An alternative to reviews...

[Flunt]

... for non reviewers.

Without rehashing the old debate and pointing fingers at members who don't write reviews for whatever their reason, what about a thread where someone posts the pro$$ies AW address and a simple note?

I was reading another thread earlier and a couple of posts between two members who have experienced a few poor punts this year but with only one review between them. I feel a certain poetic justice if they had visited a few shit pro$$ies in common?

Maybe dipping a toe in the critical waters and realising they aren't turned to stone will encourage a proper review further down the line?

[Marmalade]

They get indexed anyway as far as I understand.

[Marmalade]

No harm mentioning a prossy in the section ordinaire then it gets indexed and punters can make their own mind up whether its worth taking into account. I'm thinking that, however much reviews are encouraged, the objective is quality and helping other punters make good paid sex choices; but if more lurkers (genuine punters) come out of the closet all the better. (But if it was adopted or advocated too strongly nobody would bother writing reviews.)

[Sureshot]

If you're going to bother leaving a comment indicating youve seen a whore, you might as well write a review.

They dont have to be lengthy or detailed just factual and beeficial to other members.

[Flunt]

They get indexed anyway as far as I understand.

This is what I was thinking so that if someone searches the AW number they can find a comment or two, better than nothing.

It wasn't a suggestion to replace the current system.

[cueball]

Imo... I'd much rather see a review of a real experience, I read all comments but a pukka review is the best source on here for me.

As said earlier, a review only takes a few minutes to write if you want it to.

[turkmanstan]

Imo... I'd much rather see a review of a real experience, I read all comments but a pukka review is the best source on here for me.

As said earlier, a review only takes a few minutes to write if you want it to.

It make take longer than a few minutes if you are not an experienced scribe but you are right reading a review and drawing your on conclusions from the evidance available is the most effective way of helping insure a good punt.It follows that accurate and informative reviews are an important part of making a punting choice

[Marmalade]

This is what I was thinking so that if someone searches the AW number they can find a comment or two, better than nothing.

Much as I've said I agree (at least to a certain extent), listen to Cueball. There are , unfortunately, in among genuine punters, sadly plenty of wannabees who like to trawl AW with their free hand and pass a 'comment' based on that. What a proper review also does is give another punter enough substance (usually) to determine a) whether the reviewer has actually been there and seen her, and b) whether the punter-reader might want to do likewise. Admittedly it can open up to bun-fights, especially the charge of the whiteknight brigade over a negative comment, or the charge of the clean-up brigade sick to the teeth of fawning reviews written for the benefit of the prossie. It might sound a bit rough, but there are some very experienced punters on here that are fairly quick to recognise rubbish and this is the only site where all punters, newbie ones and experienced, can hope for detailed honest information on British paid-sex. It was hard to achieve, and worth maintaining.

[MrMatrix]

No harm mentioning a prossy in the section ordinaire then it gets indexed and punters can make their own mind up whether its worth taking into account. I'm thinking that, however much reviews are encouraged, the objective is quality and helping other punters make good paid sex choices; but if more lurkers (genuine punters) come out of the closet all the better. (But if it was adopted or advocated too strongly nobody would bother writing reviews.)

Sorry Maramalade I dont understand your reference to "section ordinaire then it gets indexed ", sounds like I've missed something here

[Marmalade]

Sorry Maramalade I dont understand your reference to "section ordinaire then it gets indexed ", sounds like I've missed something here

As far as I know (Admin may correct me), if you put a link to a prossie's AW page more or less anywhere it usually gets indexed. Am I wrong?

[MrMatrix]

As far as I know (Admin may correct me), if you put a link to a prossie's AW page more or less anywhere it usually gets indexed. Am I wrong?

I don't know as I've not heard of this. 

[Marmalade]

I don't know as I've not heard of this. 

I'm not sure exactly how it works. But try typing 3104624 into the search box. You get a delightful mix of review and verification pics. (The "mix" being the delightful bit.)

[MrMatrix]

I'm not sure exactly how it works. But try typing 3104624 into the search box. You get a delightful mix of review and verification pics. (The "mix" being the delightful bit.)

The search is on the top menu bar of AW. This AW link gives me Gemini a 59 year old WG. I have entered the number in this search box and no additional pictures are show. 
Sorry to be hard work Marmalade.

[MrMatrix]

I'm not sure exactly how it works. But try typing 3104624 into the search box. You get a delightful mix of review and verification pics. (The "mix" being the delightful bit.)

Are you teasing me perhaps as she features on Worst escort pictures, with good reason.
 https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=10615.msg1221010#msg1221010

I thought you were referring to the AW site and enter into search. Think I must be getting wires totally crossed here

[hungrypunt]

Are you teasing me perhaps as she features on Worst escort pictures, with good reason.
 https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=10615.msg1221010#msg1221010

I thought you were referring to the AW site and enter into search. Think I must be getting wires totally crossed here

Marmalade is saying that anywhere on UKP is indexed...eg if I type in here now CUNTWANKARSETWATFUCK

And someone searches that exact phrase in the search at top right, it will appear indexed.


YEP, Im gonna try it later after the indexing has taken place

[Marmalade]

Marmalade is saying that anywhere on UKP is indexed...eg if I type in here now CUNTWANKARSETWATFUCK

And someone searches that exact phrase in the search at top right, it will appear indexed.


YEP, Im gonna try it later after the indexing has taken place

Are you not mildly worried that every time someone types in CUNTWANKARSETWATFUCK that it will lead directly to you?   

[Marmalade]

Are you teasing me perhaps

Um ... yes 

pleased you figured it out. sorry not to be more clear.

[MrMatrix]

Um ... yes 

pleased you figured it out. sorry not to be more clear.

I actually thought you were referring me to AW, from the initial comment, hence my misunderstanding. Soz.

[MrRaunchy]

Just write a shorter review

[KenniLingus]

A haiku review
Really short and to the point.
Admin rejected.

[Home Alone]

A haiku review
Really short and to the point.
Admin rejected.

VERY clever Kenni; 5 - 7 - 5, too!  Respect!

[Horizontal pleasures]

If you're going to bother leaving a comment indicating youve seen a whore, you might as well write a review.

They dont have to be lengthy or detailed just factual and beeficial to other members.

+1

[Horizontal pleasures]

... for non reviewers.

Without rehashing the old debate and pointing fingers at members who don't write reviews for whatever their reason,

why not? There are some prolific participants on here with zero reviews. About time they pulled out their pens after they pull up their pants.

[KenniLingus]

why not? There are some prolific participants on here with zero reviews. About time they pulled out their pens after they pull up their pants.

Indeed. Far to many non reviewers. Even just say 'she was my type and ok' or 'she had a cunt like a wizards sleeve' would suffice.