an hour at a bad WG and you will simply be £100 an hour lighter of wallet than throwing £100 an hour at a bad WG.

Use this site to locate recommended WGs by punters you find credible. Sadly even on here some punters spout complete and utter bollocks about cheap WGs being ALL skanks, its proven that thats bollocks by reviews on here.

[Jimmyredcab]

So, if i have the same services offered what more do i get if I pay 150 or 200 instead of 100?

If you drop below the £100 threshold you increase the risks of a bad punt, ask yourself why a girl is charging well under the norm, you may either be rushed or she will try to hit you for extra charges, if it looks too good to be true then it probably is.

[385North]

If you drop below the £100 threshold you increase the risks of a bad punt, ask yourself why a girl is charging well under the norm, you may either be rushed or she will try to hit you for extra charges, if it looks too good to be true then it probably is.

I've paid £70 for an hour with a relatively unknown before and had a better time than when I paid close to £200 for a well reviewed girl, so not sure I agree with that. It's her attitude that matters at the end of the day, not how much she charges.

[smiths]

If you drop below the £100 threshold you increase the risks of a bad punt, ask yourself why a girl is charging well under the norm, you may either be rushed or she will try to hit you for extra charges, if it looks too good to be true then it probably is.

You know why redcab   There is also no norm in punting, in reality there are WGs at many prices. EE WGs often come from poor countries and charging say £80 an hour is great money to them and might undercut their rivals. Some come here for a few weeks and work most days then go back home. Some also once established put their rates up, this has been the case for years and years, and for years and years you have known this, and for years and years you agreed there was NO correlation between price charged and how good a WG might be.

 It might or might not be the truth that a WG offers a good service or not and we have countless reviews to prove it. One of the main reasons for this site is to help punters find good WGs, so by doing that a risk averse punter in London anyway can locate such WGs.

The fact is after actually punting with many sub-£100 an hour WGs this year only 1 tried to charge me extra as i confirm the all-in cost before handing my money over, and a couple tried to cut my time short. Its not been a regular occurence.

[Jimmyredcab]

I've paid £70 for an hour with a relatively unknown before and had a better time than when I paid close to £200 for a well reviewed girl, so not sure I agree with that. It's her attitude that matters at the end of the day, not how much she charges.

You may remember Tesco were selling 10 Burgers for £1, it turned out they were full of shit.

Sometimes what appears to be a bargain is nothing of the sort.

[385North]

Interesting analogy; not sure it's really applicable to this argument though.

[smiths]

I've paid £70 for an hour with a relatively unknown before and had a better time than when I paid close to £200 for a well reviewed girl, so not sure I agree with that. It's her attitude that matters at the end of the day, not how much she charges.

Absolutely right. Those that link cost to how good a WG might be are totally wrong in my experience of punting with WGs who charged me £350 an hour and others who charged me £80 an hour, there was no difference in the service offered so i wouldnt pay £350 an hour again.

[Jimmyredcab]

I've paid £70 for an hour .

Yes, I saw the review, an ageing BBW, not the sort of lady that I would consider, £70 an hour is about right.   

Hidden Image/Members Only

[385North]

Yes, I saw the review, an ageing BBW, not the sort of lady that I would consider, £70 an hour is about right.   

Hidden Image/Members Only

So if you actually read the review then maybe you'll appreciate your theory is not as black and white as you claim it is. She gave it 110%. She may not be your type, that's got nothing to do with it.

[Jimmyredcab]

. She may not be your type, that's got nothing to do with it.

With respect, it is everything to do with it, the type of lady that I seek is not available at £70 an hour.

BBW's have to try that bit harder to get repeat custom.   

[385North]

With respect, it is everything to do with it, the type of lady that I seek is not available at £70 an hour.

BBW's have to try that bit harder to get repeat custom.   

As always you insist on moving the goal posts with every comment you make to suit your own narrow opinion. I'll leave you to it.

[Jimmyredcab]

As always you insist on moving the goal posts with every comment you make to suit your own narrow opinion. I'll leave you to it.

I am pleased you had a good time for £70, if anyone spots "my type" of lady for that rate would  they be kind enough to send me a PM.

[smiths]

I am pleased you had a good time for £70, if anyone spots "my type" of lady for that rate would  they be kind enough to send me a PM.

WTF. But ALL WGs who charge under £100 an hour are skanks to you as you have posted.

[a10]

It's all subjective. You look at what's on offer and from who. You decide if you feel the whole package is worth it.

If it's worth it, in your opinion you pay the money.

Simple 

[jcdmj12]

So, if i have the same services offered what more do i get if I pay 150 or 200 instead of 100?

A brand new Audi A6 costs anywhere from £30-50K.

You can buy a perfectly serviceable second hand Nissan Micra for £1,500 (or less if you know what you're doing)

Both will get you from A to B, in approximately the same time if you are driving in a city.

Why should you buy a new Audi instead of a cheap second hand car?  Maybe you shouldn't.  But many people happily do.

[Mr Farkyhars]

Thanks for reminding me about your £70 lass, 385North - I'll pencil her in for next time I'm in town

[berksboy]

       Sorry but wrong , in a city the micra will get you there 1st !  But feel free to give me a RS4 

         

[385North]

Thanks for reminding me about your £70 lass, 385North - I'll pencil her in for next time I'm in town

I believe she has since relocated. No longer at her old Earls Court address but now over in Brent.   

[Dodo]

So, if i have the same services offered what more do i get if I pay 150 or 200 instead of 100?

Are you havin a laugh or are you just naive !
Thats like asking why the price for any service in life differs.

[Quesadilla]

My experience is that for £150-200 - which is what my punts average out to - you get independent escorts with consistency, reliability, and a degree of availability that you don't get at £100. 

Above the £150-200ph mark you get into "elite escort" and "agency escort" territory which is a completely different market.  Here you can pay much more for the same service (or not as good) - agencies in particular seem to rely on a more affluent clientèle maybe businessmen or travellers who don't have the time to research independents or are unfamiliar with the London escorting scene and as a result are willing to pay extra for "convenience" vs quality of service. 

For independent escorts it's not rocket science - a decent escort might start at £100 ph (I know many top £200ph escorts today started at £100ph), but if they deliver consistent quality service guys will come back and word of mouth will develop.  Some of the very best escorts as per reviews on this site started out exactly like this.

At £100ph such a WG will then get VERY busy and difficult to book, so either she burns out trying to fit in 10-15 bookings per day and as a result something has to give - either quality or availability suffers.  The only alternative is she ups her rates to a point where the bookings become manageable again.  Doing so she inevitably finds she makes almost as much money with half as many bookings. She's happy, her regs are still happy, and she'll get new regs who are also willing to pay that bit extra for the combination of reliability, consistency and availability. 

Only those unwilling/unable to see her at the new higher price lose out.

If she's not good enough to warrant a higher price, her clients will drop off and she'll have a dusty phone until she gets to a price point that's appropriate again.

At £100ph you do occasionally find a gem - but in which case they will either be new and therefore a risky punt, or else they will be inconsistent, unreliable or not readily available.  Despite protestations to the contrary I have still yet to hear of any WG in London / surrounds who charges £100ph and provides a consistent, reliable and good standard of service while being reasonably available to book.  At least not one that delivers the services I need for a decent punt.  There always seems to be a compromise somewhere. At £100ph if you're good you're fully booked, if you're readily available it's because you're not good!  IMHO.

For £100 you pays' your money you take your chances. Ce'st la vie.   

[smiths]

My experience is that for £150-200 - which is what my punts average out to - you get independent escorts with consistency, reliability, and a degree of availability that you don't get at £100. 

Above the £150-200ph mark you get into "elite escort" and "agency escort" territory which is a completely different market.  Here you can pay much more for the same service (or not as good) - agencies in particular seem to rely on a more affluent clientèle maybe businessmen or travellers who don't have the time to research independents or are unfamiliar with the London escorting scene and as a result are willing to pay extra for "convenience" vs quality of service. 

For independent escorts it's not rocket science - a decent escort might start at £100 ph (I know many top £200ph escorts today started at £100ph), but if they deliver consistent quality service guys will come back and word of mouth will develop.  Some of the very best escorts as per reviews on this site started out exactly like this.

At £100ph such a WG will then get VERY busy and difficult to book, so either she burns out trying to fit in 10-15 bookings per day and as a result something has to give - either quality or availability suffers.  The only alternative is she ups her rates to a point where the bookings become manageable again.  Doing so she inevitably finds she makes almost as much money with half as many bookings. She's happy, her regs are still happy, and she'll get new regs who are also willing to pay that bit extra for the combination of reliability, consistency and availability. 

Only those unwilling/unable to see her at the new higher price lose out.

If she's not good enough to warrant a higher price, her clients will drop off and she'll have a dusty phone until she gets to a price point that's appropriate again.

At £100ph you do occasionally find a gem - but in which case they will either be new and therefore a risky punt, or else they will be inconsistent, unreliable or not readily available.  Despite protestations to the contrary I have still yet to hear of any WG in London / surrounds who charges £100ph and provides a consistent, reliable and good standard of service while being reasonably available to book.  At least not one that delivers the services I need for a decent punt.  There always seems to be a compromise somewhere. At £100ph if you're good you're fully booked, if you're readily available it's because you're not good!  IMHO.

For £100 you pays' your money you take your chances. Ce'st la vie. 

How do you know for definite these WGs are Independent?

[Quesadilla]

How do you know for definite these WGs are Independent?

Because they tell me so.  Most of the girls I see are part timers with day jobs or students so I have no reason to doubt them.

Obviously can't say for definite. I know some do also advertise separately with agencies at a completely different (ridiculous) rate but as I say they are aiming at a different audience. I'm only interested in their AW rate. 

[smiths]

Because they tell me so.  Most of the girls I see are part timers with day jobs or students so I have no reason to doubt them.

Obviously can't say for definite. I know some do also advertise separately with agencies at a completely different (ridiculous) rate but as I say they are aiming at a different audience. I'm only interested in their AW rate. 

The reality is you cant know whether ANY WG is really Independent unless you were with them 24/7.

[Quesadilla]

The reality is you cant know whether ANY WG is really Independent unless you were with them 24/7.

And I should care about that because...?

The point of my post was about pricing not the independence or not of a particular WG.

[smiths]

And I should care about that because...?

The point of my post was about pricing not the independence or not of a particular WG.

I didnt say you should care.

[StevenS]

Because they tell me so.

 

[trailblazer]

A 'production-line' WG who sees 4 clients a day at average £90 a client takes over £2000 a week, 6 days, no down-time. She will not be treating you as anything other than 'the next client'.

A good-quality escort who only sees one client a day and takes £200 per client will only pull £1000 a week, assuming 5 days, no down-time. If she is good she will be fully-booked in advance, and she may well want something sexual out of it herself - hence you get a better session. You can also get a longer booking if that's what you want.

At the end of the day it's down to what you can afford and what you're looking for, and there's no hard-and-fast written-in-stone correlation between what you pay and what you get out of it. Sometimes you pay big and don't quite get what you wanted, leaving you a bit down because you've spent the money. Other times you get more than you expected for your money with a cheaper punt, and you get an added boost from that. It's not predictable, and maybe we do it partly because of that.

[smiths]

A 'production-line' WG who sees 4 clients a day at average £90 a client takes over £2000 a week, 6 days, no down-time. She will not be treating you as anything other than 'the next client'.

A good-quality escort who only sees one client a day and takes £200 per client will only pull £1000 a week, assuming 5 days, no down-time. If she is good she will be fully-booked in advance, and she may well want something sexual out of it herself - hence you get a better session. You can also get a longer booking if that's what you want.

At the end of the day it's down to what you can afford and what you're looking for, and there's no hard-and-fast written-in-stone correlation between what you pay and what you get out of it. Sometimes you pay big and don't quite get what you wanted, leaving you a bit down because you've spent the money. Other times you get more than you expected for your money with a cheaper punt, and you get an added boost from that. It's not predictable, and maybe we do it partly because of that.

The fact is you dont know how many punters any WG actually sees. Some smart WGs say they only punt with 1 or 2 punters a day as they know telling the truth might put off the more squeamish punters and thus potentially lose them some business. I discount whats unprovable.

I view every WG whatever she charges me as operating a conveyor belt, cashing in while they can which i see as smart. I dont care how many punters a WG really has punted, all i require is a good service.

As to being treated as the next punter, just fine with me, i certainly believe WGs are WGs for the money first and foremost, if some do enjoy and get something sexual out of it good for them, a good WG is a good actress so a good act is all i require.

[Jimmyredcab]

A 'production-line' WG who sees 4 clients a day at average £90 a client takes over £2000 a week, 6 days, no down-time. She will not be treating you as anything other than 'the next client'.

Many "production line" girls work for pimps (Sergei) and will see far more that 4 clients a day, they will get half the fee ----- if they are lucky.

How do I know they only get 50%.   

Well put yourself in Sergei's shoes, you supply the premises, the maid, the advertising and pay all the bills ---------- what percentage would you think is fair.     

[smiths]

Many "production line" girls work for pimps (Sergei) and will see far more that 4 clients a day, they will get half the fee ----- if they are lucky.

How do I know they only get 50%.   

Well put yourself in Sergei's shoes, you supply the premises, the maid, the advertising and pay all the bills ---------- what percentage would you think is fair.     

Guessing again redcab. As you know and have punted through pimps yourself some WGs choose to work for a pimp, that includes EVERY WG who works in a brothel/Parlour and Agency.

I hope every woman who is being forced is rescued and those that have forced her caught and sentenced to very long prison sentences, should be a mandatory life sentence in my view.

[dilettante]

To me, a well-reviewed EE for £60 for half hour and no more than £100 for hour is absolutely fine, depends on personal attraction to the girl but no complaints whatever.  This can be really a very nice girl, a student or someone with aspirations who wants to save up for something.

However if you are going to get an English girl for the same rates this will invariably be a lower class of girl - not necessarily druggie skank, but well-educated middle-class girls just aren't going to do this - a generalisation of course as I've had excellent service from a Manchester girl for that rate (she's a bit older though), and there's another in the same area I'm aching to get my nuts into whose name I daren't mention on here.

So, to me, if you want to get porking the sort of English girl that blokes you look up to and envy have on their arms, that's when you start needing to spend £130+ for the privilege - hence the typical blurb of "English rose" etc that justifies upping the price tag.  Or it could be older ladies with private means who will only do it for higher rates.  Personally, I've never been tempted ...

[Jimmyredcab]

To me, a well-reviewed EE for £60 for half hour and no more than £100 for hour is absolutely fine, depends on personal attraction to the girl but no complaints whatever.  This can be really a very nice girl, a student or someone with aspirations who wants to save up for something.

However if you are going to get an English girl for the same rates this will invariably be a lower class of girl - not necessarily druggie skank, but well-educated middle-class girls just aren't going to do this - a generalisation of course as I've had excellent service from a Manchester girl for that rate (she's a bit older though), and there's another in the same area I'm aching to get my nuts into whose name I daren't mention on here.

So, to me, if you want to get porking the sort of English girl that blokes you look up to and envy have on their arms, that's when you start needing to spend £130+ for the privilege - hence the typical blurb of "English rose" etc that justifies upping the price tag.  Or it could be older ladies with private means who will only do it for higher rates.  Personally, I've never been tempted ...

Pretty young English girls don't have to work for a pittance, it's all about supply and demand, Romanians are ten a penny.   

[smiths]

To me, a well-reviewed EE for £60 for half hour and no more than £100 for hour is absolutely fine, depends on personal attraction to the girl but no complaints whatever.  This can be really a very nice girl, a student or someone with aspirations who wants to save up for something.

However if you are going to get an English girl for the same rates this will invariably be a lower class of girl - not necessarily druggie skank, but well-educated middle-class girls just aren't going to do this - a generalisation of course as I've had excellent service from a Manchester girl for that rate (she's a bit older though), and there's another in the same area I'm aching to get my nuts into whose name I daren't mention on here.

So, to me, if you want to get porking the sort of English girl that blokes you look up to and envy have on their arms, that's when you start needing to spend £130+ for the privilege - hence the typical blurb of "English rose" etc that justifies upping the price tag.  Or it could be older ladies with private means who will only do it for higher rates.  Personally, I've never been tempted ...

Good post and in my experience most Brit WGs charge a premium nowadays if they advertise as Indies as they know enough punters will pay it including me up to £200 an hour if i fancy the WG enough. My most expensive 121 punts have been with Brits this year, all good VFM to me.

[James999]

Many "production line" girls work for pimps (Sergei) and will see far more that 4 clients a day, they will get half the fee ----- if they are lucky.

How do I know they only get 50%.   

Well put yourself in Sergei's shoes, you supply the premises, the maid, the advertising and pay all the bills ---------- what percentage would you think is fair.

According to the Media Sergei pays them £100 a day regardless how many punters they see, he targets say 15 - 20 a day and pockets the rest, so say 18 @ £50 = £900 and she gets £100 thats about a 90 / 10 split in Sergeis favour 

[Jimmyredcab]

According to the Media Sergei pays them £100 a day regardless how many punters they see, he targets say 15 - 20 a day and pockets the rest, so say 18 @ £50 = £900 and she gets £100 thats about a 90 / 10 split in Sergeis favour 

That could be right, however I don't trust the "media" when it comes to prostitution.     

[James999]

When reporting on court cases they tend to be a bit more factual

[LL]

My experience is that for £150-200 - which is what my punts average out to - you get independent escorts with consistency, reliability, and a degree of availability that you don't get at £100. 

Above the £150-200ph mark you get into "elite escort" and "agency escort" territory which is a completely different market.  Here you can pay much more for the same service (or not as good) - agencies in particular seem to rely on a more affluent clientèle maybe businessmen or travellers who don't have the time to research independents or are unfamiliar with the London escorting scene and as a result are willing to pay extra for "convenience" vs quality of service. 

For independent escorts it's not rocket science - a decent escort might start at £100 ph (I know many top £200ph escorts today started at £100ph), but if they deliver consistent quality service guys will come back and word of mouth will develop.  Some of the very best escorts as per reviews on this site started out exactly like this.

At £100ph such a WG will then get VERY busy and difficult to book, so either she burns out trying to fit in 10-15 bookings per day and as a result something has to give - either quality or availability suffers.  The only alternative is she ups her rates to a point where the bookings become manageable again.  Doing so she inevitably finds she makes almost as much money with half as many bookings. She's happy, her regs are still happy, and she'll get new regs who are also willing to pay that bit extra for the combination of reliability, consistency and availability. 

Only those unwilling/unable to see her at the new higher price lose out.

If she's not good enough to warrant a higher price, her clients will drop off and she'll have a dusty phone until she gets to a price point that's appropriate again.

At £100ph you do occasionally find a gem - but in which case they will either be new and therefore a risky punt, or else they will be inconsistent, unreliable or not readily available.  Despite protestations to the contrary I have still yet to hear of any WG in London / surrounds who charges £100ph and provides a consistent, reliable and good standard of service while being reasonably available to book.  At least not one that delivers the services I need for a decent punt.  There always seems to be a compromise somewhere. At £100ph if you're good you're fully booked, if you're readily available it's because you're not good!  IMHO.

For £100 you pays' your money you take your chances. Ce'st la vie. 

That's not been my experience at all.  When I first started punting years ago I would pay £200 an hour since I would only punt once few months and could therefore save up.  I met good WGs and shit ones.  Had good experiences and bad.  These days I tend to pay £60 for 30 minutes and I get roughly the same rate of satisfaction that I had when paying £200 per hour.  That is, I still meet some good WGs and some shit ones.

[smiths]

That's not been my experience at all.  When I first started punting years ago I would pay £200 an hour since I would only punt once few months and could therefore save up.  I met good WGs and shit ones.  Had good experiences and bad.  These days I tend to pay £60 for 30 minutes and I get roughly the same rate of satisfaction that I had when paying £200 per hour.  That is, I still meet some good WGs and some shit ones.

Same here. As its not what a WG charges that makes her a good or bad WG but her attitude punting is ALL about finding WGs you fancy who have a good attitude.

[306]

£60-£70 half hour
and £100-£130 hour is  a ok price

£140 HOUR TO £180 HOUR must have something more i think ?? 

[Quesadilla]

That's not been my experience at all.  When I first started punting years ago I would pay £200 an hour since I would only punt once few months and could therefore save up.  I met good WGs and shit ones.  Had good experiences and bad.  These days I tend to pay £60 for 30 minutes and I get roughly the same rate of satisfaction that I had when paying £200 per hour.  That is, I still meet some good WGs and some shit ones.

Bit confused LL - from your review count of 21 I could only find two positive reviews of WG's who are still active and £100ph.  There were a handful of other positive reviews but all the profiles are gone - burnt out or what?   And even in your positive reviews you often seem to find issues with things like e.g. timekeeping - ie someone knocking on the door too early - which certainly seems to take the edge off your satisfaction. 

At £150 ph I've never had someone knock at the door, or have an alarm go off, or any other overt signs of timekeeping - more often than not running over if anything.  And I've had a much higher satisfaction rate - only 4 out of 39 punts which were "just ok" and only 2 bad enough to justify a negative review.  19 out of the 26 girls I've seen are all good enough that I'd happily go see again (and are still available!) and almost all around £150ph.

Only three girls I've personally seen at £100ph were any good - BritBabe Tamara who I got from a reverse bid (her standard rate is £150 ph); New Polish Girl and Platinum Cindy were both great value at £100ph when I saw them but both are now £120ph.   

If there are so many good, consistent, reliable performers at £100ph where are they please?  It's not my experience and it doesn't actually seem to be yours either!  Those you saw that were good can't be reliable/consistent as they aren't still advertising.

I don't disagree with Smiths at all - of course it's all about finding WGs you fancy who have a good attitude (and for me also reliable / consistent / bookable) - so far just haven't found any that are cheaper. 

[LL]

Bit confused LL - from your review count of 21 I could only find two positive reviews of WG's who are still active and £100ph.  There were a handful of other positive reviews but all the profiles are gone - burnt out or what?   

Good bit of detective work  actually not.
11 positives out of 21 reviews.  That's over half, not a handful.  And 4 are neutral.  I don't review everyone I've seen.  For example I've had an excellent punt with Michelle Independent and several with Mia of Farringdon.  I can't fault either of them.  Both girls are already well reviewed here.  I probably commented on their existing threads that I'd seen them.  I didn't feel there was any point me putting up dedicated reviews for them.  Same goes for others I've seen.  If I saw Adele I don't think I'd bother to write a review for her either unless she gave me a less than positive service.  Again, no point just repeating what so many others have already said.  Also I'm not ashamed to admit that I have on occasion, deliberately kept to myself some of my positive punts with unreviewed newbies (actually in all such cases I've shared the details with certain members via PM).

Most of the original profiles behind my posted positive reviews are gone, yes, but that's because I chose to punt EE girls and the nature of that choice means that unfortunately these girls often tend to go back to their home country after a short time, also some of them have started up new profiles since I reviewed them (e.g. Xena, Busty Audrey), but a quick search will reveal their new profile.

Burnt out?  Well maybe a little in terms of writing reviews as I don't review as many as I used to - but not burnt out in punting.  It might surprise you to hear that I couldn't actually give a shit what you think.  Don't assume you have the right to judge another member here just because you have a lot of money to throw away every month and have found a place to brag about it in order to massage your ego.

And even in your positive reviews you often seem to find issues with things like e.g. timekeeping - ie someone knocking on the door too early - which certainly seems to take the edge off your satisfaction. 

I'm not sure I would give the review a positive if that happened but I'll take your word for it as you've read my reviews more recently than I have.

In my earlier reply to this thread I wrote that I get the same level of satisfaction now compared to when I was seeing £200-an-hour hookers.  I.e. I often had little niggles even when getting a good punt from a more expensive girl.  Perhaps I'm striving for perfection.  I also get about the same success rate in terms of good/bad punt - about 75%/25% I reckon.  That might seem high [rate of failure] to you or others but I'm the kind of punter who likes to take risks with newbies as I get a kick out of not knowing whether it's going to be any good or not.  Complete truth be told punting doesn't give me the same level of satisfaction I have gotten from shagging a civvie who actually wanted to shag me (i.e. with no money being exchanged), since I'm no longer under any illusions about punting and the girlfriend experience offered by any WG no longer fools me (though I still enjoy it).  Under my current circumstances however, punting is the best I can get.

[Quesadilla]

Good bit of detective work  actually not.
11 positives out of 21 reviews.  That's over half, not a handful.  And 4 are neutral. 

What I said was only 2 out of your positive reviews are actually active WG's - the remainder either are not active or were for massage/HJ which is not the comparison I was making.

I don't review everyone I've seen.  For example I've had an excellent punt with Michelle Independent and several with Mia of Farringdon.  I can't fault either of them.  Both girls are already well reviewed here.  I probably commented on their existing threads that I'd seen them.  I didn't feel there was any point me putting up dedicated reviews for them.  Same goes for others I've seen.  If I saw Adele I don't think I'd bother to write a review for her either unless she gave me a less than positive service.  Again, no point just repeating what so many others have already said.  Also I'm not ashamed to admit that I have on occasion, deliberately kept to myself some of my positive punts with unreviewed newbies (actually in all such cases I've shared the details with certain members via PM).

Fair enough. 

Most of the original profiles behind my posted positive reviews are gone, yes, but that's because I chose to punt EE girls and the nature of that choice means that unfortunately these girls often tend to go back to their home country after a short time, also some of them have started up new profiles since I reviewed them (e.g. Xena, Busty Audrey), but a quick search will reveal their new profile.

Burnt out?  Well maybe a little in terms of writing reviews as I don't review as many as I used to - but not burnt out in punting.  It might surprise you to hear that I couldn't actually give a shit what you think.  Don't assume you have the right to judge another member here just because you have a lot of money to throw away every month and have found a place to brag about it in order to massage your ego.

I wasn't calling you burnt out you plum, I was referencing my earlier comment that WG's who are good either become so busy they burn out and either disappear or become unreliable!

I think you'll find I rarely make judgements about other members punting activities, very happy about all punters who post reviews like yourself and I apologise if you misunderstood.

Yes I have a frail ego and am very happy to have found some people to massage it for me - prefer having my cock and other bits massaged, but the ego needs it too sometimes! 

A few members here seem to like my reviews - have said so both publicly and via PM - and that is seriously the only reason I post as I was on the edge of quitting not too long ago due to my annoyance at the amount of lurkers who take and give nothing back.

I'm not sure I would give the review a positive if that happened but I'll take your word for it as you've read my reviews more recently than I have.

Yeah, just a couple, sorry, don't mean to be picky - they were 30 min punts as well I think where time is of the essence which I guess is a different market anyway.

In my earlier reply to this thread I wrote that I get the same level of satisfaction now compared to when I was seeing £200-an-hour hookers.  I.e. I often had little niggles even when getting a good punt from a more expensive girl.  Perhaps I'm striving for perfection.  I also get about the same success rate in terms of good/bad punt - about 75%/25% I reckon.  That might seem high [rate of failure] to you or others but I'm the kind of punter who likes to take risks with newbies as I get a kick out of not knowing whether it's going to be any good or not.  Complete truth be told punting doesn't give me the same level of satisfaction I have gotten from shagging a civvie who actually wanted to shag me (i.e. with no money being exchanged), since I'm no longer under any illusions about punting and the girlfriend experience offered by any WG no longer fools me (though I still enjoy it).  Under my current circumstances however, punting is the best I can get.

Fair enough - I don't want to risk newbies as I'd rather have a good punt every time if possible - and good news for you - this year I will definitely review a lot less as I'm going to be focusing a lot of my time on 5 or 6 regs who I've already reviewed. 

Again apologise if you felt I was attacking you I was just trying to make my point about my experience re pricing and I felt your reviews illustrated the point. May have been a bad example as you are really punting a different type of WG I would say - ie ones more focused on 30-60 min punts than 2-3 hours. 

No hard feelings I hope?

Q (The Ego!)

[LL]

Again apologise if you felt I was attacking you I was just trying to make my point about my experience re pricing and I felt your reviews illustrated the point. May have been a bad example as you are really punting a different type of WG I would say - ie ones more focused on 30-60 min punts than 2-3 hours. 

No hard feelings I hope?

Q (The Ego!)

I felt like I was being put under a microscope but I seem to have misunderstood your intentions.
So no hard feelings and sorry about the misunderstanding.

I also think that you write good reviews here and are a good contributor.  About the ego reference - it's not about your reviews but more the dedicated thread you made detailing your exploits for the whole festive period that I found to be a bit over the top personally.  However, this opinion is obviously not shared by all (and maybe it's just me) as you've had a very positive response to that thread too.

LL (The plum!)

[Quesadilla]

I felt like I was being put under a microscope but I seem to have misunderstood your intentions.
So no hard feelings and sorry about the misunderstanding.

I also think that you write good reviews here and are a good contributor.  About the ego reference - it's not about your reviews but more the dedicated thread you made detailing your exploits for the whole festive period that I found to be a bit over the top personally.  However, this opinion is obviously not shared by all (and maybe it's just me) as you've had a very positive response to that thread too.

LL (The plum!)

No hard feelings and appreciate the compliment about my reviews! 

Re the 12 Lays thread - no question there was an element of ego involved so it is absolutely fair comment. Not something I've done before in my life, never likely to again, so guess I wanted to make a big deal of it.  For what it's worth it's my first Christmas being single in 14 years and I fully expected it to be the most miserable depressing time of my life and instead it absolutely rocked and the thread just gave me something extra to do.  Pathetic I'm sure you'll agree but I really did need the ego boost - which many members here were gracious enough to give me and for which I am eternally grateful.   

You certainly aren't the only one who's made that point (actually just one other person that I've seen) and frankly I'm really chuffed I didn't have more people call me out on it.  Some have clearly enjoyed it even though I'm sure many more think I'm an egotistical twat which is fair enough.  I fully expected it to qualify me for WOTW at least, so I should be grateful for small mercies.

Q   

[385North]

It’s sometimes handy to have an ego that walks six feet ahead of you, if only to take the brunt of it when things get unruly on here. 

[Quesadilla]

It’s sometimes handy to have an ego that walks six feet ahead of you, if only to take the brunt of it when things get unruly on here.

I agree mate - definitely helps. Mine's more like 6 inches at the moment after being drained dry but every little counts!